Mindfulness-Based Interventions Targeting Modifiable Lifestyle Behaviors Associated With Brain Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis investigated randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) targeting lifestyle behaviors commonly associated with brain health in adults. Data sources included Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycINFO, CINAHL [EBSCO], Embase, Cochrane Library [Ovid], Web of Science, and https://ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies were screened using Covidence 2.0. A total of 79 published RCTs of MBIs for adults (18+, patient and non-patient populations) targeting one or more lifestyle behavior (physical activity, sleep, diet, alcohol use, tobacco cessation, and social and mental activities) met eligibility criteria. MBIs were associated with reduced sleep disturbance (40/54 RCTs; 3537 participants; SMD = −.53; 95% CI = −.74 to −.32; I² = 78%), increased physical activity (9/17 RCTs analyzed; 685 participants; SMD = .72; 95% CI = .04 to 1.40; I² = 89%), improved tobacco cessation (8/12 RCTs; 1234 participants; OR = 2.11; 95% CI = 1.12 to 3.97; I² = 55%), and lowered alcohol use (4/6 RCTs; 261 participants; SMD = −.39; 95% CI = −.45 to −.32; I² = 0%). This review found moderate to high-quality evidence for MBIs targeting sleep, physical activity, alcohol use, and tobacco cessation. Heterogeneity for these outcomes and insufficient data to analyze diet, mental activities, and cognitive functioning limit our ability to draw definitive conclusions about the effects of MBIs on brain health.

Keywords

meta-analysis randomized trials mindfulness meditation lifestyle medicine systematic review

“Mindfulness increases self-awareness, decreases impulsivity, and allows individuals to make intentional lifestyle choices rather than be on automatic pilot.”

Introduction

A large and growing body of research suggests that lifestyle behaviors are critical for brain health.¹ Rather than the absence of illness, recent biopsychosocial definitions of brain health emphasize optimal brain functioning at all ages through the integration of the mind, brain, and body.² Physical activity, sleep, diet, alcohol use, tobacco cessation, and social and mental activities have been consistently identified by meta-analyses,^3,4 population-based studies,^5-7 and public health institutions,^8,9 as lifestyle “Pillars of Brain Health.” Engaging in these lifestyle behaviors promotes brain health in many ways, such as reducing the rate and burden of neuropsychiatric illness, slowing cognitive decline, and preserving brain structure with aging,^10–15 even in at-risk populations.^16,17 Modifiable lifestyle behaviors of brain health are a public health priority because neuropsychiatric illnesses are leading causes of disability and death worldwide, affect >100 million Americans, and cost the US healthcare system over $800 billion annually.^18,19 In addition to brain health, lifestyle behaviors are equally critical for the prevention and management of other conditions, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease.^20,21 The benefits of modifying lifestyle risk factors begin in midlife or earlier^10–14 and accumulate with aging,^15,22 underscoring the importance of adopting healthy behaviors across the lifespan.

Mindfulness practices have direct brain health benefits and may promote lifestyle behavior change. Mindfulness is commonly defined as a practice of non-judgmental awareness of the present moment.²³ Mindfulness recruits emotion regulation, attentional and cognitive control, and self-related processes (e.g., monitoring, efficacy) that enhance one’s ability to make healthier choices and cope with stressors that derail lifestyle goals (e.g., urges to overeat or avoid exercise).^24-27 Positive associations between mindfulness and brain structure,^28-30 cognitive function,^28,31-34 and neuropsychiatric illness risk reduction (e.g., chronic stress, depression, cardiovascular disease)^35-37 have been observed even through brief practice.³⁸ Mindfulness training interventions offer a feasible and potentially cost-effective approach to promoting behavior change and brain health.^24,39,40

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs)—secular, manualized, group-based intervention programs⁴¹—have had a growing presence in lifestyle medicine and medical settings over the past 20 years.²⁶ Two of the most validated MBI are mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), which are standardized protocols that consist of 8 weeks of group sessions (2-2.5 hours) that provide education and training in various mindfulness practices (e.g., mindful breathing, body scan).^26,42 Researchers have adapted MBSR and MBCT for specific populations (e.g., Mindfulness and Relaxation Training for Insomnia, MRTI)⁴³ and developed analogous mind-body programs that promote engagement in healthy lifestyle behaviors (e.g., The Stress Management and Resiliency Training, SMART).⁴⁴ Systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted on individual lifestyle outcomes have shown a positive relationship between MBIs and physical activity,⁴⁵ sleep,⁴⁶ weight loss,^26,47 and substance use^48,49; however, other studies provided low quality or inconclusive evidence.^50,51 To date, no systematic review and meta-analysis has comprehensively examined the effects of MBIs on multiple lifestyle behaviors linked to brain health. Also, there is limited understanding of how design choices—for example, MBIs practices, format, duration—impact lifestyle outcomes.

To address these research gaps, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials (RCT) that evaluated the effects of MBIs on one or more lifestyle behavioral outcomes linked to brain health in adult (age 18 and older) samples. We focused on lifestyle behaviors that could be modified by MBIs (physical activity, sleep, diet, alcohol use, tobacco cessation, and social and mental activities) instead of non-modifiable risk factors that are associated with brain health and disease (e.g., history of dementia or traumatic brain injury). Our first aim was to investigate, following the PICOS framework,⁵² the range of research methods used in the RCTs. Our second aim was to estimate the effect size of MBIs on lifestyle behavior outcomes, explore whether the effects differ by study characteristics (patient status, age, sex, MBIs type, control type, intervention duration, risk of bias), and assess RCT quality (Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool version 1.0⁵³ and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; (GRADE).⁵⁴ The results will identify directions to improve the quality of future studies and provide evidence-based conclusions to guide the use of MBIs to promote brain health.

Online Methods

Literature Search

Our systematic review was conducted according to a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO# CRD42020193780). We searched the following databases using tailored search strategies for each database: Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycINFO, CINAHL via EBSCO, Embase, Cochrane Library via Ovid, Web of Science, and https://ClinicalTrials.gov. Our literature search was developed and conducted by a medical librarian (author initials LLP) at our academic medical center with experience in systematic reviews and meta-analysis of MBIs. We limited our search to RCTs published from inception to 2020 to ensure that our study on 7 lifestyle outcomes of brain health was feasible. The Supplement contains the full search strategy (eTables 1-6). Our methodology followed the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)⁵⁵ and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions guidelines.⁵³

Eligibility Criteria

Study Design

We included published RCTs of MBIs targeting one or more modifiable lifestyle behavior for brain health (see Outcomes section). The comparison condition included active, waitlist, no intervention, or a combination of these groups. We excluded studies that were: (1) not peer-reviewed (manuscripts, abstracts, presentations, book chapters, protocols, dissertations), (2) not original RCTs that reported quantitative outcomes (secondary analysis, follow-up, observational, qualitative, cases studies, non-randomized open pilots), (3) incomplete trials (protocol papers), (4) narrative and systematic reviews, and (5) not published in English due to lack of resources for translation.

