Superintendents and school boards mustwork together to improve schools and student academic performance. In an attempt to improve often dismal school system performance, several states passed laws over the past decade changing certification requirements for superintendents, effectively permitting anyone, however trained, to become superintendent of a school system. What happens when people outside the traditional educational establishment become leaders of schools? This case describes the actions of a nontraditional superintendent (a noneducator) hired by a district with a history of conflict between the superintendent and the school board. This case demonstrates the challenges surrounding the hiring of nontraditional superintendents, the politics of local school boards, and issues with changes in school governance structures.
Bjork, L. G., Bell, R. J.,& Gurley, D. K. (2002). Politics and the socialization of superintendents. In G. Perreault & F. Lunenburg (Eds.), The changing world of school administration(pp. 294-311). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
2.
Boyd, W. L. (1976). The public, the professionals, and educational policy: Who governs?Teachers College Record, 77, 539-578.
3.
Carter, G. R.,& Cunningham, W. G. (1997). The American school superintendent: Leading in an age of pressure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Council of State Governments. (2004, January 16). AASA Director Paul Houston talks about the “Politics” and the “politics” of school leadership. Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://www.csg.org/CSG/Policy/education/Dr.+Houston+interview.htm
5.
Cronin, J. M., & Usdan, M. D. (2003). Rethinking the urban superintendency: Nontraditional leaders and newmodels of leadership. In W. L. Boyd& D. Miretzky (Eds.), American educational governance on trial: Change and challenges(pp. 177-195). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Danzberger, J. P. (1994). Governing the nation's schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 367-374.
7.
Danzberger, J. P., Kirst, M. W., & Usdan, M. D. (1992). Governing public schools: New times, new requirements. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
8.
Feuerstein, A., & Opfer, V. D. (1998). School board chairmen and school superintendents: An analysis of perceptions concerning special interest groups and educational governance. Journal of School Leadership, 8, 373-398.
9.
Finn, C. E., Jr., & Keegan, L. G. (2004). Lost at sea. Education Next, 4(3), 15-17.
10.
Fusarelli, L. D., Cooper, B. S., & Carella, V. A. (2003). Who will serve? An analysis of superintendent occupational perceptions, career satisfaction, and mobility. Journal of School Leadership, 13, 304-327.
11.
Fusarelli, L. D., & Petersen, G. J. (2002). Changing times, changing relationships: An exploration of current trends influencing the relationship between superintendents and boards of education. In G. Perreault& F. Lunenburg (Eds.), The changing world of school administration(pp. 282-293). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
12.
Glass, T.,& Bjork, L. G. (2003). The superintendent shortage: Findings from research on school board presidents. Journal of School Leadership, 13, 264-287.
13.
Konnert, W. M.,& Augenstein, J. J. (1995). The school superintendency: Leading education into the 21st century. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
14.
Kowalski, T. J. (1995). Keepers of the flame: Contemporary urban superintendents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
15.
Kowalski, T. J. (1999). The school superintendent: theory, practice, and cases. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
Morgan, C.,& Petersen, G. J. (2002). The role of the district superintendent in leading academically successful school districts. In B. S. Cooper & L. D. Fusarelli (Eds.), The promises and perils facing today's school superintendent(pp. 175-196). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
17.
Natkin, G., Cooper, B., Fusarelli, L. D., Alborano, J., Padilla, A., & Ghosh, S. (2002). Myth of the revolving-door superintendency. The School Administrator, 59(5), 28-31.
18.
Nygren, B. (1992). Two-party tune up. American School Board Journal, 178(7), 35-35.
19.
Petersen, G. J. (1999). Demonstrated actions of instructional leaders: An examination of five California superintendents. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(18). Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n18.html
20.
Petersen, G. J., & Short, P. M. (2001). School board presidents and the district superintendent relationship: Applying the lens of social influence. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(4), 533-570.
21.
Public Agenda. (2003). Rolling up their sleeves. New York: Author.
22.
Renchler, R. (1992). Urban superintendent turnover: The need for stability. Urban Superintendents' Sounding Board, 1(1), 2-13.
23.
Stanford, J. (1999). Victory in our schools. New York: Bantam Books.
24.
Tallerico, M. (1989). The dynamics of superintendent-school board relationships: A continuing challenge. Urban Education, 24, 215-232.
