The Cyber Aggression in Relationships Scale (CARS) is a widely used and validated measure of adult cyber intimate partner violence (C-IPV). The current study aimed to create a short screener of CARS (CARS-SS) through testing cross-cultural samples. To do so, we examined the rate of chosen items of the original scale on five pre-existing study samples: we then procured and tested the construct validity and reliability of the CARS-SS among two study samples (United States and Israel). Results of an item factor analysis confirmed one factor for both perpetration and victimization and analyses suggested good internal reliability. Overall, the CARS-SS was associated with a measure of in-person intimate partner violence. Findings suggest the CARS-SS may be a helpful measure of C-IPV among clinical and community samples of young adults.
AfrouzR. (2023). The nature, patterns and consequences of technology-facilitated domestic abuse: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(2), 913–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211046752
2.
BarterC.StanleyN.WoodM.LanauA.AghtaieN.LarkinsC.ØverlienC. (2017). Young people’s online and face-to-face experiences of interpersonal violence and abuse and their subjective impact across five European countries. Psychology of Violence, 7(3), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000096
3.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238.
4.
BorrajoE.Gámez-GuadixM.PeredaN.CalveteE. (2015). The development and validation of the cyber dating abuse questionnaire among young couples. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 358–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.063
BrownC.HegartyK. (2021). Development and validation of the TAR Scale: A measure of technology-facilitated abuse in relationships. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100059
7.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
8.
BurkeS. C.WallenM.Vail-SmithK.KnoxD. (2011). Using technology to control intimate partners: An exploratory study of college undergraduates. Computers in human behavior, 27(3), 1162–1167.
9.
CalveteE.Fernández-GonzálezL.OrueI.MachimbarrenaM.González-CabreraJ. (2021). Validación de un cuestionario para evaluar el abuso en relaciones de pareja en adolescentes (CARPA), sus razones y las reacciones [Validation of a questionnaire to assess abuse in dating relationships in Spanish adolescents (CARPA): Reasons and reactions]. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 8(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.21134/rpcna.2021.08.1.8
10.
Cano-GonzalezI.CharakR.GilbarO.Viñas-RacioneroR.StraitM. K. (2022). Witnessing parental violence and cyber IPV perpetration in Hispanic emerging adults: The mediating role of attitudes toward IPV. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(9–10), NP8115–NP8137. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0886260520975834
11.
CaridadeS.BragaT.BorrajoE. (2019). Cyber dating abuse (CDA): Evidence from a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 48, 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.018
12.
ChanK. L. (2011). Gender differences in self-reports of intimate partner violence: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.02.008
13.
CharakR.VillarrealL.SchmitzR. M.HiraiM.FordJ. D. (2019). Patterns of childhood maltreatment and intimate partner violence, emotion dysregulation, and mental health symptoms among gay, lesbian, and bisexual emerging adults: A 3-step latent class approach. Child Abuse and Neglect, 89, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.01.007
14.
DaskalukS. (2016). Cyber dating abuse: How coercive control and attitudes about dating aggression affect health and relationship quality [Electronic Theses and Dissertations]. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/5809
15.
DavisM.Padilla-MedinaD. M. (2021). Brief intimate partner violence perpetration screening tools: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(4), 900–913.
16.
FlachR. M. D.DeslandesS. F. (2017). Cyber dating abuse in affective and sexual relationships: A literature review. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 33(7), e00138516. https://doi.org/10.15090/0102-311x00138516
17.
FreedD.PalmerJ.MinchalaD.LevyK.RistenpartT.DellN. (2018, April). “A stalker’s paradise”: How intimate partner abusers exploit technology. In MandrykR.HancockM. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC Canada.
18.
GarcíaL. H.CastañedaM. P.LozanoL. L.AlcaideM. P.GavínM. O.GrandeA. G. (2021). Validation of a cyberbullying questionnaire as a screening tool for other forms of intimate-partner violence towards young women. BMC Public Health, 21, 1–7.
