This work investigates how vowel duration and vowel quality affect degrees of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. The effects of these two factors on vowel-to-vowel coarticulation have previously received little study. Phonological durational differences due to vowel length distinction were examined in Thai. It was hypothesized that shorter vowel duration could result in more vowel-to-vowel coarticulation, and further that the vowel /a/ would allow more vowel-to-vowel coarticulation than /i/ or /u/ cross-linguistically. Thus, the susceptibility of different vowel qualities to vowel-to-vowel coarticulation was examined using Thai data. Results show that shorter vowel duration did not affect vowel-to-vowel coarticulation; and the lower the vowel, the more susceptible it is to coarticulation. Possible factors contributing to such patterns are discussed.
AbramsonA. S. (1962). The vowels and tones of standard Thai: Acoustical measurements and experiments (Bloomington: Indiana University Research Centre in Anthropology, Folklore and Linguistics. Publication No. 20). International Journal of American Linguistics, 28, Part III.
2.
AbramsonA. S. (1974). Experimental phonetics in phonology: Vowel duration in Thai. Pasaa: Notes and News about Language Teaching and Linguistics in Thailand, 4, 71–90.
3.
AbramsonA. S. (2001). The stability of distinctive vowel length in Thai. In TingsabadhK.AbramsonA. S. (Eds.), Essays in Tai linguistics (pp. 13–26). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
4.
AbramsonA. S.RenN. (1990). Distinctive vowel length: Duration vs. spectrum in Thai. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 79–92.
5.
BeddorP. S.HarnsbergerJ. D.LindemannS. (2002). Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: Acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 591–627.
6.
BeddorP. S.YavuzH. K. (1995). The relationship between vowel-to-vowel coarticulation and vowel harmony in Turkish. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), 44–51. Stockholm, Sweden.
7.
BoyceS. E. (1990). Coarticulatory organization for lip rounding in Turkish and English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 2584–2595.
8.
ButcherA.WeiherE. (1976). An electropalatographic investigation of coarticulation in VCV sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 4, 59–74.
9.
ByrdD.TanC. C. (1996). Saying consonant clusters quickly. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 263–282.
10.
ChoT. (2004). Prosodically conditioned strengthening and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 141–176.
11.
ChoT. (2008). Prosodic strengthening in transboundary V-to-V lingual movement in American English. Phonetica, 65, 45–61.
12.
De JongK. (2001a). Effects of syllable affiliation and consonant voicing on temporal adjustment in a repetitive speech-production task. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 826–840.
13.
De JongK. (2001b). Rate-induced resyllabification revisited. Language and Speech, 44, 197–216.
14.
DiehlR. (1989). Remarks on Stevens’ quantal theory of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 71–78.
15.
EngstrandO. (1988). Articulatory correlates of stress and speaking rate in Swedish VCV utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 1863–1875.
16.
FlegeJ. E. (1988). Effects of speaking rate on tongue position and velocity of movements in vowel production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 901–916.
17.
FourakisM. (1991). Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 1816–1827.
18.
FowlerC. A. (1977). Timing control in speech production. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
19.
FowlerC. A. (1981). Production and perception of coarticulation among stressed and unstressed vowels. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 46, 127–139.
20.
FowlerC. A.BrancazioL. (2000). Coarticulation resistance of American English consonants and its effects on transconsonantal vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Language and Speech, 43, 1–41.
21.
GandourJ. (1984). Vowel duration in Thai. Crossroads, 2, 59–64.
GayT. (1968). Effects of speaking rate on diphthong formant movements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 1570–1573.
24.
GayT. (1978). Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 223–230.
25.
GayT. (1981). Mechanisms in the control of speech rate. Phonetica, 38, 148–158.
26.
GayT.UshijimaT.HiroseH.CooperF. S. (1974). Effect of speaking rate on labial consonant–vowel articulation. Journal of Phonetics, 2, 47–63.
27.
HardcastleW. J. (1985). Some phonetic and syntactic constraints on lingual co-articulation during /kl/ sequences. Speech Communication, 4, 247–263.
28.
HawkinsS.SlaterA. (1994). Spread of CV and V-to-V coarticulation in British English: Implications for the intelligibility of synthetic speech. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), 57–60.
29.
HertrichI.AckermannH. (1995). Coarticulation in slow speech: Durational and spectral analysis. Language and Speech, 38, 159–187.
30.
HirataY. (2004). Effects of speaking rate on the vowel length distinction in Japanese. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 565–589.
31.
JohnsonK.MartinJ. (2001). Acoustic vowel reduction in Creek: Effects of distinctive length and position in the word. Phonetica, 58, 81–102.
KeatingP.HuffmanM. K. (1984). Vowel variation in Japanese. Phonetica, 41, 191–207.
34.
