This article studies three phonological variants of /kwo y/ and the acoustic properties of /o/ and /y/ in 1,159 Taiwan Mandarin face-to-face interviews from social perspectives. Language shift from Southern Min and Hakka towards Taiwan Mandarin, leading to dialect loss, is updated by quantitative evidence derived from a series of sociolinguistic analyses. Social factors including gender, age group, educational level, internet use, and childhood residence significantly correlate with the use of three /kwo y/ variants: the standard form, /w_o/ merger, and /y/ delabialization. The latter two variants are typical Southern Min-accented Mandarin pronunciation. However, results of acoustic analysis of /o/ and /y/ suggest that the influences of Southern Min are significant only in the group with the largest Southern Min exposure. That is, for Taiwan Mandarin in its current form, dialect mixing is progressing due to intensive contact with Southern Min. But it is not a stabilized end form of change, yet.
BoersmaPaul, & WeeninkDavid. 2013. PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program], version 5.3.48. Available at: http://www.praat.org/ (accessed 1 May 2013).
2.
BritainDavid. 1997. Dialect contact and phonological reallocation: ‘Canadian Raising’ in the English Fens.Language in Society26.1:15–46.
3.
ChambersJack K.2013. Patterns of variation including change.The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (2nd edition), ed. by ChambersJack K. & SchillingNatalie, 297–323. Hoboken: John-Wiley & Sons.
4.
ChambersJack K., & SchillingNatalie. (eds.) 2013. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (2nd edition). Hoboken: John-Wiley & Sons.
5.
ChanHui-chen.1994. Language Shift in Taiwan: Social and Political Determinants. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University dissertation.
6.
ChangYue-chin.1998. Cong shengxue jiaodu miaoxie Taiwan guoyu de danyuanyin [Taiwan Mandarin vowels: an acoustic investigation]. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series28.3:255–274.
7.
ChenSu-chiao.2007. Taiwan Yuyan huoli yanjiu [The study of the language vitality in Taiwan]. Yuyan Zhengce de Duoyuan Wenhua Sikao [The Multiculturally Thinking of Language Policy], ed. by ChengChin-Chuan, HoDah-an, HsiaoSuying, ChiangMin-hua & ChangHenry Y., 19–39. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
8.
Deshaies-LafontaineDenise. 1974. A Socio-phonetic Study of a Québec French Community: Trois-Rivières. London: University College London dissertation.
9.
DuanmuSan. 2000. The Phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
EckertPenelope. 1988. Adolescent social structure and the spread of linguistic change.Language in Society17.2:183–207.
11.
FantGunnar. 1966. A note on vocal tract size factors and non-uniform F-pattern scaling.STL-QPSR7.4:22–30.
12.
FeifelKarl-Eugen.1994. Language Attitudes in Taiwan: A Social Evaluation of Language in Social Change. Taipei: Crane.
13.
FoulkesPaul, ScobbieJames M., & WattDominic. 2010. Sociophonetics.The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences (2nd edition), ed. by HardcastleWilliam J., LaverJohn & GibbonFiona E., 703–754. Oxford: Blackwell.
14.
GilesHoward. 1973. Accent mobility: a model and some data.Anthropological Linguistics15.2:87–105.
15.
GilesHoward, & SmithPhilip. 1979. Accommodation theory: optimal levels of convergence.Language and Social Psychology, ed. by GilesHoward & St. ClairRobert N., 45–65. Baltimore: University Park Press.
16.
GumperzJohn J.1958. Dialect differences and social stratification in a north India village.American Anthropologist60.4:668–682.
17.
HayJennifer, & DragerKatie. 2007. Sociophonetics.Annual Review of Anthropology36:89–103.
18.
HeylenAnn. 2005. The legacy of literacy practices in colonial Taiwan. Japanese-Taiwanese-Chinese: Language interaction and identity formation.Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development26.6:496–511.
19.
HoDah-an. 1996. Shengyunxue zhong de Guannian he Fangfa [Concept and Method of Phonology]. Taipei: Daan Press.
20.
HsuHui-ju, & Kwock-ping TseJohn. 2009. The tonal leveling of Taiwan Mandarin: a study in Taipei.Concentric: Studies in Linguistics35.2:225–244.
