Honorary authorship is the inclusion of an author on an article whose contribution does not warrant authorship. We conducted an Internet-based survey among first authors publishing in Indian biomedical journals from 2012 to 2013 to study the frequency and factors associated with honorary authorship. The response rate was 27% (245/908) with the prevalence of perceived, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)-defined, and unperceived honorary authorship of 20.9% (50/239), 60% (147/245), and 46.9% (115/245), respectively. Those residing in India were found to list more honorary authors. We hope to increase awareness of the ICMJE authorship guidelines and the general issue of honorary authorship among researchers in India and elsewhere.
Al-HerzW.HaiderH.Al-BahharM.SadeqA. (2013). Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: How common is it and why does it exist?Journal of Medical Ethics, 40, 346-348.
2.
BhatA.ShahA.SherigharS. (2017). Instructions to prospective authors by Indian biomedical journals: An opportunity to promote responsible conduct of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12, 117-123.
3.
BonekampS.HalappaV. G.Corona-VillalobosC. P.MensaM.EngJ.LewinJ. S.KamelI. R. (2012). Prevalence of honorary co-authorship in the American Journal of Roentgenology. American Journal of Roentgenology, 198, 1247-1255.
4.
DhingraD.MishraD. (2014). Publication misconduct among medical professionals in India. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 11, 104-107.
5.
EisenbergR. L.NgoL. H.BankierA. A. (2014). Honorary authorship in Radiologic research articles: Do geographic factors influence the frequency?Radiology, 271, 472-478.
6.
EisenbergR. L.NgoL. H.BoiselleP. M.BankierA. A. (2011). Honorary authorship in Radiologic research articles: Assessment of frequency and associated factors. Radiology, 259, 479-486.
7.
FlanaginA. (1998). Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 222-224.
8.
HuthE. J. (1986). Irresponsible authorship and wasteful publication. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104, 257-259.
9.
HuthE. J.CaseK. (2004). The URM: Twenty-five years old. Science Editor, 27, 17-21.
MowattG. (2002). Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2769-2771.
13.
PatnaikP. R. (2015). Scientific misconduct in India: Causes and perpetuation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 1245-1249.
14.
RajasekaranS.LoA.AlyA.AshworthN. (2015). Honorary authorship in postgraduate medical training. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 91, 501-507.
15.
RajasekaranS.ShanR. L.FinnoffJ. T. (2014). Honorary authorship: Frequency and associated factors in physical medicine and rehabilitation research articles. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95, 418-428.
SloneR. M. (1996). Co-authors’ contributions to major papers published in the AJR: Frequency of undeserved co-authorship. American Journal of Roentgenology, 167, 571-579.
18.
StewartW. W.FederN. (1987). The integrity of the scientific literature. Nature, 325, 207-214.
19.
WislarJ. S.FlanaginA.FontanarosaP. B.DeAngelisC. D. (2011). Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: A cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal, 343, d6128.
