The Median Effective Dose of Dexmedetomidine for the Inhibition of Emergence Delirium in Preschool Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy and/or Adenoidectomy: A Retrospective Dose-response Trial

Abstract

The incidence of emergence delirium (ED) is higher in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the median effective dose (ED50) of dexmedetomidine (DEX) for the inhibition of ED in preschool children by using probit regression analysis. A total of 140 anesthesia records were retrieved and divided into seven groups based on the infusion rate of DEX: .2, .25, .3, .35, .4, .45, and .5 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹. The Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAEDS) was used to assess ED in preschool children, and ED was defined as a PAEDS score ≥ 10. Probit regression analysis revealed that the ED50 and ED95 of DEX were .31 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ (95% CI: .29–.35) and .48 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ (95% CI: .44–.56), respectively. Probit(p) = −2.84 + 9.28 × ln (Dose), (χ² = 1.925, P = .859). The PAEDS score was significantly increased in the ED group, and the rate of bradycardia was significantly decreased in the ED group compared with the without ED group (27.3% vs 54.1%, P = .02). DEX can effectively inhibit the ED in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy, however, bradycardia was the main complication.

Keywords

dexmedetomidine median effective dose emergence delirium children tonsillectomy

Introduction

General anesthesia (GA) is frequently used in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy, and some children experience ED due to pain, residual sedation, and throat suffocation, including the destructive behavior observed during the recovery period from GA.^1,2 In addition, preoperative fear, anxiety, venipuncture, mask application, and loneliness due to separation from parents are all risk factors for ED in preschool patients.³ Prophylactic medication is the most common method to minimize anxiety in children, which facilitates the process of anesthesia induction, and various sedatives are continuously intravenously infused intraoperatively to reduce the incidence of ED before children are transferred to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU).⁴

Midazolam is a traditional sedative anxiolytic agent that is widely used for premedication to reduce the incidence of ED.³ A previous report confirmed that oral administration of .5 mg/kg midazolam can effectively reduce separation and anxiety in preschool children.⁵ However, some adverse effects associated with midazolam were increased, such as respiratory depression, changes in postoperative behavior, paradoxical reactions, and cognitive dysfunction.⁶ More importantly, some studies demonstrated that midazolam was not effective in preventing ED when compared with other sedative agents, such as α-2 receptor agonists and propofol.⁷

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been proven to be an “arousable” sedative; it is a novel highly selective α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist and is considered an alternative premedication for ED in children.⁸ DEX is used for sedation and analgesia as well as an anxiolytic effect without respiratory depression, thus producing a similar natural sleep state for its stable recovery of the central nervous system (CNS).⁹ Recently, DEX has been explored as a premedication in the inhibition of ED in children,¹⁰ and numerous studies have confirmed that DEX can effectively reduce the incidence of ED in children.^11–13 However, some adverse effects, such as hypotension and bradycardia, limit its clinical application.^14,15 Although different studies have provided different doses of DEX,^16,17 there is no consensus on the optimal dose of DEX to prevent ED in pediatric patients.

Emergence Delirium (ED) in children is mainly related to behaviors such as crying sadly, kicking, hallucinations, disorientation, cognitive, and memory impairment during emergence from GA.¹⁸ Timely management of the ED in the PACU is necessary and requires more sedative and analgesics, which prolong discharge from the hospital. To date, studies on effective doses of DEX are very limited despite the perception that DEX may prevent ED in children.

The aim of this dose-response trial was to determine the ED50 of DEX for the inhibition of ED in preschool children between the ages of 3 and 7 years who underwent tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy with GA.

Patients and Methods

Patients

The anesthesia record data of all the preschool children who underwent tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy between January 2020 and December 2022 were selected for this study from the information center of Anqing Medical Center, Anhui Medical University.

