Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Microneedle (MN) delivery system has been greatly developed to deliver drugs into the skin painlessly, noninvasively, and safety. In the past several decades, various types of MNs have been developed by the newer producing techniques. Briefly, as for the morphologically, MNs can be classified into solid, coated, dissolved, and hollow MN, based on the transdermal drug delivery methods of “poke and patch,” “coat and poke,” “poke and release,” and “poke and flow,” respectively. Microneedles also have other characteristics based on the materials and structures. In addition, various manufacturing techniques have been well-developed based on the materials. In this review, the materials, structures, morphologies, and fabricating methods of MNs are summarized. A separate part of the review is used to illustrate the application of MNs to deliver vaccine, insulin, lidocaine, aspirin, and other drugs. Finally, the review ends up with a perspective on the challenges in research and development of MNs, envisioning the future development of MNs as the next generation of drug delivery system.

Keywords

microneedle transdermal drug delivery drug delivery methods materials structures fabricating methods

Introduction

Skin is an important organ evolved to protect the body against unwanted influences, such as excessive water loss, invasion of harmful chemicals, and to prevent the pathogens. There are 3 layers in human skin, including the epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis.^1
–3 The stratum corneum is part of the epidermis and the outermost skin layer, which is the primary barrier of skin and consists of 15 to 20 layers of corneocytes.^4

–7

Transdermal drug delivery is an essential alternative to oral and hypodermic administrations to deliver drugs. Compared with oral and hypodermic administrations, transdermal drug delivery can overcome the problem of absorption and degradation of drugs occurring in the gastrointestinal tract or the liver; it is convenient, inexpensive, noninvasive, painless, and self-administrated; as well as it can provide sustained release of drugs to improve patient compliance.^2,8,9 However, the stratum corneum imposes significant restrictions on the successful delivery of drugs, especially the high-molecular-weight drugs.^1,10,11 Therefore, numerous technologies have been developed to enhance the permeability of drugs via stratum corneum, including chemical enhancement approaches, such as applying the chemical penetration enhancers, physical and electrical enhancement approaches, such as thermal ablation, electroporation, ultrasound, jet injection, and microneedles (MNs).^3,10,12 Generally speaking, these methods enhance the delivery of the drugs through stratum corneum either via pore formation or through improved diffusive interaction, and the principles and mechanisms of these methods have been illustrated well in the studies by Zhang¹⁰ and Leite-Silva.¹² Hereinto, MN, as the novel technique to increase the permeability of drugs, has been used widely in recent years.

Microneedle can be single or an array, consisting of hundreds or even thousands of microprojections, with a length up to 2 mm and a diameter up to hundreds of microns, which are attached to a base support.^13,14 The major advantage of MN delivery system is that the system can be used to penetrate into the skin noninvasively and painlessly to improve the safety and comfort for the patients.² In addition, MN delivery system can precisely deliver drugs from small molecules to macromolecule (eg, protein, insulin) and vaccine.¹⁵

Since the first concept of MN was proposed as a drug delivery device in a US patent in 1971 by Gerstel and Place,¹⁶ the MNs have been developed for delivery of drugs over several decades. Now, MN has been explored into various structures (out-of-plane MNs and in-plane MNs), materials (silicon, ceramic, glass, metal, and polymer), geometries (octagonal,¹⁵ cylindrical,¹⁷ rectangular,¹⁸ pyramidal,^11,19
–21 conical,^22,23,24 and quadrangular²⁵), and morphologies, that is, solid MN (first reported in 1971 by Gerstel and Place¹⁶), hollow MN (first reported in 1971 by Gerstel and Place¹⁶), dissolving MN (first reported in 2005 by Miyano et al²⁶), and coated MN (first reported in a patent in 1975 by Pistor²⁷). Meanwhile, a variety of manufacturing techniques (such as etching, micromolding techniques, and lithography) for any MNs mentioned above, comprehensively considering the factors, including materials, structures, morphologies, geometry, and size, have also been reported in numbers of literatures.

In this article, we pay attention to MN as a transdermal drugs delivery system and make an overview of the MN delivery system. First of all, types of MNs are summarized. After that, MNs fabricating techniques based on materials are summarized. Then, the applications of MNs in drug delivery are reviewed. Finally, a perspective on the challenges in research and development of MNs is illustrated. We hope this review, providing the basic information related to MNs, could be helpful for the further researching of MN delivery system.

Classification of MNs

The main purpose of MNs is to penetrate into skin via the microprojections, without hurting any nerves to improve the patient comfort and ensure the safety. Microneedles can be classified into different types based on the parameters, including drug delivery methods, materials, and structures.

Classified by Drug Delivery Methods

Solid MNs

Solid MNs are developed to deliver drugs into skin based on the mechanism of “poke-and-patch” approach. In this approach, solid MNs are penetrated into the skin to disrupt the stratum corneum and create transient microchannels and then a patch with the drug formulations is applied onto the skin so that the drug can diffuse slowly into the skin through the transient microchannels,^{1,13,28
–30} as shown in Figure 1A.

Figure 1.

Diagrams showing various microneedle drug delivery approaches. (A) Solid microneedles, for skin pretreatment to create microchannels, followed by the application of transdermal patch; (B) coated microneedles, for deposition of drug formulations into the skin, followed by removal of microneedles; (C) dissolving microneedles, incorporated into the substrate of microneedles, remaining in the skin and dissolving over time to release the drugs; and (D) hollow microneedles, for inserted into the skin and continuous infusion of drug through the created microchannels.

The solid MNs are efficient enough to enhance the delivery of drug with wide range of molecules. For examples, Zhang et al³¹ fabricated the solid silicon MN arrays with the length of 150 µm to deliver peptides. The porcine ear skin was pretreated with solid MNs and then 4 types of peptides with different molecular weight were used to illustrate the drug permeability. The experiment results showed that the solid MN arrays promoted the delivery of peptides, but the peptides permeability decreased with the increase in molecular weight of peptides. Nayak et al³² used the “poke-and-patch” method to enhance the permeation of lidocaine hydrochloride. Following solid MNs treatment about 5 minutes, lidocaine hydrochloride was efficiently delivered into the skin and crossed the minimum therapeutic drug threshold in less than 70 minutes. Recently, Bhatnagar et al³³ fabricated the MNs, containing 36 needles in 1 cm² area, to deliver 2 antibreast cancer drugs, such as tamoxifen and gemcitabine. It was confirmed that the “poke-and-patch” approach greatly enhanced the permeation of gemcitabine.

Coated MNs

Coated MNs are used for transdermal drug delivery based on the “coat-and-poke” manner. Specifically, MNs coated with drug formulation are inserted into the skin, then the drugs dissolve from the MNs and enter into the skin, and finally MNs are pulled out of the skin,^29,34,35 as shown in Figure 1B. This approach is simple because it just takes one step to deliver the drug through the skin. However, the MNs can only be coated with a small amount of drugs, resulting in a very low drug delivery efficiency.¹ Multiple coating approaches have been developed, including dip-coating,^36,37 gas-jet drying,³⁸ spray coating,³⁹ electrohydrodynamic atomization (EHDA)-based process,⁴⁰ and ink-jet printing,^41

–44 to overcome the drawback of drug wastage and loss, variable coating thickness, and inaccurate drug dosage. These coating approaches are illustrated well in Figure 2. Briefly, the dip-coating process is a simple process to coat the MNs. As shown in Figure 2A, the MNs are dipped into the formulation and then removed from the formulation to form a liquid film on the MNs. Finally, the liquid layer dries to form a solid film coating on the MNs. Gas-jet drying was proposed to overcome the slow drying process, which always induce the reducing and varying dose in the dip-coating process. The gas-jet can disperse a small amount of coating solution to wet the MNs, remove the excess coating solution, and dry the coating solution simultaneously, as shown in Figure 2B. Spray-coating process is similar to the conventional coating method to obtain the film coating on the MNs. As shown in Figure 2C, there are 3 steps to form the intact film coating. The spray coater generates the formulated microdroplets, such asatomization. After that, the droplets deposit and adhere onto the surface of the MNs and then the drops coalesce to form the film coating on the substrate. The principle of EHDA process is that the atomized droplets are produced by electrical force. The atomized liquids jet out of the capillary nozzle exit by jet and then are collected onto the electrically grounded substrate below the nozzle tip, as shown in Figure 2D. In the ink-jet printing process, as shown in Figure 2E, the microdroplets are ejected by a piezoelectric dispenser onto the surface of MNs to form the uniform, accurate, and reproducible coating films. The droplet size depends on the parameters, such as amplitude, pulse width, and excitation frequency. More illustrations of these approaches are discussed by Haj-Ahmad et al.⁹

Figure 2.

Illustration of coating approaches used to coat microneedles: (A) dip-coating, (B) gas-jet drying, (C) spray coating, and (D) electrohydrodynamic atomization–based process, and (E) ink-jet printing. (Images reprinted with permission from Haj-Ahmad et al.⁹)

Besides, numbers of proper surfactants, such as utrol F-68 NF³⁶ and poloxamer 188,³⁸ and thickening agents, such as alginic acid⁴⁵ and CpG,⁴⁶ were used to facilitate MN coating, and stabilizer, such as trehalose, was used to reduce the damage of bioactive drugs in the process of coating/drying.⁴⁷ In addition, optimizing MN structures (eg, grooves,^48,49 pockets,⁵⁰ nanopatterning,⁵¹ pores⁵²) was employed to increase coating amounts or facilitate the delivery of drugs into the skin.

