Mapping the Disciplinary Infrastructure: A Bibliometric Analysis of Games and Culture's Role in Game Studies Scholarship (2006

Abstract

This article conducts a bibliometric analysis of 816 Games and Culture publications (2006–2025) indexed in Scopus to explore how specialized journals shape the institutionalization of interdisciplinary fields. Through citation networks, keyword co-occurrence, authorship, and geographic analyses, it treats the journal as a model of scholarly infrastructure in game studies. Results reveal steady publication growth (from 20 to over 100 articles annually), increasing collaboration (2.39 authors per paper), substantial citation accumulation (2006–2008 works exceeding 3,000 citations), and diversification beyond anglophone regions. Temporal keyword trends trace thematic shifts from virtual worlds and MMOs to esports, ethics, gamification, and representation. These findings inform broader debates on how niche journals foster disciplinary legitimacy, showing that Games and Culture has been central to consolidating game studies and offers a transferable framework for examining institutionalization in other interdisciplinary domains.

Keywords

bibliometric analysis game studies scholarly communication disciplinary institutionalization Games and Culture journal

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aarseth

E. J.

(1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. JHU Press.

Akerlof

K. L.

Timm

K. M. F.

Rowan

K. E.

Olds

J. L.

Hathaway

(2022). The growth and disciplinary convergence of environmental communication: A bibliometric analysis of the field (1970–2019). Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, Article 814599. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.814599

Murray

J. H.

(1997). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace.

Aria

Cuccurullo

(2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Baaden

Rennings

Marcus

Bröring

(2024). On the emergence of interdisciplinary scientific fields: (How) does it relate to science convergence? Research Policy, 53(6), 105026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105026

Bornmann

Mutz

(2015). Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2215–2222. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23329

Consalvo

(2009). There is no magic circle. Games and Culture, 4(4), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412009343575

Donthu

Kumar

Mukherjee

Pandey

Lim

W. M.

(2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Fortunato

Bergstrom

C. T.

Börner

Evans

J. A.

Helbing

Milojević

Barabási

A.-L.

(2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), eaao0185. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185

10.

Gislam

Crawford

Bagnall

Gosling

V. K.

Yodovich

(2025). Do video games matter? Examining video games’ pathways to legitimacy and cultural value through cultural intermediaries. Games and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120251341621

11.

Gläser

(2024). From effects of governance to causes of epistemic change. Minerva, 62(3), 309–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09526-2

12.

Grabarczyk

Aarseth

(2018). An ontological meta-model for games research. Research Portal Denmark.

13.

Blackmore

(2014, December). The publishing game: An analysis of “Game” related academic publishing patterns. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on interactive entertainment (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1145/2677758.267775

14.

Haddon

(1988). Electronic and computer games: The history of an interactive medium. Screen, 29(2), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/29.2.52

15.

Hicks

Wouters

Waltman

de Rijcke

Rafols

(2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

16.

Hussain

Tosoni

Carpentier

Murru

M. F.

Kilborn

Kramp

Kunelius

McNicholas

Olsson

Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt

(2017). Bourdieu in Greenland: Elaborating the field dependencies of post-colonial journalism. Research Portal Denmark.

17.

Irwanto

Rini

T. D. S.

(2024). Research trends in blended learning in chemistry: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus-indexed publications (2012–2022). Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(3), 566–578. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.030

18.

Jordan-Vallverdú

Plaza-Navas

M. À

Raya

J. M.

Torres-Pruñonosa

(2023). The intellectual structure of esports research. Entertainment Computing, 49, 100628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2023.100628

19.

Julius

Abd Halim

M. S.

Abdul Hadi

Alias

A. N.

Mohd Khalid

M. H.

Mahfodz

Ramli

F. F.

(2021). Bibliometric analysis of research in mathematics education using Scopus database. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2040. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11329

20.

Kim

Kogler

D. F.

Maliphol

(2024). Identifying interdisciplinary emergence in the science of science: Combination of network analysis and BERTopic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03044-y

21.

Lieberoth

(2015). Shallow gamification: Testing psychological effects of framing an activity as a game. Games and Culture, 10(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412014559978

22.

Magadán-Díaz

Rivas-García

J. I.

(2022). Publishing industry: A bibliometric analysis of the scientific production indexed in Scopus. Publishing Research Quarterly, 38(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09911-3

23.

Maravić

(2023). Neoliberal ideologization of work and the beginning of unionisation in the video game industry. Sociološki Pregled, 57(3), 928–951. https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg57-44334

24.

Mäyrä

(2020). Game culture studies and the politics of scholarship: The opposites and the dialectic. Game Journal, 1(9), 11–31. https://www.gamejournal.it/game-culture/

25.

Milojević

(2015). Quantifying the cognitive extent of science. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 962–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.10.005

26.

Mortensen

T. E.

(2018). Anger, fear, and games: The long event of #GamerGate. Games and Culture, 13(8), 787–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016640408

27.

Ouellette

M. A.

Conway

(2021). The game studies crisis: What are the rules of play? Eludamos Journal for Computer Game Culture, 11(1), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.7557/23.6360

28.

Reitman

J. G.

Anderson-Coto

M. J.

Lee

J. S.

Steinkuehler

(2020). Esports research: A literature review. Games and Culture, 15(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019840892

29.

Saner

Tratschin

Leder

Rost

(2023). Introduction to the special issue: Digital academia—Investigating science and higher education in the digital age. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 449–472. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjs-2023-0022

30.

Schwarzenegger

Koenen

Radde-Antweiler

Wolf

K. D.

(2024). Beyond play: Researching the transformative power of digital gaming in deeply mediatized societies. Media and Communication, 13, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8800

31.

Shaw

(2012). Do you identify as a gamer? Gender, race, sexuality, and gamer identity. New Media & Society, 14(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410394

32.

Thanh

T. N. T.

(2025). Science-mapping research of STEM in primary schools: A bibliometric analysis from Scopus database (2004–2024). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(6), 1–17.

33.

van Eck

N. J.

Waltman

(2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

34.

Wolf

M. J. P.

(1997). Inventing space: Toward a taxonomy of on- and off-screen space in video games. Film Quarterly, 51(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.1997.51.1.04a00020

35.

Wolf

M. J. P.

(1998). Review: Myst. Film Quarterly, 52(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1213492

36.

Wuchty

Jones

B. F.

Uzzi

(2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099

37.

Zhang

B.-Y.

(2024). Research progress and intellectual structure of design for digital equity (DDE): A bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03552-x

38.

Zupic

Čater

(2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Mapping the Disciplinary Infrastructure: A Bibliometric Analysis of Games and Culture's Role in Game Studies Scholarship (2006–2025)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References