As artificial intelligence (AI) advances in healthcare, encompassing robust applications for the diagnosis and prognostication of musculoskeletal diseases, clinicians must increasingly understand the implications of machine learning and deep learning in their practice. This review article explores computer vision algorithms and patient-specific, multimodal prediction models; provides a simple framework to guide discussion on the limitations of AI model development; and introduces the field of generative AI.
AnastasioATZingerBSAnastasioTJ.A novel application of neural networks to identify potentially effective combinations of biologic factors for enhancement of bone fusion/repair. PLoS One. 2022;17(11):e0276562. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276562.
3.
BahlM.Artificial intelligence in clinical practice: implementation considerations and barriers. J Breast Imaging. 2022;4(6):632–639. Doi:10.1093/jbi/wbac065.
4.
Bhavya SreeBYashwanth BharadwajVNeelimaN. An inter-comparative survey on state-of-the-art detectors—R-CNN, YOLO, and SSD. In: Intelligent Manufacturing and Energy Sustainability. Smart innovation, systems and technologies. Singapore: Springer; 2021:475–483. Doi:10.1007/978-981-33-4443-3_46.
5.
ChenKStotterCKlestilTNehrerS.Artificial intelligence in orthopedic radiography analysis: a narrative review. Diagnostics. 2022;12(9):2235. Doi:10.3390/diagnostics12092235.
6.
ChenXWangXZhangK, et al. Recent advances and clinical applications of deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2022;79:102444. Doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102444.
7.
ChengCTWangYChenHW, et al. A scalable physician-level deep learning algorithm detects universal trauma on pelvic radiographs. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1066. Doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21311-3.
8.
EricksonBJKorfiatisPAkkusZKlineTL.Machine learning for medical imaging. Radiographics. 2017;37(2):505–515. Doi:10.1148/rg.2017160130.
9.
FaghaniSBaffourFIRinglerMD, et al. A deep learning algorithm for detecting lytic bone lesions of multiple myeloma on CT. Skeletal Radiol. 2023;52(1):91–98. Doi:10.1007/s00256-022-04160-z.
10.
FaghaniSKhosraviBZhangK, et al. Mitigating bias in radiology machine learning: 3. Performance metrics. Radiol Artif Intell. 2022;4(5):e220061. Doi:10.1148/ryai.220061.
11.
FlorkowMCNguyenCHSakkersRJB, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-based bone imaging of the lower limb: strategies for generating high-resolution synthetic computed tomography. J Orthop Res. 2024;42(4):843–854. Doi:10.1002/jor.25707.
12.
FolleLBayatSKleyerA, et al. Advanced neural networks for classification of MRI in psoriatic arthritis, seronegative, and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2022;61(12):4945–4951. Doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keac197.
13.
GittoSCuocoloRvan LangeveldeK, et al. MRI radiomics-based machine learning classification of atypical cartilaginous tumour and grade II chondrosarcoma of long bones. EBioMedicine. 2022;75:103757. Doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103757.
14.
GittoSSerpiFAlbanoD, et al. AI applications in musculoskeletal imaging: a narrative review. Eur Radiol Exp. 2024;8(1):22. Doi:10.1186/s41747-024-00422-8.
15.
GlassnerA.Deep Learning. San Francisco, CA: No Starch Press; 2021.
16.
GuermaziATannouryCKompelAJ, et al. Improving radiographic fracture recognition performance and efficiency using artificial intelligence. Radiology. 2022;302(3):627–636. Doi:10.1148/radiol.210937.
17.
GunasekeranDVMillerSHsuW, et al. National use of artificial intelligence for eye screening in Singapore. NEJM AI. 2024;1(12). Doi:10.1056/aics2400404.
18.
GuptaAVenkateshSChopraSLedigC. Generative image translation for data augmentation of bone lesion pathology. [preprint]. arXiv [csLG]. Published online February 6, 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.02248.
19.
GuptaNKhatriKMalikY, et al. Exploring prospects, hurdles, and road ahead for generative artificial intelligence in orthopedic education and training. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1544. Doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06592-8.
20.
HashimotoDARosmanGRusDMeirelesOR.Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):70–76. Doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002693.
21.
HelmJMSwiergoszAMHaeberleHS, et al. Machine learning and artificial intelligence: definitions, applications, and future directions. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020;13(1):69–76. Doi:10.1007/s12178-020-09600-8.
22.
HuangSCPareekAJensenMLungrenMPYeungSChaudhariAS.Self-supervised learning for medical image classification: a systematic review and implementation guidelines. NPJ Digit Med. 2023;6(1):74. Doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00811-0.
23.
HügleMOmoumiPvan LaarJMBoedeckerJHügleT.Applied machine learning and artificial intelligence in rheumatology. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2020;4(1):rkaa005. Doi:10.1093/rap/rkaa005.
24.
KhosraviBBukowiecLGMickleyJP, et al. Characterizing hip joint morphology using a multitask deep learning model. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024; 1–6. Doi:10.1093/jhps/hnae041.
25.
