Journal editors instruct authors to describe human participant protections in original research reports. However, little is known about African biomedical journal authors’ adherence to such journal editors’ instructions. This study investigated changes in editors’ instructions to authors and authors’ reporting of research ethics information in selected African biomedical journals between 2008 and 2017. Twelve selected journal websites and online articles were reviewed in Eastern, Southern, and Western African [ESWA] countries. A pre-tested schema and a checklist were used to collect data from journal websites and articles published in 2008 and 2017, and the data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Half of the journals requested prospective authors to disclose ethics approval and related issues in their manuscripts between 2008 and 2017. There was a significant increase in instructions to authors regarding information on the protection of research participants within this period; more authors complied with these requirements in 2017 than in 2007.
BelhekarM. N.BhaleraoS. S.MunshiR. P. (2014). Ethics reporting practices in clinical research publications: A review of four Indian journals. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 5(3), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.134316
3.
BhatA.ShahA.SherigharS. G. (2017). Instructions to prospective authors by Indian biomedical journals: An opportunity to promote responsible conduct of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617698277
4.
BrownsonR. C.KreuterM. W.ArringtonB. A.TrueW. R. (2006). Translating scientific discoveries into public health action: How can schools of public health move us forward?Public Health Reports (Washington, D.C.: 1974), 121(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335490612100118
5.
ColemanC. H.BouësseauM. C. (2008). How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review. BMC Medical Ethics, 9, 6–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-9-6
6.
Committee on Publication Ethics (2018). Promoting integrity in research and its publication. Retrieved from https://publicationethics.org/
7.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (2016). International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. 2016 International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans (pp. 1–106). Prepared by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO).
8.
EmanuelE. J.WendlerD.KillenJ.GradyC. (2004). What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 189(5), 930–937. https://doi.org/10.1086/381709
9.
HusseinG.ElmusharafK. (2019). Mention of ethical review and informed consent in the reports of research undertaken during the armed conflict in Darfur (2004–2012): A systematic review. BMC Medical Ethics, 20(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0377-7
10.
Institute of Medicine (US) (2009). Committee on Health Research and the Privacy of Health Information: The HIPAA Privacy Rule. In S. J. Nass, L. A. Levit, & L. O. Gostin (Eds.), Beyond the HIPAA privacy rule: Enhancing privacy, improving health through research (pp. 111–152). National Academies Press (US). PMID: 20662116.
11.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) (2018). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. Updated December 2017. www.icmje.org/recommendations
12.
JaykaranG. S.YadavP.ChavdaN.KanthariaN. D. (2011). Survey of “instructions to authors” of Indian medical journals for reporting of ethics and authorship criteria.Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 8(1), 36–38. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5359.53399
13.
MathurV. P.DhillonJ. K.KalraG.SharmaA.MathurR. (2013). Survey of instructions to authors in Indian and British dental journals with respect to ethical guidelines. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 31(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.115711
14.
MylesP. S.TanN. (2003). Reporting of ethical approval and informed consent in clinical research published in leading anesthesia journals. Anesthesiology: The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 99(5), 1209–1213. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200311000-00030
15.
NavaneethaC. (2011). Editorial policy in reporting ethical processes: A survey of ‘instructions for authors’ in international indexed dental journals. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 2(2), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237x.83066
16.
Nuremberg Code (1949). Trials of war criminals before the nuremberg military tribunals under control council law No. 10 (Vol. 2) (Vol. 2, pp. 181–182). US Government Printing Office.
17.
PerkinsA. C.ChoiJ. M.KimballA. B. (2007). Reporting of ethical review of clinical research submitted to the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 56(2), 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2006.08.072
18.
SchroterS.PlowmanR.HutchingsA.GonzalezA. (2006). Reporting ethics committee approval and patient consent by study design in five general medical journals. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(12), 718–723. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.015115
19.
SumathipalaA.SiribaddanaS.HewegeS.LekamwattageM.AthukoraleM.SiriwardhanaC.MurrayJ.PrinceM. (2008). Ethics review committee approval and informed consent: An analysis of biomedical publications originating from Sri Lanka. BMC Medical Ethics, 9(1), 3–3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-9-3
20.
US Department of Health Human Services (2016). Code of federal regulations. Title 45 Public welfare. Part 46: Protection of human subjects. US Department of Health and Human Services.
21.
US National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical, & Behavioral Research (1978). The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (Vol. 2). Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. DHEW Publication No. (OS) 78-0013.
22.
WagerE. (2012a). Publishing ethics and integrity. In CampbellR.PentzE.BorthwickI. (Eds.), Academic and professional publishing (pp. 337–354). Chandos Publishing.
23.
World Medical Association (2013). World medical association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
24.
YankV.RennieD. (2002). Reporting of informed consent and ethics committee approval in clinical trials. Jama, 287(21), 2835–2838. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2835
