Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper describes an aspect of a larger research project using mixed methods to develop a transgender resilience measure. We highlight how our approach “queers” mixed methods research. We center transgender and nonbinary (TNB) voices throughout our research process, disrupting conventional scale development methods and ultimately (trans)forming traditional conceptualizations of resilience, which emphasize individual recovery from adversity. Historically, TNB research has perpetuated marginalization and is rooted in cisnormativity. By understanding resilience from the theoretical frameworks of gender minority stress, the transgender resilience intervention model, and intersectionality, our conceptualization of TNB resilience rejects assumptions of cisnormativity, binary normativity, and ultimately transforms our understanding of resilience. This case study exemplifies one way to queer mixed methods research to reflect TNB people’s experiences.

Keywords

transgender nonbinary queer theory mixed methods resilience cisnormativity scale development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilera

Barrita

(2021). Resilience in LGBTQ PoC. In García

J. J.

(Ed.), Heart, brain and mental health disparities for LGBTQ people of color (pp. 137–148). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70060-7_11

Ansara

Y. G.

Hegarty

(2012). Cisgenderism in psychology: Pathologising and misgendering children from 1999 to 2008. Psychology & Sexuality, 3(2), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2011.576696

Ansara

Y. G.

Hegarty

(2014). Methodologies of misgendering: Recommendations for reducing cisgenderism in psychological research. Feminism & Psychology, 24(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514526217

Barrita

A. M.

Wong-Padoongpatt

(2021). Resilience and queer people. In Strunk

K. K.

Shelton

S. A.

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of queer studies in education (pp. 600–605). Brill.

Bell

(1987). And we are not saved: The elusive quest for racial justice. Basic Books.

Boateng

G. O.

Neilands

T. B.

Frongillo

E. A.

Melgar-Quiñonez

H. R.

Young

S. L.

(2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Bradford

N. J.

Spencer

(2020). Sexual pleasure in transgender and gender diverse individuals: An update on recent advances in the field. Current Sexual Health Reports, 12(4), 314–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-020-00284-2

Bradford

N. J.

Syed

(2019). Transnormativity and transgender identity development: A master narrative approach. Sex Roles, 81(5–6), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0992-7

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

10.

Brooks

V. R.

(1981). Minority stress and lesbian women. Lexington Books.

11.

Budge

S. L.

Adelson

J. L.

Howard

K. A. S.

(2013). Anxiety and depression in transgender individuals: The roles of transition status, loss, social support, and coping. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(3), 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031774

12.

Butler

(2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.

13.

Carpenter

(2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583

14.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – Division of Community Health [CDC] . (2013). A practitioner’s guide for advancing health equity: Community strategies for preventing chronic disease. https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dch/pdf/HealthEquityGuide.pdf

15.

Cole

E. R.

(2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564

16.

Comas-Díaz

Torres Rivera

(Eds.), (2020). Liberation psychology: Theory, method, practice, and social justice (pp. 3–13). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000198-000

17.

Combahee River Collective . (1977). The Combahee River Collective statement. In Smith

(Ed.), Homegirls: A Black feminist anthology (pp. 264–274). Kitchen Table, Women of Color Press. (Original work published 1977).

18.

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex; a Black feminist critique of discrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8

19.

Crenshaw

Gotanda

Peller

Thomas

(Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New Press.

20.

Creswell

J. W.

(2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage.

21.

DeJonckheere

Lindquist-Grantz

Toraman

Haddad

Vaughn

L. M.

(2019). Intersection of mixed methods and community-based participatory research: A methodological review. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818778469

22.

Dilley

(1999). Queer theory: Under construction. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(5), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183999235890

23.

Drescher

(2014). Gender identity diagnoses: History and controversies. In Kreukels

Steensma

de Vries

(Eds.), Gender dysphoria and disorders of sex development. Focus on sexuality research (pp. 137–150). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7441-8_7

24.

Duarte

B. J.

(2023). Disrupting the binary: Critical mixed-methods as academic resistance. In Young

M. D.

Diem

(Eds.), Handbook of critical education research (pp. 473–488). Routledge.

25.

Fletcher

Sarkar

(2013). Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. European Psychologist, 18(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000124

26.

French

B. H.

Lewis

J. A.

Mosley

D. V.

Adames

H. Y.

Chavez-Dueñas

N. Y.

Chen

G. A.

Neville

H. A.

(2020). Toward a psychological framework of radical healing in communities of color. The Counseling Psychologist, 48(1), 14–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000019843506

27.

Galupo

M. P.

(2017). Researching while cisgender: Identity considerations for transgender research. International Journal of Transgenderism, 18(3), 241–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2017.1342503

28.

