The benefit of physical activity for those who have been diagnosed with cancer is well recognized. However, methods to promote long-term engagement in physical activity among survivors of cancer are less clear. Community-based interventions may promote survivors’ long-term engagement in physical activity. The current systematic review synthesizes the effectiveness of randomized controlled trial-tested community-based physical activity interventions for adult cancer survivors, identifies characteristics of effective interventions, and reports on sustainability among these interventions. Systematic searches of three research databases were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, identifying 14 reports for inclusion in the current review. Quality appraisal of included reports was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment of Controlled Intervention Studies Tool. Overall, findings support the use of community-based interventions to promote physical activity among cancer survivors. However, opportunities exist to improve community-based trials, including consistent assessment of intervention sustainability, utilization of health behavior theory, objective measurement of behavior change, and tailored interventional components to further improve effectiveness. Further research on mechanisms underlying intervention effectiveness, sustainability, and approaches for high-risk and underserved populations is needed.
ChornokurGDaltonKBorysovaMEKumarNB. Disparities at presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and survival in African American men, affected by prostate cancer. Prostate. 2011;71(9):985-997. doi:10.1002/pros.21314.
5.
GegechkoriNHainesLLinJJ. Long-term and latent side effects of specific cancer types. Med Clin. 2017;101(6):1053-1073. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2017.06.003.
6.
OrnishDWeidnerGFairWR, et al.Intensive lifestyle changes may affect the progression of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2005;174(3):1065-1070. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000169487.49018.73.
7.
DoveyZHorowitzAWaingankarN. The influence of lifestyle changes (diet, exercise and stress reduction) on prostate cancer tumour biology and patient outcomes: a systematic review. BJUI Compass. 2023;4(4):385-416. doi:10.1002/bco2.237.
8.
MabenaNRugbeerNLehmannS, et al.Association between recorded physical activity and cancer progression or mortality in individuals diagnosed with cancer in South Africa. Br J Sports Med. 2025;59(10):715-721. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2024-108813.
9.
PedersenLIdornMOlofssonGH, et al.Voluntary running suppresses tumor growth through Epinephrine- and IL-6-Dependent NK cell mobilization and redistribution. Cell Metab. 2016;23(3):554-562. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.01.011.
10.
BettarigaFTaaffeDRCrespo-GarciaC, et al.A single bout of resistance or high-intensity interval training increases anti-cancer myokines and suppresses cancer cell growth in vitro in survivors of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025;213(1):171-180. doi:10.1007/s10549-025-07772-w.
11.
National Academies of Sciences E and Medicine. Incorporating Weight Management and Physical Activity Throughout the Cancer Care Continuum: Proceedings of a Workshop. The National Academies Press; 2018. doi:10.17226/24925.
12.
van WaartHStuiverMMvan HartenWH, et al.Effect of low-intensity physical activity and Moderate-to high-intensity physical exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy on physical fitness, fatigue, and chemotherapy completion rates: results of the PACES randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(17):1918-1927. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.59.1081.
13.
LoprinziPDLeeH. Rationale for promoting physical activity among cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41:117-125.
14.
ShephardRJ. Physical activity and prostate cancer: an updated review. Sports Med. 2017;47(6):1055-1073. doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0648-0.
15.
BurseNRWoodardNCoffmanEMSchwartzTAKneippSBryantAL. The role of physical activity on quality of life among breast cancer survivors in the black women’s health study. J Racial Ethn Health Dispar. 2025;13:916-928. doi:10.1007/s40615-025-02303-1. Published online 25 February 2025.
16.
MisiągWPiszczykASzymańska-ChabowskaAChabowskiM. Physical activity and cancer Care-A review. Cancers. 2022;14(17):4154. doi:10.3390/cancers14174154.
17.
American Cancer Society. Nutrition and physical activity guideline for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(3):263-265. doi:10.3322/caac.21721.
18.
HalbertCHJeffersonMSDrakeR, et al.Social and clinical determinants of physical activity in prostate cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29(1):459-465. doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05482-1.
19.
SwobodaCMMcAlearneyASHuertaT. Odds of meeting physical activity guidelines by cancer history: updated results from the health information national trends survey (HINTS). J Fam Med Dis Prev. 2019;5(4):112. doi:10.23937/2469-5793/1510112.