21.
HsuJoseph H.1987. A sociolinguistic survey of language attitudes in the Taipei area.Chinese-Western Encounter: Studies in Linguistics and Literature, ed. by BramkampAgatha C., FuYi-chin, SprengerArnold & VennePeter, 369–381. Taipei: Chinese Materials Center Publication.
22.
HuangShuanfan. 1993. Yuyan, Shehui yu Zuqun Yishi: Taiwan Yuyan Shehuixue de Yanjiu [Language, Society, and Ethnicity: A Study of the Sociology of Language in Taiwan]. Taipei: Crane.
23.
KendallTyler. 2007. Enhancing sociolinguistic data collections: the North Carolina Sociolinguistic Archive and Analysis Project.Penn Working Papers in Linguistics13.2:15–26. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
24.
KentRaymond D., & ReadCharles. 2002. The Acoustic Analysis of Speech (2nd edition). Albany: Singular Thomson Learning.
25.
KerswillPaul. 2002. Koineization and accommodation.The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. by ChambersJack K., TrudgillPeter & Schilling-EstesNatalie, 669–702. Malden: Blackwell.
26.
KublerCornelius C.1985. The influence of Southern Min on the Mandarin of Taiwan.Anthropological Linguistics27.2:156–176.
27.
KuoYun-Hsuan.2005. New Dialect Formation: The Case of Taiwanese Mandarin. Colchester: University of Essex dissertation.
28.
LabovWilliam. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
29.
LabovWilliam. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors.Oxford: Blackwell.
30.
LabovWilliam. 2006. A sociolinguistic perspective on sociophonetic research.Journal of Phonetics34.4:500–515.
31.
LiDavid Chen-ching. 1985. Problems and trends of standardization of Mandarin Chinese in Taiwan.Anthropological Linguistics27.2:122–140.
32.
LobanovBoris M.1971. Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America49.2:606–608.
SandelTodd L.2003. Linguistic capital in Taiwan: the KMT’s Mandarin language policy and its perceived impact on language practices of bilingual Mandarin and Tai-gi speakers.Language in Society32.4:523–551.
35.
SandelTodd L., ChaoWen-yu, & LiangChung-Hui. 2006. Language shift and language accommodation across family generations in Taiwan.Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development27.2:126–147.
36.
SankoffGillian. 2013. Linguistic outcomes of bilingualism.The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (2nd edition), ed. by ChambersJack K. & SchillingNatalie, 501–518. Hoboken: John-Wiley & Sons.
37.
SankoffGillian, & BlondeauHélène. 2007. Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French.Language83.3:560–588.
38.
SiegelJeff. 1985. Koines and koineization.Language in Society14.3:357–378.
39.
TrudgillPeter. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
TrudgillPeter. 1986. Dialects in Contact.Oxford: Blackwell.
41.
TsaoFeng-fu. 1987. Re-identifying the norm for guoyu.Chinese-Western Encounter: Studies in Linguistics and Literature, ed. by BramkampAgatha C., FuYi-chin, SprengerArnold & VennePeter, 385–406. Taipei: Chinese Materials Center Publication.
42.
TsaoFeng-fu. 1999. The language planning situation in Taiwan.Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development20.4–5:328–375.
43.
TseJohn Kwock-ping. 1998. An Yuyanxue Gailun [Introduction to Linguistics].Taipei: Sanmin.
44.
TseJohn Kwock-ping. 2000. Language and a rising new identity in Taiwan.International Journal of the Sociology of Language143.1:151–164.
45.
TsengShu-Chuan. 2008. Spoken corpora and analysis of natural speech.Taiwan Journal of Linguistics6.2:1–26.
46.
WeinreichUriel. 1968. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton.
47.
WilliamsAnn, & KerswillPaul. 1999. Dialect leveling: Continuity vs. change in Milton Keynes, Reading, and Hull.Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles, ed. by FoulkesPaul & DochertyGerard J., 141–162. London: Arnold.
48.
YoungRussell. 1989. Language Maintenance and Language Shift among the Chinese on Taiwan. Taipei: Crane.