This study was a retrospective trial, and the data of all the children were screened. During the data collection period, the data of the study subjects were kept confidential, and all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Study Protocol

We reviewed the anesthesia record data of children with continuous intraoperative intravenous infusion of DEX. The inclusion criteria of this study were as follows: preschool children between 3 and 7 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I. Intravenous propofol 1.5 mg·kg⁻¹, sufentanil .5 μg·kg⁻¹, and cisatracurium .2 mg·kg⁻¹ were administered for anesthesia induction, and then intravenous pumped propofol 3–6 mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹, remifentanil .1–.2 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹, and cisatracurium 2–5 μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹ for intraoperative maintenance. We intravenous pumped DEX 0.2-0.5 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ for intraoperative maintenance after endotracheal intubation. All of the children were treated with the same anesthesia regimen. The exclusion criteria included abnormal critical organ function, congenital diseases, asthma, mental, and neurological defects, administration of anxiolytic or anti-psychotics preoperative period, and incomplete anesthesia data. Children with a postoperative CHEOPS score >6 and intolerable were considered analgesic insufficiency, and received intravenous parecoxib sodium .5–1.0 mg·kg⁻¹, and these patients were also excluded.

We divided the patients into seven groups based on the rates of DEX intraoperative continuous infusion: .2, .25, .3, .35, .4, .45, and .5 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹. A total of 168 anesthesia record data were retrieved, and 25 incomplete data were excluded: one child was excluded in the .25 dose group due to congenital disease, one child was excluded in the .45 dose group due to mental retardation, and one child was excluded in the .50 dose group due to left upper limb neurological dysfunction. After the patients’ data were screened, 140 children were ultimately included.

Measurement

The Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) for children is scored as follows: 1 = anxious, restless; 2 = quiet and cooperative; 3 = responsive to the commands; 4 = quick responsive to a light tap; 5 = slow in response to a light tap; 6 = no response at all. In this trial, an unsatisfactory level of sedation was defined as an RSS of 1, and an RSS ≥ 2 was defined as satisfactory sedation.¹⁹

The Parental Separation Anxiety Scale (PSAS) for children is as follows: 1 = easily separated from parents; 2 = whimpers, but easy to reassure; 3 = crying and not easy to reassure, but not attached to parents; 4 = crying loudly and attached to parents. Successful parental separation was defined as a PSAS score ≤ 2 in this trial.²⁰

The Mask Acceptance Scale (MAS) is a behavioral assessment for children receiving a mask by a 4-point scale during the mask application, and the MAS score is as follows: 1 = excellent (very easy to accept mask); 2 = good (mild fear of mask, easy to comfort); 3 = fair (moderate fear of mask, but not easy to comfort); and 4 = poor (extreme fear of mask, too difficult to comfort). “Satisfactory” mask acceptance was defined as an MAS score ≤ 2 in this trial.²⁰

The Children’s Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) for children is scored as follows: 1 = no cry, 2 = moaning or crying, 3 = screaming; 0 = smiling, 1 = composed, 2 = grimace; 0 = positive, 1 = none or complaints other than pain, 2 = pain complaints; 1 = torso neutral, 2 = torso shifting or tense, shivering, restrained; 1 = not touching, 2 = reach or touch, grab; 1 = legs neutral, 2 = legs squirming kicking or drawn up tensed, standing, restrained. The total CHEOPS score was the sum of scores on 6 items, with a minimum score of 4 and a maximum score of 13. Postoperative incomplete analgesia was defined as a CHEOPS score ≥6.²¹

The Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAEDS) for children is scored as follows: 1, the children have eye contact with the caregivers; 2, the behavior of the children is purposeful; 3, the children are alert to the surrounding environment; 4, the children are restless; and 5, the children are extremely sad and difficult to comfort. The first 3 items are scored as follows: 4 = not at all; 3 = a little bit; 2 = quite a bit; 1 = very much, 0 = super much. The final two items are scored as follows: 0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = quite a bit; 3 = very much; 4 = super much. The total PAEDS score was the sum of the scores on 5 items, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 20. ED was defined as a PAEDS score ≥ 10 in this trial.²²

Parental Separation Anxiety Scale (PSAS) scores were assessed when the children were separated from their parents before anesthesia, and MAS and PAEDS scores were assessed immediately and at 5, 15, 30, and 45 minutes after extubation in the PACU.