Galupo

M. P.

Pulice-Farrow

(2020). Subjective ratings of gender dysphoria scales by transgender individuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(2), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01556-2

29.

Ghaziani

Brim

(2019). Queer methods: Four provocations for an emerging field. In Ghaziani

Brim

(Eds.), Imagining queer methods (pp. 3–27). New York University Press.

30.

Goldbach

Lindley

Anzani

Galupo

M. P.

(2023). Resisting trans medicalization: Body satisfaction and social contextual factors as predictors of sexual experiences among trans feminine and nonbinary individuals. The Journal of Sex Research, 60(6), 868–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.2004384

31.

Goldbach

Schrager

S. M.

Wood

J. K.

O'Brien

R. P.

Dunlap

S. L.

Rhoades

(2024). Development and validation of the transgender adolescent stress survey - minority stress (TASS-MS). Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1448693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1448693

32.

Grzanka

P. R.

(2016). Queer survey research and the ontological dimensions of heterosexism. WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly, 44(3–4), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2016.0039

33.

Grzanka

P. R.

Moradi

(2021). The qualitative imagination in counseling psychology: Enhancing methodological rigor across methods. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000560

34.

Halberstam

(2011). The queer art of failure. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822394358

35.

Haynes-Brown

T. K.

(2024). The role of the implementation matrix in designing and reporting integration decisions in a mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(3), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241252204

36.

Heasley

(2021). Heteronormativity and gender issues in education: Representing silent voices through radical re-imagination in empirical research. Educational Studies, 57(3), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2021.1892681

37.

Heckert

(2010). Intimacy with strangers/intimacy with self: Queer experiences of social research. In Nash

C. J.

Browne

(Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies (pp. 41–54). Routledge.

38.

Hendricks

M. L.

Testa

R. J.

(2012). A conceptual framework for clinical work with transgender and gender nonconforming clients: An adaptation of the minority stress model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43(5), 46–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029597

39.

Hesse-Biber

S. N.

(2007). Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis. Sage.

40.

Howell Smith

M. C.

Babchuk

W. A.

Stevens

Garrett

A. L.

Wang

S. C.

Guetterman

T. C.

(2020). Modeling the use of mixed methods–grounded theory: Developing scales for a new measurement model. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(2), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819872599

41.

Hyde

J. S.

Bigler

R. S.

Joel

Tate

C. C.

van Anders

S. M.

(2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist, 74(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000307

42.

Israel

Eng

Schulz

A. J.

Parker

E. A.

(2013). Methods for community-based participatory research (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

43.

Israel

Ketz

Detrie

P. M.

Burke

M. C.

Shulman

J. L.

(2003). Identifying counselor competencies for working with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 7(4), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2003.9962353

44.

Jackson

S. D.

Mohr

J. J.

Kindahl

A. M.

(2021). Intersectional experiences: A mixed methods experience sampling approach to studying an elusive phenomenon. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000537

45.

Jackson-Gordon

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2024). Using a joint display for building integration in a sequential study: Informing data dollection for a participatory second phase. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231179848

46.

James

S. E.

Herman

J. L.

Rankin

Keisling

Mottet

Anafi

(2016). The report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. National Center for Transgender Equality. https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdf

47.

Jenkins

(1996). A reflecting team approach to family therapy: A Delphi study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 22(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1996.tb00200.x

48.

Johnson

E. P.

(2001). “Quare” studies, or (almost) everything I know about queer studies I learned from my grandmother. Text and Performance Quarterly, 21(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462930128119

49.

Levitt

H. M.

Bamberg

Creswell

J. W.

Frost

D. M.

Josselson

Suárez-Orozco

(2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151

50.

Lindley

Budge

S. L.

(2022). Development and validation of the trans and nonbinary coping measure (TNCM): A measure of trans and nonbinary specific ways of coping with gender-related stress. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 11(3), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000618

51.

Lindley

Galupo

M. P.

(2020). Gender dysphoria and minority stress: Support for inclusion of gender dysphoria as a proximal stressor. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 7(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000439

52.

Lucero

Wallerstein

Duran

Alegria

Greene-Moton

Israel

Kastelic

Magarati

Oetzel

Pearson

Schulz

Villegas

White Hat

E. R.

(2018). Development of a mixed methods investigation of process and outcomes of community-based participatory research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816633309

53.

MacCallum

R. C.

Widaman

K. F.

Zhang

Hong

(1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84

54.

Marrow

(2023). “I hope that as our selection becomes more accurate, the number …will be very few”: The creation of assessment criteria for gender affirming care, 1960s–1980s. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 11(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000633

55.