Population

We included studies of adults (age 18 and older) because lifestyle behaviors are important for brain health across the adult lifespan.^1,56 We included both patient and non-patient samples to compare the effects of MBIs and to inform the primary and secondary prevention of brain health risk factors. We included cardiac diseases, cancer, and other chronic conditions because they are impacted by lifestyle behaviors and MBIs and can affect brain health.^20,21,26 We excluded treatment studies for serious medical (e.g., medically unstable or declining, requiring hospitalization) or psychiatric illness (e.g., substance use, suicidal and homicidal ideation, psychotic disorders) that would require a higher level of care than an outpatient MBIs.²⁶

Intervention

We defined MBIs as programs that teach the practice of non-judgmental awareness of the present moment as the primary treatment mechanism. We included secularized MBIs because they are more likely to be integrated into standard clinical practice, have a growing tradition in medicine, and allow for a broader appeal to more patients than religious practices (e.g., prayer).⁵⁷ We included MBSR, MBCT, and other MBIs that lasted at least two weeks (or a minimum of two sessions) to ensure a sufficient dose.²⁶ This criteria also allowed us to distinguish MBIs from non-clinical laboratory studies of mindfulness.²⁶ We excluded interventions that do not use formal mindfulness meditation as the primary intervention component (i.e., occurring in less than half of the sessions), such as cognitive behavioral therapy, dialectical behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, stress/resiliency programs, Pilates, Tai Chi, yoga, progressive muscle relaxation, or deep breathing (i.e., as a stand-alone intervention).^26,58 We excluded studies that combined mindfulness with medication to prevent treatment confounds.⁵⁹

Outcomes

Our co-primary outcomes are self-reported “Lifestyle Pillars” of brain health consistently identified in literature: physical activity, diet, sleep, alcohol use, tobacco cessation, social and mental activities.^60,61 We extracted and analyzed each lifestyle outcome separately because (1) there are no single instruments that assess all of the lifestyle behaviors,⁶² (2) existing multidomain instruments⁶³ are not widely used, and (3) analyzing the effects of MBI on individual lifestyle outcomes has utility for informing behavioral targets in clinical practice. In addition to lifestyle outcomes, we extracted cognitive functioning as an exploratory outcome given our focus on the effects of MBIs brain health. The Supplement includes full MeSH terms to define the lifestyle (primary) and cognitive (exploratory) outcomes in our search strategy. We prioritized analyzing the most commonly reported measure among the included trials when studies reported two or more lifestyle measures of the same type (e.g., two physical activity questionnaires).⁵⁸

Study Selection and Data Extraction

Two trained reviewers independently screened all studies for inclusion and exclusion criteria in three stages (title, abstract, and full text) using a standardized protocol and forms in Covidence version 2.0.⁶⁴ The principal investigator (author initials RAM) resolved disagreements at each stage to determine the final studies included in the review. We contacted corresponding authors when necessary to request full texts, pertinent unpublished data, and clarify methods or results. We extracted the following data: age, sex, population, MBIs and control type, duration, and outcome measures (sample size, mean, and standard deviation). When the outcomes data were incomplete, we imputed them using available data^65-67 and conducted sensitivity analyses.⁶⁸

Risk of Bias and Quality Assessment

We evaluated all studies included in the review with the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool version 1.0⁵³ and analyzed them in R⁶⁹ with RStudio⁷⁰ and the robvis⁷¹ package. Two trained raters independently assigned each of the following domains (sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other sources of bias) as low, unclear, or high risk using standardized forms in Covidence. The first author (RAM) resolved disagreements between the raters or consulted with the overall team to reach a consensus. We evaluated the quality of the evidence for each lifestyle outcome using the GRADE criteria⁵⁴ in the GRADEpro GDT software.⁷²

Meta-Analysis

We conducted the meta-analysis with R packages^73,74 informed by similar studies.^26,58 We calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD; Hedges’ g) between the MBIs and control at the post-intervention endpoint in a random-effects model for each lifestyle outcome using restricted maximum likelihood (REML).⁵³ We were unable to analyze secondary endpoints due to a lack of follow-up data reported by included studies. We pooled the means, standard deviations, and sample sizes of studies that included more than one control group. We assessed statistical heterogeneity between trials using the I² statistic.⁷⁵ We weighted the effects using the generic inverse variance method. We assessed bias in the meta-analysis results using both visual inspection (funnel plots) and statistical (Egger’s regression test) methods.⁷⁶ We interpreted statistical significance using the conventional two-tailed α < .05. After assessing the main outcomes, we examined whether the heterogeneity in MBIs effects significantly differed by the following subgroups: (1) patients vs non-patients, (2) age (sample mean), (3) sex (sample percent female), (4) MBIs type (e.g., MBSR, MBCT, or other), (5) control type (i.e., active, waitlist, usual care), (6) intervention duration, and (7) risk of bias (high vs low).

Results

Literature Search

Figure 1 presents the PRISMA of RCT identification and selection. Our initial search resulted in 7985 potential articles, 199 of which met our eligibility criteria. A total of 79 articles (9233 total participants) met full-text eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (eTable 7). The most common reasons for exclusion were: study did not meet set criteria for MBIs (n = 30), study was non-RCT (n = 19), and study lacked lifestyle outcomes (n = 14). Table 1

Figure 1.

PRISMA diagram of trial identification and selection.

Table 1.

Full Details of Included Participants and Studies.