19.
GeffnerR. (2016). Partner aggression versus partner abuse terminology: Moving the field forward and resolving controversies. Journal of Family Violence, 31(8), 923–925.
20.
GilbarO.CharakR.TrujilloO.CantuJ. I.CavazosV.LaviI. (2023). Meta-analysis of cyber intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization: Different types and their associations with face-to-face IPV among men and women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), 1948–1965. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221082087
21.
GilbarO.CohenL.SmethurstM.CreechS.Azaria-MizrachiZ.Ben-GalN.TaftC. (2025). Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of strength at home in Israel: A trauma informed intervention for intimate partner violence based on a social-information processing model. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 149, 107775.
22.
HenryN.PowellA. (2018). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research. Trauma, violence, & abuse, 19(2), 195–208.
23.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
24.
LeisringP. A.GiumettiG. W. (2014). Sticks and stones may break my bones, but abusive text messages also hurt. Partner Abuse, 5(3), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.5.3.323
25.
LiJ.RanG.ZhangQ.HeX. (2023). The prevalence of cyber dating abuse among adolescents and emerging adults: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 144, 107726.
26.
MahoneyJ. C.FarrellD. M.MurphyC. M. (2022). Prevalence and predictors of cyber psychological abuse among adults. Journal of Family Violence, 37(1), 151–163.
27.
MeijerR. R.TendeiroJ. N. (2018). Unidimensional item response theory. In IrwingP.BoothT.HughesD. J. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on survey, scale and test development (pp. 413–443). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch15
Nuttman-ShwartzO.DekelR.GilbarO.CharakR. (2023). Perpetrating cyber intimate partner violence: The role of gender and culture in an Israeli sample. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 32(4), 487–504.
30.
PortnoyG. A.HaskellS. G.KingM. W.MaskinR.GerberM. R.IversonK. M. (2018). Accuracy and acceptability of a screening tool for identifying intimate partner violence perpetration among women veterans: A pre-implementation evaluation. Women’s Health Issues, 28, 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2018.04.003
31.
Rocha-SilvaT.NogueiraC.RodriguesL. (2021). Intimate abuse through technology: A systematic review of scientific constructs and behavioral dimensions. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106861. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2021.106861
32.
Rodríguez-deArribaM. L.NocentiniA.MenesiniE.Sánchez-JiménezV. (2021). Dimensions and measures of cyber dating violence in adolescents: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58, 101613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101613
33.
SchnurrM. P.MahatmyaD.BascheR. A.III (2013). The role of dominance, cyber aggression perpetration, and gender on emerging adults’ perpetration of intimate partner violence. Psychology of Violence, 3(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030601
34.
Sheridan-JohnsonJ.MumfordE.MaitraP.RothmanE. F. (2024). Perceived impact of COVID-19 on cyberabuse, sexual aggression, and intimate partner violence among US young adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 39(15–16), 3483–3507.
35.
SherinK. M.SinacoreJ. M.LiX. Q.ZitterR. E.ShakilA. (1998). HITS: A short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. Family Medicine-Kansas City, 30(7), 508–512.
36.
SotoA. M.IbabeI. (2022). Recommended instruments for analyzing cyber dating violence: A systematic review. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 25(e4). https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2021.50
37.
StrausM. A.DouglasE. M. (2004). A short form of the revised conflict tactics scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality. Violence and Victims, 19(5), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.19.5.507.63686
38.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS. U. E.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001
39.
TuckerL. R.LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
40.
WatkinsL. E.MaldonadoR. C.DiLilloD. (2018). Cyber aggression in relationships scale: A new multidimensional measure of technology-based intimate partner aggression. Assessment, 25(5), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116665696
WoodlockD.McKenzieM.WesternD.HarrisB. (2020). Technology as a weapon in domestic violence: Responding to digital coercive control. Australian Social Work, 73(3), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2019.1607510
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