Matsuno

Bricker

N. L.

Collazo

Huynh

K. D.

Mohr

Jr. Colson

A. E.

Balsam

K. F.

(2024) (In press). Development and validation of the nonbinary distal minority stressors, proximal minority stressors, and resilience scales. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000719

56.

Matsuno

Israel

(2018). Psychological interventions promoting resilience among transgender individuals: Transgender Resilience Intervention Model (TRIM). The Counseling Psychologist, 46(5), 632–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000018787261

57.

McCann

Monaghan

(2020). Queer theory now: From foundations to futures. Red Globe Press.

58.

McLean

K. C.

Fish

Rogers

L. O.

Syed

(2024). Integrating systems of power and privilege in the study of resilience. American Psychologist, 79(8), 999–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001260

59.

Meyer

I. H.

(1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137286

60.

Meyer

I. H.

(2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674

61.

Meyer

I. H.

(2015). Resilience in the study of minority stress and health of sexual and gender minorities. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(3), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000132

62.

Molina-Azorin

J. F.

Fetters

M. D.

(2019). Building a better world through mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819855864

63.

Morgan

D. L.

(2016). Living within blurry boundaries: The value of distinguishing between qualitative and quantitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816686433

64.

Morgan

D. L.

(2022). Prevalence of research designs and efforts at integration in mixed methods research: A systematic review. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 14(3), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v14n3a1

65.

Muñoz

(2010). Brown, queer and gendered: Queering the Latina/o ‘street-scapes’ in Los Angeles. In Browne

Nash

C. J.

(Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research (p. 316). Routledge.

66.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Bustamante

R. M.

Nelson

J. A.

(2010). Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809355805

67.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Combs

J. P.

(2010). Emergent data analysis techniques in mixed methods research: A synthesis. In Tashakkori

Teddlie

(Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 397–430). Sage. In press.

68.

Pasley

Hamilton

Veale

(2018). Transnormativities: Reterritorializing perceptions and practice. In Doan

Johnston

(Eds.), Rethinking transgender identities: Reflections from around the globe (pp. 124–147). Routledge.

69.

Pellicane

M. J.

Ciesla

J. A.

(2022). Associations between minority stress, depression, and suicidal ideation and attempts in transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 91, 102113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102113

70.

Prunas

(2019). The pathologization of trans-sexuality: Historical roots and implications for sex counselling with transgender clients. Sexologies, 28(3), 54a–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2019.06.001

71.

Puckett

J. A.

Aboussouan

A. B.

Ralston

A. L.

Mustanski

Newcomb

M. E.

(2023). Systems of cissexism and the daily production of stress for transgender and gender diverse people. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2021.1937437

72.

Puckett

J. A.

Domínguez

Matsuno

(2024). Measures of resilience: Do they reflect the experiences of transgender individuals? Transgender Health, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2022.0015

73.

Puckett

J. A.

Glozier

Kimball

Matsuno

MacBeth

Oklo

Clements

Z. A.

Galupo

M. P.

(2025). “I was resilient before I knew that resilience was a thing”: Transgender and nonbinary people’s perspectives on resilience. Journal of Prevention and Health Promotion, 6(2), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/26320770241308397

74.

Puckett

J. A.

Kimball

Matsuno

Galupo

(2024). Resilience in transgender and nonbinary communities: Adapting conceptual frameworks and addressing measurement challenges. In Lorenz

T. K.

Holland

Hope

(Eds.), Gender resilience, integration, and transformation (Nebraska Symposium on Motivation Series) (Vol. 70, pp. 101–120). Springer Nature.

75.

Riggle

E. D. B.

Mohr

J. J.

(2015). A proposed multi factor measure of positive identity for transgender identified individuals. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000082

76.

Riggle

E. D. B.

Rostosky

S. S.

McCants

L. E.

Pascale-Hague

(2011). The positive aspects of a transgender self-identification. Psychology & Sexuality, 2(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2010.534490

77.

Riggs

D. W.

Pearce

Pfeffer

C. A.

Hines

White

Ruspini

(2019). Transnormativity in the psy disciplines: Constructing pathology in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders and standards of care. American Psychologist, 74(8), 912–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000545

78.

Robinson

B. A.

Schmitz

R. M.

(2021). Beyond resilience: Resistance in the lives of LGBTQ youth. Sociology Compass, 15(12), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12947

79.