20.
GrimmettCCorbettTBrunetJ, et al.Systematic review and meta-analysis of maintenance of physical activity behaviour change in cancer survivors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ. 2019;16(1):37. doi:10.1186/s12966-019-0787-4.
21.
OminyiJCliftonACushen-BrewsterN. Long-term effectiveness of physical activity interventions for adults across income contexts: a systematic review of strategies and outcome. Bull Fac Phys Ther. 2024;29(1):90. doi:10.1186/s43161-024-00257-9.
22.
FinegoodDTJohnstonLMSteinbergMMattesonCLDeckPB. Complexity, systems thinking, and health behavior change. In: KahanSGielenACFaganPJGreenLW, eds. Health Behavior Change in Populations. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2014:435-458.
23.
GreenLWO’NeillMWestphalMMoriskyD. The challenges of participatory action research for health promotion. Promot Educ. 1996;3(4):3-5. doi:10.1177/102538239600300401.
24.
Sansano-NadalOGiné-GarrigaMBrachJS, et al.Exercise-based interventions to enhance long-term sustainability of physical activity in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2019;16(14):2527. doi:10.3390/ijerph16142527.
25.
ShafiqueSBhattacharyyaDSNowrinI, et al.Effective community-based interventions to prevent and control infectious diseases in urban informal settlements in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2024;13(1):253. doi:10.1186/s13643-024-02651-9.
26.
TrickettEJBeehlerSDeutschC, et al.Advancing the science of community-level interventions. Am J Publ Health. 2011;101(8):1410-1419. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2010.300113.
27.
GarrettSElleyCRRoseSBO’DeaDLawtonBADowellAC. Are physical activity interventions in primary care and the community cost-effective? A systematic review of the evidence. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(584):e125-e133. doi:10.3399/bjgp11X561249.
KeimerKMDreasJAHasselH. Recruiting elderly with a migration and/or low socioeconomic status in the prevention study OptimaHl 60plus. J Prim Prev. 2011;32(1):53-63. doi:10.1007/s10935-010-0221-9.
31.
EakinEGBullSSGlasgowREMasonM. Reaching those most in need: a review of diabetes self-management interventions in disadvantaged populations. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2002;18(1):26-35. doi:10.1002/dmrr.266.
RichardsonWSWilsonMCNishikawaJHaywardRS. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club. 1995;123(3):A12-A13.
34.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71. Published online.
35.
National Cancer Institute. Definitions. National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences; 2026. https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/ocs/definitions. Accessed 12 April 2026.
36.
IsraelBASchulzAJParkerEABeckerAB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Publ Health. 1998;19(1):173-202. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173.
37.
McLeroyKRNortonBLKeglerMCBurdineJNSumayaCV. Community-based interventions. Am J Publ Health. 2003;93(4):529-533. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.4.529.
38.
ThomasJMcDonaldSNoel-StorrA, et al.Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;133:140-151. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.003.
39.
XuJHooverRLWoodardNLeemanJHirscheyR. A systematic review of dietary interventions for cancer survivors and their families or caregivers. Nutrients. 2024;16(1):56. doi:10.3390/nu16010056.
40.
MikkonenKKääriäinenM. Content analysis in systematic reviews. In: KyngäsHMikkonenKKääriäinenM, eds. The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research. Springer International Publishing; 2020:105-115. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_10.
41.
PopayJRobertsHSowdenA, et al.Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews: A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Lancaster University; 2006. doi:10.13140/2.1.1018.4643.
KnapikDMGopinatthVJacksonGR, et al.Global variation in isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Exp Orthop. 2022;9(1):104. doi:10.1186/s40634-022-00541-4.
44.
Basen-EngquistKTaylorCLRosenblumC, et al.Randomized pilot test of a lifestyle physical activity intervention for breast cancer survivors. Patient Educ Counsel. 2006;64(1-3):225-234. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.006.
45.
BjerreEDPetersenTHJørgensenAB, et al.Community-based football in men with prostate cancer: 1-year follow-up on a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2019;16(10):e1002936. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002936.
46.
Culos-ReedSNRobinsonJWLauH, et al.Physical activity for men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: benefits from a 16-week intervention. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(5):591-599. doi:10.1007/s00520-009-0694-3.
