The goal of zone II flexor tendon surgery is to perform a repair with sufficient strength to withstand the forces encountered during rehabilitation. Postoperative rerupture and adhesion formation may lead to reoperation. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with reoperation after primary zone II flexor tendon repair.
Methods:
In this retrospective case series, a total of 252 fingers in 201 patients underwent zone II flexor tendon repair. A medical record review was performed to collect data regarding patient demographics, injury and treatment characteristics and postoperative complications including reoperation. Reoperation was defined as any unplanned surgical procedure performed after initial flexor tendon repair.
Results:
There were 49 fingers (19%) in 42 patients that underwent reoperation at a median of 5.5 (interquartile range: 2.8-7.9) months. Older age, workers’ compensation, and a Kessler-type repair of the flexor digitorum profundus were independently associated with reoperation.
Conclusions:
In vitro studies suggest that Kessler-type repairs are inferior compared with other suture configurations. Our study demonstrates a clinical correlation to these biomechanical studies. Our results suggest that Kessler-type repairs are inferior compared with non-Kessler-type repairs, due to postoperative complications requiring secondary surgeries.
RigoIZRokkumM.Predictors of outcome after primary flexor tendon repair in zone 1, 2 and 3. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016;41(8):793-801. doi:10.1177/1753193416657758.
2.
DowdMBFigusAHarrisSB, et al. The results of immediate re-repair of zone 1 and 2 primary flexor tendon repairs which rupture. J Hand Surg Br. 2006;31(5):507-513. doi:10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.06.006.
3.
DyCJHernandez-SoriaAMaY, et al. Complications after flexor tendon repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(3):543-551. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.11.006.
4.
DyCJDaluiskiADoHT, et al. The epidemiology of reoperation after flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(5):919-924. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.02.003.
5.
TangJB.Flexor tendon repair in zone 2C. J Hand Surg Br. 1994;19(1):72-75. doi:10.1016/0266-7681(94)90054-x.
6.
StarnesTSaundersRJMeansKRJr.Clinical outcomes of zone II flexor tendon repair depending on mechanism of injury. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(12):2532-2540. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.021.
7.
LimRQRWongYRLokeAMK, et al. A cyclic testing comparison of two flexor tendon repairs: asymmetric and modified Lim-Tsai techniques. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018;43(5):494-498. doi:10.1177/1753193418758828.
8.
BarrieKAWolfeSWSheanC, et al. A biomechanical comparison of multistrand flexor tendon repairs using an in situ testing model. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(3):499-506. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2000.6927.
9.
PolykandriotisEBesrourFArkudasA, et al. Flexor tendon repair with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) suture material. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(3):429-434. doi:10.1007/s00402-018-03105-3.
10.
GuliharAWhitehead-ClarkeTHajipourL, et al. A comparison of two monofilament suture materials for repair of partial flexor tendon lacerations: a controlled in-vitro study. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2017;22(1):18-22. doi:10.1142/S0218810417500034.
11.
PapandreaRSeitzWHJrShapiroP, et al. Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of the epitenon-first technique of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 1995;20(2):261-266. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80021-8.
12.
AmadioPC.Gliding resistance and modifications of gliding surface of tendon: clinical perspectives. Hand Clin. 2013;29(2):159-166. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.001.
13.
WongYRLeeCSLokeAM, et al. Comparison of flexor tendon repair between 6-strand Lim-Tsai with 4-strand cruciate and Becker technique. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(9):1806-1811. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.05.007.
14.
LeeHILeeJSKimTH, et al. Comparison of flexor tendon suture techniques including 1 using 10 strands. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(7):1369-1376. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.03.021.
15.
ChesneyAChauhanAKattanA, et al. Systematic review of flexor tendon rehabilitation protocols in zone II of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(4):1583-1592. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318208d28e.
16.
SebastinSJHoAKarjalainenT, et al. History and evolution of the Kessler repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(3):552-561. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.11.033.
17.
HoffmannGLBuchlerUVogelinE.Clinical results of flexor tendon repair in zone II using a six-strand double-loop technique compared with a two-strand technique. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008;33(4):418-423. doi:10.1177/1753193408091570.
18.
JordanMCSchmittVJansenH, et al. Biomechanical analysis of the modified Kessler, Lahey, Adelaide, and Becker sutures for flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(9):1812-1817. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.05.032.
19.
RennerCCorellaFFischerN.Biomechanical evaluation of 4-strand flexor tendon repair techniques, including a combined Kessler-Tsuge approach. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(2):229-235. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.10.055.
20.
PeltzTSHaddadRScougallPJ, et al. Structural failure mechanisms of common flexor tendon repairs. Hand Surg. 2015;20(3):369-379. doi:10.1142/S0218810415400092.
21.
SandersDWMilneADJohnsonJA, et al. The effect of flexor tendon repair bulk on tendon gliding during simulated active motion: an in vitro comparison of two-strand and six-strand techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(5):833-840. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2001.24959.
22.
CoccaCJDuffyDJKershME, et al. Biomechanical comparison of three epitendinous suture patterns as adjuncts to a core locking loop suture for repair of canine flexor tendon injuries. Vet Surg. 2019;48(7):1245-1252. doi:10.1111/vsu.13266.
23.
PuttermanABDuffyDJKershME, et al. Effect of a continuous epitendinous suture as adjunct to three-loop pulley and locking-loop patterns for flexor tendon repair in a canine model. Vet Surg. 2019;48(7):1229-1236. doi:10.1111/vsu.13268.
24.
CvetanovichGLSavinDDFrankRM, et al. Inferior outcomes and higher complication rates after shoulder arthroplasty in workers’ compensation patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(5):875-881. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.007.
25.
WongJY.Time off work in hand injury patients. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(5):718-725. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.015.
26.
KadzielskiJJBotAGRingD.The influence of job satisfaction, burnout, pain, and worker’s compensation status on disability after finger injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(9):1812-1819. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.023.
27.
HarrisIMulfordJSolomonM, et al. Association between compensation status and outcome after surgery: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005;293(13):1644-1652. doi:10.1001/jama.293.13.1644.
28.
FujiharaYShauverMJLarkME, et al. The effect of workers’ compensation on outcome measurement methods after upper extremity surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(4):923-933. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003154.
29.
de MoraesVYGodinKTamaokiMJ, et al. Workers’ compensation status: does it affect orthopaedic surgery outcomes? a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50251. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050251.
30.
ZhouBZhouYTangK.An overview of structure, mechanical properties, and treatment for age-related tendinopathy. J Nutr Health Aging. 2014;18(4):441-448. doi:10.1007/s12603-014-0026-2.
31.
EdsfeldtSEklundMWiigM.Prognostic factors for digital range of motion after intrasynovial flexor tendon injury and repair: long-term follow-up on 273 patients treated with active extension-passive flexion with rubber bands. J Hand Ther. 2018;32(3):328-333. doi:10.1016/j.jht.2017.12.007.
32.
AckermanJEBahIJonasonJH, et al. Aging does not alter tendon mechanical properties during homeostasis, but does impair flexor tendon healing. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(12):2716-2724. doi:10.1002/jor.23580.
