This article addresses a core challenge in mixed methods research: integrating and visualizing heterogeneous data in a rigorous and transparent way. It introduces a novel approach to joint display analysis using dynamic, interactive visualizations that foster simultaneous bidirectional exchange between quantitative psychophysiological data and qualitative interview data. Demonstrated through a case study of advertising films on emotion and episodic memory, the approach shows how visualizations can serve as analytical tools rather than merely as communication devices. The contribution to mixed methods research lies in providing a systematic, replicable framework for synthesizing disparate data while preserving contextual nuance. More broadly, it advances methodological practice by enhancing transparency, promoting iterative interaction, and offering scalable prospects for future mixed methods inquiry.
AllenP. A.KautK. P.LordR. R. (2008). Emotion and episodic memory. In DereE.EastonA.NadelL.HustonJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral neuroscience. Handbook of episodic memory (pp. 115–132). Elsevier.
2.
BakalashT.RiemerH. (2013). Exploring Ad-elicited emotional arousal and memory for the Ad using fMRI. Journal of Advertising, 42(4), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.768065
3.
BakkerJ.PechenizkiyM.SidoravaN. (2011). What’s your current stress level? Detection of stress patterns from GSR sensor data. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 11th international conference on data mining workshops ICDMW '11 (pp. 573–580). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
4.
BazeleyP. (2009). Editorial: Integrating data analyses in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3), 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809334443
5.
BazeleyP. (2010). Computer-assisted integration of mixed methods data sources and analyses. In TashakkoriB.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 431–467). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193
6.
BazeleyP. (2012). Integrative analysis strategies for mixed data sources. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 814–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426330
7.
BazeleyP. (2018). Integrating analysis in mixed methods research. Sage.
8.
BazeleyP. (2024). Conceptualizing integration in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241253636
BonthuS.BinduK. H. (2017). Review of leading data analytics tools. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.31), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.31.18190
BrymanA. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906290531
14.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (1985). Physiological responses and advertising effects: Is the cup half full or half empty?Psychology & Marketing, 2(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220020207
15.
CaracelliV. J.GreeneJ. C. (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737015002195
16.
ChangC. (2017). Methodological issues in advertising research: Current status, shifts, and trends. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1274924
17.
CoffeyA.AtkinsonP. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage.
18.
CookN. (1998). Analysing musical multimedia. Oxford University Press.
19.
CreamerE. G. (2018). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. Sage.
20.
DamasioA. (2004). Emotions and feelings: A neurobiological perspective. In MansteadA. S. R.FrijdaN.FisherA. (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium (pp. 49–57). Cambridge University Press.
21.
DeJonckheereM.VaughnL. M.JamesT. G.SchondelmeyerA. C. (2024). Qualitative thematic analysis in a mixed methods study: Guidelines and considerations for integration. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(3), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241257546
22.
FettersM. D. (2019). The mixed methods research workbook. Activities for designing, implementing, and Publishing Projects (Vol. 7). Sage. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2019-000218
23.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
24.
FettersM. D.FreshwaterD. (2015a). The 1 + 1 = 3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815581222
25.
FettersM. D.FreshwaterD. (2015b). Publishing a methodological mixed methods research article. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815594687
26.
FettersM. D.TajimaC. (2022). Joint displays of integrated data collection in mixed methods research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221104564
27.
FieldingN. G. (2012). Triangulation and mixed methods designs: Data integration with new research technologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437101
GebreegziabherS. A.ZhangZ.TangX.MengY.GlassmanE. L.LiT. J.-J. (2023). PaTAT: human-AI collaborative qualitative coding with explainable interactive rule synthesis. In SchmidtA.VäänänenK. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–19). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581352
31.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
32.
GuettermanT. C.FàbreguesS.SakakibaraR. (2021). Visuals in joint displays to represent integration in mixed methods research: A methodological review. Methods in Psychology, 5, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100080
33.
GuettermanT. C.FettersM. D. (2018). Two methodological approaches to the integration of mixed methods and case study designs: A systematic review. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 900–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772641
34.
GuettermanT. C.FettersM. D. (2022). Data visualization in the context of integrated analyses. In HitchcockJ. H.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research (pp. 301–323). Routledge.
35.
GuettermanT. C.FettersM. D.CreswellJ. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865
36.
GuettermanT. C.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2024). In this issue: Special issue dedicated to Michael D. Fetters. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(3), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241263466
37.
HarrisonR. L.ReillyT. M.CreswellJ. W. (2020). Methodological rigor in mixed methods: An application in management studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819900585
38.
Haynes-BrownT. K.FettersM. D. (2021). Using joint display as an analytic process: An illustration using bar graphs joint displays from a mixed methods study of how beliefs shape secondary school teachers’ use of technology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1609406921993286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921993286
39.
HuntJ. B. (1989). Measuring the effectiveness of emotional commercials. In HawesJ. M.ThanopoulosJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1989 academy of marketing science (AMS) annual conference (pp. 28–32). Springer.
40.
