In this article, over 60 definitions of games since the 1930s are reviewed in order to pinpoint what those definitions agree on and, more importantly, what they disagree on. This article is conceived of as a tool game scholars can use to better position themselves in regard to the concept of “game” by working out their answers to the 10 questions regarding game definition presented in here.
AarsethE. (2007). I fought the law: Transgressive play and the implied player. Proceedings of the 2007 DiGRA International Conference: Situated Play, September 24–28, 2007, Tokyo, Japan.
2.
AbtC. C. (1970). Serious games. New York, NY: The Viking Press.
3.
AvedonE. M. (1971). The structural elements of games. In AvedonE. M.Sutton-SmithB. (Eds.), The study of games (pp. 419–426). New York, NY: John Wiley.
4.
AvedonE. M.Sutton-SmithB. (Eds.). (1971). The study of games. New York, NY: John Wiley.
5.
BatemanC. (2011). Imaginary games. Winchester, England: Zero Books.
6.
BerneE. (1964). Games people play. London, England: Penguin Books.
CailloisR. (2001). Man, play and games. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press. Original Published 1958.
9.
CarseJ. P. (1986). Finite and infinite games. New York, NY: Random House.
10.
CostikyanG. (1994). I have no words & I must design. Interactive Fantasy 2, 1, 22–38.
11.
CostikyanG. (2002). I have no words & I must design: Toward a critical vocabulary of games. In FransM. (Ed.), Proceedings of Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference (pp. 9–33). Tampere, Finland: Tampere University Press.
12.
CrawfordC. (1983). The art of computer game design. Berkeley, CA: Osborne/McGraw-Hill.
13.
CrookallD.OxfordR.SaundersD. (1987). Towards a reconceptualization of simulation: From representation to reality. Simulation/Games for Learning, 17, 147–171.
14.
DeKovenB. (1978). The well-played game. A player’s philosophy. Garden City, England: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
15.
DeKovenB. (2011). Playing well together. Keynote at Think Design Play, DiGRA 2011 Conference. Hilversum, the Netherlands: DiGRA/Utrecht School of the Arts.
16.
DempseyJ. V.HaynesL. L.LucassenB. A.CaseyM. S. (2002). Forty simple computer games and what they could mean to educators. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 157–168.
17.
DeterdingS. (2013). Modes of play. A frame analytical account of video game play. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
18.
DukeR. D. (1974). Gaming: The future’s language. New York, NY: John Wiley.
19.
EliasG. S.GarfieldR.GutscheraK. R. (2012). Characteristics of games. Cambridge, England: The MIT Press.
20.
EllingtonH.AddinallE.PercivalF. (1982). A handbook of game design. London, England: Kogan Page.
21.
EspositoN. (2005). A short and simple definition of what a videogame is. Proceedings of the 2005 DiGRA International Conference: Changing Views: Worlds in Play, June 16–20, 2005, Vancouver, Canada.
22.
FrascaG. (2007). Play the message. Play, game and videogame rhetoric. Doctoral Dissertation, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
23.
GeeJ. P. (2008). Learning and games. In KatieS. (Ed.), The ecology of games connecting youth, games and learning (pp. 21–40). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
24.
GoffmanE. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
25.
HolopainenJ. (2008). Play, games, and fun. In OlliL.HannaW.AmyrisF. (Eds.), Extending experiences. Structure, analysis and design of computer game player experiences (pp. 44–57). Rovaniemi, Finland: Lapland University Press.
26.
HuizingaJ. (1955). Homo Ludens: A study of play element in culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Original Published 1938.
27.
JuulJ. (2005). Half-Real: Video games between real rules and fictional worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
KarhulahtiV. (2013). Defining the videogame. 7th Philosophy of Computer Games Conference ‘13, October 2–4, 2013, Bergen, Norway.
29.
KelleyD. (1988). The art of reasoning. Referred from the 1998 Third Edition. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
30.
KlabbersJ. H. G. (2006). The magic circle. Principles of gaming & simulation (3rd and rev. ed.). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
31.
Lévi-StraussC. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago press. Original Published 1962.
32.
MaigaardP. (1951). About ludology. 14th International Congress of Sociology (pp. 362–373), August 14–September 3, 1951, Rome, Italy.
33.
MalabyT. (2007). Beyond play: A new approach to games. Games and Culture, 2, 95–113.
MatsunagaS. (2014). Games as design of actions. An attempt to redefine games and play. Presentation at Kyoto Game Conference, March 8, 2014, Kyoto, Japan.
36.
McLuhanM. (1964). Understanding media. The extensions of man. New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self & society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
38.
MidgleyM. (1974). The game game. Philosophy, 49, 231–253.
MontolaM. (2012). On the edge of the magic circle. Understanding role-playing and pervasive games. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
41.
MortensenT. E. (2009). Perceiving play: The art and study of computer games. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
42.
MyersD. (2009). In search of a minimalist game. Proceedings of the 2009 DiGRA International Conference: Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory, September 1–4, 2009, West London, UK.
43.
NachmanovitchS. (1990). Free play. Improvisation in life and art. New York, NY: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam.
44.
NewmanJ.SimonsI. (Eds.). (2004). Difficult questions about videogames. Nottingham, England: PublicBeta.
45.
OxlandK. (2004). Gameplay and design. London, England: Addison-Wesley.
46.
ParlettD. (1999). The Oxford history of board games. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
47.
PrenskyM. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
48.
RiezlerK. (1941). Play and seriousness. The Journal of Philosophy, 38, 505–517.