Hemodynamic parameters such as the mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO₂) were recorded.

Statistical Analyses

Sample size was calculated using PASS 11 (NSCC, LCC, Kaysville, UT), (the Cochran - Armitage test for trend in proportions),²³ based on our calculation, the incidence of ED was 84, 70, 52, 34, 19, 9, and 4% for the seven DEX infusion doses of .2, .25, .3, .35, .4, .45, and .5 μg·kg⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively. Our calculations showed that a sample size of 17 patients in each group could provide 81% power with a linear trend, using a two-tailed Z test and maintaining an α level of .05, our total sample size of 140 patients is sufficient.

SPSS 21.0 was used to analyze the data. Normally distributed data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation ( $\bar{x}$ ± SD). Comparisons between two groups were performed by the independent samples t test, and comparisons between more than three groups were performed using one-way ANOVA. Categorical data were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. P values of less than .05 were considered significantly different. The ED50, ED95, and 95% confidence interval (CI) were predicted using probit regression.

Results

Anesthesia records from 168 children were retrieved. Records from 25 children were excluded due to being incomplete, and three children were excluded due to congenital disease, mental retardation, and left upper limb neurological dysfunction. Ultimately, 140 children were included in the current study. The children’s flow of this study is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Subjects cohort flow diagram.

Demographic characteristics (gender, age, weight, and height), duration of surgery and duration of extubation of all preschool children are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of all the Children, Duration of Surgery, and Duration of Extubation.

	.20 μg (n = 18)	.25 μg (n = 22)	.30 μg (n = 19)	.35 μg (n = 21)	.40 μg (n = 22)	.45 μg (n = 18)	.50 μg (n = 20)	t/(χ²) Value	P Value
Gender (M/F)	13/7	10/10	13/7	10/10	14/6	8/12	12/8	(5.658)	.463^△
Age (year)	4.9 ± 1.2	4.8 ± 1.2	4.9 ± 1.3	4.7 ± 1.1	4.6 ± 1.2	5.0 ± 1.0	5.1 ± 1.2	.463	.496^※
Weight (kg)	21.4 ± 6.7	22.6 ± 6.8	20.8 ± 7.2	19.8 ± 5.2	23.2 ± 5.5	21.5 ± 5.6	22.3 ± 4.6	.879	.381^※
Height (cm)	114.2 ± 14.8	116.4 ± 12.2	112.8 ± 10.6	117.5 ± 12.8	115.6 ± 9.6	113.7 ± 6.7	114.8 ± 5.8	.006	.940^※
Duration of surgery (min)	31.6 ± 11.9	33.2 ± 9.0	35.6 ± 11.2	32.8 ± 10.2	32.5 ± 7.5	31.8 ± 7.9	32.5 ± 9.6	2.689	.101^※
Duration of extubation (min)	15.9 ± 5.9	12.6 ± 6.3	18.6 ± 4.3	16.8 ± 7.2	17.2 ± 5.2	16.8 ± 5.8	16.2 ± 5.5	1.737	.084^※

Data are expressed as $\bar{x}$ ± SD or the number. M: male, F: female. The duration of extubation was defined as the time between the end of anesthesia and the removal of the tracheal tube.

^△P value: Chi-square test. ^※P value: One-way ANOVA. Duration of extubation was defined as the time between the end of anesthesia and the removal of the tracheal tube.

Based on whether children developed ED or not, we again divided 140 children into two groups, ED group and Without ED group. Demographic characteristics, duration of surgery and duration of extubation of all children are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Demographic Characteristics of all Children, Duration of Surgery, and Duration of Extubation.