Rocco

T. S.

Bliss

L. A.

Gallagher

Perez-Prado

(2003). Taking the next step: Mixed methods research in organizational systems. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 21(1), 19–29. https://www.academia.edu/2688702/Taking_the_Next_Step_Mixed_Methods_Taking_the_Next_Step_Mixed_Methods_Research_in_Organizational_Systems_Research_in_Organizational_Systems

80.

Rood

B. A.

Reisner

S. L.

Puckett

J. A.

Surace

F. I.

Berman

A. K.

Pantalone

D. W.

(2017). Internalized transphobia: Exploring perceptions of social messages in transgender and gender-nonconforming adults. International Journal of Transgenderism, 18(4), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2017.1329048

81.

Shannon-Baker

(2021). Queering mixed methods research. In Strunk

K. K.

Shelton

S. A.

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of queer studies in education (pp. 589–594). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004506725_116

82.

Shannon-Baker

(2023). Call for papers for a special issue on queer approaches to mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(4), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231201244

83.

Shulman

Holt

N. R.

Hope

D. A.

Mocarski

Eyer

Woodruff

(2017). A review of contemporary assessment tools for use with transgender and gender nonconfirming adults. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 4(3), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000233

84.

Shuster

S. M.

Westbrook

(2024). Reducing the joy deficit in sociology: A study of transgender joy. Social Problems, 71(3), 791–809. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spac034

85.

Singh

A. A.

(2015). Leaning into the ambiguity of liberation: Phenomenology for social justice. In Johnson

C. W.

Parry

D. C.

(Eds.), Fostering social justice through qualitative inquiry: A methodological guide (2nd ed., pp. 66–82). Routledge.

86.

Singh

A. A.

McKleroy

V. S.

(2011). “Just getting out of bed is a revolutionary act”: The resilience of transgender people of color who have survived traumatic life events. Traumatology, 17(2), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534765610369261

87.

Singh

A. A.

Meng

S. E.

Hansen

A. W.

(2014). “I am my own gender”: Resilience strategies of trans youth. Journal of Counseling and Development, 92(2), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00150.x

88.

Stacy

Acevedo-Polakovich

Rosewood

(2018). Youth Go: An approach to gathering youth perspectives in out-of-school time programs. Afterschool Matters, 28, 34–43. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1195646.pdf

89.

Stacy

S. T.

Castro

K. M.

Acevedo-Polakovich

I. D.

(2020). The cost of youth voices: Comparing the feasibility of Youth GO against focus groups. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 1(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.1331230

90.

Suslovic

Lett

(2023). Resilience is an adverse event: A critical discussion of resilience theory in health services research and public health. Community Health Equity Research & Policy, 44(3), 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X231159721

91.

Tashakkori

Creswell

J. W.

(2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906293042

92.

Testa

Habarth

Peta

Balsam

Bockting

(2015). Development of the gender minority stress and resilience measure. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000081

93.

Vaughn

L. M.

Jacquez

Lindquist-Grantz

Parsons

Melink

(2017). Immigrants as research partners: A review of immigrants in community-based participatory research (CBPR). Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 19(6), 1457–1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-016-0474-3

94.

Vaughn

L. M.

Jacquez

Zhen-Duan

Graham

Marschner

Peralta

García

Recino

Maya

Cabrera

(2017). Latinos Unidos por la Salud: The process of developing an immigrant community research team. Collaborations: A Journal of Community-Based Research and Practice, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.33596/coll.9

95.

Veale

J. F.

Clarke

D. E.

Lomax

T. C.

(2012). Male-to-female transsexuals’ impressions of blanchard's autogynephilia theory. International Journal of Transgenderism, 13(3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2011.669659

96.

Veldhuis

C. B.

Cascalheira

Delucio

Budge

Matsuno

Huynh

Puckett

J. A.

Balsam

Velez

Galupo

M. P.

(2024). Guidelines for writing up and publishing LGBTQIA+ research. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 11(3), 365–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000722

97.

Vincent

B. W.

(2018). Studying trans: Recommendations for ethical recruitment and collaboration with transgender participants in academic research. Psychology & Sexuality, 9(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2018.1434558

98.

White Hughto

J. M.

Reisner

S. L.

Pachankis

J. E.

(2015). Transgender stigma and health: A critical review of stigma determinants, mechanisms, and interventions. Social Science & Medicine, 147(1), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.010

99.

Wright

W. T.

Zhang

M. Y.

(2021). Poststructuralism. In Strunk

K. K.

Shelton

S. A.

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of queer studies in education (pp. 452–455). Brill.

100.

(2012). The status of online public relations research: An analysis of published articles in 1992-2009. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24(5), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2012.723277

Transforming Queer Mixed Methods Research to be Trans and Nonbinary-Inclusive

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References