This study examines the impact of players’ gender and nationality on game performance before and during the Israel-Hamas war. The study focuses on two games for social impact revolving around intractable conflicts: PeaceMaker (Israeli-Palestinian conflict) and Fact Finders (Cyprus Conflict). We conducted three case studies with 510 undergraduates voluntarily playing the aforementioned games and reporting their final scores. The participants included Israeli-Jew, Palestinian, American, and Cypriot undergraduate students. We found that before the Israel-Hamas war, women won PeaceMaker no less than men. Interestingly, during the Israel-Hamas war, women won PeaceMaker more than men. Finally, third-parties to the Cyprus conflict (Israelis, Palestinians and Americans) significantly outperformed direct-parties (Cypriots) in Fact Finders before and during the Israel-Hamas war. Overall this study's findings suggest that serious games can be used as effective interventions for peace education and conflict resolution regardless of players’ gender or nationality, even during violent times.
Bar-TalD. (2001). Why does fear override hope in societies engulfed by intractable conflict, as it does in the Israeli society?”. Political Psychology, 22(3), 601–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00255
BurakA.KeylorE.SweeneyT. (2005). Peacemaker: A video game to teach peace. In GonzalezC.MitgutschK. (Eds.), Intelligent technologies for interactive entertainment (pp. 307–310). Springer.
4.
Cohen-ChenS.CrispR. J.HalperinE. (2015). Perceptions of a changing world induce hope and promote peace in intractable onflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215573210
5.
CuhadarE.KampfR. (2014). Learning about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and negotiations through simulations: The case of PeaceMaker. International Studies Persectives, 15(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12005
6.
DucheneautN.YeeN.NickellE.MooreR. (2017). The life and death of online gaming communities: A look at guilds in World of Warcraft. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(pp. 839–848).
7.
DurdoL. (2021). Digital games for peace education. In PolatS. (Ed.), Multicultural structure of schools and intercultural education (pp. 238–269). IGI Global.
Interactive Software Federation of Europe [ISFE]. (2023). Videogames in Europe: Consumer study.
12.
IyengarS. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press.
13.
Kampfr. (2023). Are two better than one? Game performance of same gender dyads and mixed gender dyads in a computerized simulation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Media Frames. (in Hebrew).
14.
KampfR.CuhadarE. (2015). Do computer games enhance learning about conflicts? A cross-national inquiry into proximate and distant scenarios in global conflicts. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.08.008
15.
KampfR.NicolaidouI. (2024). Using social impact games to overcome intractable conflicts: The case of fact finders and PeaceMaker. Information, Communication and Society, 27, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2331770
16.
LeshemO. A.HalperinE. (2024). Introducing the Bidimensional Model of Hope and its conceptual and methodological utilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 456303. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1456303
17.
Lopez-FernandezO.WilliamsA. J.KussD. J. (2019). Measuring female gaming: Gamer profile, predictors, prevalence, and characteristics from psychological and gender perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00898
18.
MitgutschK. (2020). Learning through play – A delicate matter: Experience-based recursive learning in computer games. In FrommeJ.UngerA. (Eds.), Computer games and new media cultures: A handbook of digital games studies (pp. 101–135). Springer.
19.
MitgutschK. (2021). Serious learning in serious games: Learning in, through and beyond serious games. In MaM.OikonomouA.JainL. C. (Eds.), Serious games and edutainment applications (pp. 45–58). Springer.
20.
MitgutschK.NavdaA. (2019). Purposeful by design? A serious game design assessment framework. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 121–128).
21.
NicolaidouI.Egenfeldt-NielsenS.ZupančičR.HajslundS.MilioniD. L. (2023). Developing fact finders: A Mobile game for overcoming intractable conflicts. Social Science Computer Review, 41(4), 1166–1186. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211073586
22.
NicolaidouI.KampfR. (2024). Serious games, knowledge acquisition and conflict resolution: The case of PeaceMaker as a peace education tool. Social Science Computer Review, 42(3), 1–25.
23.
SanceszD. R. (2022). Videogame-based training: The impact and interaction of videogame characteristics on learning outcomes. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6030019
24.
TondelloG. F.NackeL. E. (2019). Player characteristics and video game preferences. Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play – CHI PLAY ‘19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347185
25.
YeeN. (2014). The Proteus paradox: How online games and virtual worlds change us – and how they don't. Yale University Press.
