Priority is a dimension of research design in a mixed method study that provides a signpost to signify how a study’s principal findings were derived. The contribution of mixing has not typically been considered as an explicit component of the weighting of the priority of a mixed methods study. Adding the expression mixed priority to the terminology used to provide transparency about priority is one way to distinguish research with an interactive design where qualitative and quantitative data are merged during analysis to create a sum that is greater than its parts. The most significant implication of this discussion is to add integration as a third factor in the conceptualization of priority in mixed method research.
CreamerE. G. (2018). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. Sage.
2.
CreswellJ. W. (2015). Revisiting mixed methods and advanced scientific practices. In Hesse-BiberS. N.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 57–71). Oxford University Press.
3.
CreswellJ. W.KlassenA. C.Plano ClarkV. L.Clegg SmithK. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in health sciences. Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research, National Institute of Health.
4.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed method research. Sage.
5.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research (2nd ed.). Sage.
6.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed method research (3rd ed.). Sage.
7.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L.GutmannM. L.HansonW. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–271). Sage.
8.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
FettersM. D.GuettermanT. C. (2021). Development of a joint display as mixed analysis. In In OnwuegbuzieA. J.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), The Routledge reviewer’s guide to mixed methods analysis (pp. 259-276). Sage.
11.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Wiley.
12.
JangE.McDougallD. E.HerbertM.RussellP. (2008). Integrative data analytic strategies in research in school success in challenging circumstances. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 221–247. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.vt.edu/10.1177%2F1558689808315323
13.
JohnsonR. B.WalshI. (2019). Mixed grounded theory: Merging grounded theory with mixed methods and multimethod research. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 517–531). Sage.
14.
MorganD. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800307
MorseJ. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189–208). Sage.
18.
MorseJ. M.NiehausL. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Life Coast Press.
19.
MoseholmE.FettersM. D. (2017). Conceptual models to guide integration during analysis in convergent mixed methods studies. Methodological Innovation, 10(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799117703118
20.
NastasiB. K.HitchcockJ.SarkarS.BurkholderG.VarjasK.JayasenaA. (2007). Mixed methods in intervention research: Theory to adaptation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298181
21.
OnwuegbuzieA.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), (2021). The Routledge reviewers guide to mixed methods analysis. Routledge.
22.
PedersenM.OvergaardD.AndersonI.BaastrupM. (2018). Mechanisms and drivers of social inequality in phase II cardiac rehabilitation attendance: A convergent mixed methods study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(9), 2185–2195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13715
23.
PeroffD. M.MoraisD.SeekampE.SillsE.WallaceT. (2020). Assessing residents’ place attachment to the Guatemalan Maya landscape through mixed methods photo elicitation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819845800
24.
PetersM.Guietert-CatasúsM.RomeroM. (2021). Student learning ecologies in online higher education: A model to support connected learning across contexts. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.2014408
25.
PothC. (2018). The contributions of mixed insights to advancing technology-enhanced formative assessments within higher education learning environments: An illustrative example. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). 9, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0090-5
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.
28.
WesthuesA.OchockaJ.JacobsonN.SimichL.MaiterS.JanzenR.FlerasA. (2008). Developing theory from complexity: Reflections on a collaborative mixed method participatory action research study. Qualitative Health Research, 18(5), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308316531
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