Author	Year	N	Population	Primary Aim	Lifestyle Outcomes
Adair	2018	94	General health and wellbeing	Increase social connection in an adult sample	Social support
Amutio	2018	39	Fibromyalgia	Improve sleep quality in a sample of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome	Sleep
Andersen	2013	336	Cancer	Improve sleep quality in an adult sample of Danish breast cancer patients	Sleep
Bai	2019	234	Women’s health	Reduce psychological distress in women with infertility	Sleep
Bartlett	2017	120	General health and wellbeing	Improve mindfulness and reduce stress and related health and productivity problems in public sector employees	Sleep, social support
Black	2015	49	Sleep disturbances	Improve sleep quality and daytime impairment in older adults with sleep disturbances	Sleep
Blaes	2016	42	Cancer	Improve quality of life and/or immune function in cancer patients recovering from chemotherapy or radiation	Sleep
Bower	2015	71	Cancer	Reduce stress, depression, and inflammatory activity in young breast cancer survivors	Sleep
Brewer	2011	87	Smoking cessation	Improve smoking cessation in a sample of treatment-seeking, nicotine-dependent adults	Smoking
Britton	2010	26	Depression	Improve sleep quality in a sample of adults with partially remitted depression	Sleep
Carmody	2011	105	Women’s health	Reduce the degree of bother that late perimenopausal and early menopausal women experience from their hot flashes and night sweats	Sleep
Cash	2015	91	Fibromyalgia	Reduce stress, sleep disturbances, and symptom severity in a sample of female fibromyalgia patients	Sleep
Cavalera	2019	121	Multiple sclerosis	Improve quality of life and reduce anxiety, depression, sleep problems, and fatigue in a sample of adults with multiple sclerosis	Sleep
Christopher	2018	61	General health and wellbeing	Reduce health risk, stress reactivity, and aggression in law enforcement officers	Sleep, alcohol
Crain	2017	113	General health and wellbeing	Improve wellbeing, quality and quantity of sleep, and sleepiness during the day in teachers	Sleep
Creswell	2012	40	General health and wellbeing	Reduce loneliness and downregulate loneliness-related pro-inflammatory gene expression in older adults	Social support
Davis	2012	175	Smoking cessation	Reduce smoking rates in a sample of smoking adults	Smoking
Davis	2013	55	Smoking cessation and binge drinking	Achieve smoking cessation in a sample of young adult binge drinkers	Smoking, alcohol
Davis	2014	196	Smoking cessation	Reduce smoking behavior in a sample of smokers in a disadvantaged population	Smoking
Dvorakova	2017	109	General health and wellbeing	Promote health and wellbeing in a sample of first year college students in their transition period to university	Sleep, social support, alcohol
Dykens	2014	243	General health and wellbeing	Reduce distress in mothers of children with autism and other disabilities	Sleep
Esmer	2010	25	Failed back surgery syndrome	Improve quality of life in adults with failed back surgery syndrome	Sleep
Garcia	2018	30	Women’s health	Improve insomnia and overall quality of life in postmenopausal women	Sleep
Garland	2014	72	Cancer	Decrease insomnia symptoms in a sample of cancer patients	Sleep
Garrison	2020	325	Smoking cessation	Reduce smoking rates in a sample of adult smokers	Smoking
Goldenhersch	2020	120	Smoking cessation	Improve smoking cessation in a sample of smoking adults	Smoking
Greeson	2014	90	General health and wellbeing	Reduce stress, improve sleep, and increase mindfulness, self-compassion and gratitude in a sample of college and graduate students	Sleep
Grensman	2018	80	General health and wellbeing	Improve quality of life in a sample of adult patients on sick leave because of burnout	Physical activity, sleep, social support
Gross	2010	137	Transplant	Reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression, and poor sleep in a sample of transplant patients	Sleep
Gross	2011	30	Insomnia	Improve sleep in a sample of adults with insomnia	Sleep
Gross	2017	55	Transplant	Improve quality of life in patients with progressive kidney disease awaiting transplantation	Sleep
Huberty	2019	88	General health and wellbeing	Reduce stress levels in college students	Physical activity, sleep, alcohol
Hwang	2019	185	General health and wellbeing	Improve educator wellbeing in a sample of educators working in Australian schools	Sleep
Ingraham	2017	80	Obesity and weight management	Improve outcomes associated with chronic disease risk among overweight and obese lesbian and bisexual women older than 40 years	Physical activity, diet
Jastreboff	2018	42	Obesity and weight management	Decrease the risk of early childhood obesity in a sample of low-income parents with obesity	Physical activity, mindful eating
Johns	2015	35	Cancer	Improve cancer-related fatigue symptoms in an adult sample	Sleep
Johns	2016	71	Cancer	Reduce cancer-related fatigue related symptoms in a sample of persistently fatigued breast and colorectal cancer survivors	Sleep
JohnsSa	2014	35	Cancer	Improve cancer-related fatigue symptoms in an adult sample	Sleep
Klatt	2009	45	General health and wellbeing	Reduce sustained stress levels in a sample of working adults	Sleep
Klatt	2017	57	General health and wellbeing	Reduce stress and enhance quality of sleep and work engagement in bank employees of a non-American culture	Sleep
Lee	2018	57	Insomnia	Improve sleep in a sample of adults with insomnia	Sleep
Lengacher	2009	84	Cancer	Improve quality of life in breast cancer survivors	Physical activity, social support
Lengacher	2012	84	Cancer	Reduce the prevalence and severity of symptoms and symptom clustering in a sample of adult breast cancer survivors	Physical activity, sleep
Lengacher	2015	79	Cancer	Improve objective or subjective sleep parameters in women with breast cancer	Sleep
Lu	2019	100	General health and wellbeing	Reduce negative emotions and improve sleep quality levels in adult clinical staff members	Sleep
Lyzwinski	2019	90	Obesity and weight management	Reduce stress and achieve weight loss and weight-related behavior change in a sample of university students	Physical activity, diet
Mak	2017	1255	General health and wellbeing	Enhance mental health in college students and young working adults	Sleep
Mason	2016	194	Obesity and weight management	Improve weight loss and reduce sweet food consumption and fasting glucose levels in a sample of obese adults	Diet
Messer	2019	21	Cancer	Alleviate symptoms associated with cancer recovery in an adult cancer survivor sample	Sleep
Miller	2012	52	Diabetes	Improve mindful eating habits in an adult sample with type 2 diabetes	Physical activity, diet
Nakamura	2013	57	Cancer	Improve posttreatment self-reported sleep disturbance and comorbid symptoms in a sample of cancer survivors	Sleep
Nanthakwang	2020	59	General health and wellbeing	Improve sleep quality and quality of life in a sample of older adults	Physical activity, sleep, social support
Ong	2014	54	Insomnia	Improve insomnia and sleep outcomes in a sample of adults with chronic insomnia	Sleep
Palmeira	2017	73	Obesity and weight management	Reduce weight self-stigma and unhealthy eating patterns and increase quality of life in a sample of obese or overweight women	Physical activity, diet
Querstret	2017	118	General health and wellbeing	Reduce work-related rumination, fatigue, and improve sleep in a sample of working adults	Sleep
Ruscio	2016	44	Smoking cessation	Reduce smoking behavior in a sample of adult community smokers	Smoking
Schneider	2012	201	Cardiovascular disease	Reduce cardiovascular disease risk factors in a sample of adult Black men and women	Physical activity, smoking, alcohol
Shi	2019	38	General health and wellbeing	Increase physical activity and improve mental health outcomes in an adult sample	Physical activity, sleep
Siritienthong	2018	25	Insomnia	Improve sleep quality and insomnia symptoms in patients diagnosed with chronic insomnia	Sleep
SorianoAyala	2020	51	General health and wellbeing	Improve healthy lifestyle behaviors in a sample of university students	Smoking, alcohol, diet
Spadaro	2017	46	Obesity and weight management	Increase short-term weight loss and improve eating behaviors in a sample of overweight and obese adults	Physical activity, diet
Tang	2013	60	Smoking cessation	Induce smoking reduction in a sample of smoking adults	Smoking
vanBerkel	2014	257	General health and wellbeing	Improve physical activity, dietary behavior and sedentary behavior in workers at two Dutch research institutes	Physical activity, diet
vanderZwan	2015	75	General health and wellbeing	Improve stress in an adult sample	Sleep
Victorson	2020	126	Cancer	Improve physical, social, and emotional functioning in a young adult cancer sample	Sleep, social support
Vidrine	2016	412	Smoking cessation	Improve smoking cessation and reduce lapse recovery in a sample of smoking adults	Smoking
Wahbeh	2016	31	General health and wellbeing	Improve quality of life, self-efficacy, depression symptoms, sleep disturbance, perceived stress, and mindfulness in a sample of adults	Sleep
WeissdeSouza	2020	86	Smoking cessation	Improve treatment adherence and adaptive coping in relation to withdrawal and anhedonia in a sample of smoking adults	Smoking
Wirth	2019	36	Cancer	Reduce pain, stress, and depressive symptoms, and improve physical activity, sleep, and inflammation in a sample of adult cancer survivors	Physical activity, sleep
WitekJanusek	2019	124	Cancer	Improve psychological and behavioral outcomes and restore immunological function in women recently diagnosed with breast cancer	Sleep
Wolever	2012	239	General health and wellbeing	Reduce stress levels and improve productivity in a sample of adult employees	Sleep
Wong	2016	57	Insomnia	Reduce insomnia severity in a sample of adults with chronic insomnia	Physical activity, sleep
Wong	2017	216	Insomnia	Reduce insomnia severity and improve sleep parameters in a sample of adults with chronic primary insomnia	Sleep
WoodsGiscombe	2019	68	Diabetes	Reduce the risk of diabetes in a sample of African Americans with prediabetes	Physical activity, diet
Younge	2015	324	Cardiovascular disease	Increase exercise capacity in patients with heart disease	Physical activity, social support
Zhang	2015	60	General health and wellbeing	Improve chronic insomnia and combined depressive or anxiety symptoms in older adults aged 75 years and older	Sleep
Zhang	2017	65	Cancer	Reduce insomnia and emotional symptoms in leukemia patients receiving chemotherapy	Sleep
Zhang	2019	70	Insomnia	Improve sleep-related outcomes in a sample of cancer patients with insomnia	Sleep
Zhao	2020	136	Cancer	Improve insomnia and sleep quality in a sample of breast cancer survivors	Sleep

