Anatomically Complete Supraclavicular Reoperation for Recurrent Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Clinical Characteristics,Operative Findings,and Long-term Outcomes

Abstract

Background:

The clinical outcomes of reoperations for recurrent neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) remain undefined.

Methods:

From 2009 to 2019, 90 patients with recurrent NTOS underwent anatomically complete supraclavicular reoperation after previous operation(s) performed at other institutions using either supraclavicular (Prev-SC = 48), transaxillary (Prev-TA = 31), or multiple/combination (Prev-MC = 11) approaches. Prospectively maintained data were analyzed retrospectively.

Results:

The mean patient age was 39.9 ± 1.4 years, 72% were female, and the mean interval after previous operation was 4.1 ± 0.6 years. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score was 62 ± 2, reflecting substantial preoperative disability. Residual scalene muscle was present in 100% Prev-TA, 79% Prev-SC, and 55% Prev-MC (P < .05). Retained/residual first rib was present in 90% Prev-TA, 75% Prev-SC, and 55% Prev-MC (P < .05). There were no differences in operative time (overall 210 ± 5 minutes), length of hospital stay (4.7 ± 0.2 days), or 30-day readmissions (7%). During follow-up of 5.6 ± 0.3 years, the improvement in QuickDASH scores was 21 ± 2 (36% ± 3%) (P < .01) and patient-rated outcomes were excellent in 10%, good in 36%, fair in 43%, and poor in 11%.

Conclusions:

Anatomically complete decompression for recurrent NTOS can be safely and effectively accomplished by supraclavicular reoperation, regardless of the type of previous operation. Residual scalene muscle and retained/residual first rib are more frequently encountered after transaxillary operations than after supraclavicular or multiple/combined operations. Supraclavicular reoperation can achieve significant symptom reduction and functional improvement for approximately 90% of patients with recurrent NTOS.

Keywords

brachial plexus nerve diagnosis nerve compression rib resection scalene muscle reoperation patient-reported outcomes measures disability research and health outcomes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sanders

. Anatomy and pathophysiology of NTOS. In: Illig

Thompson

Freischlag

, et al, eds. Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. London, England: Springer; 2013:35-39.

Illig

Donahue

Duncan

, et al. Reporting standards of the Society for Vascular Surgery for thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64:e23-e35.

Thompson

. Thoracic outlet syndrome: neurogenic. In: Sidaway

Perler

, eds. Rutherford’s Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018:1619-1638.

Sanders

Hammond

Rao

NM.

Diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:601-604.

Thompson

. Development of consensus-based diagnostic criteria for NTOS. In: Illig

Thompson

Freischlag

, et al, eds. Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. London, England: Springer; 2013:143-155.

Balderman

Holzem

Field

, et al. Associations between clinical diagnostic criteria and pre-treatment patient-reported outcomes measures in a prospective observational cohort of patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:533-544.

Dellon

. The results of supraclavicular brachial plexus neurolysis (without first rib resection) in management of post-traumatic “thoracic outlet syndrome.” J Reconstr Microsurg. 1993;9(1):11-17.

Mingoli

Feldhaus

Farina

, et al. Long-term outcome after transaxillary approach for thoracic outlet syndrome. Surgery. 1995;118(5):840-844.

Chang

Rotellini-Coltvet

Mukherjee

, et al. Surgical intervention for thoracic outlet syndrome improves patient’s quality of life. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(3):630-637.

10.

Atasoy

A hand surgeon’s further experience with thoracic outlet compression syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35: 1528-1538.

11.

Atasoy

A hand surgeon’s advanced experience with thoracic outlet compression syndrome. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2013;45:131-150.

12.

Caputo

Wittenberg

Vemuri

, et al. Supraclavicular decompression for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome in adolescent and adult populations. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(1): 149-157.

13.

Rochlin

Gilson

Likes

, et al. Quality-of-life scores in neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome patients undergoing first rib resection and scalenectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2013; 57(2):436-443.

14.

Hosseinian

Loron

Soleimanifard

Evaluation of complications after surgical treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;50(1): 36-40.

15.

Maqbool

Novak

Jackson

, et al. Thirty-day outcomes following surgical decompression of thoracic outlet syndrome. Hand. 2019;14(1):107-113.

16.

Balderman

Abuirqeba

Eichaker

, et al. Physical therapy management, surgical treatment, and patient-reported outcomes measures in a prospective observational cohort of patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(3):832-841.

17.

Ransom

Minton

Young

, et al. Intermediate and long-term outcomes following surgical decompression of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome in an adolescent patient population [published online ahead of print February 10, 2020]. Hand. doi:10.1177/1558944719901319.

18.

Urschel

Razzuk

Jr Albers

, et al. Reoperation for recurrent thoracic outlet syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1976;21:19-25.

19.

Roos

DB.

Recurrent thoracic outlet syndrome after first rib resection. Acta Chir Belg. 1980;79:363-372.

20.

Sessions

RT.

Reoperation for thoracic outlet syndrome. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;30:434-444.

21.

Sanders

Haug

Pearce

WH.

Recurrent thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 1990;12:390-400.

22.

Lindgren

Leino

Lepantalo

, et al. Recurrent thoracic outlet syndrome after first rib resection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:208-210.

23.

Cheng

Stoney

RJ.

Supraclavicular reoperation for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19(4):565-572.

24.

Ambrad-Chalela

Thomas

Johansen

KH.

Recurrent neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Am J Surg. 2004;187: 505-510.

25.

Atasoy

Recurrent thoracic outlet syndrome. Hand Clin. 2004;20:99-105.

26.

Mingoli

Sapienza

di Marzo

, et al. Role of first rib stump length in recurrent neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Am J Surg. 2005;190(1):156.

27.

Altobelli

Kudo

Haas

, et al. Thoracic outlet syndrome: pattern of clinical success after operative decompression. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(1):122-128.

28.

Sanders

RJ.

Recurrent neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome stressing the importance of pectoralis minor syndrome. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011;45(1):33-38.

29.

Rochlin

Likes

Gilson

, et al. Management of unresolved, recurrent, and/or contralateral neurogenic symptoms in patients following first rib resection and scalenectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:1061-1067.

30.

Annest

Sanders

. Assessment and treatment of recurrent NTOS. In: Illig

Thompson

Freischlag

, et al, eds. Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. London, England: Springer; 2013:281-289.

31.

Likes

Dapash

Rochlin

, et al. Remaining or residual first ribs are the cause of recurrent thoracic outlet syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28:939-945.

32.

Gelabert

Jabori

Barleben

, et al. Regrown first rib in patients with recurrent thoracic outlet syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28(4):933-938.

33.

Greenberg

Alix

Nehler

, et al. Computed tomography-guided reoperation for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(2):469-474.

34.

Duwayri

Thompson

. Supraclavicular approach for surgical treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome. In: Chaikof

Cambria

, eds. Atlas of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2014:172-192.

35.

Derkash

Goldberg

Mendelson

, et al. The results of first rib resection in thoracic outlet syndrome. Orthopedics. 1981;4:1025-1029.

36.

Sanders

. Results of treatment and comments. In: Sanders

, ed. Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Common Sequela of Neck Injuries. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott Company; 1991:171-191.

37.

Sorensen

Howard

Tan

, et al. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(4):641-649.

38.

Franchignoni

Vercelli

Giordano

, et al. Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(1):30-39.

39.

Kazmers

Qiu

Yoo

, et al. The minimal clinically important difference of the PROMIS and QuickDASH instruments in a nonshoulder hand and upper extremity patient population. J Hand Surg Am. 2020;45(5):399-407.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

4.80 MB

3.60 MB

0.24 MB