Do school boards have a role in student achievement? Recent research suggests that they do. This case study identifies 12 board of education governance practices associated with higher levels of student achievement. The relationship between these board governance practices and the role of the board in district leadership is examined in the context of Superintendent Smith’s change initiative.
AlsburyT. L. (2008). School board politics and student achievement. In AlsburyT. L. (Ed.), The future of school board governance: Relevancy and revelation (pp. 247-272). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Education.
2.
AndersonS.TogneriW. (2005). School district-wide reform policies in education. In BasciaN.CummingA.DantlowA.LeithwoodK.LivingstoneD. (Eds.), International handbook of educational policy (pp. 173-194). Dordrecth, Netherlands: Springer.
3.
DanzbergerJ. (1994). Governing the nation’s schools: The case for restructuring local school boards. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 67-73.
4.
DelagardelleM. L. (2008). The lighthouse inquiry: Examining the role of school board leadership in the improvement of student achievement. In AlsburyT. L. (Ed.), The future of school board governance: Relevancy and revelation (pp. 191-223). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Education.
5.
Education Commission of the States (ECS). 1999. Governing America’s schools: Changing the rules. Report of the National Commission on Governing America’s Schools. Denver: ECS.
6.
GlassT. E. (1992). The 1992 study of the American school superintendency. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
7.
GlassT. E.BjorkL.BrunnerC. (2000). The study of the American superintendency. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
8.
GoodmanR. H.FulbrightL.ZimmermanW. G.Jr. (1997). Getting there from here—School board–superintendent collaboration: Creating a school governance team capable of raising student achievement. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
9.
GoodmanR. H.ZimmermanW. G.Jr. (2000). Thinking differently: Recommendations for 21st century school board/superintendent leadership. Governance and teamwork for high student achievement. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service and New England School Development Council.
10.
HessF. M. (2002). School boards at the turn of the 21st century: Conditions and challenges of school governance. Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Association.
11.
HoffmanR. H. (1995). Contextual influences on school effectiveness: The role of school boards. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 308-331.
12.
Iowa Association of School Boards. (2000). IASB’s Lighthouse Study: School boards and student achievement. Iowa School Board Compass, 5(2), 1-12.
13.
JohnsonP. (in press). Leading for learning: Leadership practices of effective boards. ERS Spectrum.
14.
KaplanG. (1989). Who runs our schools?Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
15.
LamontH.DelagardelleM. (2009). What you need to know from the lighthouse project. American School Board Journal, 196, 20-24.
16.
LandD. (2002). Local school boards under review: Their role and effectiveness in relation to students’ academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 72, 229-278.
17.
LaRocqueL.ColemanP. (1993). The politics of excellence: Trustee leadership and school district ethos. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 39(4), 449-475.
18.
LeithwoodK.JantziD. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 496-528.
19.
MarzanoR. J.WatersT. (2009). District leadership that works: Striking the right balance. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20.
McAdamsD. (2000). Fighting to save our urban schools . . . and winning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
21.
MountfordM. (2008). Historical and current tensions among board—Superintendent teams: Symptoms or cause? In AlsburyT. L. (Ed.), The future of school board governance: Relevancy and revelation (pp. 81-1114). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Education.
22.
MurphyJ.HallingerP. (2001). Characteristics of instructionally effective school districts. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 175-181.
23.
National School Boards Association. (1996). Becoming a better school board member: A guide to effective school board service. Alexandria, VA: NSBA.
24.
PaigeR. (2002). School boards: Holding the power and bearing the responsibility for educational leadership. Paper presented at the National School Boards Association Annual Conference-The Second Annual Jacqueline P. Danzberger Memorial Lecture, New Orleans, LA.
25.
RiceD.DelagardelleM.BucktonM.JonsC.LuedersW.VensM.. . . WeathersbyJ. (2001). The lighthouse inquiry: School board/superintendent team behaviors in school districts with extreme differences in student achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
26.
StringfieldS. (2008). School boards and raising student outcomes: Reflections (Confessions?) of a former school board member. In AlsburyT. L. (Ed.), The future of school board governance: Relevancy and revelation (pp. 273-294). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Education.