KhosraviBRouzrokhPEricksonBJ, et al. Analyzing racial differences in imaging joint replacement registries using generative artificial intelligence: advancing orthopaedic data equity. Arthroplast Today. 2024;29:101503. Doi:10.1016/j.artd.2024.101503.
26.
KhosraviBRouzrokhPMaradit KremersH, et al. Patient-specific hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: an explainable multimodal machine learning-based approach. Radiol Artif Intell. 2022;4(6):e220067. Doi:10.1148/ryai.220067.
27.
KhosraviBRouzrokhPMickleyJP, et al. Creating high fidelity synthetic pelvis radiographs using generative adversarial networks: unlocking the potential of deep learning models without patient privacy concerns. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(10):2037–2043.e1. Doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.013.
28.
KhosraviBWestonADNugenF, et al. Demystifying statistics and machine learning in analysis of structured tabular data. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(10):1943–1947. Doi:10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.045.
29.
KtenaIWilesOAlbuquerqueI, et al. Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under distribution shifts. Nat Med. 2024;30(4):1166–1173. Doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02838-6.
30.
KumarVRocheCOvermanS, et al. What is the accuracy of three different machine learning techniques to predict clinical outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478(10):2351–2363. Doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000001263.
31.
KunzeKNKrivicichLMClappIM, et al. Machine learning algorithms predict achievement of clinically significant outcomes after orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2022;38(6):2090–2105. Doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.12.030.
32.
KunzeKNSculcoPKZhongH, et al. Development and internal validation of machine learning algorithms for predicting hyponatremia after TJA. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104(3):265–270. Doi:10.2106/JBJS.21.00718.
33.
LabottJRLuYSalmonsHICampCLWylesCCTauntonMJ.Health and socioeconomic risk factors for unplanned hospitalization following ambulatory unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development of a patient selection tool using machine learning. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(10):1982–1989. Doi:10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.026.
LiYCChenHHHorng-Shing LuHHondar WuHTChangMCChouPH.Can a deep-learning model for the automated detection of vertebral fractures approach the performance level of human subspecialists?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479(7):1598–1612. Doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000001685.
36.
Machine Learning Consortium, on behalf of the SPRINT and FLOW Investigators. A machine learning algorithm to identify patients with tibial shaft fractures at risk for infection after operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021;103(6):532–540. Doi:10.2106/JBJS.20.00903.
37.
MickleyJPGroveAFRouzrokhP, et al. A stepwise approach to analyzing musculoskeletal imaging data with artificial intelligence. Arthritis Care Res. 2024;76(5):590–599. Doi:10.1002/acr.25260.
38.
MinaeeSBoykovYYPorikliFPlazaAJKehtarnavazNTerzopoulosD.Image segmentation using deep learning: a survey. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2021;1–1. Doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3059968.
39.
MulfordKLGroveAFKajiES, et al. Uncertainty-aware deep learning characterization of knee radiographs for large-scale registry creation. J Arthroplasty. 2025; 40(5):1232–1238. Doi:10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.103.
40.
MulfordKLKajiEGroveAF, et al. A deep learning tool for minimum joint space width calculation on anteroposterior knee radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2025;S0883-5403(25)00065-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.01.038
41.
MulfordKLSanieiSKajiE, et al. Total knee arthroplasty automated implant detector: an uncertainty-aware deep learning classifier to identify total knee arthroplasty implants. J Arthroplasty. 2025; S0883-5403(25)00034-8. Doi:10.1016/j.arth.2025.01.019.
42.
MyersTGRamkumarPNRicciardiBFUrishKLKipperJKetonisC.Artificial intelligence and orthopaedics: an introduction for clinicians. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(9):830–840. Doi:10.2106/JBJS.19.01128.
43.
NorgeotBGlicksbergBSTrupinL, et al. Assessment of a deep learning model based on electronic health record data to forecast clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(3):e190606. Doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0606.
44.
NugenFVera GarciaDVSohnS, et al. Application of natural language processing in total joint arthroplasty: opportunities and challenges. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(10):1948–1953. Doi:10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.047.
45.
NwachukwuBUBeckECLeeEK, et al. Application of machine learning for predicting clinically meaningful outcome after arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(2):415–423. Doi:10.1177/0363546519892905.
46.
PadashSMickleyJPVera GarciaDV, et al. An overview of machine learning in orthopedic surgery: an educational paper. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(10):1938–1942. Doi:10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.043.
47.
PanSAboueiEWynneJ, et al. Synthetic CT generation from MRI using 3D transformer-based denoising diffusion model. Med Phys. 2024;51(4):2538–2548. Doi:10.1002/mp.16847.
48.
PeekenJCEtzelLTomovT, et al. Development and benchmarking of a deep learning-based MRI-guided gross tumor segmentation algorithm for radiomics analyses in extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Radiother Oncol. 2024;197:110338. Doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110338.
49.
PolisettyTSJainSPangM, et al. Concerns surrounding application of artificial intelligence in hip and knee arthroplasty: a review of literature and recommendations for meaningful adoption: a review of literature and recommendations for meaningful adoption. Bone Joint J. 2022;104-B(12):1292–1303. Doi:10.1302/0301-620X.104B12.BJJ-2022-0922.R1.