	ED (n = 55)	Without ED (n = 85)	t/(χ²) Value	P Value
Gender (M/F)	29/26	41/44	(.270)	.604^△
Height (cm)	115.3 ± 11.2	114.6 ± 10.6	3.627	.235^※
Weight (kg)	21.8 ± 6.3	22.4 ± 5.8	.056	.863^※
Age (year)	4.6 ± 1.0	4.7 ± 1.3	.523	.637^※
Duration of surgery (min)	35.2 ± 8.7	33.8 ± 7.3	1.238	.364^※
Duration of extubation (min)	13.2 ± 4.3	14.6 ± 8.2	1.635	.128^※

Data are expressed as $\bar{x}$ ± SD or the number. M: male, F: female. ^△P value: Chi-square test. ^※P value: t-test.

Probit regression analysis revealed that the ED50 of DEX for the inhibition of ED in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy was .31 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ (95% CI: .29–.35), and the ED95 was .48 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ (95% CI: .44–.56). Probit(p) = −2.84 + 9.28 × ln (Dose), (χ² = 1.925, P = .859). The probability of ED inhibition in children with DEX was determined by probit regression analysis, and the dose-response curve was plotted and shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Dose-response curve of DEX for the inhibition of the ED in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. Probability unit vs Dose of DEX.

The RSS was significantly decreased in the ED group compared with the without ED group (Figure 3A), however, the PSAS, MAS, CHEOPS, and PAEDS scores were significantly increased in the ED group compared with the without ED group (Figure 3B-E), respectively. The rate of bradycardia was significantly decreased in the ED group compared with the without ED group (27.3% vs 54.1%, P = .02, Figure 3F).

Figure 3.

Comparison of RSS, PSAS, MAS, CHEOPS, PAEDS scores and the rate of bradycardia in two groups. (A) Ramsay Sedation Scale. (B) Parental Separation Anxiety Scale. (C) Mask Acceptance Scale. (D) Children’s Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale. (E) Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale. (F) the rate of bradycardia was significantly decreased in the ED group. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.

The changes in MAP and HR are shown in Figure 4 A and B in the two groups. The MAP and HR in the ED group were significantly increased at the time of extubation and 5, 10, and 15 min after extubation compared with the without ED group.

Figure 4.

Hemodynamic changes in two groups. (A) The MAP was significantly decreased in the withou ED group. (B) The HR was significantly decreased in the withou ED group. ***P < 0.001.

Discussion

This retrospective dose-response trial was designed to determine the ED50 of DEX for the inhibition of ED in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. The probit regression analysis showed that the ED50 was .31 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ (95% CI: .29–.35), and the ED95 was .48 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ (95% CI: .44–.56). Fifty-five children developed ED, and 85 children did not develop ED. The demographic characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups.

Our previous studies often used the Dixon sequential method to determine the ED50 of drugs. The advantage of this method is that a small sample is sufficient, but the disadvantage is that the results are not accurate enough because the sample size at the extreme dose is only 1–3, which leads to serious bias.^24,25 In this study, a large sample of 140 children were included in a wide range of dose groups (7 doses), and thus, the results were less biased and highly reliable.

Eckenhoff first described the “neuroexcitation” observed during emergence under GA in the 1960s, but the patients were in a state of free consciousness.²⁶ Patients present with an “unpleasant state of extreme excitement” often associated with pain, anxiety, fear, and more complex neurobehavior.²⁷ Different surgical categories lead to different rates of ED, ranging from 10 to 80%.²⁸ Patient characteristics, anesthetic techniques, type of surgery, and different methods used to assess ED all contribute to different rates of ED. Once ED occurs in the PACU, the symptoms first need to be adequately assessed, including the level of analgesia, sedation, consciousness, and delusion. Children with severe ED may harm themselves or others, so caregivers in the PACU must quickly consult about the children’s medical history, the type of surgery, and style of anesthesia to identify the most appropriate management. Factors of severe ED may include acute pain, changes in the surrounding environment, or restrictive factors, and for children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy, attention is given to oral secretions, blood clots, or postoperative sensory changes.