47.
GaskinCJCraikeMMohebbiMCourneyaKSLivingstonPM. A clinician referral and 12-Week exercise training program for men with prostate cancer: outcomes to 12 months of the ENGAGE cluster randomized controlled trial. J Phys Activ Health. 2017;14(5):353-359. doi:10.1123/jpah.2016-0431.
48.
HarvieMPegingtonMMcMullanD, et al.The effectiveness of home versus community-based weight control programmes initiated soon after breast cancer diagnosis: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer. 2019;121(6):443-454. doi:10.1038/s41416-019-0522-6.
49.
IrwinMLCadmusLAlvarez-ReevesM, et al.Recruiting and retaining breast cancer survivors into a randomized controlled exercise trial: the yale exercise and survivorship study. Cancer. 2008;112(11 Suppl):2593-2606. doi:10.1002/cncr.23446.
50.
KwartengJLBeyerKMMBanerjeeAStolleyMR. Facilitators of behavior change and weight loss in an intervention for African American breast cancer survivors. Cancer Cau Cont. 2020;31(8):737-747. doi:10.1007/s10552-020-01315-y.
51.
MutrieNCampbellAMWhyteF, et al.Benefits of supervised group exercise programme for women being treated for early stage breast cancer: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Int Ed). 2007;334(7592):517. doi:10.1136/bmj.39094.648553.AE.
52.
PernarCHFallKRiderJR, et al.A walking intervention among men with prostate cancer: a pilot study. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017;15(6):e1021-e1028. doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2017.05.022.
53.
SolteroEGJamesDLHanSLarkeyLK. The impact of a meditative movement practice intervention on short- and long-term changes in physical activity among breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2023;18:1912-1920. doi:10.1007/s11764-023-01430-0. Published online.
54.
IrwinMLCartmelBHarriganM, et al.Effect of the LIVESTRONG at the YMCA exercise program on physical activity, fitness, quality of life, and fatigue in cancer survivors. Cancer. 2017;123(7):1249-1258. doi:10.1002/cncr.30456.
55.
TsianakasVHarrisJReamE, et al.CanWalk: a feasibility study with embedded randomised controlled trial pilot of a walking intervention for people with recurrent or metastatic cancer. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e013719. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013719.
56.
GreenleeHSantiago-TorresMContentoI, et al.¡Mi vida saludable!: results of a randomized, controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial of an In-Person and eHealth diet and physical activity intervention in Latina breast cancer survivors. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2025;126(5):156260. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2025.156260.
57.
MichieSRichardsonMJohnstonM, et al.The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81-95. doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6.
58.
CunninghamEWeaverRRLemondeMDograSNonoyamaML. Nordic pole walking for individuals with cancer: a feasibility randomized controlled trial assessing physical function and health-related quality of life. Rehabil Oncol. 2020;38(2):81-91. doi:10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000204.
59.
SwartzMCLewisZHLyonsEJ, et al.Effect of Home- and community-based physical activity interventions on physical function among cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(8):1652-1665. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.017.
60.
FinneEGlauschMExnerAKSauzetOStölzelFSeidelN. Behavior change techniques for increasing physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:5125-5143. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S170064.
61.
SevenMMarie MoraitisA. Community-based interventions designed to optimize health behaviors among cancer survivors: an integrative systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(10):8405-8415. doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07097-0.
62.
CoughlinSCaplanLStoneRStewartJ. A review of home-based physical activity interventions for breast cancer survivors. Curr Cancer Rep. 2019;1(1):6-12. doi:10.25082/CCR.2019.01.002.
63.
BockCJarczokMNLitakerD. Community-based efforts to promote physical activity: a systematic review of interventions considering mode of delivery, study quality and population subgroups. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17(3):276-282. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2013.04.009.
64.
WahlichCChaudhryUARFortescueR, et al.Effectiveness of adult community-based physical activity interventions with objective physical activity measurements and long-term follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10(5):e034541. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034541.
65.
SteeleCBLiJHuangBWeirHK. Prostate cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): findings from the CONCORD-2 study. Cancer. 2017;123(Suppl 24):5160-5177. doi:10.1002/cncr.31026
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