Coated MNs can be used to deliver various drugs into the skin. For example, Baek et al¹⁸ fabricated the biocompatible coated MNs made of poly (l-lactide) (PLLA), which were coated with optimized coating formation of lidocaine on the tips by the dip-coating device. It was confirmed that the PLLA MN arrays released rapidly the lidocaine into the phosphate-buffered saline within 2 minutes and into skin more efficiently than EMLA cream and provided rapid local anesthesia in a painless way. Gill and Prausnitz⁵⁰ designed the MNs with holes cut through the shafts to form “pockets,” which were dip coated with fluorescent model drugs and various surfactants and viscosity enhancers. It was concluded that the coated MNs released rapidly the model drugs after inserted into the skin, indicating the capabilities of MNs to control the drug delivery into skin. Additionally, Jung et al⁵¹ designed the MNs with nanopatterns on the surface and dip coated with plasmid DNA vaccinations. It was concluded that the improved hydrophilicity of nanopatterned MNs induced to enhance the loading capacity of MNs. The in vivo study revealed that higher immune responses were induced by the nanopattered MNs than by unmodified MNs. In short, the above results proved that the coated MNs have a promising potential to deliver drugs in transdermal drug delivery systems.

Dissolving MNs

Dissolving MNs deliver drugs into skin based on the mechanism of “poke-and-release” method. Quite different from “poke-and-patch” method, drugs are usually encapsulated within MNs, and MNs remain on the skin after being inserted into the skin and then the drug releasing is realized when MNs completely degrade or dissolve in the skin,^1,8 as shown in Figure 1C. These MNs have various advantages, such as easily-made, convenient, and high drug loading.⁵³ Furthermore, these MNs can eventually dissolve in the skin, thus leaving no biohazardous sharp waste and ensuring a safe disposal for remaining MNs.⁵⁴

To date, minimally invasive dissolvable MNs are effective and convenient for transdermal drug delivery. Li et al⁵⁵ fabricated the dissolving MNs made of polylactic acid (PLA) for the delivery of insulin using thermal micromolding technique. The relationships between MN dimensions, drug concentration, drug viscosity, administration time, and drug penetration into the skin were discussed. It was concluded that the shorter MNs had a better mechanical stability, while the longer MNs were more appropriate for drug permeation. The increasing of drug concentration induced the increasing of drug permeation amount, but not affected the drug permeation rate. However, with the increase in drug viscosity, the drug permeation amount decreased. Prolonging the administration time on the skin at 1 hour, the drug permeation amount achieved to a stable value and essentially unchanged after 1 hour. The in vivo study revealed that dissolving MN system promoted the insulin absorption to reduce the blood glucose levels to 29% of initial level at 5 hours. Bhatnagar et al²⁰ fabricated the dissolvable MNs made of the mixture of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) for the codelivery of doxorubicin and docetaxel. It was concluded that the pyramidal-shaped MNs fully dissolved within 1 hour after inserted into the excised skin, reduced the tumor volume and tumor weight in 4T1 tumor-bearing athymic nude mice, and indicated greater survival compared with intratumoral injection. Besides, Sullivan et al⁵⁴ fabricated the PVP MNs to deliver influenza vaccine. In detail, the MNs have a length of 650 µm and a diameter of 20 µm in the tip. The MNs dissolved 89% ± 3% (by mass) after 5 minutes application in ex vivo study and 83% ± 6% (by mass) after 15 minutes application in in vivo study and induced a strong cellular and humoral immune response after a single immunization with a low antigen dose, which can confer protective immunity against fatal viral challenge.

Hollow MNs

Hollow MN deliver drugs via the “poke-and-flow” approach. Similar to the hypodermic injection, the liquid drug can continuously flow into the skin via the holes in the hollow MNs driven by the pressure, as shown in Figure 1D. Hence, the flow rate of drug can be accurately controlled by special equipment, such as micropump.³⁴ Comparing with the solid MNs, hollow MNs are likely to promote force-driven fluid flow, thereby allowing faster drug delivery rates. Furthermore, the painless, long-term, and continuous drug delivery can be achieved by hollow MNs with precise and tunable dosage according to the need of the patients.

Hollow MNs have also been extensively used to deliver various drugs. For examples, Vinayakumar et al⁵⁶ developed a hollow stainless MN to deliver insulin into a diabetic rat. In detail, the hollow MN array with a height of 300 µm and an outer diameter of 110 µm at tip and 150 µm at the base was fabricated using femtosecond laser micromachining. The insulin was delivered into the dermis of the rat skin through hollow MN by peristaltic pump. The insulin successfully diffused into the blood stream and the blood glucose level significantly decreased to the normal level after 5 hours, indicating that the hollow MNs can efficiently replace the subcutaneous insulin delivery. Pamornpathomkul et al⁵⁷ used the hollow MNs combined with a nanocarrier delivery system to deliver plasmid DNA vaccine encoding ovalbumin. It was concluded that this complex system was good at enhancing the permeation of plasmid DNA vaccine encoding ovalbumin into skin, without inducing infection or pinpoint bleeding and inducing a strong immunoglobulin G immune response. Besides, hollow MNs are suitable for the blood extraction based on the transportation mechanism of poke and flow. Li et al⁵⁸ fabricated a hollow MN by drawing lithography technique. In detail, the hollow MN with a bevel angle of 15° has a length, inner diameter, and tip diameter of 1800, 60, and 120 μm, respectively. The hollow MNs are penetrated into the skin without rupture and extracts 20 mL mouse blood in vivo, indicating that the hollow MNs have potential applications in blood analysis systems for diagnosis.

Classified by Structure of MNs

Microneedles can be divided into 2 types based on the structures, including in-plane and out-of-plane MNs. The out-of-plane MNs show that the length of MNs is perpendicular to the substrate,^59
–61 as shown in Figure 3A. It is easy to enhance the efficiency of drug delivery on large areas of skin by out-of-plane MNs through increasing the density of MN arrays. Out-of-plane MNs can be hollow or solid MNs. Furthermore, it is also easy to manufacture the out-of-plane MNs, and the out-of-plane MNs have widely used to deliver drugs, as shown in Table 1. However, it is a challenging task to fabricate the out-of-plane MNs with high aspect ratio structures.⁶⁹ In contrast, the in-plane MNs show that the length of MNs is parallel to the substrate,^69,70 as shown in Figure 3B. The in-plane MNs can be produced into production with a wide range of lengths and easily combined with the microfluid chip techniques, but the density of in-plane MNs cannot be high enough.^1,2,8,113 Until now, only some literatures have been reported related to the in-plane MNs to deliver drugs, as shown in Table 1. For examples, Li et al⁷⁰ fabricated the in-plane silicon MNs with conical structure, tapering smoothly from the base to the apex by micromachining method. The surface of the MNs was treated with oxygen plasma to make the surface hydrophilic. These in-plane MNs were robust enough to penetrate porcine skin, being intact after the repetitive penetration. Khandan⁸¹ developed the in-plane titanium (Ti)-based MNs for passive ocular drug delivery. In detail, the in-plane MNs with length from 500 to 1500 μm, width from 50 to 200 μm, thickness of 50 μm, and needle tip angle of 60° were developed using methods of photolithographic patterning and dry-etching. The results showed that the MNs were stiffness enough for reliable corneal insertion and provided potential for enhanced safety. Additionally, Kolli and Banga²⁵ fabricated the solid maltose in-plane MNs for transdermal delivery. The in-plane MNs were manufactured to be 508.46 ± 9.32 µm in length with a radius of curvature of 3 µm at the tip, and to create microchannels with 55.42 ± 8.66 µm in diameter in the skin to improve the delivery of nicardipine hydrochloride.

Figure 3.

(A) Out-of-plane and (B) in-plane microneedles.

Table 1.

Overview of Microneedle Arrays Manufactured by Various Methods Based on Materials.

Method/Material	Microneedles Type	Structure	References
Inorganic materials
Wet-etching/silicon	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁶²
Wet-etching/silicon	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁶³
Wet-etching/silicon	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁶⁴
Wet-etching/silicon	Hollow MN	Out-of-plane	⁶¹
Dry-etching/silicon	Solid MN	In-plane	⁶⁵
Dry-etching/silicon	Hollow MN	Out-of-plane	⁶⁶
Dry-etching/silicon	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁶⁷
Reactive ion etching/silicon	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁶⁸
Deep reactive ion etching/silicon	Hollow MN	Out-of-plane	⁶⁹
Deep reactive ion etching/silicon	Solid MN	In-plane	⁷⁰
Deep reactive ion etching/silicon	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁷¹
Deep reactive ion etching/silicon	Hollow MN	Out-of-plane	⁷²
Electrochemical micromachining/silicon	Hollow MN	Out-of-plane	⁷³
Micromolding/ceramic	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁷⁴
Micromolding/bioceramic	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁷⁵
Micromolding/bioceramic	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁷⁶
Micromolding/bioceramic	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁷⁷
Two photon polymerization micromolding and pulsed laser deposition/ceramic	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁷⁸
Metal MNs
Micromolding/Ti	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁷⁹
Wire-electrode cutting and wet-etching/Ti	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁸⁰
Dry-etching/Ti	Solid MN	In-plane	⁸¹
Sputter deposition/Ti	Hollow MN	Out-of-plane	⁸²
Laser cutting/Ti	Solid MN	In-plane	⁸³
Laser cutting/SS	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁸⁴
Laser cutting/SS	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁸⁵
Laser cutting/SS	Solid MN	In-plane	⁸⁶
Laser cutting/SS	Solid MN	In-plane	⁸⁷
Laser cutting/SS	Coated MN	In-plane	⁴⁷
EDM and femtosecond laser machining/SS	Hollow MN	Out-of-plane	⁵⁶
EDM/SS	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁸⁸
Mechanical dicing and electrochemical corrosion/SS	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁸⁹
Micromilling/SS	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁹⁰
Electroplating/Ni	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁹¹
Electrodeposition/Ni	Hollow MN	Out-of-plane	⁹²
Electrodeposition/Ni	Hollow MN	Out-of-plane	⁹³
Polymeric MNs
Hot embossing/PLLA	Coated MN	Out-of-plane	⁴⁸
Hot embossing/PMMA	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁹²
Hot embossing/PLA	Coated MN/dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	⁹⁴
Hot embossing/PLGA	Dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	⁹⁵
Hot embossing/PCL	Dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	⁹⁶
Injection/PMMA	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁹⁷
Injection/PGA	Dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	⁹⁸
Injection/nylon-6	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	⁹⁸
Injection/liquid crystal polymer	Coated MN	Out-of-plane	⁹⁹
Injection/polycarbonate	Hollow MN	Out-of-plane	¹⁰⁰
Micromolding/PLA	Dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	⁵⁵
Micromolding/PGA, PLA, PLGA	Dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	¹⁰¹
Micromolding/PCL	Dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	¹⁰²
Micromolding/PVA	Dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	¹⁰³
Casting/mixture of PVA and PVP	Dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	¹⁰⁴
Casting/mixture of PVA, dextran, and CMC	Dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	¹⁰⁵
Casting/mixture of CMC and AP	Dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	¹⁰⁶
Casting/PGA	Dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	¹⁰⁷
Photolithography/PEGDA	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	¹⁰⁸
Photolithography/PEGDA	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	¹⁰⁹
Photolithography/PEGDA	Solid MN	Out-of-plane	¹¹⁰
Heat imprint lithography/PLA	Dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	¹¹¹
Laser writing/SU-8	Hollow MN	Out-of-plane	⁵
3-Dimensional printing/PLA	Dissolving MN	Out-of-plane	¹¹²

