The present study used a sample of high school youth (N = 218) and a mixed-methodological research design to examine high school students’ reactions to participating in focus groups and completing surveys that inquired about dating violence (DV). Results showed that showed that 1.5% (n = 3) of the youth regretted participating in the study and 6% (n = 12) were upset by the study questions; being upset was attributed to personal experiences with DV and being disturbed by peers’ responses during the focus group. Furthermore, 49% (n = 99) of the youth reported feeling that they personally benefited from participating in the study for reasons such as learning ways to help friends in situations of DV. Results have implications for conducting mixed-methodological DV research with youth.
BanyardV. L. (2008). Measurement and correlates of pro-social bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 23, 85-99. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.83
2.
BanyardV. L.CrossC. (2008). Consequences of teen dating violence: Understanding intervening variables in ecological context. Violence Against Women, 14, 998-1013. doi:10.1177/1077801208322058
3.
BasileK. C.HamburgerM. E.SwahnM. H.ChoiC. (2013). Sexual violence perpetration by adolescents in dating versus same-sex peer relationships: Differences in associated risk and protective factors. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 14, 329-340. doi:10.5811/westjem.2013.3.15684
4.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.. . . StevensM. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf
5.
BrownA. L.BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M. (2014). College students as helpful bystanders against sexual violence: Gender, race, and year in college moderate the impact of perceived peer norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 350-362. doi:10.1177/0361684314526855
6.
BurnS. M. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60, 779-792. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9581-5
ChuA. T.DePrinceA. P. (2013). Perceptions of trauma research with a sample of at-risk youth. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8, 67-76. doi:10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.67
9.
Cooper RobinsS. C.RawsthorneM.PaxtonK.HawkeC.SkinnerS. R.SteinbeckK. (2011). “You can help people”: Adolescents’ views on engaging young people in longitudinal research. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 8-13. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00759.x
10.
DaleyA. M. (2013). Adolescent-friendly remedies for the challenges of focus group research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 35, 1043-1059. doi:10.1177/0193945913483881
11.
de BruijnP.BurrieI.van WelF. (2006). A risky boundary: Unwanted sexual behaviour among youth. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12, 81-96. doi:10.1080/13552600600841631
12.
DeckerS. E.NaugleA. E.Carter-VisscerR.BellK.SeifertA. (2011). Ethical issues in research on sensitive topics: Participants’ experiences of distress and benefit. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6, 55-64. doi:10.1525/jer.2011.63.55
13.
DischE. (2001). Research as clinical practice: Creating a positive research experience for survivors of sexual abuse by professionals. Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Sociology, 3, 221-239.
14.
EdwardsK. M.GidyczC. A.DesaiA. D. (2012). Men’s reactions to participating in interpersonal violence research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 3683-3700. doi:10.1177/0886260512447576
15.
EdwardsKM (2015) Intimate Partner Violence and the Rural-Urban-Suburban Divide: Myth or Reality?A Critical Review of the Literature. doi: 10.1177/1524838014557289.
16.
EdwardsK.M.NealAMDardisC.M.KelleyE.L.GidyczC.A.EllisG. (2015). College Students’ Reactions to Participating in Relational Trauma Research: A Mixed Methodological Study. DOI : 0886260515599158
17.
EdwardsK. M.SylaskaK. M.GidyczC. A. (2014). Women’s reactions to participating in dating violence research: A mixed methodological study. Psychology of Violence, 4, 224-239. doi:10.1037/a0034339
18.
EdwardsK. M.Rodenhizer-StämpfliK. A.EcksteinR. P. (2015). Bystander action in situations of dating and sexual aggression: A mixed methodological study of high school youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2321-2336. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0307-z.
19.
FosheeV. A.BaumanK. E.ArriagaX. B.HelmsR. W.KochG. G.LinderG. F. (1998). An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 45-50.
20.
FosheeV. A.BaumanK. E.LinderF.RiceJ.WilcherR. (2007). Typologies of adolescent dating violence: Identifying typologies of adolescent dating violence perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 498-519. doi:10.1177/0886260506298829
21.
FosheeV. A.LangwickV. L. (2010). Safe dates: An adolescent dating abuse prevention curriculum (2nd ed.). Center City, MI: Hazeldon Publishing.
22.
FredlandN. M.RicardoI. B.CampbellJ. C.SharpsP. W.KubJ. K.YonasM. (2008). The meaning of dating violence in the lives of middle school adolescents. Journal of School Violence, 4, 95-114. doi:10.1300/J202v04n02_06
23.
GarnerB. R.PassettiL. L.OrndorffM. G.GodleyS. H. (2007). Reasons for and attitudes toward follow-up research participation among adolescents enrolled in an outpatient substance abuse treatment program. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 16, 45-57. doi:10.1300/J029v16n04_03
24.