Included Studies

The characteristics of included participants and studies are summarized in eTable 8 and are fully listed in eTable 9. Included studies were published between 2009 to 2020 with an increase over time (min = 2 in 2009, max = 12 in 2019). The average sample size was 116.87 (SD = 152.83, min = 21, max = 1255) and the average age was 46.75 (SD = 11.58, min = 20.16, max = 78.57). The samples were predominately Female (76.71%). There was even representation of both patients (n = 46, 58%) and non-patient (n = 33, 42%) samples. The most common MBIs were to promote general health and wellbeing in healthy adults (n = 24, 30%, e.g., increase social connection in a non-clinical sample), followed by MBIs for lifestyle behaviors in medical populations such as cancer (n = 17) and tobacco cessation (n = 10, 13%) (see eTable 8 for all categories).

eTable 9 reports the intervention and control characteristics. The most common form of MBIs were programs developed by the researchers to promote lifestyle behaviors in specific populations. MBSR and MBCT were used in 25 (32%) and 4 (5%) studies, respectively. The majority of MBIs were in-person (n = 66, 84%), delivered in a group format (n = 65, 82%), and lasted approximately 8 weeks on average (M = 7.89, SD = 4.22, min = 2, max = 24). Nearly half of the studies (n = 36, 46%) used an active control. The majority of studies (n = 56, 71%) reported that the MBIs group was superior to the control at post-intervention (19% both improved, 6% neither, 3% control improved, 1% unclear).

The greatest source of bias was incomplete outcome data due to attrition at the post-intervention assessment (over 25% of included RCTs). There were some concerns regarding allocation concealment, blinding of outcome assessors, and blinding of participants and personnel. This is likely attributed to insufficient reporting about these procedures and the challenge of blinding in behavioral interventions. See eFigure 1 for risk of bias assessment summary plots, which were similar when analyzed with and without accounting for sample size.

Lifestyle Outcomes (Co-Primary)

eTable 10 reports the lifestyle outcome measures. MBIs were associated with post-intervention reductions in sleep disturbance (40/54 RCTs analyzed; 3537 participants; SMD = −.53; 95% CI = −.74 to −.32; I² = 78%), increases in physical activity (9/17 RCTs analyzed; 685 participants; SMD = .72; 95% CI = .04 to 1.40; I² = 89%), greater odds of tobacco cessation (8/12 RCTs analyzed; 1234 participants; OR = 2.11; 95% CI = 1.12 to 3.97; I² = 55%), and lower alcohol use (4/6 RCTs analyzed; 261 participants; SMD = −.39; 95% CI = −.45 to −.32; I² = 0%). MBIs were not significantly associated with social activity (7/9 RCTs analyzed; 552 participants; SMD = .46; 95% CI = −.36 to 1.28; I² = 87%). See Figures 2 –4 and eFigures 2-3 for lifestyle outcome forest plots. Inspection of the funnel plots and Eggar’s test (t = −2.58, P = .02) suggested that sleep outcomes were asymmetrical. This distribution was likely driven by heterogeneity in two studies with high SMD in favor of MBIs (see Supplement).^43,77 We were unable to analyze diet due to the lack of consistent outcome measures between studies. No studies tested mental activities as a lifestyle outcome.