Abbreviations: AP, amylopectin; CMC, carboxymethyl cellulose; EDM, electric discharge machining; MNs, microneedles; PEGDA, polyethylene glycol diacrylate; PCL, polycaprolactone; PGA, polyglycolic acid; PLA, polylactic acid; PLGA, polylactic-co-glycolic acid; PLLA, poly (l-lactide); PMMA, polymethyl methacrylate; PVA, polyvinyl alcohol; PVP, polyvinylpyrrolidone; SS, stainless steel.

Classified by Materials of MNs

Traditionally, materials used for MNs are inorganic materials, metals, and polymer. We subsequently introduce each type of materials in detail.

Inorganic materials

The inorganic materials used to fabricate MNs are silicon,^62,63,70,114 glass,^115
–117 and ceramic.^74,75 Until now, the inorganic materials have been used as structural materials to fabricate solid MNs, coated MNs, and hollow MNs.^{39,61,63
–65,70,75,76,118} Hereinto, silicon is the most common inorganic materials for manufacturing various MNs. The silicon is relative high hardness; therefore, the silicon MNs are easily to be penetrated into skin. However, silicon MNs are easy to break off during the process of insertion into the skin due to the fragile property. Therefore, these MNs may stay underneath the skin after used and induce inflammation because silicon is not well established as biocompatible materials like some polymers and metals (such as Ti, stainless steel [SS]), which limits their wide applications.^1,8,66 Glass is also a kind of brittle material, and the glass MNs may meet the same problems after penetrated into skin. Ceramic has generated great interest from researchers over years and also widely been used to produce MNs. Alumina, zirconia, and calcium sulfate hemihydrate are commonly used to fabricate MNs. However, most sintered ceramics (eg, alumina) are brittle and nonresorbable, which may induce unwanted inflammation after breaking in the skin.^75,119 Hence, biodegradable bioceramic MNs (BCMNs) have been developed and proved to have improved mechanical strength to be penetrated into the skin, without keeping so much biohazardous sharp waste in the skin. Moreover, the BCMNs can control the drug release well via controlling the factors, such as the porosity, surface, and degradation.^75,76

Metal

Various metals, such as SS,^51,61,84,88 Ti,^81,83,120 and nickel (Ni),92 have been used as structural materials to fabricate solid MNs, coated MNs, and hollow MNs. Metals have strong mechanical strength and toughness for the transdermal drug delivery system.⁵³ However, metals are nonbiodegradable, which may produce unwanted biohazardous tip waste induced by the broken MNs left behind in the skin, even though some metals, such as SS and Ti, have been safely used as biomaterials in medical treatment for decades.^121,122

Polymer

Nowadays, polymeric MNs have attracted great attention of researchers because most polymeric MNs are biocompatible and biodegradable to avoid harsh side effects in the skin, providing a safe device for the delivery of drugs.^{30,104,112,123} Polymeric materials have been efficiently fabricated into solid MNs, coated MNs, dissolving MNs, and hollow MNs, including polymethyl methacrylate,^21,97,124 PLA,^55,94,112 polyglycolic acid,^101,98 polylactic-co-glycolic acid),^95,125 PVP,^{22,54,104,126} polycaprolactone (PCL),^102,127 PVA,^103,105 and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC).^106,128,129 However, most polymers are too soft to induce the buckling failure during the insertion process.⁸ Therefore, some complex structural materials such as PCL-polyethylene glycol (PCL/PEG),¹²⁷ CMC-amylopectin,¹⁰⁶ PVP-cyclodextrin,¹³⁰ and PVA-PLA¹³¹ are used to prepare the MNs to increase the mechanical strength during insertion process. Besides, geometry properties of polymeric MNs have been investigated well to improve the mechanical strength. For example, Li et al⁵⁵ systemically investigated the mechanical stability of PLA MNs, evaluated by the relationship between percentage of successful insertions and the number of MNs on the patch. In detail, the MN array with heights of 0, 600, 700, and 800 µm were prepared and used to treat porcine cadaver skins. The results showed that the MN patches with lower height resulted in better mechanical strength. Chen et al¹⁰² fabricated MNs with various types of aspect ratio and the results demonstrated that the MNs with a smaller aspect ratio also exhibited higher mechanical strength. Gittard et al¹³² also proved that a decrease in the aspect ratio of MN induced to an increase in mechanical strength. Recently, a type of MN array with separable arrowhead was fabricated. This MN array combines the mechanical strength of metal and dissolving property of polymer to eliminate biohazardous sharp waste and improve strength of MNs so as to be penetrated into skin for the enhancing capacity of delivering drugs.¹³³

Other materials such as sugars (eg, maltose, trehalose, sucrose) are also attractive materials to fabricate the dissolving MNs. For example, Loizidou et al¹³⁴ fabricated the MNs based on sugar materials of CMC/maltose, CMC/trehalose, and CMC/sucrose, respectively, by the vacuum deposition method. Nguyen and Banga¹³⁵ also prepared the MNs based on maltose by micromolding technique. The maltose MNs can rapidly dissolve and increase the permeability of drugs through skin.

Fabrication of MNs

To accurately produce the microstructures of the MNs, many researchers have attempted to develop fabricating methods of MNs based on the materials. Table 1 presents an overview of various techniques to fabricate the MNs made of polymer, inorganic materials, and metal.

Fabrication of Inorganic Material MNs

Since the first solid MNs made of silicon by reactive ion etching (RIE)¹³⁶ was reported, the techniques to fabricate the silicon MNs have been developed for years. Not only wet-etching and dry-etching but also electrochemical micromachining have already been used to fabricate silicon MNs, such as solid, hollow, in-plane, and out-of-plane MNs. These methods have also been used together to make silicon MNs. For example, Jurčíček et al⁶¹ prepared the hollow silicon MNs with a height of more than 100 µm and a hole diameter of 10 to 25 µm under the condition of 40% KOH solution and a water bath temperature of 87°C using the deep RIE and anisotropic wet-etching technique. These manufacturing techniques in Table 1 offer the potential for high production of MNs, but the processing of some methods for making silicon MNs requires clean room and the manufacturing methods for MNs are relative expensive and complicated.^2,8,35

Micromolding is the most common method to make BCMNs or ceramic MNs. Generally, in this fabricating method, the MN master templates were first prepared by microfabrication methods, after that the ceramic slurry was filled into the cavities of molds, and then the ceramic MNs were formed when the ceramic materials were dried.¹¹⁹ Traditionally, poly(dimethyl siloxane) mold^74,77 was usually used to fabricate ceramic MNs or BCMNs with nanopores. The porosity, grain size, and morphology of MNs can be controlled well through slurry process.¹³⁷ Cai et al⁷⁶ have prepared the BCMNs with flexible and self-swelling substrate (BCMN-Gs) by the micromolding technique. The process of micromolding technique used to produce this BCMNs is illustrated in Figure 4. Briefly, the homogenous paste, which is the mixture of α calcium sulfate hemihydrate and water, was filled in the cavities of the negative replica and then the needles formed after cured in the ambient conditions. Finally, the warmed gelatin solution was poured on the top of the mold and cross-linked in the desiccators overnight under ambient conditions. In addition, 2 photon polymerization micromolding was also developed to fabricate the ceramic MNs.^7
8,138

Figure 4.

Micromolding process to fabricate BCMN-G. BCMN-G indicates bioceramic microneedle with gelatin substrate. (Images reprinted with permission from Cai et al.⁷⁶)

Glass MNs are usually manufactured by pulling of glass rods using pipette puller.^{115
–117,139} For example, Mahadevan et al¹¹⁶ used a pipette puller to fabricate the glass MNs based on borosilicate glass capillary tubes. Peter et al¹³⁹ fabricated the MNs with fine gradually tapered shape (angles between 0.02° and 0.66°) by pulling of borosilicate glass rods using a micropipette puller. The MNs were cut into different finial length by platinum wire. After that, the tips were fire polished until smooth and then the MNs were bent into a 90° cantilever by the microforge.

