“I’ve Risen Up From the Ashes That I Created”: Record Clearance and Gendered Narratives of Self-Reinvention and Reintegration

Abstract

Record clearance allows some individuals to redesignate or remove certain minor convictions from their criminal records. This interview-based study finds that both men and women seek opportunities for personal gain through record clearance, but women are more motivated by moral and religious influences and concern about reputation. Women are also more likely than men to acknowledge personal flaws, and to desire to replace criminal identities with law-abiding identities. As women redefine their identities, caregiving is especially important as a personal obligation and professional aspiration. Record clearance is particularly compatible with women’s motivations, willingness to change, and personal and professional goals.

Keywords

expungement record clearance criminal records reentry reintegration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

E. B.

Chen

E. Y.

Chapman

(2017). Erasing the mark of a criminal past: Ex-offenders’ expectations and experiences with record clearance. Punishment & Society, 19, 23-52.

Aresti

Eatough

Brooks-Gordon

(2010). Doing time after time: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of reformed ex-prisoners’ experiences of self-change, identity and career opportunities. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 169-190.

Bakken

N. W.

Gunter

W. D.

Visher

C. A.

(2013). Spirituality and desistance from substance use among reentering offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 1321-1339.

Bates

R. E.

(2004). Women prisoners and recidivism: Factors associated with re-arrest one year post-release (Children, Families, and the Criminal Justice System, Spring). Chicago, IL. Retrived from https://socialwork.uic.edu/wp-content/uploads/bsk-pdf-manager/recidbriefSpring04edited_129.pdf

Bazemore

Erbe

(2004). Reintegration and restorative justice: Towards a theory and practice of informal social control and support. In Maruna

Immarigeon

(Eds.), After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 27-56). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.

Benda

B. B.

(2005). Gender differences in life-course theory of recidivism: A survival analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 325-342.

Bloom

Owen

Covington

(2004). Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy. Review of Policy Research, 21, 31-48.

Bui

H. N.

Morash

(2010). The impact of network relationships, prison experiences, and internal transformation on women’s success after prison release. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49, 1-22.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2015). Survey of state criminal history information systems, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

10.

Bushway

S. D.

Apel

(2012). A signaling perspective on employment-based reentry programming. Criminology & Public Policy, 11, 21-50.

11.

Byrne

C. F.

Trew

K. J.

(2008). Pathways through crime: The development of crime and desistance in the accounts of men and women offenders. The Howard Journal of Criminal and Justice, 47, 238-258.

12.

Caiafa

Farnsworth

A. R.

(1982). Under the influence of California’s new drunk driving law: Is the drunk driver’s presumption of innocence on the rocks? Pepperdine Law Review, 10, 91-138.

13.

Campbell

(1987). Self definition by rejection: The case of gang girls. Social Problems, 34(5), 451-466.

14.

Charmaz

(2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

15.

Charmaz

(2011). Ground theory methods in social justice research. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 359-380). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

16.

Cobbina

J. E.

(2010). Reintegration success and failure: Factors impacting reintegration among incarcerated and formerly incarcerated women. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49, 210-232.

17.

Cobbina

J. E.

Bender

K. A.

(2012). Predicting the future: Incarcerated women’s views of reentry success. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 51, 275-294.

18.

Connell

R. W.

(1987). Gender and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

19.

Cressey

D. R.

(1965). Social psychological foundations for using criminals in the rehabilitation of criminals. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 2, 49-59.

20.

Curcio

Pattavina

Fisher

(2018). Gender differences on the road to redemption. Feminist Criminology, 13, 182-204. doi: 10.1177/1557085116654566

21.

Dodge

Pogrebin

M. R.

(2001). Collateral costs of imprisonment for women: Complications of reintegration. The Prison Journal, 81(1), 42-54.

22.

Dodson

K. D.

Cabage

L. N.

Klenowski

P. M.

(2011). An evidence-based assessment of faith-based programs: Do faith-based programs “work” to reduce recidivism? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50, 367-383.

23.

Doyle

J. M.

Kao

(2007). Are racial identities of multiracials stable? Changing self-identification among single and multiple race individuals. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 405-423.

24.

Ehrensaft

Khashu

Ross

Wamsley

(2003). Patterns of criminal conviction and incarceration among mothers of children in foster care in New York city. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.

25.

Giordano

P. C.

Cernkovich

S. A.

Rudolph

J. L.

(2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 990-1064.

26.

Giordano

P. C.

Longmore

M. A.

Schroeder

R. D.

Seffrin

P. M.

(2008). A life-course perspective on spirituality and desistance from crime. Criminology, 46, 99-132.

27.

Giordano

P. C.

Schroeder

R. D.

Cernkovich

S. A.

(2007). Emotions and crime over the life course: A neo-meadian perspective on criminal continuity and change. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1603-1661.

28.

Harm

N. J.

Phillips

S. D.

(2001). You can’t go home again: Women and criminal recidivism. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 32(3), 3-21.

29.

Herrschaft

B. A.

Veysey

B. M.

Tubman-Carbone

H. R.

Christian

(2009). Gender differences in the transformation narrative: Implications for revised reentry strategies for female offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 463-482.

30.