49.
RollingsA.MorrisD. (2004). Game architecture and design. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
50.
SalenK.ZimmermanE. (2004). Rules of play. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51.
ShubikM. (1983). Gaming: The State-of-the-art survey. In IngolfS. (Ed.), Operational gaming. An international approach (pp. 15–22). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
52.
SicartM. (2009). The ethics of computer games. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
53.
SicartM. (2011). Against procedurality. Game Studies, 11.
54.
StåhlI. (Ed.). (1983a). Operational gaming. An international approach. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
55.
StåhlI. (1983b). What is operational gaming? In IngolfS. (Ed.), Operational gaming. An international approach (pp. 25–39). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
56.
StraussN. (2005). The game. Penetrating the secret society of pickup artists. New York, NY: Regan.
57.
SuitsB. (1973). The elements of sport. In RobertO. (Ed.), The philosophy of sport: A collection of essays. Quoted fromMorganWilliam J.MeierKlaus V. (eds.) (1995). Philosophical inquiry in sport (2nd ed., pp. 8–15). Human Kinetics; Champaign.
58.
SuitsB. (1978). The grasshopper. Games, life and utopia. Toronto, Canada: Broadview Press.
59.
SuitsB. (1988). Tricky triad: Games, play, and sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, XV. Quoted fromMorganWilliam J.MeierKlaus V. (eds.) (1995). Philosophical inquiry in sport (2nd ed., pp. 16–22). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
60.
TavinorG. (2009). The art of videogames. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
61.
Von NeumannJ.MorgensternO. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
WaernA. (2012). Framing games. Proceedings of 2012 International DiGRA Nordic Conference, June 6–8, 2012, Tampere, Finland.
63.
WhittonN. (2009). Learning with digital games. A practical guide to engaging students in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
64.
WolfM. J. P. (2001). The medium of the video game. Austin: University of Texas Press.
65.
ArjorantaJ. (2015). Real-time hermeneutics. Meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
66.
BjörkS.HolopainenJ. (2005). Patterns in game design. Hingham, MA: Charles River Media.
67.
BjörkS.JuulJ. (2012). Zero-player games. Or: What we talk about when we talk about players. Philosophy of Computer Games Conference, Madrid, Spain. Retrieved fromwww.jesperjuul.net/text/zeroplayergames/
68.
BogostI. (2006). Unit operations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
69.
BogostI. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
70.
DanseyN.StevensB.EglinR. (2009). Contextually-ambiguous pervasive games: An exploratory study. Proceedings of the 2009 DiGRA International Conference: Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory, September 1–4, 2009, West London, UK.
71.
Egenfeldt-NielsenS.SmithJ. H.ToscaS. P. (2013). Understanding video games. The essential introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
72.
FlanaganM. (2009). Critical play, radical game design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
73.
GautB. (2000). “Art” as a cluster concept. In CarrollN. (Ed.), Theories of art today (pp. 130–140). Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
74.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
75.
HarviainenJ. T. (2012). Systemic perspectives on information in physically performed role-play. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
76.
HunickeR.LeBlancM.ZubekR. (2004). MDA: Formal approach to game design and game research. Proceedings of the AAAI-04 Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, San Jose, CA, USA.
77.
IserW. (1974). The implied reader. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
78.
JuulJ. (2008). Who made the magic circle? Seeking the solvable part of the game-player problem. Keynote at Philosophy of Computer Games 2008.
79.
KultimaA. (2009). Casual games design values. Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era (pp. 58–65), September 30–October 2, 2009, Tampere, Finland.
80.
LantzF. (2009). Pervasive games and the “Art Question”. In MarkusM.JaakkoS.AnnikaW. (Eds.) Pervasive games. Theory and design (pp. 245–249). Burlington, Canada: Morgan Kaufmann.
81.
PetticrewM. (2001). Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: Myths and misconceptions. British Medical Journal, 322, 98–101.
82.
PotterW. J. (1996). An analysis of thinking and research about qualitative methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
83.
SalminenA. (2011). Mikä kirjallisuuskatsaus? Johdatus kirjallisuuskatsauksen tyyppeihin ja hallintotieteellisiin sovelluksiin. Vaasa, Finland: Vaasan yliopisto.
84.
SmithJ. H. (2006). Plans and purposes. How videogame goals shape player behaviour. Doctoral Dissertation, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
85.
SteinkuehlerC. (2006). The mangle of play. Games and Culture, 1, 199–213.
86.
StenrosJ. (2014). In defence of a magic circle: The social, mental and cultural boundaries of play. Transactions of Digital Games Research Association, 1, 147–185.
87.
StenrosJ. (2015). Playfulness, play, and games: A constructionist ludology approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
88.
TaylorT. L. (2006). Play between worlds. Exploring online game culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
89.
TaylorT. L. (2007). Pushing the boundaries: Player participation and game culture. In JoeK. (Ed.), Structures of participation in digital culture (pp. 112–130). New York, NY: Social Science Research Council.
90.
TaylorT. L. (2009). The assemblage of play. Games and Culture, 4, 331–339.
91.
TreanorM.MateasM. (2013). An account of proceduralist meaning. Proceedings of the 2013 DiGRA International Conference: DeFragging Game Studies, August 26–29, 2013, Atlanta, USA.
92.
WalzS. P. (2010). Towards a ludic architecture. The space of play and games. Halifax, Canada: ETC Press.
93.
WilsonD. (2012). Designing for the pleasures of disputation, or how to make friends by trying to kick them!Doctoral dissertation, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