Fabrication of Metal MNs

Ti and SS are the 2 types of metals to fabricate MNs due to their biocompatibility and good fracture toughness. Various fabricating methods, including dry-etching, wet-etching, laser cutting, electroplating (or electrodeposition), micromilling, electric discharge machining (EDM), and micromolding techniques, have been used either alone or in combination to make Ti or SS MNs, as shown in Table 1. Ni, as a common metal, has also been used to make hollow and solid MNs by electrodeposition or electroplating. Other methods, such as twisted-light laser ablation¹⁴⁰ and electrochemical corrosion, have been developed to make metal MNs. Hereinto, electrodeposition and laser machining are often used to produce the hollow metal MNs.

Fabrication of Polymeric MNs

Polymer materials are now widely used to fabricate the MNs because polymers are inexpensive and easy to mass production due to their uncomplicated fabrication and low cost.^{1,3,141
–143} The most common manufacturing technique for polymeric MNs is micromolding method, including hot embossing, injection, and casting.^144

–148 After the master mold for MNs are fabricated, MNs can be produced efficiently and stably via micromolding techniques until the mold breaks. These maser molds with desired microstructures were usually produced via techniques such as LIGA (the abbreviation of lithographie, galvanoformung, and abformung), EDM, micromilling and microgrinding techniques, and laser percussion drilling, which have been described in detail in the reference.¹⁴⁹ Other methods, such as photolithography, heat imprint lithography, and laser writing, were also used to fabricate polymeric MNs. Dardano et al¹⁰⁸ have used the photolithographic approach to fabricate MNs made of polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) with different shape, length, and tip. In the group of Kang,^109,110 photolithographic approach was widely used to prepare the polymeric MNs. Recently, the 3-dimensional printing has been developed for polymeric MNs. All these methods have been achieved based on the advantage of versatility of polymer, including viscosity, dissolution properties, and postmodification.^{13,150

–156}

Application of MNs

Microneedles are convenient, safe, and painless enough to achieve the comfort of patient and now widely used in transdermal, ocular, and intracellular delivery.^10,12,34,131 Hereinto, transdermal drug delivery is the main area for the application of MNs.

Microneedle Delivery of Vaccine

Traditionally, most vaccines are administered intramuscularly or subcutaneously, and the route of administration is relatively painful. Today, MNs array system has been widely studied for delivery of vaccine and is comparable to the conventional routes of administration.

DNA vaccines are considered to be the effective candidates of conventional vaccines because they can generate strong cellular and humoral immune responses, are inexpensively, and can be manufactured easily.^51,157,158 However, DNA vaccines often exhibit an immune response weaker than expected when administered intramuscularly to patients because of the low efficient delivery of plasmid DNA into host cell, which induces the low expression of encoded antigen.¹⁵⁹ Thus, a suitable DNA vaccines delivery system is considered a key method to improve the immunization results. Microneedles can deliver DNA vaccine into the skin to improve the immune responses induced by the enhancing expression of encoded antigen and become an effective delivering method for DNA vaccines.

Kim et al¹⁵⁸ used the MNs coated with pH-responsive polyelectrolyte multilayer assembly to deliver functional polyplexes containing DNA vaccines. It was concluded that in in vivo experiment on mice, compared with the traditional subcutaneous injection method, MNs were able to release polyplexes rapidly into skin and induced strong humoral immune response. The mechanism of polyplexes containing DNA vaccine releasing from MNs is shown in Figure 5A. In brief, after the 16 bilayers of heparin and albumin were coated alternatively on the MNs, cationic polyplexes containing plasmid DNA were deposited on the outermost of heparin film layers via electrostatic interaction. Finally, multilayer films rapidly disintegrated to release polyplexes from MN arrays after inserted into skin at pH 7.4. In addition, Man-DA3 is utilized to form the polyplexes for target gene delivery to the resident antigen-presenting cells (APCs) into dermis, and dermal APCs can express high levels of mannose receptors and mannose receptor-related receptors. The mechanism of delivery of polyplexes with surface mannose moieties into intradermal resident APCs after release from the MNs was illustrated in Figure 5B.

Figure 5.

(A) Description of functional polyplexes released from MNs coated with pH-responsive PMA after applied on the skin. (B) Illustration of delivery of polyplexes with surface mannose moieties to intradermal resident APCs after releasing from MNs. APC indicates antigen-presenting cells; MNs microneedles; PMA, polyelectrolyte multilayer assembly. (Images reprinted with permission from Kim et al.¹⁵⁸)

Zhang et al¹⁵⁹ conducted the experiment of delivery of DNA vaccine by MNs with pyramid shape on the shaved mouse ear pinna or dorsal skin. The results showed that the MNs can be superior to conventional syringe injection in respect of both protein expression resulting from intradermal delivery of DNA vaccine and immunogenicity. Microneedles also prolonged the protein expression compared to the syringe injection. For example, MN delivery gave a 18.6-fold higher level of green fluorescent protein expression in the ear and more than 4-fold higher in dorsal skin than syringe injection.

Every year, there is about 3 to 5 million serious diseases and 250 000 to 500 000 deaths induced by influenza.^160,161 Vaccination is the main method to control seasonal influenza via improving protection against the illness and reducing the risk of death and hospitalization caused by influenza-related complications.¹⁶² The MNs array system has been investigated for influenza immunization due to the efficient and precise delivery of vaccine. Kim et al⁴⁷ used the fabricated SS-coated MNs to deliver influenza vaccine into skin. After coating the SS MNs with the optimized vaccine formulation, vaccine delivered into the skin via MNs induced strong systemic and functional antibodies, and provided complete protection against fatal challenge infection, similar to conventional intramuscular injection. Later on, Kim et al⁴⁵ investigated the SS-coated MNs to deliver influenza virus-like particle vaccine into skin. It was also concluded that the vaccine generated strong antibody response and provided full protection against high-dose fatal challenge infection. Numbers of human trials for assessing the safety, tolerability, and immune response generation with various MN devices, such as MicronJet (Nanopass Technologies Ltd., Ness Ziona, Israel)¹⁶⁰ and BD Soluvia (New Jersey, USA),¹⁶³ have been conducted. Bhatnagar et al² have already reviewed in detail the successful application of these MN devices on the delivery of influenza vaccine and the results reveal that the influenza vaccine is well against influenza. In summary, MN array system provides an important advance in the delivery of vaccine to enhance the strong cellular immunity, indicating that MNs will have a great influence on drugs used for vaccination in the future.

Microneedle Delivery of Insulin

Diabetes mellitus is a complex metabolic diseases caused by abnormal insulin level in the whole world. Its main manifestations are increased glucose production in the liver and decreased clearance of glucose into muscle and fat, resulting in obvious hyperglycemia in the blood.^10,164–165 There is approximately 425 million adults suffering from diabetes, and the number of globally diabetic patients is estimated to be 439 million by 2030.^10,53,166 Insulin administration is required to control blood glucose levels for patients suffering from various types of diabetes. Traditionally, the delivery of insulin is conducted by methods ranging from smaller gauge needles to insulin pen to insulin jet injector and to insulin pump.¹⁶⁷ However, the exogenous insulin delivered by these methods does not closely match the physiological release of insulin, which often causes inadequate glycemic control and subsequent negative consequences. For example, too low dose of insulin will induce the blindness and kidney failure for patients, while too high dose of insulin will induce hypoglycemia, which will cause seizures, loss of consciousness, and even death.⁵³ Microneedle delivery system is the expected technique to deliver the insulin, closely matching the need of patient. Numbers of published literatures have grown steadily these years, showing that the MN delivery system is attractive carrier for insulin delivery.

Ling and Chen¹⁶⁸ fabricated a dissolving MN patch composed of starch and gelatin for the transdermal delivery of insulin to diabetic rats. The dissolving MNs were administrated by a homemade applicator to the diabetic rat, as shown in Figure 6. It was concluded that the dissolving MNs are strength enough to penetrate into skin painlessly and completely dissolve after being inserted into the skin for 5 minutes. Insulin was rapidly released into skin, resulting in similar hypoglycemic effect in rats like a subcutaneous injection.

Figure 6.

The schematic illustration of the microneedles used for delivery of insulin. (Images reprinted with permission from Ling and Chen.¹⁶⁸)

Resnik et al¹¹⁸ used the hollow silicon MNs with length of 220 μm, out diameter of 130 μm, and inner diameter of 50 µm to deliver insulin. The in vivo results implied that the hollow MNs improved transdermal delivery of fast-acting insulin without causing any skin irritation or inflammation at the delivery sites. At almost the same injection dose, compared with the subcutaneous injection, hollow MNs showed no significant decrease in glucose level, but significant increase in serum insulin. Zhang et al¹⁶⁹ used the calcium ion cross-linked alginate/maltose composite MNs with pyramidal shape to deliver insulin into rats. These prepared MNs exhibited strong mechanical properties with the maximum failure force of about 0.41 N/needle to be penetrated into the skin. It was concluded that the MNs successfully triggered the releasing of insulin and had obvious and effective hypoglycemic effect compared with subcutaneous injection. Additionally, Yu et al⁷⁷ used the fabricated BCMNs for insulin transdermal delivery. The made MNs were strength enough to be penetrated into skin. Insulin released from the MNs also exhibited an effective and obvious hypoglycemic effect. There are still many other literatures related to insulin delivered by MNs, which have not been illustrated in this review. Jin et al¹⁷⁰ have comprehensively introduced the MNs for insulin delivery in clinical trials. It was indicated that the MNs for insulin delivery are expected to pave the way for noninvasive regulation of glucose level for diabetic patients.

Microneedle Delivery of Other Drugs

Lidocaine is a class drug for local anesthesia and is usually delivered for pre- and postoperative anesthesia either alone or in combination with other drugs.^99,171 Transcutaneous injection are often used to deliver lidocaine. However, the traditional method can cause local and systemic effect to the patients, including unpleasant feeling (eg, fear, pain, anxiety), erythema, and edema occurred in topical application, increasing risk of unexpected diffusion and inadequate placement of lidocaine.^172,173 Hence, MN delivery system has been investigated to be an alternative traditional delivery method of lidocaine.

