Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-4
A Novel Mixed Methods Approach Combining Geospatial Mapping and Qualitative Inquiry to Identify Multilevel Policy Targets: The Focused Rapid Assessment Process (fRAP) Applied to Cancer Survivorship
Multilevel perspectives across communities, medical systems and policy environments are needed, but few methods are available for health services researchers with limited resources. We developed a mixed methods health policy approach, the focused Rapid Assessment Process (fRAP), that is designed to uncover multilevel modifiable barriers and facilitators contributing to public health issues. We illustrate with a study applying fRAP to the issue of cancer survivorship care. Through this multilevel investigation we identified two major modifiable areas affecting high-quality cancer survivorship care: (1) the importance of cancer survivorship guidelines/data and (2) the need for improved oncology–primary care relationships. This article contributes to the mixed methods literature by coupling geospatial mapping to qualitative rapid assessment to efficiently identify policy change targets.
BavaL.JohnsA.FreyerD. R.RuccioneK. (2017). Development of a culturally competent service to improve academic functioning for Latino survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Methodological considerations. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 34(3), 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454216676837
3.
BeebeJ. (2001). Rapid assessment process: An introduction. AltaMira Press.
4.
BeebeJ. (2014). Rapid qualitative inquiry: A field guide to team-based assessment (2nd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
ChambersR. (1981). Rapid rural appraisal: Rationale and repertoire. Public Administration and Development, 1(2), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.4230010202
8.
CohenD. J.CrabtreeB. F. (2008). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: Controversies and recommendations. Annals of Family Medicine, 6(4), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.818
9.
CoughlinS. S.SmithS. A. (2015). The impact of the natural, social, built, and policy environments on breast cancer. Journal of Environment and Health Science, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.15436/2378-6841.15.020
10.
CrabtreeB. F.MillerW. L. (1991). A qualitative approach to primary care research: The long interview. Family Medicine, 23(2), 145-151.
11.
CrabtreeB. F.MillerW. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage.
12.
CrabtreeB. F.MillerW. L.GunnJ. M.HoggW. E.ScottC. M.LevesqueJ. F.HarrisM. F.ChaseS. M.AdvocatJ. R.HalmaL. M.RussellG. M. (2018). Uncovering the wisdom hidden between the lines: The collaborative reflexive deliberative approach. Family Practice, 35(3), 266-275. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx091
13.
CrabtreeB. F.MillerW. L.HowardJ.RubinsteinE. B.TsuiJ.HudsonS. V.O’MalleyD.FerranteJ. M.StangeK. C. (2020). Cancer survivorship care roles for primary care physicians. Annals of Family Medicine, 18(3), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2498
FrelsJ. G.FrelsR. K.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2011). Geographic information systems: A mixed methods spatial approach in business and management research and beyond. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 5(3), 367-386. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2011.5.3.367
16.
GittelsohnJ. (1998). Rapid assessment procedures (RAP): Ethnographic methods to investigate women’s health. International Nutrition Foundation.
17.
GorinS. S.BadrH.KrebsP.Prabhu DasI. (2012). Multilevel interventions and racial/ethnic health disparities. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 2012(44), 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs015
HewittM.GreenfieldS.StovallE. (2005). From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. National Academies Press.
20.
IvankovaN. V.CreswellJ. W.StickS. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
21.
KatzM. L.YoungG. S.ZimmermannB. J.TatumC. M.PaskettE. D. (2018). Assessing colorectal cancer screening barriers by two methods. Journal of Cancer Education, 33(3), 536-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1148-5
22.
KesslerR.GlasgowR. E. (2011). A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: Dramatic change is needed. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(6), 637-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.023
23.
Kieber-EmmonsA.MillerW. L.CrabtreeB. F.JaenC.TopmillerM. (2019). Environmental and contextual differences affecting cervical cancer survivorship in Hispanic women in three Texas Counties [Poster presentation]. North American Primary Care Research Group, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
24.
Kieber-EmmonsA.MillerW. L.CrabtreeB.TopmillerM. (2018). A novel mixed method using geographic information systems (GIS) and ethnographic methods to study disparities in cervical cancer mortality in Hispanic women [Poster presentation]. North American Primary Care Research Group 46th Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, United States.
25.
KimT. H.ChangJ. S.KongI. D. (2017). Effects of exercise training on physical fitness and biomarker levels in breast cancer survivors. Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 7(2), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.15280/jlm.2017.7.2.55
26.
KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810033001
27.
LevesqueJ. F.HarrisM. F.ScottC.CrabtreeB.MillerW.HalmaL. M.HoggW. E.WeeninkJ.-W.AdvocatJ. R.GunnJ.RussellG. (2018). Dimensions and intensity of inter-professional teamwork in primary care: Evidence from five international jurisdictions. Family Practice, 35(3), 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx103
28.
McCrackenG. D. (1988). The long interview. Sage.
29.
McWilliamsJ. M.HatfieldL. A.ChernewM. E.LandonB. E.SchwartzA. L. (2016). Early performance of accountable care organizations in Medicare. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(24), 2357-2366. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1600142
30.
MenesesK.BenzR.BailJ. R.VoJ. B.TriebelK.FazeliP.FrankJ.VanceD. E. (2018). Speed of processing training in middle-aged and older breast cancer survivors (SOAR): Results of a randomized controlled pilot. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 168(1), 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4564-2
31.
MillerK. D.SiegelR. L.LinC.-C.MariottoA. B.KramerJ. L.RowlandJ. H.SteinK. D.AlteriR.JemalA. (2016). Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA: Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 66(4), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21349
32.
PaskettE.ThompsonB.AmmermanA. S.OrtegaA. N.MarstellerJ.RichardsonD. (2016). Multilevel interventions to address health disparities show promise in improving population health. Health Affairs, 35(8), 1429-1434. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1360
33.
