Large language models (LLMs) offer potential applications across medical specialties; in spine surgery, opportunities exist to enhance patient care, streamline research, and improve clinical practice. This review explores the current and potential applications of LLMs in spine surgery, assessing their possibilities and limitations across patient education, research, clinical practice, and perioperative assistance.
AgaronnikNDKwokASchoenfeldAJLindvallC.Natural language processing for automated surveillance of intraoperative neuromonitoring in spine surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2022;97:121–126.
2.
AhmedWSaturnoMRajjoubR, et al. ChatGPT versus NASS clinical guidelines for degenerative spondylolisthesis: a comparative analysis. Eur Spine J. 2024;33(11):4182–4203.
3.
Al RawiZMKirbyBJAlbrechtPANuelleJAVLondonDA.Experimenting with the new frontier: artificial intelligence-powered chat bots in hand surgery. Hand. 2024;2024:15589447241238372.
4.
Benaich N. State of AI report 2023. 2023. Available at: https://www.stateof.ai/2023. Accessed January 5, 2025.
5.
BiswasSMcMenemyLSarkarV, et al. Natural language processing for the automated detection of intra-operative elements in lumbar spine surgery. Front Surg. 2023;10:1271775.
6.
BleaseC.Open AI meets open notes: surveillance capitalism, patient privacy and online record access. J Med Ethics. 2024;50(2):84–89.
7.
BrameierDTAlnasserAACarninoJMBhashyamARvon KeudellAGWeaverM.Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery: can a large language model “write” a believable orthopaedic journal article?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023;105(17):1388–1392.
8.
ButlerJJHarringtonMCTongY, et al. From jargon to clarity: improving the readability of foot and ankle radiology reports with an artificial intelligence large language model. Foot Ankle Surg. 2024;30(4):331–337.
9.
CascellaMSemeraroFMontomoliJBelliniVPiazzaOBignamiE.The breakthrough of large language models release for medical applications: 1-year timeline and perspectives. J Med Syst. 2024;48(1):22.
ClusmannJKolbingerFRMutiHSCarreroZIEckardtJNLalehNG. The future landscape of large language models in medicine. Commun Med. 2023;3(1):141.
12.
DwyerTHoitGBurnsD, et al. Use of an artificial intelligence conversational agent (chatbot) for hip arthroscopy patients following surgery. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023;5(2):e495-e505.
HuangKTMehtaNHGuptaSSeeAPArnaoutO.Evaluation of the safety, accuracy, and helpfulness of the GPT-4.0 large language model in neurosurgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2024;123:151–156.
15.
KasthuriVSGlueckJPhamH, et al. Assessing the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated responses to patient questions regarding spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024;106(12):1136–1142.
16.
KuckelmanIJWetleyKYiPHRossAB.Translating musculoskeletal radiology reports into patient-friendly summaries using ChatGPT-4. Skeletal Radiol. 2024;53(8):1621–1624.
17.
KuckelmanIJYiPHBuiMOnuhIAndersonJARossAB.Assessing AI-powered patient education: a case study in radiology. Acad Radiol. 2024;31(1):338–342.
LawrenceKWHabibiAAWardSALajamCMSchwarzkopfRRozellJC.Human versus artificial intelligence-generated arthroplasty literature: a single-blinded analysis of perceived communication, quality, and authorship source. Int J Med Robot. 2024;20(1):e2621.
MaroteauGAnJSMurgierJHuletCOllivierMFerreiraA.Evaluation of the impact of large language learning models on articles submitted to Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR): a significant increase in the use of artificial intelligence in 2023. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023;109(8):103720.
22.
MejiaMRArroyaveJSSaturnoM, et al. Use of ChatGPT for determining clinical and surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy: a North American Spine Society guideline comparison. Neurospine. 2024;21(1):149–158.
23.
MenzBDKudererNMBacchiSModiNDChin-YeeBHuT.Current safeguards, risk mitigation, and transparency measures of large language models against the generation of health disinformation: repeated cross sectional analysis. BMJ. 2024;384:e078538.
24.
MeskóBTopolEJ.The imperative for regulatory oversight of large language models (or generative AI) in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. 2023;6(1):120.
ParkY-JPillaiADengJ, et al. Assessing the research landscape and clinical utility of large language models: a scoping review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024;24(1):72.
27.
RajjoubRArroyaveJSZaidatB, et al. ChatGPT and its role in the decision-making for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative analysis and narrative review. Global Spine J. 2024;14(3):998–1017.
28.
SaadAJenkoNAriyaratneS, et al. Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in the peer review process: an observational study. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2024;18(2):102946.
29.
Sánchez-RosenbergGMagnéliMBarleN, et al. ChatGPT-4 generates orthopedic discharge documents faster than humans maintaining comparable quality: a pilot study of 6 cases. Acta Orthop. 2024;95:152–156.
30.
SastryRASettyALiuDD, et al. Natural language processing augments comorbidity documentation in neurosurgical inpatient admissions. PLoS One. 2024;19(5):e0303519.
31.
ShahRJayakumarPTrutnerZBiniS.Practical artificial intelligence: realistic ways it can help orthopaedic surgeons and the challenges it will face. Instr Course Lect. 2023;72:101–110.
32.
ShahRFBiniSVailT.Data for registry and quality review can be retrospectively collected using natural language processing from unstructured charts of arthroplasty patients. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(7 suppl B):99–104.
33.
SinghalKAziziSTuT, et al. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature. 2023;620(7972):172–180.
ChatterjeeSBhattacharyaMPalSLeeSSChakrabortyC. ChatGPT and large language models in orthopedics: from education and surgery to research. J Exp Orthop. 2023;10(1):128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00700-1.
36.
SosaBRCungMSuhardiVJ, et al. Capacity for large language model chatbots to aid in orthopedic management, research, and patient queries. J Orthop Res. 2024;42(6):1276–1282.
37.
StroopAStroopTZawy AlsofyS, et al. Large language models: are artificial intelligence-based chatbots a reliable source of patient information for spinal surgery?Eur Spine J. 2023;33(11):4135–4143.
van BuchemMMBoosmanHBauerMPKantIMJCammelSASteyerbergEW.The digital scribe in clinical practice: a scoping review and research agenda. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4(1):57.
40.
Van VeenDVan UdenCBlankemeierLDelbrouckJBAaliABluethgenC. Adapted large language models can outperform medical experts in clinical text summarization. Nat Med. 2024;30(4):1134–1142.
41.
Van VeenDVan UdenCBlankemeierL, et al. Clinical text summarization: adapting large language models can outperform human experts (preprint). Res Sq. 2023.
ZaidatBLahotiYSYuAMohamedKSChoSKKimJS.Artificially intelligent billing in spine surgery: an analysis of a large language model. Global Spine J. 2023;15:1113–1120.
44.
ZaidatBShresthaNRosenbergAM, et al. Performance of a large language model in the generation of clinical guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in spine surgery. Neurospine. 2024;21(1):128–146.
45.
ZakiMO’SullivanLDevaneDSeguradoRMcAuliffeE.Factors influencing the statistical planning, design, conduct, analysis and reporting of trials in health care: a systematic review. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022;26:100897.
46.
ZhangSLiauZQGTanKLMChuaWL.Evaluating the accuracy and relevance of ChatGPT responses to frequently asked questions regarding total knee replacement. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2024;36(1):15.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