Kathuria et al¹⁷¹ used the MNs made of PEGDA by photolithography to deliver lidocaine into skin. The in vitro and in vivo experiment results showed that MN can deliver lidocaine into the skin perpendicularly and release the active ingredient to alleviate acute and chronic pain. Zhang et al⁹⁹ fabricated the coated MNs via injection. The lidocaine was coated to the MNs by dip-coating process. The MN was used to deliver lidocaine into the skin of swine. The in vivo results revealed that the lidocaine dissolved rapidly off the MNs into skin within seconds and induced local analgesia about 1 minute, facilitating routine or emergency procedures. Additionally, Baek et al¹⁸ also prepared the coated MNs made of PLLA using micromolding technique for the delivery of lidocaine into porcine ears. Dip-coating device was used to coat lidocaine onto the MNs. The results revealed that the lidocaine on the MNs was released into phosphate-buffered saline within 2 minutes and its storages stability could last for 3 weeks at different temperatures. These MNs also showed more efficient delivery of lidocaine than the commercial EMLA cream.

Acetyl salicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) is commonly used for pain relief and anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular treatment. Due to the gastrointestinal side effects and low bioavailability of oral administration, MNs delivery system is becoming an alternative method for the delivery of ASA.^174,175 Olatunji et al¹⁷⁵ conducted the experiment on the delivery of ASA on the porcine skin. The result revealed that the release of ASA from fish scale biopolymer transdermal patches via the “poke-and-patch” method was greatly enhanced after pretreating the porcine skin with the solid metal MNs.

In addition, MNs are widely used to deliver other large-molecular-weight drugs, such as protein,^28,176 DNA,^177,178 and peptides,^31,179 and small-molecular-weight drugs, such as dyclonine developed for topical anesthesia,¹⁸⁰ zolmitriptan developed for acute treatment of migraine,¹⁸¹ naltrexone used to treat opiate and alcohol dependence,¹⁸² and so on. Besides, MNs can be also one of the methods used to detect the tumors^183,184 and to continuously real time monitor alcohol,¹⁸⁵ glucose,¹⁸⁶ and so on for patients, since they can be penetrated into skin with negligible damage or pain.

Conclusions and Outlook

After the first MN reported for the drug delivery in 1971, MNs have been developed over 4 decades. Compared to the traditional drug delivery system, MNs have been demonstrated to be safe and successful enough to deliver various drugs. So far, MNs have been made of a variety of materials, including polymers, metals, silicon, ceramics, glass, and sugar. Researchers have already made great achievements in the fabrication techniques of MNs based on these materials. Solid, coated, dissolved, and hollow MNs have been developed to deliver drugs with wide range of molecules. Furthermore, the in-plane and out-of-plane MNs are also fabricated for the special requirement in the delivery of drugs.

Despite great successes of the MNs in the transdermal drug and vaccine delivery, there still exist some challenges for the long-term use of MNs. One of the challenges of MNs is that although doses and delivering rate of drug can be controlled well by MNs through some devices, and some MNs can be used to monitor situation of patients, most current MNs are unable to change the delivery parameters in time upon the changing condition of patients. Hence, it is urgent to develop the super-MNs in the future, which are consisted of MNs, biosensor, bioelectronics, automation, and so on, and are able to monitor patient conditions, rapidly change the delivery parameters (such as pH, temperature, and dose) in response to the information of patient, realize the diagnostic and treatment purpose simultaneously, and increase the compliance of patient with the minimal side effects.

In addition, there are already some MN devices on the market, which have brought good clinical outcomes for the delivery of insulin, influenza vaccine, and lidocaine. However, most MNs are still in experimental phases. To move more MNs into market further, narrowing the gap between laboratory research and clinical applications is a must in the future. To achieve this goal, manufacturing process should be optimized and validated to the current manufacturing standards, and more comprehensive in vivo study and clinical trials are important to achieve the requirements of regulatory system. Moreover, MNs should be designed well to balance the pain, mechanical strength, quantity of drugs, and stable drug formulation; be fabricated with a relatively low cost to obtain sufficient and reproducible penetration; and be easily handled by all patients.

In spite of these problems, due to the unique properties of MNs, more efficient and advanced MN system will be developed for the market in the near future. Definitely, MNs system for transdermal drug and vaccine delivery will have a great impact on the future medicine.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51673020 and 51173015), the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (No. JD1910), and the Talents Introduction Project in Beijing University of Chemical Technology (No. buctrc201909).

ORCID iD

Jingyao Sun

References

Van der Maaden

Jiskoot

Bouwstra

. Microneedle technologies for (trans)dermal drug and vaccine delivery. J Control Release. 2012;161(2):645–655.

Bhatnagar

Dave

Venuganti

VVK

. Microneedles in the clinic. J Control Release. 2017;260:164–182.

Kim

Seo

. Transdermal drug delivery devices based on microneedles: a review. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2015;1(1):5–14.

Lee

Prausnitz

. Drug delivery using microneedle patches: not just for skin. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2018;15(6):541–543.

Mishra

Maiti

Bhattacharyya

. Design and scalable fabrication of hollow SU-8 microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. IEEE Sens J. 2018;18(14):5635–5644.

Ventrelli

Marsilio Strambini

Barillaro

. Microneedles for transdermal biosensing: current picture and future direction. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4(17):2606–2640.

Ito

Hirono

Fukushima

Sugioka

Takada

. Two-layered dissolving microneedles formulated with intermediate-acting insulin. Int J Pharm. 2012;436(1-2):387–393.

. Microneedle, bio-microneedle and bio-inspired microneedle: a review. J Control Release. 2017;251:11–23.

Haj-Ahmad

Khan

Arshad

, et al. Microneedle coating techniques for transdermal drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2015;7(4):486–502.

10.

Zhang

Kahkoska

Wang

Buse

. Advances in transdermal insulin delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;139:51–70. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.1012.1006.

11.

Bekir

Emrullah

Rakesh

, et al. Dissolvable microneedle arrays for intradermal delivery of biologics: fabrication and application. Pharm Res. 2013;31(1):117–135.

12.

Leite-Silva

Mariana Mandelli

Aurélie

Jeffrey

Michael

. Delivery of drugs applied topically to the skin. Exp Rev Dermatol. 2014;7(4):383–397.

13.

Fonseca

DFS

Vilela

Silvestre

AJD

Freire

CSR

. A compendium of current developments on polysaccharide and protein-based microneedles. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;136:704–728.

14.

Donnelly

Singh

TRR

Woolfson

, Microneedle-based drug delivery systems: microfabrication, drug delivery, and safety. Drug Deliv. 2010;17(4):187–207.

15.

Gerstel

Place

. Drug delivery device. 1976, Google Patents. U.S. Patent No. 3,964,482.

16.

Martin

Allender

Brain

Morrissey

Birchall

. Low temperature fabrication of biodegradable sugar glass microneedles for transdermal drug delivery applications. J Control Release. 2012;158(1):93–101.

17.

Xie

Gao

. Controlled transdermal delivery of model drug compounds by MEMS microneedle array. Nanomedicine. 2005;1(2):184–190. 2005;1(2):184–190.

18.

Baek

Shin

Kim

. Drug-coated microneedles for rapid and painless local anesthesia. Biomed Microdevices. 2017;19(1):2.

19.

González-Vázquez

Larrañeta

McCrudden

MTC

, et al. Transdermal delivery of gentamicin using dissolving microneedle arrays for potential treatment of neonatal sepsis. J Control Release. 2017;265:30–40.

20.

Bhatnagar

Bankar

Kulkarni

Venuganti

VVK

. Dissolvable microneedle patch containing doxorubicin and docetaxel is effective in 4T1 xenografted breast cancer mouse model. Int J Pharm. 2019;556:263–275.

21.

Moon

Lee

. A novel fabrication method of a microneedle array using inclined deep X-ray exposure. J Micromech Microeng. 2005;15(5):903–911.

22.

Deng

Juang

. Polydimethyl siloxane wet etching for three dimensional fabrication of microneedle array and high-aspect-ratio micropillars. Biomicrofluidics. 2014;8(2):026502.

23.

Sun

Huang

, et al. Simple and affordable way to achieve polymeric superhydrophobic surfaces with biomimetic hierarchical roughness. ACS Omega. 2019;4(2):2750–2757.

24.

Sun

Xiaobing

Jinghua

, et al. Biomimetic moth-eye nanofabrication: enhanced antireflection with superior self-cleaning characteristic. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):5438.

25.

Kolli

Banga

. Characterization of solid maltose microneedles and their use for transdermal delivery. Pharmaceut Res. 2007;25(1):104–113.

26.

Miyano

Tobinaga

Kanno

, et al. Sugar micro needles as transdermic drug delivery system. Biomed Microdevic. 2005;7(3):185–188.

27.

Pistor

MLP

. Device for cutaneous therapeutic treatment. 1975;Google Patents. U.S. Patent No. 3,918,449.

28.

Witting

Obst

Pietzsch

Friess

Hedtrich

. Feasibility study for intraepidermal delivery of proteins using a solid microneedle array. Int J Pharm. 2015;486(1-2):52–58.

29.

Giri Nandagopal

Rahul

Rangabhashiyam

Nidhin

Selvaraju

. Overview of microneedle system: a third generation transdermal drug delivery approach. Microsyst Technol. 2014;20(7):1249–1272.

30.

Sun

Shen

Chen

, et al. Nanofiller reinforced biodegradable PLA/PHA composites: current status and future trends. Polymers. 2018;10(5):505.

