Journals provide instructions to prospective authors to facilitate the process of manuscript publication. The information provided under such instructions could be a potential opportunity to promote responsible conduct of research (RCR). We analyzed 74 Indian biomedical journals for the type of information provided in the “instructions to authors” section and adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations. Among the 71 journals that had an “instructions to authors” section, 53 journals adhered to ICMJE recommendations. We discuss sections of the ICMJE recommendations detailed by Indian biomedical journals under the “instructions to authors” section and emphasize components that require greater exposure.
AggarwalR.GogtayN.KumarR.SahniP. (2016). The revised guidelines of the Medical Council of India for academic promotions: Need for a rethink. Indian Pediatrics, 53, 23-26.
3.
Al-HerzW.HaiderH.Al-BahharM.SadeqA. (2014). Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: How common is it and why does it exist?Journal of Medical Ethics, 40, 346-348. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-101311
BartholomewR. E. (2014). Science for sale: The rise of predatory journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 107, 384-385. doi:10.1177/0141076814548526
6.
BavdekarS. B.GogtayN. J.ChavanR. (2009). Reporting ethical processes: Survey of “instructions to authors” provided by Indian journals. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, 63, 260-262. doi:10.4103/0019-5359.53399
7.
BhaumikS.BiswasT. (2013). Editorial policies of MEDLINE indexed Indian journals on clinical trial registration. Indian Pediatrics, 50, 339-340.
8.
BohannonJ. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review?Science, 342, 60-65. doi:10.1126/science.342.6154.60.
CorneliusJ. L. (2012). Reviewing the review process: Identifying sources of delay. The Australasian Medical Journal, 5, 26-29. doi:10.4066/amj.2012.1165
14.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.cioms.ch/
Editorial. (2012). Promoting research integrity: A new global effort. The Lancet, 380, 1445. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61822-4
17.
FanelliD. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
18.
FernandesL. B. (2017). Embedding responsible conduct in learning and research into an Australian undergraduate curriculum. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45, 53-59. doi:10.1002/bmb.20990
19.
Forum for Ethics Review Committees in India. (2013). Available from http://ferci.org/
20.
HopewellS.AltmanD. G.MoherD.SchulzK. F. (2008). Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact factor medical journals: A survey of journal editors and journal “instructions to authors.”Trials, 9, Article 20. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-9-20
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2016). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. Retrieved from http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
23.
International Steering Committee of Medical Editors. (1979). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Annals of Internal Medicine, 90, 95-99.
24.
JangH.KimH. (2014). Research output of science, technology and bioscience publications in Asia. Science Editing, 1, 62-70. doi:10.6087/kcse.2014.1.62
25.
Jaykaran, YadavP.ChavdaN.KanthariaN. D. (2011). Survey of “instructions to authors” of Indian medical journals for reporting of ethics and authorship criteria. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 8, 36-38.
26.
KadamR.KarandikarS. (2012). Ethics committees in India: Facing the challenges!Perspectives in Clinical Research, 3, 50-56. doi:10.4103/2229-3485.96444
27.
KunathF.GrobeH. R.KeckB.RuckerG.WullichB.AntesG.MeerpohlJ. J. (2011). Do urology journals enforce trial registration? A cross-sectional study of published trials. BMJ Open, 1(2), e000430. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000430
28.
LawrenceD. J. (2011). Human subject research: Reporting ethics approval and informed consent in 3 chiropractic journals. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 34, 627-633. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.02.008
29.
MandalM.BagchiD.BasuS. R. (2015). Scientific misconducts and authorship conflicts: Indian perspective. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 59, 400-405. doi:10.4103/0019-5049.160918
MeerpohlJ. J.WolffR. F.AntesG.von ElmE. (2011). Are pediatric open access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions. BMC Pediatrics, 11, Article 27. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-11-27
32.
MeerpohlJ. J.WolffR. F.NiemeyerC. M.AntesG.von ElmE. (2010). Editorial policies of pediatric journals: Survey of instructions for authors. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164, 268-272. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.287
33.
OkontaP. I.RossouwT. (2014). Misconduct in research: A descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country. BMC Medical Ethics, 15, Article 25. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-25
34.
PatnaikP. R. (2016). Scientific misconduct in India: Causes and perpetuation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 1245-1249. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9677-6
35.
RajasekaranS.ShanR. L.FinnoffJ. T. (2014). Honorary authorship: Frequency and associated factors in physical medicine and rehabilitation research articles. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95, 418-428. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.024
36.
SabirH.KumbhareS.ParateA.KumarR.DasS. (2015). Scientific misconduct: A perspective from India. Medicine, Health care, and Philosophy, 18, 177-184. doi:10.1007/s11019-014-9603-8
37.
SchneiderB.SchuklenkU. (2005). Module six: Special issues. Developing World Bioethics, 5, 92-108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8847.2005.00104.x
38.
ShenC.BjorkB. C. (2015). “Predatory” open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13, Article 230. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2
39.
TharyanP.PremkumarT. S.MathewV.BarnabasJ. P.Manuelraj. (2008). Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials: A survey of instructions for authors and assessment of trial reports in Indian medical journals (2004-05). The National Medical Journal of India, 21, 62-68.
