Environmental health is often considered the oldest public health practice; yet, in many respects, particularly in relation to chemical exposure and impact, we know very little about the span of consequences. According to the World Health Organization, environmental hazards are responsible for 23% of the total burden of disease worldwide. Environmental and occupational diseases frequently manifest as common medical problems or have nonspecific symptoms; yet consideration of environmental factors rarely enters into the clinician’s history taking or diagnosis.
DollRPetoR. The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981;66:1191-1308.
3.
MurrayCJLopezAD, eds. Global Burden of Disease. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1996.
4.
DriscollTSteenlandKPrüss-UstünAImel NelsonDLeighJ. Occupational Carcinogens: Assessing the Environmental Burden of Disease at National and Local Levels. Environmental Burden of Disease Series, No. 6. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars. Accessed June 9, 2011.
7.
Prüss-UstünACorvalanC. How much disease burden can be prevented by environmental interventions?Epidemiology. 2007;18:167-178.
8.
DesaiMAMehtaSSmithKR. Indoor Smoke From Solid Fuels: Assessing the Environmental Burden of Disease at National and Local Levels. WHO Environmental Burden of Disease Series, No. 4. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004.
9.
Prüss-UstünAVickersCHaefligerPBertolliniR. Knowns and unknowns on burden of disease due to chemicals: a systematic review. Environ Health. 2011;10:9.
10.
ThomasSPHrudeySE. Risk of death in Canada: what we know and how we know it. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta Press;1997.
11.
SchwartzJ. Low-level lead exposure and the IQ of children. A meta-analysis of modern studies. JAMA. 1990;263:673-678.
12.
WigleDTArbuckleTETurnerMC. Epidemiologic evidence of relationships between reproductive and child health outcomes and environmental chemical contaminants. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2008;11:373-517.
13.
CovelloVSandmanPM. Risk communication: evolution and revolution. In WolbarstA, ed. Solutions to an Environment in Peril. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2001:164-178.
14.
WallaceL. Comparison of risks from outdoor and indoor exposure to toxic chemicals. Environ Health Perspect. 1991;95:7-13.
15.
National Research Council of the National Academies. Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Chemicals. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
American Conference of Governmental and Industrial Hygienists. TLVÒ/BEIÒ resources. http://www.acgih.org/TLV/. Accessed June 9, 2011.
18.
HanlonPCarlisleSHannahMReillyDLyonA. Making the case for the fifth wave in public health. Public Health. 2011;125:30-36.
19.
MarshallLWeirEAbelsohnASanbornM. Identifying and managing adverse environmental health effects: 1. Taking an exposure history. CMAJ. 2002;166:1049-1055.
20.
McCurdySAMorrinLAMemmottMM. Occupational history collection by third-year medical students during internal medicine and surgery inpatient clerkships. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40:680-684.