Figure 2.

Forest plot of sleep outcomes generated in the meta R package. MBIs were associated with reductions in sleep disturbance (40/54 RCTs analyzed; 3,537 participants; SMD = −0.53; 95% CI = −0.74 to -0.32; I2 = 78%).

Figure 3.

Forest plot of physical activity outcomes generated in the meta R package. 70 MBIs were associated with improvements in physical activity (9/17 RCTs analyzed; 685 participants; SMD = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.04 to 1.40; I2 = 89%).

Figure 4.

Forest plot of tobacco smoking outcomes generated in the meta R package. MBIs were significantly associated with greater odds of tobacco smoking cessation (8/12 RCTs analyzed; 1,234 participants; OR = 2.11; 95% CI = 1.12 to 3.97; I2 = 55%).

Subgroup Analyses of Lifestyle Outcomes

A-priori subgroup analyses indicated that the effects were greater in RCTs of adapted MBIs (15 RCTs; SMD = −.61; 95% CI = −.95 to −.26) than MBSR (14 RCTs; SMD = −.28; 95% CI = −.45 to −.10) on sleep disturbance; however, MBSR had lower heterogeneity (I² = 42% vs 74%). The effects of MBIs on sleep disturbance were greater against waitlist, treatment-as-usual, and empty control arms (25 RCTs; SMD = −.64; 95% CI = −.90 to −.37, I² = 79%) and were lower and not significant against active controls (15 RCTs; SMD = −.32; 95% CI = −.65 to .01, I² = 69%). Longer MBIs (e.g., 12 vs 5 weeks) were associated with greater improvements in social activity (estimate = .34, 95% CI = .14 to .53, P = .007). The remaining subgroup analyses (patient status, age, sex, control type, risk of bias) were not significant.

Cognitive Outcomes (Exploratory)

Only two articles included cognitive outcomes. In an older adult sample (N = 59), Nanthakwang et al. (2020) found that deep breathing and body scan combined with music was associated with significant improvements on the PTQL Cognitive Domain vs the routine care control (P = .001). In a sample of healthy adults (N = 80), Grensman et al. (2018) found that MBCT was associated with improvements on the Swedish health-related quality of life survey (P < .001) cognitive functioning subscale but was not superior to the CBT control. However, we had insufficient data to include cognitive outcomes in the meta-analysis (see eTable 11).

Discussion

In this systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs, MBIs were associated with significant post-intervention improvements in sleep quality, physical activity, reduced alcohol use, and tobacco cessation compared to control conditions. The moderate effect size and heterogeneity for these outcomes were generally consistent with similar studies.^26,57,58 We found the quality of the evidence to be high for tobacco cessation, moderate for sleep quality and physical activity due to heterogeneity, and moderate for alcohol use due to imprecision (see eTable 12 for GRADE criteria). Our systematic review and meta-analysis adds to the published studies of MBIs for lifestyle medicine^26,58 because it is the first to investigate multiple lifestyle outcomes consistent with recent initiatives to understand the biopsychosocial determinants of brain health. The RCT designs, relatively low risk of bias, and large proportion of active control groups were methodological strengths of the included studies.

Mindfulness increases self-awareness, decreases impulsivity, and allows individuals to make intentional lifestyle choices rather than be on automatic pilot. MBIs have been shown to decrease negative patterns of ruminative thoughts, emotional reactivity, and judgmental self-evaluations that contribute to sleep disturbance.^78-81 These mindfulness processes may also promote the tolerance of uncomfortable thoughts and sensations that are experienced through exertion (e.g., pain, fatigue), thereby promoting sustained physical activity.^82-84 The substance use literature has focused on the potential for MBIs to enhance emotion regulation towards aversive experiences that contribute to alcohol and tobacco cravings and urges.^85,86 Future studies are needed to test mindfulness mechanisms that drive lifestyle changes for brain health.

The subgroup analyses provide evidence that study design choices significantly affect outcomes in RCT of MBIs. It is possible that adapting MBIs to specific lifestyle behaviors or populations can increase potency, such as integrating specific behavioral techniques for sleep restriction and hygiene.⁸⁷ Importantly, RCT of MBSR for sleep had the lowest heterogeneity, which is likely by design because it follows a highly standardized protocol that emphasizes consistent training and therapist fidelity.⁸⁸ Consistent with prior research,⁸⁹ the effects of MBIs on sleep disturbance were greater when compared to waitlist, treatment-as-usual, or empty conditions than active controls. We encourage researchers to provide a clear rationale for the control condition that is appropriate for the stage of intervention development. Finally, the effects of MBIs on lifestyle outcomes were independent of participants’ age, sex, and patient status suggesting that MBIs could be broadly implemented to promote brain health. Based on the subgroup results, we encourage future research to explore whether adaptations to MBIs could improve outcomes, and fully report decision choices so that their associations with outcomes can be further studies in future meta-analyses.

Our findings suggest that MBIs have broad applications in clinical contexts. “Brain Health Services” offers a promising model for integrating MBIs into primary and preventative care to promote brain health.^90,91 In this model, patients are triaged to brain health interventions after a comprehensive assessment of individual lifestyle profiles. MBIs can be offered in combination with education on brain health and individualized coaching in the form of shared medical visits.^92,93 Shared medical visits are cost-effective and sustainable because they are delivered to groups of patients with similar risk factors and can be billed to insurance. To promote scalability, clinical integration could begin with MBSR and MBCT because they are commonly recognized and follow a standardized protocol with high therapist fidelity, demonstrating a model for effective and replicable intervention. Ultimately, MBIs must be adapted to be successfully offered in outpatient clinics or community health centers, targeting diverse populations across the adult lifespan. To be successful, healthcare systems must overcome the documented barriers to implementing brain health care, such as limited time and resources for prevention.⁹⁴ Overall, our study positions MBIs as a versatile and effective approach within lifestyle medicine, offering valuable insights for clinicians and healthcare systems seeking to enhance brain health and patient quality of life.

