There is growing interest for research ethics professionals to engage with members of the public, yet they often lack the training needed to engage effectively. The STEM Ambassador Program provides a promising framework for training research ethics professionals to form authentic community connections and carry out effective engagement activities based on shared interests and values. The experiences of ten research administrators who participated in a pilot of the STEM Ambassador training for research ethics professionals are presented. Post-training surveys of the research administrators indicate that they valued the training and the skills obtained, and intend to continue with public engagement activities with support of their leadership.
BesleyJ. C.DudoA.YuanS. (2018a). Scientists’ views about communication objectives. Public Understanding of Science, 27(6), 708-730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517728478
3.
BesleyJ. C.DudoA. D.YuanS.Abi GhannamN. (2016). Qualitative interviews with science communication trainers about communication objectives and goals. Science Communication, 38(3), 356-381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016645640
BesleyJ. C.LeeN. M.PressgroveG. (2021). Reassessing the variables used to measure public perceptions of scientists. Science Communication, 43(1), 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020949547
DickertN.SugarmanJ. (2005). Ethical goals of community consultation in research. American Journal of Public Health, 95(7), 1123-1127. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.058933
8.
FeineJ.JakubovicsN. (2021). Science in the spotlight: A crisis of confidence?JDR clinical and Translational Research, 6(1), 4-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084420976358
9.
GoldmanS. (2017). Design thinking. In PepplerK. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of out-of-school learning (Vol. 1, pp. 210-212). Sage Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385198.n84
10.
HolzerJ. K.EllisL.MerrittM. W. (2014). Why we need community engagement in medical research. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 62(6), 851. https://doi.org/10.1097/JIM.0000000000000097
11.
HoodN. E.BrewerT.JacksonR.WewersM. E. (2010). Survey of community engagement in NIH-funded research. Clinical and Translational Science, 3(1), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00179.x
JohnsonA.Kasimatis SingletonM. (2022). Responsibilities of the reviewing IRB. In BankertE. A.GordonB. G.HurleyE. A.ShriverS. P. (Eds.), Institutional review board management and function (pp. 143-155). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
14.
KabatG. C. (2017). Taking distrust of science seriously: To overcome public distrust in science, scientists need to stop pretending that there is a scientific consensus on controversial issues when there is not. EMBO reports, 18(7), 1052-1055. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744294
15.
KingK. F.KolopackP.MerrittM. W.LaveryJ. V. (2014). Community engagement and the human infrastructure of global health research. BMC medical Ethics, 15, 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-84
16.
KrutsingerD. C.O’LearyK. L.EllenbergS. S.CotnerC. E.HalpernS. D.CourtrightK. R. (2020). A randomized controlled trial of behavioral nudges to improve enrollment in critical care trials. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 17(9), 1117-1125. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-194OC
NadkarniN. M.WeberC. Q.GoldmanS. V.SchatzD. L.AllenS.MenloveR. (2019). Beyond the deficit model: The ambassador approach to public engagement. BioScience, 69(4), 305-313. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz018
20.
NathanR. A. (1999). How important is patient recruitment in performing clinical trials?The Journal of Asthma: Official Journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 36(3), 213-216. https://doi.org/10.3109/02770909909075405
NippR. D.HongK.PaskettE. D. (2019). Overcoming barriers to clinical trial enrollment. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, 39, 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_243729
24.
Protection of Human Subjects, 45 C.F.R. § 46.107 (2017).
25.
RisienJ.StorksdieckM. (2018). Unveiling impact identities: A path for connecting science and society. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 58(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icy011
SelvakumarM.StorksdieckM. (2013). Portal to the public: Museum educators collaborating with scientists to engage museum visitors with current science. Curator: The Museum Journal, 56(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12007
28.
StraussD. H.WhiteS. A.BiererB. E. (2021). Justice, diversity, and research ethics review. Science (New York, N.Y.), 371(6535), 1209-1211. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf2170
29.
WeberC. Q.AllenS.NadkarniN. M. (2021). Scaling training to support scientists to engage with the public in non-traditional venues. Journal of Science Communication, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20040802
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