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a highly selective α-2 receptor agonist and is widely used in clinical sedation due to its short half-life. In recent years, numerous studies have demonstrated that DEX effectively prevents ED in adult patients at doses ranging from .25 to .4 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ but is accompanied by an increased risk for dose-related adverse effects such as hypotension, residual sedation, prolonged duration of extubation, and retention in the PACU.^17,29 Few studies have examined the effects of DEX on ED in pediatric patients, and optimization of the DEX dose is crucial to prevent ED and reduce complications in pediatric patients. The ED50 we calculated herein using probit regression analysis effectively inhibited ED in children and did not increase the dose-related adverse effects, such as not prolonging extubation time (Table 2). There is no consensus on whether DEX causes bradycardia. The dose of DEX, the type of surgery, and the evaluation method of ED are all important factors responsible for the different conclusions.^30–32 The similarity of this study and previous results lies in that DEX effectively inhibited ED in children, but bradycardia seemed inevitable.³³ There were 46 patients with bradycardia in the non-ED group and 15 patients in the ED group (54.1% vs 27.3%, P = .02, Figure 3F).

How to prevent and handle ED in children is not yet clear. Some studies have proven that the preoperative use of nonpharmacological strategies to reduce preoperative anxiety in children can effectively reduce the incidence of ED.^34,35 Although the effect of preoperative pharmacological intervention on the development of ED remains unclear, a recent randomized controlled trial compared oral benzodiazepine and tablet-based interactive distraction (TBID), and the results confirmed that anxiety baseline and mask-induced tolerance were improved in the TBID group, shortened hospital stay, and a lower incidence of ED.³⁶ In addition, nasal administration of DEX (1–2 μg/kg) 20 minutes before anesthesia induction significantly reduced the incidence of ED and led to less postoperative anxiety; more importantly, the patient’s recovery time was not delayed compared with placebo.³⁷ Recent studies have also demonstrated that preoperative oral DEX significantly reduced PAEDS scores (P < .05) and the incidence of ED compared with oral benzodiazepine (DEX 0% vs benzodiazepine 19%, P = .01).³⁸

Emergence delirium (ED) severely affected MAP and HR in the children. Abdel-ghaffar et al. confirmed that oral DEX at 1.0 μg/kg reduced MAP by 25% compared to the control group (equal volume of saline).³⁹ We divided all the children into two groups (ED group and without ED group) and found that MAP and HR in the ED group did not decrease compared with the basal value; however, the MAP and HR in the ED group were significantly increased at the time of extubation and 15 min after extubation. The levels of RSS were significantly decreased (Figure 3A), and the PSAS, MAS, CHEOPS, and PAEDS scores were significantly increased in the ED group, which resulted in an increase in MAP and HR (Figure 3B-E). Therefore, the ED50 measured in this study can effectively inhibit ED in children and maintain the stability of MAP and HR during the emergence period.

Although ED is transient, there are many potential risks, such as incision cracking, hemostatic gauze shedding, and bed falling, which should be considered by PACU caregivers and treated early or in a timely manner. In addition, ED can increase the incidence of adverse events, such as prolonged resuscitation time and susceptibility to asphyxia. There are some limitations in this study. The first limitation is that it is a retrospective study, and the researchers did not participate in the preoperative psychological counseling and anxiety relief of children, which is one of the important reasons for ED in children. Therefore, the results may have been biased. The second limitation is that each anesthesiologist treated ED with a different strategy, which affected the duration of ED and the degree of postoperative pain. Therefore, there may have been bias in the CHEOPS and PAEDS scores. Finally, although this is a large sample size study, it is also a single-center study and a prudent conclusion requires a large sample size and multicenter study.

In conclusion, DEX can effectively inhibit ED in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy without complications such as respiratory depression, delayed extubation, and residual sedation, but bradycardia is the major perioperative complication, and the anesthesiologist should be vigilant. The primary caregivers of the PACU should accurately assess the awareness, agitation degree, and pain level when the child has an ED to assist the anesthesiologist in rapid treatment. Future studies require further all-cause analysis of ED and behavioral dysregulation in pediatric children to better develop strategies to prevent ED and improve the long-term consequences of ED.