The limitations of included RCTs must be weighed against the findings of our systematic review and meta-analysis. First, visual inspection of the funnel plots and Eggar’s regression test revealed asymmetry in the sleep outcomes. Although publication bias cannot be ruled out, asymmetry was likely driven by two RCTs with small sample sizes that reported large SMD in favor of the MBI. Second, there were several threats to generalizability. RCTs had an overrepresentation of female participants. Data on race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status could not be extracted and analyzed due to reporting inconsistencies between studies. Additionally, we excluded non-English studies due to a lack of translation resources. Third, incomplete data and reporting inconsistencies between studies limited our ability to draw conclusions about the effects of MBIs on brain health. We were unable to analyze the effects of MBIs on diet, mental activities, and cognitive functioning outcomes due to insufficient data and heterogeneity in outcome measures. Fourth, there was wide variability in authors’ descriptions of MBIs, and some of the included studies may not be universally considered an MBI (e.g., transcendental meditation). Fifth, incomplete outcome data, blinding of participants and personnel, outcome assessors, and allocation concealment were the most common risks of bias and studies often lacked sufficient details to provide definitive ratings. Despite our attempts to impute missing data, several studies were excluded from the meta-analysis because essential outcomes data (sample size, mean, and standard deviation) were not reported (see Supplement). Finally, our intention was to evaluate the emerging evidence of MBIs to modify lifestyle “Pillars of Brain Health,” but acknowledge that these behaviors widely impact other health conditions.

Our study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the range of research methods used in RCTs and estimate the effects of MBIs on multiple lifestyle outcomes for brain health. Our findings provide empirical evidence that MBIs, as a feasible and efficacious psychosocial intervention, may offer a broad and robust lifestyle medicine approach for promoting brain health across the adult lifespan. Yet, the heterogeneity in outcomes and insufficient data to analyze diet, mental activities, and cognitive functioning limit our ability to draw definitive conclusions about the effects of MBIs on the broad range of lifestyle behaviors commonly linked to brain health. Future studies should address the methodological limitations documented in our review and test whether MBI-related improvements in lifestyle behaviors can reduce other risk factors for poor brain health (e.g., chronic stress, depression, cardiovascular disease) and promote quality of life in diverse populations.

CME/CE Article Quiz

American College of Lifestyle Medicine (ACLM) members can earn FREE CME/CE credit by reading this approved CME/CE article and successfully completing the online CME/CE activity. Non-members can earn CME/CE for $40 per article. Visit lifestylemedicine.org to join the ACLM.

Instructions.

AJLM CME/CE Articles and Quizzes are offered online only through the American College of Lifestyle Medicine and are accessible at lifestylemedicine.org/store. ACLM Members can enroll in the activity, complete the quiz, and earn this CME/CE for free. Non-members will be charged $40 per article.

A Passing score of 80% or higher is required in order to be awarded the CME/CE credit.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material - Mindfulness-Based Interventions Targeting Modifiable Lifestyle Behaviors Associated With Brain Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Supplemental Material for Mindfulness-Based Interventions Targeting Modifiable Lifestyle Behaviors Associated With Brain Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analy0073is by Ryan A. Mace, PhD, Matthew J. Stauder, MS, Sarah W. Hopkins, MS, Joshua E. Cohen, Malvina O. Pietrzykowski, MS, Lisa L. Philpotts, BSN, MSLS, Christina M. Luberto, PhD, and Ana-Maria Vranceanu, PhD American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material - Mindfulness-Based Interventions Targeting Modifiable Lifestyle Behaviors Associated With Brain Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Sim Uppal, Mira Reichman, Juliana Wagner, Julia Oppenheim, and Anna Yaggi for their contributions to the planning, abstract screening, and data extraction phases of this study.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Ryan A. Mace

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Mintzer

Donovan

Kindy

Lock

Chura

Barracca

. Lifestyle choices and brain health. Front Med. 2019;6:204. doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00204

Redefining Brain Health . A call to embrace a biopsychosocial approach | catalyst non-issue content. https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.22.0034

Cooper

Lyketsos

Livingston

. Treatment for mild cognitive impairment: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;203(04):255-264. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.127811

World Health Organization . The Epidemiology and Impact of Dementia: Current State and Future Trends; 2015. https://www.who.int/mental_health/neurology/dementia/dementia_thematicbrief_epidemiology.pdf.

Cattaneo

Bartrés-Faz

Morris

, et al. The barcelona brain health initiative: a cohort study to define and promote determinants of brain health. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:321. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2018.00321

Gorelick

Furie

Iadecola

, et al. Defining optimal brain health in adults: a presidential advisory from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2017;48(10):e284-e303. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000148

Gelfo

Mandolesi

Serra

Sorrentino

Caltagirone

. The neuroprotective effects of experience on cognitive functions: evidence from animal studies on the neurobiological bases of brain reserve. Neuroscience. 2018;370:218-235. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.065

Pillars . Healthy brains by Cleveland clinic. https://healthybrains.org/pillars/

The Six Pillars of Brain Health. https://states.aarp.org/virginia/the-six-pillars-of-brain-health

10.

Andel

Crowe

Pedersen

Fratiglioni

Johansson

Gatz

. Physical exercise at midlife and risk of dementia three decades later: a population-based study of Swedish twins. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63(1):62-66.

11.

Baumgart

Snyder

Carrillo

Fazio

Kim

Johns

. Summary of the evidence on modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia: a population-based perspective. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(6):718-726. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2015.05.016

12.

Geda

Roberts

Knopman

, et al. Physical exercise, aging, and mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study. Arch Neurol. 2010;67(1):80-86. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.297

13.

Hamer

Chida

. Physical activity and risk of neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review of prospective evidence. Psychol Med. 2009;39(1):3-11. doi:10.1017/S0033291708003681

14.

Tan

Wang

, et al. Meta-analysis of modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86:1299-1306. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-310548

15.

Barnes

Yaffe

. The projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer’s disease prevalence. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(9):819-828. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70072-2

16.

Lourida

Hannon

Littlejohns

, et al. Association of lifestyle and genetic risk with incidence of dementia. JAMA. 2019;322(5):430-437. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.9879

17.

Rabin

Klein

Kirn

, et al. Associations of physical activity and β-amyloid with longitudinal cognition and neurodegeneration in clinically normal older adults. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(10):1203-1210. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1879

18.

Feigin

Abajobir

Abate

. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(11):877-897. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30299-5

19.