31.

Zhang

Qiu

Gao

. Enhanced delivery of hydrophilic peptides in vitro by transdermal microneedle pretreatment. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2014;4(1):100–104.

32.

Nayak

Das

Vladisavljević

. Microneedle-assisted permeation of lidocaine carboxymethylcellulose with gelatine co-polymer hydrogel. Pharmaceut Res. 2013;31(5):1170–1184.

33.

Bhatnagar

Kumari

Pattarabhiran

Venuganti

VVK

. Zein microneedles for localized delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to treat breast cancer: drug loading, release behavior, and skin permeation studies. AAPS Pharm Sci Technol. 2018;19(4):1818–1826.

34.

Kim

Park

Prausnitz

. Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(14):1547–1568.

35.

Tuan-Mahmood

McCrudden

Torrisi

, et al. Microneedles for intradermal and transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013;50(5):623–637.

36.

Gill

Prausnitz

. Coated microneedles for transdermal delivery. J Control Release. 2007;117(2):227–237.

37.

Caudill

Perry

Tian

Luft

DeSimone

. Spatially controlled coating of continuous liquid interface production microneedles for transdermal protein delivery. J Control Release. 2018;284:122–132.

38.

Chen

Prow

Crichton

, et al. Dry-coated microprojection array patches for targeted delivery of immunotherapeutics to the skin. J Control Release. 2009;139(3):212–220.

39.

McGrath

Vrdoljak

O’Mahony

Oliveira

Moore

Crean

. Determination of parameters for successful spray coating of silicon microneedle arrays. Int J Pharm. 2011;415(1-2):140–149.

40.

Mehta

Haj-Ahmad

Rasekh

, et al. Pharmaceutical and biomaterial engineering via electrohydrodynamic atomization technologies. Drug Discov Today. 2017;22(1):157–165.

41.

Uddin

Scoutaris

Klepetsanis

Chowdhry

Prausnitz

Douroumis

. Inkjet printing of transdermal microneedles for the delivery of anticancer agents. Int J Pharm. 2015;494(2):593–602.

42.

Ross

. Inkjet printing of insulin microneedles for transdermal delivery. Drug Deliv Translation Res. 2015;5(4):451–461.

43.

Economidou

Lamprou

Douroumis

. 3D printing applications for transdermal drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2018;544(2):415–424.

44.

O’mahony

Leonie

Tobias

, et al. Accuracy and feasibility of piezoelectric inkjet coating technology for applications in microneedle-based transdermal delivery. Microelectronic Eng. 2017;172:19–25. doi:org/10.1016/j.mee.2017.02.018.

45.

Kim

Fu-Shi

Richard

, et al. Formulation of microneedles coated with influenza virus-like particle vaccine. AAPS Pharm Sci Technol. 2010;11(3):1193–1201.

46.

Zeng

Gammon

Tostanoski

Chiu

Jewell

. In vivo expansion of melanoma-specific T cells using microneedle arrays coated with immune-polyelectrolyte multilayers. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;3(2):195–205.

47.

Kim

Quan

Compans

Kang

Prausnitz

. Formulation and coating of microneedles with inactivated influenza virus to improve vaccine stability and immunogenicity. J Control Release. 2010;142(2):187–195.

48.

Han

Dae

Seong

, et al. Improvement in antigen-delivery using fabrication of a grooves-embedded microneedle array. Sens Actuat Chem. 2009;137(1):274–280.

49.

Shen

Ying

Xiang

Xiaolin

. The fabrication and property of a novel coated out-of-plane microneedle arrays. Microsys Technol. 2015;22(1):143–149.

50.

Gill

Prausnitz

. Pocketed microneedles for drug delivery to the skin. J Phys Chem Solids. 2008;69(5-6):1537–1541.

51.

Jung

Rejinold

Kwak

Park

Kim

. Nano-patterning of a stainless steel microneedle surface to improve the dip-coating efficiency of a DNA vaccine and its immune response. Colloids Surf B Biointerf. 2017;159:54–61.

52.

Ullah

Kim

C M

Kim

. Porous polymer coatings on metal microneedles for enhanced drug delivery. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;5(4):171609.

53.

Hao

Zhou

Yang

Qian

. Microneedles-based transdermal drug delivery systems: a review. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2017;13(12):1581–1597.

54.

Sullivan

Koutsonanos

Del Pilar Martin

, et al. Dissolving polymer microneedle patches for influenza vaccination. Nat Med. 2010;16(8):915–920.

55.

Jia Nan

Bo Zhi

Qi Lei

Xin Dong

. A solid polymer microneedle patch pretreatment enhances the permeation of drug molecules into the skin. RSC Adv. 2017;7(25):15408–15415.

56.

Vinayakumar

Prachit

Nayak

, et al. A hollow stainless steel microneedle array to deliver insulin to a diabetic rat. J Micromech Microeng. 2016;26(6):065013.

57.

Pamornpathomkul

Wongkajornsilp

Laiwattanapaisal

Rojanarata

Opanasopit

Ngawhirunpat

. A combined approach of hollow microneedles and nanocarriers for skin immunization with plasmid DNA encoding ovalbumin. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:885–898.

58.

Lee

Jung

. An optimized hollow microneedle for minimally invasive blood extraction. Biomed Microdevices. 2012;15(1):17–25.

59.

Rodgers

Courtenay

Donnelly

. Dissolving microneedles for intradermal vaccination: manufacture, formulation, and stakeholder considerations. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2018;15(11):1039–1043.

60.

Zhu

Shen

Ying

, et al. Characterization of out-of-plane cone metal microneedles and the function of transdermal delivery. Microsyst Technol. 2012;19(4):617–621.

61.

Jurčíček

Helin

Shuiping

Chong

. Design and fabrication of hollow out-of-plane silicon microneedles. Micro Nano Lett. 2013;8(2):78–81.

62.

Mulcahy

Morrissey

. Process optimization and characterization of silicon microneedles fabricated by wet etch technology. Microelectron J. 2005;36(7):650–656.

63.

Pradeep Narayanan

Raghavan

. Solid silicon microneedles for drug delivery applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;93(1-4):407–422.

64.

Yan

Jing-Quan

Shui-Dong

, et al. Fabrication and testing analysis of tapered silicon microneedles for drug delivery applications. Microelectronic Eng. 2013;111:33–38.

65.

Izumi

Aoyagi

. Novel fabrication method for long silicon microneedles with three-dimensional sharp tips and complicated shank shapes by isotropic dry etching. IEEJ Trans Elect Electronic Eng. 2007;2(3):328–334.

66.

Vinayakumar

Hegde

Nayak

, et al. Fabrication and characterization of gold coated hollow silicon microneedle array for drug delivery. Microelectron Eng. 2014;128:12–18.

67.

Held

Gaspar

Ruther

, et al. Design of experiment characterization of microneedle fabrication processes based on dry silicon etching. J Micromech Microeng. 2010.20(2):025024.

68.

Chen

Wei

Tay

FEH

, et al. Silicon microneedle array with biodegradable tips for transdermal drug delivery. Microsyst Technol. 2008;14(7):1015–1019.

69.

Ashraf

Tayyaba

Nisar

, et al. Design, fabrication and analysis of silicon hollow microneedles for transdermal drug delivery system for treatment of hemodynamic dysfunctions. Cardiovasc Eng. 2010;10(3):91–108.

70.

Hang

Ruifeng

, et al. In-plane silicon microneedles with open capillary microfluidic networks by deep reactive ion etching and sacrificial layer based sharpening. Sens Actuat A Phy. 2019;292:149–157. doi:org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.04.008.

71.

Rouhi

Jung-Kubiak

White

Wilson

Anderson

Marrese-Readin

. Fabrication of 3-D silicon microneedles using a single-step DRIE process. J Microelectromech Sys. 2015.24(5):1409–1414.

72.

Khanna

Luongo

Strom

Bhansali

. Sharpening of hollow silicon microneedles to reduce skin penetration force. J Micromech Microeng. 2010.20(4):045011.

73.

Longo

Strambini

Ventrelli

Barillaro

. Silicon microneedles for transdermal applications by electrochemical micromachining technology. IEEE Sens. 2014;691–693. doi:10.1109/ICSENS.2014.6985093.

74.

Bystrova

Luttge

. Micromolding for ceramic microneedle arrays. Microelectronic Eng. 2011;88(8):1681–1684.

75.

Vallhov

Wei

Håkan

, et al. Bioceramic microneedle arrays are able to deliver OVA to dendritic cells in human skin. J Mater Chemist B. 2018;6(42):6808–6816.

76.

Cai

Xia

Bredenberg

Engqvist

. Bioceramic microneedles with flexible and self-swelling substrate. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;94:404–410.

77.

Jiang

Liu

, et al. Transdermal delivery of insulin with bioceramic composite microneedles fabricated by gelatin and hydroxyapatite. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;73:425–428.

78.

Gittard

Narayan

Jin

, et al. Pulsed laser deposition of antimicrobial silver coating on Ormocer® microneedles. Biofabrication. 2009;1(4):041001.

79.

Liu

Zhou

, et al. Fabrication of a Ti porous microneedle array by metal injection molding for transdermal drug delivery. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0172043.

80.

Yan

Liu

Jiang

, et al. Fabrication and testing of porous Ti microneedles for drug delivery. Micro Nano Lett. 2013;8(12):906–908.

81.

Khandan

. Titanium-Based, Fenestrated, In-Plane Microneedles for Passive Ocular Drug Delivery. Paper presented at: 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS San Diego, California, USA, 28 August–1 September 2012: 6572–6575.

82.

Tsuchiya

Nakanishi

Uetsuji

Nakamachi

. Development of blood extraction system for health monitoring system. Biomed Microdevices. 2005;7(4):347–353.

