This article explicates the intragroup social dynamics and work of a nursing and education research team as a community of research practice interested in organizational cultures and occupational subcultures. Dynamics were characterized by processes of socialization through reeducation and group social identity formation that enabled members to cross discipline-bordered traditions and produce interdisciplinary mixed methods combinations. Combinations were achieved at the paradigm level through the generation of a shared viewing position and theoretical model. At methods and technique levels, such achievements were accomplished through methodological capitalization and prioritization and the development of a quantitative culture assessment tool that can be used in combination with complementary qualitative observation and interview protocols. Recommendations for other teams are provided.
AboelaS. W.LarsonE.BakkenS.CarrasquilloO.FormicolaA.GliedS. A.. . . GebbieK. M. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42, 329-346.
2.
AliseM. A.TeddlieC. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 103-126.
3.
BarbourR. S. (1998). Mixing qualitative methods: Quality assurance or qualitative quagmire?Qualitative Health Research, 8, 352-361.
4.
BarryC. A.BrittenN.BarberN.BradleyC.StevensonF. (1999). Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative teamwork. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 26-44.
5.
BrannenJ. (1992). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches: An overview. In BrannenJ. (Ed.), Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 3-37). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
6.
CaracelliV. J.GreeneJ. C. (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed-methods evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 195-207.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DenscombeM. (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 270-283.
10.
EstabrooksC. A.ThompsonD. S.LovelyJ. J.HofmeyerA. (2006). A guide to knowledge translation theory. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 25-36.
11.
Forbes-ThompsonS.GajewskiB.CawiezellJ.DuntonN. (2006). An exploration of nursing home organizational processes. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 28, 935-954.
12.
FullanM. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
FullanM. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
14.
GageN. L. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A “historical” sketch of research and teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4-10.
15.
GlasgowR. E.KlesgesL. M.DzewaltowskiD. A.BullS. S.EstabrooksP. (2004). The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?Annals of Behavior Medicine, 27, 3-12.
16.
GlasgowR. E.McKayH. G.PietteJ. D.ReynoldsK. D. (2001). The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: What can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management?Patient Education and Counseling, 44, 119-127.
17.
GreenhalghT.RobertG.BateP.MacfarlaneF.KyriakidouO. (2005). Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations: A systematic literature review. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18.
KalishB.LeeH.RochmanM. (2010). Nursing staff teamwork and job satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 938-947.
19.
KennerlyS.YapT.HemmingsA.BeckettG.SchaferJ.BorchersA. (2012). Development and psychometric testing of the Nursing Culture Assessment Tool (NCAT). Clinical Nursing Research, 21, 467-485.
20.
KuhG. D.WhittE. J. (1998). The invisible tapestry: Culture in American colleges and universities (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 1). Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
21.
LaschingerH.K.HavensD. (1996). Staff nurse work empowerment and perceived control over nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Administration, 26(9), 27-35.
22.
LaveJ. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In ResnickL.LevineJ.TeasleyS. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63-82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23.
LeechN. L.DellingerA. B.BrannaganK. B.TanakaH. (2010). Evaluating mixed research studies: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 17-31.
24.
MasseyC.AlpassF.FlettR.LewisK.MorrissS.SligoF. (2006). Crossing fields: The case of a multi-disciplinary research team. Qualitative Research, 6, 131-149.
25.
MorganD. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 362-376.
26.
MorganD. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76.
27.
NadlerD.TushmanM. (1980). A congruence model for diagnosing organizational behavior. In LawlerE.NadlerD.CammannC. (Eds.) Organizational assessment (pp. 261-278). New York, NY: Wiley
28.
NairK.DolovichL.BrazilK.RainaP. (2008). It’s all about relationships: A qualitative study of health researchers’ perspectives of conducting interdisciplinary health research. BMC Health Services Research, 8, 110-120.
29.
O’HagenJ.PersaudD. (2009). Creating a culture of accountability in health care. Health Care Manager, 28, 124-133.
PerryL.BellchambersH.HowieAMoxeyA.ParkinsonL.CapraS.BylesJ. (2011). Examination of the utility of the promoting action on research implementation in health services framework for implementation of evidence based practice in residential aged care settings. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67, 2139-2150.
32.
RhodesV.StevensD.HemmingsA. (2011). Creating positive culture in a new urban high school. High School Journal, 94(3), 82-94.
33.
SandelowskiM. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-methods studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 246-255.
34.
SarasonS. B. (1996). Revisiting “The culture of the school and the problem of change.”New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
35.
ScheinE. H. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45, 109-119.
36.
ScheinE. H. (1996a). Culture: The missing concept in organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 229-240.
37.
ScheinE. H. (1996b). Three cultures of management: The key to organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 9-20.
38.
ScheinE. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
39.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: NY: Teachers College Press.
40.
SelznickP. (1992). The moral commonwealth: Social theory and the promise of community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
SleutalM. (2000). Climate, culture, context, or work environment? Organizational factors that influence nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Administration, 30(2), 53-58.
42.
SpradleyJ. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
43.
StecklerA.McLeroyK. R.GoodmanR. M.BirdS. T.McCormickL. (1992). Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction. Health Education Quarterly, 19, 1-8.
44.
SugaiG.HornerR. H.DunlapG.HienemanM.LewisT. J.NelsonC. M.. . . ReufM. (2000). Applying positive behavioral support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 2, 131-143.
45.
TaifelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinL. W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
46.
WeberM. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 1-8.