Gooch

Pracht

Borenstein

. The burden of neurological disease in the United States: a summary report and call to action. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(4):479-484. doi:10.1002/ana.24897

20.

Zhang

Pan

Chen

, et al. Combined lifestyle factors, incident cancer, and cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Br J Cancer. 2020;122(7):1085-1093. doi:10.1038/s41416-020-0741-x

21.

Kariuki

Imes

Engberg

Scott

Klem

Cortes

. Impact of lifestyle-based interventions on absolute cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBI Evid Synth. 2024;22:4-65. doi:10.11124/JBIES-22-00356

22.

Ahlskog

Geda

Graff-Radford

Petersen

. Physical exercise as a preventive or disease-modifying treatment of dementia and brain aging. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(9):876-884. doi:10.4065/mcp.2011.0252

23.

Ludwig

Kabat-Zinn

. Mindfulness in medicine. JAMA. 2008;300(11):1350-1352. doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1350

24.

Geiger

Boggero

Brake

, et al. Mindfulness-based interventions for older adults: a review of the effects on physical and emotional well-being. Mindfulness. 2016;7(2):296-307. doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0444-1

25.

Dutton

. The role of mindfulness in health behavior change. ACSM's Health & Fit J. 2008;12(4):7-12. doi:10.1249/FIT.0b013e31817bf5db

26.

Victorson

Kentor

Maletich

, et al. Mindfulness meditation to promote wellness and manage chronic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of mindfulness-based randomized controlled trials relevant to lifestyle medicine. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2015;9(3):185-211. doi:10.1177/1559827614537789

27.

Schuman-Olivier

Trombka

Lovas

, et al. Mindfulness and behavior change. Harv Rev Psychiatr. 2020;28(6):371-394. doi:10.1097/HRP.0000000000000277

28.

Hölzel

Carmody

Vangel

, et al. Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatr Res. 2011;191(1):36-43. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.006

29.

Sevinc

Hölzel

Greenberg

, et al. Strengthened hippocampal circuits underlie enhanced retrieval of extinguished fear memories following mindfulness training. Biol Psychiatr. 2019;86(9):693-702. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.05.017

30.

Gotink

Meijboom

Vernooij

Smits

Hunink

MGM

. 8-week Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction induces brain changes similar to traditional long-term meditation practice – a systematic review. Brain Cognit. 2016;108:32-41. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.07.001

31.

Tang

Hölzel

Posner

. The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(4):213-225. doi:10.1038/nrn3916

32.

Creswell

Lindsay

. How does mindfulness training affect health? A mindfulness stress buffering account. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014;23(6):401-407. doi:10.1177/0963721414547415

33.

Kilpatrick

Suyenobu

Smith

, et al. Impact of mindfulness-based stress reduction training on intrinsic brain connectivity. Neuroimage. 2011;56(1):290-298. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.034

34.

Gard

Hölzel

Lazar

. The potential effects of meditation on age-related cognitive decline: a systematic review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1307:89-103. doi:10.1111/nyas.12348

35.

Schneider

Grim

Rainforth

, et al. Stress reduction in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: randomized, controlled trial of transcendental meditation and health education in Blacks. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(6):750-758. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967406

36.

Khoury

Lecomte

Fortin

, et al. Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(6):763-771. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005

37.

Innes

Selfe

. Meditation as a therapeutic intervention for adults at risk for alzheimer’s disease – potential benefits and underlying mechanisms. Front Psychiatr. 2014;5:40. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00040

38.

Zeidan

Johnson

Diamond

David

Goolkasian

. Mindfulness meditation improves cognition: evidence of brief mental training. Conscious Cognit. 2010;19(2):597-605. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.014

39.

Lenze

Hickman

Hershey

, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for older adults with worry symptoms and co-occurring cognitive dysfunction. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr. 2014;29(10):991-1000. doi:10.1002/gps.4086

40.

Parra

Wetherell

Van Zandt

Brownson

Abhishek

Lenze

. A qualitative study of older adults’ perspectives on initiating exercise and mindfulness practice. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):354. doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1375-9

41.

Shapero

Greenberg

Pedrelli

de Jong

Desbordes

. Mindfulness-based interventions in psychiatry. Focus. 2018;16(1):32-39. doi:10.1176/appi.focus.20170039

42.

Strauss

Bond

Cavanagh

. How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;37:1-12. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006

43.

Garcia

Kozasa

Tufik

Mello

LEAM

Hachul

. The effects of mindfulness and relaxation training for insomnia (MRTI) on postmenopausal women: a pilot study. Menopause. 2018;25(9):992-1003. doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000001118

44.

Vranceanu

Gonzalez

Niles

, et al. Exploring the effectiveness of a modified comprehensive mind-body intervention for medical and psychologic symptom relief. Psychosomatics. 2014;55(4):386-391. doi:10.1016/j.psym.2014.01.005

45.

Schneider

Malinowski

Watson

Lattimore

. The role of mindfulness in physical activity: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2019;20(3):448-463. doi:10.1111/obr.12795

46.

Rusch

Rosario

Levison

, et al. The effect of mindfulness meditation on sleep quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019;1445(1):5-16. doi:10.1111/nyas.13996

47.

Carrière

Khoury

Günak

Knäuper

. Mindfulness-based interventions for weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2018;19(2):164-177. doi:10.1111/obr.12623

48.

Oikonomou

Arvanitis

Sokolove

. Mindfulness training for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. J Health Psychol. 2017;22(14):1841-1850. doi:10.1177/1359105316637667

49.

Howard

Garland

McGovern

Lazar

. Mindfulness treatment for substance misuse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;75:62-96. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2017.01.008

50.

Jackson

Brown

Norris

Livingstone-Banks

Hayes

Lindson

. Mindfulness for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;4(4):CD013696. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013696.pub2

51.

Maglione

Maher

Ewing

, et al. Efficacy of mindfulness meditation for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addict Behav. 2017;69:27-34. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.01.022

52.

Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews | Emergency Medicine Journal. https://emj.bmj.com/content/37/6/387

53.

Higgins

Thomas

Cumpston

Page

Welch

. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; 2021. https://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

54.

Schünemann

Higgins

Vist

Akl

Skoetz

Guyatt

. Chapter 14: completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence. In: Higgins

Thomas

Chandler

, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 6.3. London, UK: Cochrane; 2022. https://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

55.

Page

McKenzie

Bossuyt

, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71

56.