KondoY.AraiY. (1998). Prosodic constraint on V-to-V coarticulation in Japanese. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), 1755–1758. Sydney, Australia.
35.
KuehnD. P.MollK. (1976). A cinefluorographic investigation of CV and CV articulatory velocities. Journal of Phonetics, 3, 303–320.
36.
LeeT. (1983). The vowel system in two varieties of Cantonese. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 57, 97–114.
37.
LehisteI. (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
LindblomB. (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 1773–1781.
39.
LindblomB. (1983). Economy of speech gestures. In MacneilageP. F. (Ed.), The production of speech (pp. 217–245). New York: Springer.
40.
LindblomB. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In HardcastleW. J.MarchalA. (Eds.), Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 403–439). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
41.
MaddiesonI. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MagenH. S. (1984). Vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English and Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, Suppl. S1, T11.
43.
MagenH. S. (1997). The extent of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 187–205.
44.
MagenH. S.BlumsteinS. E. (1993). Effects of speaking rate on the vowel length distinction in Korean. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 387–409.
45.
ManuelS. (1987). Acoustic and perceptual consequences of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in three Bantu languages (Unpublished PhD thesis). Yale University.
46.
ManuelS. (1990). The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1286–1298.
47.
ManuelS. (1999). Cross-language studies: Relating language-particular coarticulation patterns to other language-particular facts. In HardcastleW. J.HewlettN. (Eds.), Coarticulation: Theory, data and techniques (pp. 179–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
MatthiesM. L.PerrierP.PerkellJ. S.ZandipourM. (2001). Variation in anticipatory coarticulation with changes in clarity and rate. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 340–353.
49.
ModarresiG.SussmanH.LindblomB.BurlingameE. (2004). An acoustic analysis of the bidirectionality of coarticulation in VCV utterances. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 291–312.
50.
MokP. P. K. (2007a). Effects of syllable structures on v-to-v coarticulation (Thai vs English). Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), 421–424. Saarbrücken, Germany.
51.
MokP. P. K. (2007b). Influences on vowel-to-vowel coarticulation (Unpublished PhD thesis). Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge.
52.
MokP. P. K. (2010). Language-specific realizations of syllable structure and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 1346–1356.
53.
MoonS. J.LindblomB. (1994). Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 40–55.
54.
NordL. (1987). Vowel reduction in Swedish. In EngstrandO. (Ed.), Papers from the Swedish Phonetics Conference (pp. 16–21). Uppsala.
55.
ÖhmanS. E. G. (1966). Coarticulation in VCV utterances: Spectrographic measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, 151–168.
56.
PrzezdzieckiM. (2005). Vowel harmony and coarticulation in three dialects of Yorùbá: Phonetics determining phonology (Unpublished PhD thesis). Department of Linguistics, Cornell University.
57.
PurcellE. T. (1979). Formant frequency patterns in Russian VCV utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 1691–1702.
58.
RecasensD. (1984). Vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in Catalan VCV sequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 1624–1635.
59.
RecasensD. (1985). Coarticulatory patterns and degrees of coarticulatory resistance in Catalan CV sequences. Language and Speech, 28, 97–114.
60.
RecasensD. (1987). An acoustic analysis of V-to-C and V-to-V coarticulatory effects in Catalan and Spanish VCV sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 299–312.
61.
RecasensD. (1989). Long range coarticulation effects for tongue dorsum contact in VCVCV sequences. Speech Communication, 8, 293–307.
62.
RecasensD. (2002). An EMA study of VCV coarticulatory direction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 2828–2841.
63.
RecasensD.PallarèsM. D. (2001). Coarticulation, assimilation and blending in Catalan consonant clusters. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 273–301.
64.
RecasensD.PallarèsM. D.FontdevilaJ. (1997). A model of lingual coarticulation based on articulatory constraints. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 544–561.
65.
RobersonJ. (1982). Bangkok Thai tones (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Southern California.
66.
ScriptureE. W. (1902). The elements of experimental phonetics. London: Edward Arnold.
67.
SittachitK. (1972). Observations on short and long vowels in Thai (in Thai). In HarrisJ. G.NossR. B. (Eds.), Tai phonetics and phonology (pp. 28–32). Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language.
68.
StevensK. N. (1989). On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 3–45.
69.
SvastikulaM. L. K. (1986). A perceptual and acoustic study of the effects of speech rate on distinctive vowel length in Thai (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Connecticut, ProQuest Information and Learning, Ann Arbor.
70.
TsaoY. C.WeismerG.IqbalK. (2006). The effect of intertalker speech rate variation on acoustic vowel space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1074–1082.
71.
Van SonR. J.PolsL. C. (1992). Formant movements of Dutch vowels in a text, read at normal and fast rate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 121–127.
72.
ZsigaE. C. (1994). Acoustic evidence for gestural overlap in consonant sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 22, 121–140.
