This case was written for school leaders, specifically building-level principals and central office administrators attempting to implement school turnaround reform efforts. Often, leaders who embark on this type of organizational change work in intense environments that produce high levels of pressure to demonstrate improvement in student achievement. Educators studying this case should examine the impact on ethical leadership when implementing rapid reform efforts, particularly the pressure on school leaders at the district and building levels to employ a transactional rather than transformational approach to leadership as they respond to the pressures of turnaround school policy.
DukeD. L. (2008). Keys to sustaining successful school turnarounds. Charlottesville, VA: Public Impact.
7.
FurmanG. (2012). Social justice leadership and praxis: Developing capacities through preparation programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 191-229.
8.
Gerstl-PepinC.AikenJ. A. (2009). Democratic school leaders: Defining ethical leadership in a standardized context. Journal of School Leadership, 19, 406-444.
9.
HallP. M.McGintyP. J. W. (1997). Policy as the transformation of intentions: Producing program from statue. The Sociological Quarterly, 38, 439-467.
10.
HsiaoH. C.LeeM. C.TuY. L. (2012). The effects of reform in principal selection on leadership behavior of general and vocational high school principals in Taiwan. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49, 421-450.
11.
LeithwoodK.SunJ. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 387-423.
12.
MathisW. J.WelnerK. G. (2010). Assessing the research base for a blueprint for reform. In MathisW. J.WelnerK. G. (Eds.), The Obama education blueprint: Researchers examine the evidence (pp. 1-7). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
13.
MaxcyS. J. (2002). Ethical school leadership. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
14.
MazzeoC.BermanI. (2003). Reaching new heights: Turning around low-performing schools. Washington, DC: Center for Best Practices, National Governors Association.
15.
MetteI. M. (2013). Turnaround as reform: Opportunity for change or neoliberal posturing?Interchange, 43, 317-342.
16.
MurphyJ. (2008). Turning around failing schools: Policy insights from the corporate, government, and nonprofit sectors. Educational Policy, 23, 796-830.
17.
MurphyJ.MeyersC. V. (2008). Turning around failing schools: Leadership lessons from the organizational sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
18.
PearceJ. A.RobbinsD. K. (1993). Toward improved theory and research on business turnaround. Journal of Management, 19, 613-636.
19.
PlacierM. (1996). The cycle of student labels in education: The cases of culturally deprived/disadvantaged and at risk. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 236-270.
20.
ReboreR. W. (2014). The ethics of educational leadership (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
21.
Rensselaerville Institute. (2011). The think tank with muddy boots. Available from http://www.rinstitute.org/
22.
RhimL. M.KowalJ. M.HasselB. C.HasselE. A. (2007). School turnarounds: A review of the cross-sector evidence on dramatic organizational improvement. Charlottesville, VA: Public Impact.
23.
ShapiroJ. P.StefkovichJ. A. (2011). Ethical leadership and decision making in education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
ShuchmanM. L.WhiteJ. S. (1995). The art of the turnaround: How to rescue your troubled business from creditors, predators, and competitors. New York, NY: American Management Association.
25.
SlatterS.LovettD.BarlowL. (2006). Leading corporate turnaround: How leaders fix troubled companies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
StefkovichJ.BegleyP. T. (2007). Ethical school leadership: Defining the best interests of students. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35, 205-224.
StrikeK. A. (2007). Ethical leadership in schools: Creating community in an environment of accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
29.
TrujilloT.RenéeM. (2012). Democratic school turnarounds: Pursuing equity and learning from evidence. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.
30.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). School improvement report: Executive orders on actions for turning around low-performing schools. Washington, DC: Office of the Under Secretary and Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, U.S. Department of Education.
31.
U.S. Department of Education. (2010). ESEA blueprint for reform. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, U.S. Department of Education.
BoyneG. A. (2006). Strategies for public service turnaround: Lessons from the private sector?Administration & Society, 38, 365-388.
34.
BradyR. C. (2003). Can failing schools be fixed?Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
35.
MurphyJ. (2010). Turning around failing organizations: Insights for educational leaders. Journal of Educational Change, 11, 157-176.
36.
PeurachD. J.MarxG. E. (2010). Leading systemic improvement: Confronting complexity in turnaround schools. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 13, 26-36.
37.
ShieldsC. M. (2003). Good intentions are not enough: Transformative leadership for communities of difference. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