PraestegaardC.JensenA.JensenS. M.NielsenT. S.WebbP. M.NagleC. M.DeFAzioA., H.HøgdallE.RossingM. A.DohertyJ. A.WicklundK. G.GoodmanM. T.ModugnoF.MoysuchK.NessR. B.EdwardsR.MatsuoK.HosonoM.GoodeE. L. . . . KjaerS. K., & the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. (2017). Cigarette smoking is associated with adverse survival among women with ovarian cancer: Results from a pooled analysis of 19 studies. International Journal of Cancer, 140(11), 2422-2435. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30600
34.
ResnicowK.PageS. E. (2008). Embracing chaos and complexity: A quantum change for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 98(8), 1382-1389. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.129460
35.
RubinsteinE. B.MillerW. L.HudsonS. V.HowardJ.O’MalleyD.TsuiJ.Sophia LeeH.BatorA.CrabtreeB. F. (2017). Cancer survivorship care in advanced primary care practices: A qualitative study of challenges and opportunities. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(12), 1726-1732. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4747
36.
RussellG. M.MillerW. L.GunnJ. M.LevesqueJ. F.HarrisM. F.HoggW. E.ScottC. M.AdvocatJ. R.HalmaL.ChaseS. M.CrabtreeB. F. (2018). Contextual levers for team-based primary care: Lessons from reform interventions in five jurisdictions in three countries. Family Practice, 35(3), 276-284. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx095
37.
ScrimshawN. S.GleasonG. R. (1992). Rapid assessment procedures: Qualitative methodologies for planning and evaluation of health related programmes. International Nutrition Foundation for Developing Countries.
38.
ScrimshawS.HurtadoE. (1987). Rapid assessment procedures for nutrition and primary health care: Anthropological approaches to improving programme effectiveness. UCLA Latin American Center Publications, University of California.
39.
ShaakK.TopmillerM.Kieber-EmmonsA.CareyvaB.JohnsonM. (2019). A mixed methods approach to identifying local variations in diabetes care [Poster presentation]. American Public Health Association, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
40.
Shariff-MarcoS.GomezS. L.SangaramoorthyM.YangJ.KooJ.HertzA.JohnE. M.ChengI.KeeganT. H. (2015). Impact of neighborhoods and body size on survival after breast cancer diagnosis. Health Place, 36, 162-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.10.003
41.
SimmonsV. N.PineiroB.HooperM. W.GrayJ. E.BrandonT. H. (2016). Tobacco-related health disparities across the Cancer Care Continuum. Cancer Control, 23(4), 434-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/107327481602300415
42.
SimoneJ. V.HewittM. (1999). Ensuring quality cancer care. National Academies Press.
43.
SpostoR.KeeganT. H.VigenC.KwanM. L.BernsteinL.JohnE. M.ChengI.YangJ.KooJ.KurianA. W.CaanB. J.LuY.MonroeK. R.Shariff-MarcoS.GomezS. L.WuA. H. (2016). The effect of patient and contextual characteristics on racial/ethnic disparity in breast cancer mortality. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 25(7), 1064-1072. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1326
44.
StangeK. C.BreslauE. S.DietrichA. J.GlasgowR. E. (2012). State-of-the-art and future directions in multilevel interventions across the cancer control continuum. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 2012(44), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs006
45.
StangeK. C.GlasgowR. E. (2013, June). Contextual factors: The importance of considering and reporting on context in research on the patient-centered medical home [AHRQ Publication No. 13-0045-EF]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
46.
StokolsD. (1996). Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10(4), 282-298. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.282
47.
TaplinS. H.Anhang PriceR.EdwardsH. M.FosterM. K.BreslauE. S.CholletteV.Prabhu DasI.ClauserS. B.FennellM. L.ZapkaJ. (2012). Introduction: Understanding and influencing multilevel factors across the cancer care continuum. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 2012(44), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs008
48.
TaylorB.HenshallC.KenyonS.LitchfieldI.GreenfieldS. (2018). Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis. BMJ Open, 8(10), Article e019993. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019993
49.
TeddlieC.YuF. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430
50.
Tomoaia-CotiselA.ScammonD. L.WaitzmanN. J.CronholmP. F.HalladayJ. R.DriscollD. L.SolbergL. I.HsuC.Tai-SealeM.HiratsukaV.ShihS. C.FettersM. D.WiseC. G.AlexanderJ. A.HauserD.McMullenC. K.ScholleS. H.TirodkarM. A.SchmidtL.. . . StangeK. C. (2013). Context matters: The experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change. Annals of Family Medicine, 11(Suppl. 1), S115-S123. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1549
51.
TopmillerM.Kieber-EmmonsA. M.ShaakK.McCannJ. L. (2020). Identifying bright spot counties for appropriate diabetes preventive care: A geospatial, positive deviance approach. Journal of Primary Prevention, 41(5), 431-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-020-00601-4
52.
TsuiJ.HudsonS. V.RubinsteinE. B.HowardJ.HicksE.Kieber-EmmonsA.BatorA.LeeH. S.FerranteJ.CrabtreeB. F. (2018). A mixed-methods analysis of the capacity of the Patient-Centered Medical Home to implement care coordination services for cancer survivors. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 8(3), 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibx059
53.
ZapkaJ. (2008). Innovative provider- and health system-directed approaches to improving colorectal cancer screening delivery. Medical Care, 46(9 Suppl. 1), S62-S67. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817fdf57
54.
ZapkaJ.TaplinS. H.GanzP.GrunfeldE.SterbaK. (2012). Multilevel factors affecting quality: Examples from the cancer care continuum. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 2012(44), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs005