National Academies of Sciences E, Division H and M, Practice B on PH and PH Nicholson

. Brain Health across the Life Span. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556452/

57.

Luberto

Shinday

Song

, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of meditation on empathy, compassion, and prosocial behaviors. Mindfulness. 2018;9(3):708-724. doi:10.1007/s12671-017-0841-8

58.

Oberoi

Yang

Woodgate

, et al. Association of mindfulness-based interventions with anxiety severity in adults with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2012598. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12598

59.

Andrieu

Guyonnet

Coley

, et al. Effect of long-term omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation with or without multidomain intervention on cognitive function in elderly adults with memory complaints (MAPT): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(5):377-389. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30040-6

60.

Sabayan

Sorond

. Reducing risk of dementia in older age. JAMA. 2017;317(19):2028-2028. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.2247

61.

Livingston

Huntley

Sommerlad

, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;396(10248):413-446. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6

62.

Future directions of multiple behavior change research | SpringerLink. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10865-016-9809-8

63.

DiMatteo

Sherbourne

Hays

, et al. Physicians’ characteristics influence patients’ adherence to medical treatment: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Health Psychol. 1993;12(2):93-102. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.12.2.93

64.

Veritas Health Innovation . Covidence Systematic Review Software. https://www.covidence.org.

65.

Follmann

Elliott

Suh

Cutler

. Variance imputation for overviews of clinical trials with continuous response. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(7):769-773. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90054-q

66.

Elbourne

Altman

Higgins

JPT

Curtin

Worthington

Vail

. Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(1):140-149. doi:10.1093/ije/31.1.140

67.

Wiebe

Vandermeer

Platt

Klassen

Moher

Barrowman

. A systematic review identifies a lack of standardization in methods for handling missing variance data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(4):342-353. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.08.017

68.

16.1.3.1 Imputing standard deviations. https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_16/16_1_3_1imputing_standard_deviations.htm

69.

R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; 2020. https://www.R-project.org/.

70.

RStudio Team . RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. https://www.rstudio.com/.

71.

McGuinness

. Robvis: An R Package and Web Application for Visualising Risk-Of-Bias Assessments; 2020. https://github.com/mcguinlu/robvis.

72.

McMaster University and Evidence Prime . GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool; 2022. https://gradepro.org

73.

Balduzzi

Rücker

Schwarzer

. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evid Base Ment Health. 2019;22(4):153-160. doi:10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117

74.

Viechtbauer

. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Software. 2010;36(3). doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03

75.

Higgins

JPT

Thompson

. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539-1558. doi:10.1002/sim.1186

76.

Sterne

JAC

Sutton

Ioannidis

JPA

, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d4002. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002

77.

Bower

Crosswell

Stanton

, et al. Mindfulness meditation for younger breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2015;121(8):1231-1240. doi:10.1002/cncr.29194

78.

Jain

Shapiro

Swanick

, et al. A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training: effects on distress, positive states of mind, rumination, and distraction. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33(1):11-21. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm3301_2

79.

Desbordes

Negi

Pace

TWW

Wallace

Raison

Schwartz

. Effects of mindful-attention and compassion meditation training on amygdala response to emotional stimuli in an ordinary, non-meditative state. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:292. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00292

80.

van Vugt

Hitchcock

Shahar

Britton

. The effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on affective memory recall dynamics in depression: a mechanistic model of rumination. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:257. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00257

81.

Ong

Ulmer

Manber

. Improving sleep with mindfulness and acceptance: a metacognitive model of insomnia. Behav Res Ther. 2012;50(11):651-660. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2012.08.001

82.

Gilbert

Waltz

. Mindfulness and health behaviors. Mindfulness. 2010;1(4):227-234. doi:10.1007/s12671-010-0032-3

83.

Salmon

Hanneman

Harwood

. Associative/dissociative cognitive strategies in sustained physical activity: literature review and proposal for a mindfulness-based conceptual model. Sport Psychol. 2010;24(2):127-156. doi:10.1123/tsp.24.2.127

84.

Butryn

Arigo

Raggio

Kaufman

Kerrigan

Forman

. Measuring the ability to tolerate activity-related discomfort: initial validation of the physical activity acceptance questionnaire (PAAQ). J Phys Activ Health. 2015;12(5):716-717. doi:10.1123/jpah.2013-0338

85.

Sancho

De Gracia

Rodríguez

, et al. Mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of substance and behavioral addictions: a systematic review. Front Psychiatr. 2018;9:95. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00095

86.

Amaro

Black

. Moment-by-Moment in Women’s Recovery: randomized controlled trial protocol to test the efficacy of a mindfulness-based intervention on treatment retention and relapse prevention among women in residential treatment for substance use disorder. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017;62:146-152. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2017.09.004

87.

Ong

Manber

Segal

Xia

Shapiro

Wyatt

. A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation for chronic insomnia. Sleep. 2014;37(9):1553-1563. doi:10.5665/sleep.4010

88.

de Vibe

Bjørndal

Tipton

Hammerstrøm

Kowalski

. Mindfulness based stress reduction (MBSR) for improving health, quality of life, and social functioning in adults. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2012;8(1):1-127. doi:10.4073/csr.2012.3

89.

Goldberg

Riordan

Sun

Davidson

. The empirical status of mindfulness-based interventions: a systematic review of 44 meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022;17(1):108-130. doi:10.1177/1745691620968771

90.

Isaacson

Ganzer

Hristov

, et al. The clinical practice of risk reduction for Alzheimer’s disease: a precision medicine approach. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(12):1663-1673. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.08.004

91.

Altomare

Molinuevo

Ritchie

, et al. Brain Health Services: organization, structure, and challenges for implementation. A user manual for Brain Health Services—part 1 of 6. Alzheimer's Res Ther. 2021;13:168. doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00827-2

92.

Mirsky

Thorndike

. Virtual group visits: hope for improving chronic disease management in primary care during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Health Promot. 2021;35(7):904-907. doi:10.1177/08901171211012543

93.

Lacagnina

Tips

Pauly

Cara

Karlsen

. Lifestyle medicine shared medical appointments. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021;15(1):23-27. doi:10.1177/1559827620943819

94.

Kulmala

Rosenberg

Ngandu

, et al. Facilitators and barriers to implementing lifestyle intervention programme to prevent cognitive decline. Eur J Publ Health. 2021;31(4):816-822. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckab087

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.55 MB

0.28 MB