50.
RouzrokhPKhosraviBFaghaniS, et al. RadRotator: 3D rotation of radiographs with diffusion models [preprint]. arXiv [csLG]. Published online April 19, 2024. Doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.13000
51.
RouzrokhPKhosraviBJohnsonQJ, et al. Applying deep learning to establish a total hip arthroplasty radiography registry: a stepwise approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104(18):1649–1658. Doi:10.2106/JBJS.21.01229.
52.
RouzrokhPMickleyJPKhosraviB, et al. THA-AID: deep learning tool for total hip arthroplasty automatic implant detection with uncertainty and outlier quantification. J Arthroplasty. 2024;39(4):966–973.e17. Doi:10.1016/j.arth.2023.09.025.
53.
RouzrokhPWylesCCPhilbrickKA, et al. A deep learning tool for automated radiographic measurement of acetabular component inclination and version after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(7):2510–2517.e6. Doi:10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.026.
54.
SchiettecatteEVereeckeEJaremkoJL, et al. MRI-based synthetic CT for assessment of the bony elements of the sacroiliac joints in children. Insights Imaging. 2024;15(1):53. Doi:10.1186/s13244-023-01603-6.
55.
SchirattiJBDuboisRHerentP, et al. A deep learning method for predicting knee osteoarthritis radiographic progression from MRI. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23(1):262. Doi:10.1186/s13075-021-02634-4.
56.
ShahRFBiniSAMartinezAMPedoiaVVailTP.Incremental inputs improve the automated detection of implant loosening using machine-learning algorithms. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(6 Suppl A):101–106. Doi:10.1302/0301-620X.102B6.BJJ-2019-1577.R1.
57.
ShahRMWongCArpeyNCPatelAADiviSN.A surgeon’s guide to understanding artificial intelligence and machine learning studies in orthopaedic surgery. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022;15(2):121–132. Doi:10.1007/s12178-022-09738-7.
58.
ShenLYuLZhaoWPaulyJXingL.Novel-view X-ray projection synthesis through geometry-integrated deep learning. Med Image Anal. 2022;77:102372. Doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102372.
ShinoharaIInuiAHwangK, et al. Leveraging AI models for lesion detection in osteonecrosis of the femoral head and T1-weighted MRI generation from radiographs. J Orthop Res. 2025; 43(3), 650–659. Doi:10.1002/jor.26026.
61.
ShohatNGoswamiKTanTL, et al. 2020 Frank Stinchfield Award: identifying who will fail following irrigation and debridement for prosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(7 Suppl B):11–19. Doi:10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1628.R1.
62.
StoelB.Use of artificial intelligence in imaging in rheumatology - current status and future perspectives. RMD Open. 2020;6(1):e001063. Doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001063.
63.
SuganyadeviSSeethalakshmiVBalasamyK.A review on deep learning in medical image analysis. Int J Multimed Inf Retr. 2022;11(1):19–38. Doi:10.1007/s13735-021-00218-1.
64.
SuriATangSKargilisD, et al. Conquering the Cobb angle: a deep learning algorithm for automated, hardware-invariant measurement of Cobb angle on radiographs in patients with scoliosis. Radiol Artif Intell. 2023;5(4):e220158. Doi:10.1148/ryai.220158.
65.
TafatWBudkaMMcDonaldDWainwrightTW.Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery: a comprehensive review of current innovations and future directions. Comput Struct Biotechnol Rep. 2024;1:100006. Doi:10.1016/j.csbr.2024.100006.
66.
ThioQCBSKarhadeAVBindelsBJJ, et al. Development and internal validation of machine learning algorithms for preoperative survival prediction of extremity metastatic disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478(2):322–333. Doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000000997.
67.
TiulpinAThevenotJRahtuELehenkariPSaarakkalaS.Automatic knee osteoarthritis diagnosis from plain radiographs: a deep learning-based approach. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1727. Doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20132-7.
68.
TopolE.Deep Medicine. New York, NY: Basic Books; 2019.
69.
TopolEJ.High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44–56. Doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7.
70.
Vera-GarciaDVNugenFPadashS, et al. Educational overview of the concept and application of computer vision in arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(10):1954–1958. Doi:10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.046.
71.
von SchackyCEWilhelmNJSchäferVS, et al. Multitask deep learning for segmentation and classification of primary bone tumors on radiographs. Radiology. 2021;301(2):398–406. Doi:10.1148/radiol.2021204531.
72.
VukicevicAMRadovicMZabottiA, et al. Deep learning segmentation of primary Sjögren’s syndrome affected salivary glands from ultrasonography images. Comput Biol Med. 2021;129:104154. Doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104154.
73.
YaharaYTamuraMSekiS, et al. A deep convolutional neural network to predict the curve progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):610. Doi:10.1186/s12891-022-05565-6.
74.
ZechJRJaramilloDAltosaarJPopkinCAWongTT.Artificial intelligence to identify fractures on pediatric and young adult upper extremity radiographs. Pediatr Radiol. 2023;53(12):2386–2397. Doi:10.1007/s00247-023-05754-y.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