Conclusions: This retrospective dose-response trial confirmed that DEX effectively inhibited ED in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. The ED50 of DEX was .31 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ (95% CI: .29–.35), and the ED95 was .48 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ (95% CI: .44–.56). Bradycardia was the main complication.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the patients and doctors who participated in the study. The authors are very grateful to Professor Tao Pan, Anqing Medical Center of Anhui Medical University, for his guidance on this study.

Authors’ contributions

The study was conceived and designed by BYW and WBW; JBX collected the data; CYY, HX, and PZ analyzed the data; CYY and BYW drafted and corrected the manuscript, and all authors read and agreed to the submission.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by the Department of Anhui Education (NO: 2022AH052555) and Anhui Medical University (NO: 2022xkj247).

Ethical Statement

Clinical Trial Registration

The current dose-response trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (NO.: ChiCTR2300069681) on 23/03/2023.

ORCID iD

WeiBing Wang

References

Kim

Choi

. Risk factors of emergence agitation in adults undergoing general anesthesia for nasal surgery. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;8(1):46-51.

Kim

Chae

Choi

, et al. A comparative study of emergence agitation between sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia in adults after closed reduction of nasal bone fracture. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;63(1):48-53.

Sheta

Al-Sarheed

Abdelhalim

. Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24(2):181-189.

Yuen

Hui

Irwin

Yuen

. A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(6):1715-1721.

Cox

Nemish

Ewen

Crowe

. Evidence-based clinical update: does premedication with oral midazolam lead to improved behavioural outcomes in children? Can J Anaesth. 2006;53(12):1213-1219.

Bergendahl

Lönnqvist

Eksborg

. Clonidine in paediatric anaesthesia: review of the literature and comparison with benzodiazepines for premedication. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50(2):135-143.

Dahmani

Stany

Brasher

, et al. Pharmacological prevention of sevoflurane-and desflurane-related emergence agitation in children: a meta-analysis of published studies. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104(2):216-223.

Pasin

Febres

Testa

, et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam as preanesthetic medication in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015;25(5):468-476.

Coull

Jones

Egan

Frith

Maze

. Attentional effects of noradrenaline vary with arousal level: selective activation of thalamic pulvinar in humans. Neuroimage. 2004;22(1):315-322.

10.

Peng

. Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinics. 2014;69(11):777-786.

11.

Lin

Chen

Huang

, et al. Efficacy of premedication with intranasal dexmedetomidine on inhalational induction and postoperative emergence agitation in pediatric undergoing cataract surgery with sevoflurane. J Clin Anesth. 2016;33(9):289-295.

12.

Hauber

Davis

Bendel

, et al. Dexmedetomidine as a rapid bolus for treatment and prophylactic prevention of emergence agitation in anesthetized children. Anesth Analg. 2015;121(5):1308-1315.

13.

Mukherjee

Das

Basunia

Chattopadhyay

Kundu

Bhattacharyya

. Emergence agitation prevention in paediatric ambulatory surgery: a comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and Clonidine. J Res Pharm Pract. 2015;4(1):24-30.

14.

Kurhekar

Vinod

Rajarathinam

Dhiviya Krishna

Raghuraman

. Randomized comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam for prevention of emergence agitation after nasal surgeries. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018;12(1):61-66.

15.

Jakob

Ruokonen

Grounds

, et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2012;307(11):1151-1160.

16.

Sun

Wang

Shi

, et al. Consciousness inhibition of intravenous dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing lower limb surgery with epidural anesthesia: a dose-response study by age group. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2018;31(6(Special)):2863-2868.

17.

Garg

Kamal

Mohammed

Singariya

Chouhan

Biyani

. Efficacy of dexmedetomidine for prevention of emergence agitation in patients posted for nasal surgery under desflurane anaesthesia: a prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62(7):524-530.

18.