HaglundK.BelknapR. A.GarciaJ. T. (2012). Mexican American female adolescents’ perceptions of relationships and dating violence. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 44, 215-222. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01452.x
25.
HunfeldJ. A. M.PasschierJ. (2012). Participation in medical research; a systematic review of the understanding and experience of children and adolescents. Patient Education & Counseling, 87, 268-276. doi:10.1019/j.pec.2011.09.006
26.
JormA. F.KellyC. M.MorganA. J. (2007). Participant distress in psychiatric research: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 37, 917-926.
27.
KilpatrickD. (2004). The ethics of disaster research: A special section. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 361-362.
28.
KoelschL. E.BrownA. L.BoisenL. (2012). Bystander perceptions: Implications for university sexual assault prevention programs. Violence and Victims, 27, 563-579. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.27.4.563
29.
KrippendorffK. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
30.
KuyperL.de WitJ.AdamP.WoertmanL. (2012). Doing more good than harm? The effects of participation in sex research on young people in the Netherlands. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 497-506. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9780-y
31.
Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.ArataC.O’BrienN.BowersD.KlibertJ. (2006). Sensitive research with adolescents: Just how upsetting are self-report surveys anyway?Violence and Victims, 21, 425-444. doi:10.1891/vivi.21.4.425
32.
McCarryM. (2012). Who benefits? A critical reflection of children and young people’s participation in sensitive research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15, 55-68. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.568196
33.
McClinton AppollisT.LundC.de VriesP. J.MatthewsC. (2015). Adolescents’ and adults’ experiences of being surveyed about violence and abuse: A systematic review of harms, benefits, and regrets. American Journal of Public Health, 105, e31-e45. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302293
34.
McMahonS. (2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59, 3-11. doi:10.1080/07448481.2010.483715
35.
McMahonS.FarmerG. L. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35, 71-81.
36.
NewmanE.WillardT.SinclairR.KaloupekD. (2001). The costs and benefits of research from the participants’ view: The path to empirically informed research practice. Accountability in Research, 8, 27-47. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/gacr20/current
37.
OttM. A.RosenbergerJ. G.FortenberryJ. D. (2010). Parental permission and perceived research benefits in adolescent STI research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5, 57-64. doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.57
38.
PadgettD. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39.
PriebeG.BäckströmM.AinsaarM. (2010). Vulnerable adolescent participants’ experience in surveys on sexuality and sexual abuse: Ethical aspects. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 438-447. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.10.005
40.
ProsperoM. (2006). The role of perceptions in dating violence among young adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 470-484. doi:10.1177/0886260505285725
41.
Rankin WilliamsL.AdamsH. L.AltamiranoB. N. (2012). Mexican American adolescents’ perceptions of dating violence programs: Recommendations for effective program design. Qualitative Social Work, 11, 395-411. doi:10.1177/1473325012438633
42.
ReevesP. M.Orpinas.P. (2012). Dating norms and dating violence among ninth graders in Northeast Georgia: Reports from student surveys and focus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1677-1698. doi:10.1177/088626051143086
43.
ReyesH. M.FosheeV. A. (2013). Sexual dating aggression across grades 8 through 12: Timing and predictors of onset. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 581-595. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9864-6
44.
RichardsT. N.BranchK. A. (2012). The relationship between social support and adolescent dating violence: A comparison across genders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1540-1561. doi:10.1177/0886260511425796
45.
RichardsT. N.BranchK. A.RayK. (2014). The impact of parental and peer social support on dating violence perpetration and victimization among female adolescents: A longitudinal study. Violence and Victims, 29, 317-331. doi:10.1891/0886-6708
46.
RobertsT.KleinJ.FisherS. (2003). Longitudinal effect of intimate partner abuse on high-risk behavior among adolescents. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 157, 875-881. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.9.875
47.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2001). Special report: Intimate partner violence and age of victim, 1993-1999 (Bureau of Justice Statistics). Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ipva99.pdf
48.
WassersteinR. L.LazarN. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician. doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
49.
Wolitzky-TaylorK. B.RuggieroK. J.DanielsonC. K.ResnickH. S.HansonR. F.SmithD. W.. . . KilpatrickD. G. (2008). Prevalence and correlates of dating violence in a national sample of adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 755-762. doi:10.1097/CHI.0b013e318172ef5f
50.
YbarraM. L.Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.FriendJ.Diener-WestM. (2009). Impact of asking sensitive questions about violence to children and adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 499-507. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.009
51.
ZajacK.RuggieroK. J.SmithD. W.SaundersB. E.KilpatrickD. G. (2011). Adolescent distress in traumatic stress research: Data from the national survey of adolescents-replication. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 24, 226-229. doi:10.1002/jts.20621