Huebner

B. M.

DeJong

Cobbina

(2010). Women coming home: Long-term patterns of recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 27, 225-254. doi:10.1080/07418820902870486

31.

Jacobs

J. B.

(2015). The eternal criminal record. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

32.

Johnson

B. R.

(2004). Religious programs and recidivism among former inmates in prison fellowship programs: A long-term follow-up study. Justice Quarterly, 21, 329-354.

33.

Lalonde

R. J.

Cho

R. M.

(2008). The impact of incarceration in state prison on the employment prospects of women. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 243-267.

34.

Laub

J. H.

Sampson

R. J.

(2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

35.

LeBel

T. P.

(2007). An examination of the impact of formerly incarcerated persons helping others. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 46, 1-24.

36.

LeBel

T. P.

(2008). Perceptions of and responses to stigma. Sociology Compass, 2, 409-432.

37.

LeBel

T. P.

Maruna

(2012). Life on the outside: Transitioning from prison to the community. In Petersilia

Reitz

K.R.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook on sentencing and corrections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

38.

LeBel

T. P.

Richie

Maruna

(2015). Helping others as a response to reconcile a criminal past: The role of the wounded healer in prisoner reentry programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 108-120.

39.

Leverentz

A. M.

(2014). The ex-prisoner’s dilemma: How women negotiate competing narratives of reentry and desistance. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

40.

Maruna

(2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

41.

Maruna

LeBel

T. P.

(2002). Revisiting ex-prisoner re-entry: A buzzword in search of a narrative. In Rex

Tonry

(Eds.), Reform and punishment (pp. 158-180). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

42.

Maruna

LeBel

T. P.

(2003). Welcome home? Examining the reentry court concept from a strengths-based perspective. Western Criminology Review, 4, 91-107.

43.

Mauer

(2013). The changing racial dynamics of women’s incarceration. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.

44.

McIvor

Murray

Jamieson

(2004). Desistance from crime: Is it different for women and girls? In Richards

S.C.

Maruna

Immarigeon

(Eds.), After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 181-197). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

45.

Mears

D. P.

Cochran

J. C.

(2014). Prisoner reentry in the era of mass incarceration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

46.

Michalsen

(2011). Mothering as a life course transition: Do women go straight for their children? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50, 349-366.

47.

Miller

(2002). The strengths and limits of “doing gender” for understanding street crime. Theoretical Criminology, 6, 433-460.

48.

O’Brien

(2001a). “Just like baking a cake”: Women describe the necessary ingredients for successful reentry after incarceration. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 82, 287-295.

49.

O’Brien

(2001b). Making it in the free world: Women in transition from prison. Albany: State University of New York Press.

50.

Opsal

(2011). Women disrupting a marginalized identity: Subverting the parolee identity through narrative. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40, 135-167.

51.

Opsal

(2012). “Livin’ on the straights”: Identity, desistance, and work among women post-incarceration. Sociological Inquiry, 82, 378-403.

52.

Opsal

(2015). “It’s their world, so you’ve just got to get through”: Women’s experiences of parole governance. Feminist Criminology, 10, 188-207.

53.

Owen

(2009). Accounts of change and resistance among women prisoners. In Veysey

Christian

Martinez

(Eds.), How offenders transform their lives (pp. 104-123). Abingdon, UK: Routledge. .

54.

Paternoster

Bachman

Bushway

Kerrison

O’Connell

(2015). Human agency and explanations of criminal desistance: Arguments for a rational choice theory. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1, 209-235.

55.

Paternoster

Bushway

(2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99, 1103-1156.

56.

Petersilia

(2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

57.

Richie

B. E.

(2001). Challenges incarcerated women face as they return to their communities: Findings from life history interviews. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 368-389.

58.

Richie

B. E.

(2002). The social impact of mass incarceration on women. In Mauer

Chesney-Lind

(Eds.), Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 136-149). New York, NY: The New Press.

59.

Riessman

(1965). The “helper” therapy principle. Social Work, 10, 27-32.

60.

Rocque

Posick

Paternoster

(2016). Identities through time: An exploration of identity change as a cause of desistance. Justice Quarterly, 33, 45-72.

61.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

62.

Saperstein

Penner

A. M.

(2010). The race of a criminal record: How incarceration colors racial perceptions. Social Problems, 57, 92-113.

63.

The Sentencing Project. (2015). Fact sheet: Incarcerated women and girls. Retrieved from http://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Incarcerated-Women-and-Girls.pdf

64.

Spohn

Beichner

(2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 149-184.

65.

Steffensmeier

Allan

(1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 459-487.

66.

Thomas

D. R.

(2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237-246.

67.

Uggen

Kruttschnitt

(1998). Crime in the breaking: Gender differences in desistance. Law & Society Review, 32, 339-366.

68.

U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Table 1.4 Occupations with the most job growth, 2014 and projected 2024. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_104.htm

69.

West

Zimmerman

D. H.

(1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125-151.

70.

Wright

E. M.

Van Voorhis

Salisbury

E. J.

Bauman

(2012). Gender-responsive lessons learned and policy implications for women in prison: A review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1612-1632.

71.

Zemore

S. E.

Kaskutas

L. A.

Ammon

L. N.

(2004). In 12-step groups, helping helps the helper. Addiction, 99, 1015-1023.