Vlajkovic

Sindjelic

. Emergence delirium in children: many questions, few answers. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(1):84-91.

19.

Xia

Sun

Liu

. Effects of dezocine on PAED scale and Ramsay sedation scores in patients undergoing NUSS procedure. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(5):5468-5475.

20.

Evren Sahin

Karkiner

. The effect of using tablet computer on surgical stress: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(3):340.e1-340.e9.

21.

Shen

Xiao

, et al. Association between ABO blood groups and postoperative pain in children after adenotonsillectomy: a prospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):407.

22.

Epulef

Muñoz

Alarcón

Vial

. Spanish version of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale: translation and cross-cultural adaptation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):349.

23.

Feng

Yao

, et al. Determination of the dose-response relationship of epidural dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine for labor analgesia. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2022;16:609-618.

24.

Wang

Sun

Dong

. Determination of the median effective dose (ED50) of bupivacaine and ropivacaine unilateral spinal anesthesia: prospective, double blinded, randomized dose-response trial. Anaesthesist. 2017;66(12):936-943.

25.

Wang

Zhou

Sun

Xiao

Dong

. Determination of the median effective dose of dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence agitation in geriatric patients undergoing major open surgery with general anesthesia: a prospective, double-blinded, dose-response trial. Dose Response. 2021;19(3):15593258211037153.

26.

Eckenhoff

Kneale

Dripps

. The incidence and etiology of postanesthetic excitment. A clinical survey. Anesthesiology. 1961;22:667-673.

27.

Tobias

. Dexmedetomidine: applications in pediatric critical care and pediatric anesthesiology. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007;8(2):115-131.

28.

Doerrfuss

Kramer

Tafelski

Spies

Wernecke

Nachtigall

. Frequency, predictive factors and therapy of emergence delirium: data from a large observational clinical trial in a broad spectrum of postoperative pediatric patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85(6):617-624.

29.

Aouad

Zeeni

Al Nawwar

, et al. Dexmedetomidine for improved quality of emergence from general anesthesia: a dose-finding study. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(6):1504-1511.

30.

Zhang

Miao

, et al. Effects of perioperative intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation after general anesthesia in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2019;13(8):2853-2864.

31.

Liang

Dai

Wang

. Perioperative dexmedetomidine reduces delirium after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2018;50(11):33-42.

32.

Kang

Tang

, et al. Intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion is associated with reduced emergence agitation and improved recovery profiles after lung surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2019;13:871-879.

33.

Wang

Xiao

Zhou

. Determination of the median effective dose of sufentanil for inhibiting the laryngeal mask insertion response in geriatric patients: a prospective, double-blinded, dose-response trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):216, Cyna AM, ed.

34.

Yip

Middleton

Cyna

Carlyle

. Non-pharmacological interventions for assisting the induction of anaesthesia in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:CD006447.

35.

Kain

Caldwell-Andrews

Mayes

, et al. Family-centered preparation for surgery improves perioperative outcomes in children: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2007;106(1):65-74.

36.

Stewart

Cazzell

Pearcy

. Single-blinded randomized controlled study on use of interactive distraction versus oral midazolam to reduce pediatric preoperative anxiety, emergence delirium, and postanesthesia length of stay. J PeriAnesthesia Nurs. 2019;34(3):567-575.

37.

L-Q

Wang

H-Y

Zhang

. Effects of different doses of intranasal dexmedetomidine on preoperative sedation and postoperative agitation in pediatric with total intravenous anesthesia undergoing adenoidectomy with or without tonsillectomy. Medicine. 2018;97(39):e12140-e12147.

38.

Keles

Kocaturk

. Comparison of oral dexmedetomidine and midazolam for premedication and emergence delirium in children after dental procedures under general anesthesia: a retrospective study. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2018;12(3):647-653.

39.

Abdel-Ghaffar

Abdel-Wahab

Roushdy

. Oral trans-mucosal dexmedetomidine for controlling of emergence agitation in children undergoing tonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019;69(5):469-476.