83.

Zhang

Chen

. Design, fabrication and characterization of in-plane titanium microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Key Eng Mater. 2011;483:532–536.

84.

Rajabi

Roxhed

Shafagh

, et al. Flexible and stretchable microneedle patches with integrated rigid stainless steel microneedles for transdermal biointerfacing. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0166330.

85.

Gupta

Gill

Andrews

Prausnitz

. Kinetics of skin resealing after insertion of microneedles in human subjects. J Control Release. 2011;154(2):148–155.

86.

Kim

Shin

Noh

Song

Kim

. Development of the novel coating formulations for skin vaccination using stainless steel microneedle. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2016;6(5):486–497.

87.

Koutsonanos

del Pilar Martin

Zarnitsyn

, et al. Transdermal influenza immunization with vaccine-coated microneedle arrays. PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4773.

88.

Vinayakumar

KB.

Out-of-plane cup shaped stainless steel microneedle array for drug delivery. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Annual International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS), Japan, Matsushima Bay and Sendai MEMS City, 17–20 April 2016: 172–175.

89.

Yan

Liu

Iang

Yang

. Tapered metal microneedles fabricated by the hybrid process of mechanical dicing and electrochemical corrosion for drug delivery. Micro Nano Lett. 2012;7(12):1313–1315.

90.

López

EG.

Siller

Rodríguez

, Study of the fabrication of AISI 316L microneedle arrays. Proc Manuf. 2018;26:117–124.

91.

Bai

Yang

, et al. Fabrication of metal micro needle array by LIGA process. Adv Mater Res. 2011;418:1911–1914.

92.

Zhu

Chen

, et al. Silica needle template fabrication of metal hollow microneedle arrays. J Micromech Microeng. 2009;19(11):115010.

93.

Mansoor

Liu

Häfeli

Stoeber

. Arrays of hollow out-of-plane microneedles made by metal electrodeposition onto solvent cast conductive polymer structures. J Micromech Microeng. 2013;23(8):85011–85020.

94.

Chen

Wang

Jin

Guo

. Fabrication of coated polymer microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. J Control Release. 2017;265:14–21.

95.

Zhou

Yang

, et al. Fabrication of gradient porous microneedle array by modified hot embossing for transdermal drug delivery. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;96:576–582.

96.

Andersen

Peterse

, et al. Drug loaded biodegradable polymer microneedles fabricated by hot embossing. Microelectronic Eng. 2018;195:57–61.

97.

Janphuang

Mongkhol

Chanwut

, et al. Polymer based microneedle patch fabricated using microinjection moulding. MATEC Web Conf. 2018;192:01039.

98.

Ono

Azukizawa

Ito

, et al. Development of novel double-decker microneedle patches for transcutaneous vaccine delivery. Int J Pharm. 2017;532(1):374–383.

99.

Zhang

Brown

Siebenaler

Determan

Dohmeier

Hansen

. Development of lidocaine-coated microneedle product for rapid, safe, and prolonged local analgesic action. Pharm Res. 2012;29(1):170–177.

100.

Lhernould

Deleers

Delchambre

. Hollow polymer microneedles array resistance and insertion tests. Int J Pharm. 2015. 480(1-2):152–157.

101.

Park

Allen

Prausnitz

. Biodegradable polymer microneedles: fabrication, mechanics and transdermal drug delivery. J Control Release. 2005;104(1):51–66.

102.

Chen

Wang

Chen

Ling

Liu

. Remotely triggered release of small molecules from LaB₆@SiO₂-loaded polycaprolactone microneedles. Acta Biomater. 2015;13:344–353.

103.

Nguyen

Bozorg

Kim

, et al. Poly (vinyl alcohol) microneedles: fabrication, characterization, and application for transdermal drug delivery of doxorubicin. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;129:88–103.

104.

Chu

Choi

Prausnitz

. Fabrication of dissolving polymer microneedles for controlled drug encapsulation and delivery: bubble and pedestal microneedle designs. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99(10):4228–4238.

105.

Yang

Feng

Zhang

Chen

Yuan

Jin

. A scalable fabrication process of polymer microneedles. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:1415–1422.

106.

Park

Keun

Choi

, et al. Fabrication of degradable carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) microneedle with laser writing and replica molding process for enhancement of transdermal drug delivery. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2016;21(1):110–118.

107.

Chen

Ling

Kusuma

. Poly-γ-glutamic acid microneedles with a supporting structure design as a potential tool for transdermal delivery of insulin. Acta Biomater. 2015;24:106–116.

108.

Dardano

Caliò

Palma

Bevilacqua

Matteo

Stefano

LDA

. Photolithographic approach to polymeric microneedles array fabrication. Materials (Basel). 2015;8(12):8661–8673.

109.

Kochhar

Zou

Chan

Kang

. Protein encapsulation in polymeric microneedles by photolithography. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:3143–3154.

110.

Kochhar

Quek

Soon

Choi

Zou

Kang

. Effect of microneedle geometry and supporting substrate on microneedle array penetration into skin. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102(11):4100–4108.

111.

Tomono

. Puncture performance of sharpen microneedles by using inclined contact UV lithography. Microsyst Technol. 2018;24(9):3589–3599.

112.

Luzuriaga

Berry

Reagan

Smaldone

Gassensmith

. Biodegradable 3D printed polymer microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Lab Chip. 2018;18(8):1223–1230.

113.

Paik

Sangwon

Jung

, et al. In-plane single-crystal-silicon microneedles for minimally invasive microfluid systems. Sens Actuat A Phys. 2004;114(2-3):276–284.

114.

Huo

Zhou

, et al. Super-short solid silicon microneedles for transdermal drug delivery applications. Int J Pharm. 2010;389(1-2):122–129.

115.

Lee

Jeong

Beebe

. Microfluidic valve with cored glass microneedle for microinjection. Lab Chip. 2003;3(3):164–167.

116.

Mahadevan

Sheardown

Selvaganapathy

. PDMS embedded microneedles as a controlled release system for the eye. J Biomater Appl. 2012;28(1):20–27.

117.

Yukun

, et al. A micro-needle induced strategy for preparation of monodisperse liquid metal droplets in glass capillary microfluidics. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2019;23:13.

118.

Resnik

Možek M, Pečar

, et al. In vivo experimental study of noninvasive insulin microinjection through hollow Si microneedle array. Micromachines (Basel). 2018;9(1):40.

119.

Ita

. Ceramic microneedles and hollow microneedles for transdermal drug delivery: two decades of research. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2018;44:314–322.

120.

Ita

Hatsakorzian

Tolstikov

. Microneedle-mediated delivery of atenolol and bisoprolol hemifumarate. J Nanopharma Drug Deliv. 2013. 1(1):38–44.

121.

Gyaneshwar

Nitesh

Sagar

Pranav

Rustagi

. Treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures by stainless steel and titanium elastic nail system: a randomized comparative trial. Chin J Traumatol. 2016;19(4):213–216.

122.

Chaudhary

Gharti

Adhikari

. An in vivo comparison of accuracy of two electronic apex locators in determining working length using stainless steel and nickel titanium files. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018;10:75–82. doi:10.2147/CCIDE.S158882.

123.

Park

Allen

Prausnitz

. Polymer microneedles for controlled-release drug delivery. Pharm Res. 2006;23(5):1008–1019.

124.

Moronkeji

Todd

Dawidowska

Barrett

Akhtar

. The role of subcutaneous tissue stiffness on microneedle performance in a representative in vitro model of skin. J Control Release. 2017;265:102–112.

125.

Nguyen

Banga

. Delivery of methotrexate and characterization of skin treated by fabricated PLGA microneedles and fractional ablative laser. Pharm Res. 2018;35(3):68.

126.

Dangol

Yang

, et al. Innovative polymeric system (IPS) for solvent-free lipophilic drug transdermal delivery via dissolving microneedles. J Control Release. 2016;223:118–125.

127.

Pei-Ting

Chi Leea

Chin Chenb

Wei Tsaia

. Polymer microneedles fabricated from PCL and PCL/PEG blends for transdermal delivery of hydrophilic compounds. J Taiwan Instit Chem Eng. 2015;51:1–8.

128.

Chen

Shyu

Chen

. Dissolving microneedle patches for transdermal insulin delivery in diabetic mice: potential for clinical applications. Materials (Basel). 2018;11(9):1625.

129.

Kim

Yang

Lee

Jung

. Droplet-born air blowing: novel dissolving microneedle fabrication. J Control Release. 2013;170(3):430–436.

130.

Chen

Chong

Yan

, et al. Improved polyvinylpyrrolidone microneedle arrays with non-stoichiometric cyclodextrin. J Mater Chemist B. 2014;2(12):1699–1705.

131.

Chen

Ashfaq

Guo

. Assessment of mechanical stability of rapidly separating microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2018;8(5):1034–1042.

132.

Gittard

Chen

, et al. The effects of geometry on skin penetration and failure of polymer microneedles. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2013;27(3):227–243.

133.

Chu

Prausnitz

. Separable arrowhead microneedles. J Control Release. 2011;149(3):242–249.

134.

Loizidou

Williams

Barrow

, et al. Structural characterisation and transdermal delivery studies on sugar microneedles: experimental and finite element modelling analyses. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;89(2):224–231.

135.

Nguyen

Banga

. Fabrication, characterization and application of sugar microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Ther Deliv. 2017;8(5):249–264.

136.

Hashmi

Ling

Hashmi

Reed

Gaugler

Trimmer

. Genetic transformation of nematodes using arrays of micromechanical piercing structures. Biotech. 1995;19(5):766–770.

137.