JohansenJ. D. (1989). Utility – Identity – Epiphany: Some reflections on the logical structure of TV commercials. In LarsenH. H.MickD. G.AlstedC. (Eds.), Marketing and semiotics: Selected papers from the Copenhagen Symposium (pp. 128–141). Handelshøjskolen.
41.
JohnsonJ. C. (1990). Selecting ethnographic informants. Sage.
42.
KleihA.-K.LehbergerM.SparkeK. (2021). Using photographs in mixed methods research: An illustration integrating quantitative and qualitative analyses from consumer research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(4), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211056748
43.
KuckartzU.RädikerS. (2023). Using software for innovative integration in mixed methods research: Joint displays, insights and inferences with MAXQDA. In PothC. N. (Ed.), The Sage handbook of mixed methods research design (pp. 315–327). Sage.
44.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2009). InterViews: Learning the crafts of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
LouwS.ToddR. W.JimarkonP. (2014). Picking the ripe cherry: Extract selection in qualitative research. In Proceedings of the international conference: Research in applied linguistics (pp. 155–169): ILA.
47.
LoveH. R.CorrC. (2021). Integrating without quantitizing: Two examples of deductive analysis strategies within qualitatively driven mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689821989833
McCruddenM. T.MarchandG.SchutzP. A. (2021). Joint displays for mixed methods research in psychology. Methods in Psychology, 5, 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100067
51.
Moran-EllisJ.AlexanderV. D.CroninA.DickinsonM.FieldingJ.SleneyJ.ThomasH. (2006). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058870
52.
MoseholmE.FettersM. D. (2017). Conceptual models to guide integration during analysis in convergent mixed methods studies. Methodological Innovations, 10(2), 2059799117703118. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799117703118
53.
NessleC. N.GhazalL. V.ChoiS. W.FettersM. D. (2023). Joint display of integrated data collection for mixed methods research: An illustration from a pediatric oncology quality improvement study. Annals of Family Medicine, 21(4), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2985
54.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2007). Integration and publications as indicators of “yield” from mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806299094
55.
Plano ClarkV. L.GarrettA. L.Leslie-PeleckyD. L. (2010). Applying three strategies for integrating quantitative and qualitative databases in a mixed methods study of a nontraditional graduate education program. Field Methods, 22(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X09357174
56.
RanfagniS.GuerciniS.CamiciottoliB. C. (2014). An interdisciplinary method for brand association research. Management Decision, 52(4), 724–736. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2012-0284
57.
RavajaN. (2004). Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: Review and recommendations. Media Psychology, 6(2), 193–235. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0602_4
58.
RietzT.MaedcheA. (2021). Cody: An AI-based system to semi-automate coding for qualitative research. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–14). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445591
SackW. (2011). Aesthetics of information visualization. In LovejoyM.PaulC.EsnaV. (Eds.), Context providers: Conditions of meaning in media arts (pp. 123–149). Intellect.
61.
Santos-LozanoA.Hernández-VicenteA.Pérez-IsaacR.Santín-MedeirosF.Cristi-MonteroC.CasajúsJ. A.GaratacheaN. (2017). Is the SenseWear Armband accurate enough to quantify and estimate energy expenditure in healthy adults?Annals of Translational Medicine, 5(5), 97. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.02.31
62.
SchöchC. (2013). Big? Smart? Clean? Messy? Data in the humanities. Journal of Digital Humanities, 2(3), 2–13.
63.
SeitzP. F. D.ShipleyR. E. (1952). An experimental approach to psychocutaneous problems: II. Simultaneous recording of psychotherapeutic interviews and galvanic skin response. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 19(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.1952.64
64.
ShneidermanB. (2002). Inventing discovery tools: Combining information visualization with data mining. Information Visualization, 1(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500006
65.
ShovalN.SchvimerY.TamirM. (2018). Real-time measurement of tourists’ objective and subjective emotions in time and space. Journal of Travel Research, 57(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517691155
66.
StadlerR.JepsonA. S.WoodE. H. (2018). Electrodermal activity measurement within a qualitative methodology. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(11), 3363–3385. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2017-0781
67.
TaggP.ClaridaB. (2003). Ten little tunes: Towards a musicology of the mass media. The Mass Media Music Scholars’ Press.
68.
ThompsonR. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.1994.tb01276.x
TulvingE. (1998). Neurocognitive processes of human memory. In von EulerC.KundbergI.LlinasR. (Eds.), Basic mechanisms in cognition and language (pp. 261–281). Elsevier.
71.
UprichardE.DawneyL. (2019). Data diffraction: Challenging data integration in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816674650
72.
Van Der ValkJ. M.GroenJ. (1950). Electrical resistance of the skin during induced emotional stress; a study of normal individuals and of patients with internal disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 12(5), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-195009000-00003
73.
VecchiatoG.CherubinoP.MaglioneA. G.EzquierroM. T. H.MarinozziF.BiniF.TrettelA.BabiloniF. (2014). How to measure cerebral correlates of emotions in marketing relevant tasks. Cognitive Computation, 6(4), 856–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-014-9304-x
74.
WoolleyC. (2009). Meeting the mixed methods challenge of integration in a sociological study of structure and agency. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808325774