Domanski

Winnubst

Luttge

, et al. Production and characterization of miro- and nano-features in biomedical alumina and zirconia ceramics using a tape casting route. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23(7):1637–1644.

138.

Doraiswamy

Jin

Narayan

, et al. Two photon induced polymerization of organic–inorganic hybrid biomaterials for microstructured medical devices. Acta Biomater. 2006;2(3):267–275.

139.

Ayittey

Walker

Rice

De Tombe

. Glass microneedles for force measurements: a finite-element analysis model. Pflugers Arch. 2008;457(6):1415–1422.

140.

Omatsu

Chujo

Miyamoto

, et al. Metal microneedle fabrication using twisted light with spin. Optic Exp. 2010;18(17):17967–17973.

141.

Sun

Zhuang

Jiang

, et al. Thermal dissipation performance of metal-polymer composite heat exchanger with V-shape microgrooves: a numerical and experimental study. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;121:492–500.

142.

Zhu

Huang

Sun

. Microfluidic-based single-cell study: current status and future perspective. Molecules. 2018;23(9):2347.

143.

Kormakov

Huang

, et al. Mathematical model for predicting conductivity of polymer composites with a forced assembly network obtained by SCFNA method. Polym Comp. 2018;40(5):1819–1827.

144.

Sun

Liu

, et al. Rapid fabrication of microstructure on PMMA substrate by the plate to plate transition-spanning isothermal hot embossing method nearby glass transition temperature. Polym Eng Sci. 2017;57(3):268–274.

145.

Sun

Liu

Dai

Jiang

. Numerical simulation and experimental study of filling process of micro prism by isothermal hot embossing in solid-like state. Adv Polym Technol. 2018;37(6):1581–1591.

146.

Zhuang

Fan

, et al. Fabrication and testing of metal/polymer microstructure heat exchangers based on micro embossed molding method. Microsyst Technol. 2018;25(2):381–388.

147.

Jingyao

Liu

, et al. Rapid fabrication of micro structure on polypropylene by plate to plate isothermal hot embossing method. Polym Eng Sci. 2018;58(6):952–960.

148.

Zhuang

Huang

Liu

Sun

. Edge effect in hot embossing and its influence on global pattern replication of polymer-based microneedles. Int Polym Process. 2019;34(2):231–238.

149.

Juster

Der Aar

Brouwer

. A review on microfabrication of thermoplastic polymer-based microneedle arrays. Polym Eng Sci. 2019;59(5):877–890.

150.

Huang

Kormakov

, et al. Conductive polymer composites from renewable resources: an overview of preparation, properties, and applications. Polymers. 2019;11(2):187.

151.

Liu

Jian

Chen

, et al. Application of biodegradable and biocompatible nanocomposites in electronics: current status and future directions. Nanomaterials. 2019;9(7):950.

152.

Yao

Wan

, et al. Enhancing thermal conductivity of polydimethylsiloxane composites through spatially confined network of hybrid fillers. Comp Sci Technol. 2019;172:163–171.

153.

Yao

Liu

, et al. Improved thermal conductivity of polydimethylsiloxane/short carbon fiber composites prepared by spatial confining forced network assembly. J Mater Sci. 2018;53(20):14299–14310.

154.

Sun

Zhao

Yang

, et al. Highly stretchable and ultrathin nanopaper composites for epidermal strain sensors. Nanotechnology. 2018;29(35):355304.

155.

Hao

Zhu

, et al. Polyethylenimine-based formulations for delivery of oligonucleotides. Curr Med Chem. 2019;26(13):2264–2284.

156.

Sun

Jia

Shi

, et al. Highly elastic and ultrathin nanopaper-based nanocomposites with superior electric and thermal characteristics. J Mater Sci. 2019;54(11):8436–8449.

157.

Yang

Guo

Yang

Compans

Prausnitz

. Ebola vaccination using a DNA vaccine coated on PLGA-PLL/γPGA nanoparticles administered using a microneedle patch. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6(1):1600750.

158.

Kim

Lee

Kim

, et al. Polyplex-releasing microneedles for enhanced cutaneous delivery of DNA vaccine. J Control Release. 2014;179:11–17.

159.

Zhang

Zhao

Jin

Wang

Zhao

. Microneedles improve the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines. Hum Gen Ther. 2018;29(9):1004–1010.

160.

Levin

Kochba

Shukarev

Rusch

Herrera-Taracena

van Damme

. A phase 1, open-label, randomized study to compare the immunogenicity and safety of different administration routes and doses of virosomal influenza vaccine in elderly. Vaccine. 2016;34(44):5262–5272.

161.

Norman

Arya

McClain

Frew

Meltzer

Prausnitz

. Microneedle patches: usability and acceptability for self-vaccination against influenza. Vaccine. 2014;32(16):1856–1862.

162.

Morelon

Pouteil Noble

Daoud

, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of intradermal influenza vaccination in renal transplant patients who were non-responders to conventional influenza vaccination. Vaccine. 2010;28(42):6885–6890.

163.

Icardi

Orsi

Ceravolo

Ansaldi

. Current evidence on intradermal influenza vaccines administered by Soluvia™ licensed micro injection system. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;8(1):67–75.

164.

De Rosa

Arcidiacono

Chiefari

Brunetti

Indolfi

Foti

. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease: genetic and epigenetic links. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:2.

165.

Trierweiler

Kisielewicz

Hoffmann Jonasson

, et al. Sarcopenia: a chronic complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2018;10(1):25.

166.

Xie

. Microneedles for transdermal delivery of insulin. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2015;28:11–17.

167.

Peyrot

Dreon

Zraick

Cross

Tan

. Patient perceptions and preferences for a mealtime insulin delivery patch. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9(1):297–307.

168.

Ling

Chen

. Dissolving polymer microneedle patches for rapid and efficient transdermal delivery of insulin to diabetic rats. Act Biomater. 2013;9(11):8952–8961.

169.

Zhang

Jiang

Liu

. Microneedles fabricated from alginate and maltose for transdermal delivery of insulin on diabetic rats. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018;85:18–26.

170.

Jin

Zhu

Chen

Ashfaq

Guo

. Insulin delivery systems combined with microneedle technology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;127:119–137.

171.

Kathuria

Pan

, et al. Large size microneedle patch to deliver lidocaine through skin. Pharm Res. 2016;33(11):2653–2667.

172.

Ishikawa

Fukamizu

Tetsuyai

Ohta

Yoshiki

. Application of a three-microneedle device for the delivery of local anesthetics. Patient Prefer Adher. 2015;9:585–588.

173.

Kochhar

Lim

Zou

Foo

Pan

Kang

. Microneedle integrated transdermal patch for fast onset and sustained delivery of lidocaine. Mol Pharm. 2013;10(11):4272–4280.

174.

Ammar

Ghorab

El-Nahhas

Kamel

. Design of a transdermal delivery system for aspirin as an antithrombotic drug. Int J Pharm. 2006;327(1-2):81–88.

175.

Olatunji

Olubowale

Okereke

. Microneedle-assisted transdermal delivery of acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) from biopolymer films extracted from fish scales. Polym Bull. 2017;75(9):4103–4115.

176.

Sullivan

Murthy

Prausnitz

. Minimally invasive protein delivery with rapidly dissolving polymer microneedles. Adv Mater. 2008;20(5):933–938.

177.

Nam

kim

Park

, et al. Fabrication of DNA-coated microneedles for transdermal DNA delivery. Sci Adv Mater. 2014;6(11):2536–2539.

178.

Wei

Zheng

Wang

, et al. A flexible microneedle array as low-voltage electroporation electrodes for in vivo DNA and siRNA delivery. Lab Chip. 2014;14(20):4093–4102.

179.

Zhao

Coulman

Hanna

Wong

Dayan

Birchall

. Formulation of hydrophobic peptides for skin delivery via coated microneedles. J Control Release. 2017;265:2–13.

180.

Zhao

Qin

, et al. Microneedle pretreatment improves efficacy of cutaneous topical anesthesia. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28(2):130–134.

181.

Uppuluri

Devineni

Han

, et al. Microneedle-assisted transdermal delivery of zolmitriptan: effect of microneedle geometry, in vitro permeation experiments, scaling analyses and numerical simulations. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2017;43(8):1292–1303.

182.

Wermeling

Banks

Hudson

, et al. Microneedles permit transdermal delivery of a skin-impermeant medication to humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(6):2058–2063.

183.

Chiappini

Campagnolo

Almeida

, et al. Mapping local cytosolic enzymatic activity in human esophageal mucosa with porous silicon nanoneedles. Adv Mater. 2015;27(35):5147–5152.

184.

Sun

Semen

Ying

, et al. Recent progress in metal-based nanoparticles mediated photodynamic therapy. Molecules. 2018;23(7):1704.

185.

Mohan

AMV

Windmiller

Mishra

Wang

. Continuous minimally-invasive alcohol monitoring using microneedle sensor arrays. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;91:574–579.

186.

Ester

Brady

Eltayib

, et al. Hydrogel-forming microneedle arrays allow detection of drugs and glucose in vivo: potential for use in diagnosis and therapeutic drug monitoring. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0145644.

Microneedle System for Transdermal Drug and Vaccine Delivery: Devices,Safety,and Prospects

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Classification of MNs

Classified by Drug Delivery Methods

Solid MNs

Coated MNs

Dissolving MNs

Hollow MNs

Classified by Structure of MNs

Classified by Materials of MNs

Inorganic materials

Metal

Polymer

Fabrication of MNs

Fabrication of Inorganic Material MNs

Fabrication of Metal MNs

Fabrication of Polymeric MNs

Application of MNs

Microneedle Delivery of Vaccine

Microneedle Delivery of Insulin

Microneedle Delivery of Other Drugs

Conclusions and Outlook

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References