This article explores authenticity, immersion, and heritage in two historical video games, Svoboda 1945: Liberation and Train to Sachsenhausen. The two games use different strategies when inviting understanding, emotional attachment, and immersive experiences of past events. We draw upon a critical, self-reflective analysis of the design process and a comparison of both games. Our aim is to expand further the toolset for historical game analysis and critique by developing the terms inter-medial authenticity and procedural heritage to enable investigations of games as both representations and simulations of historical events. We show that both these aspects can contribute to the roles games can play as conveyors of historical memory and heritage.
Ariese-VandemeulebrouckeC. E.BoomK. H. J.MolA.Van HoutB.PolitopoulosA. (Eds.). (2021). Return to the interactive past. Sidestone Press.
2.
BogostI. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. The MIT Press.
3.
BrathwaiteB.SharpJ. (2010). The mechanic is the message: A postmortem in process. In SchrierK.GibsonD. (Eds.), Ethics and game design: Teaching values through play (pp. 311–329). Information Science Reference.
4.
CallejaG. (2011). In-game: From immersion to incorporation. MIT Press.
5.
ChampionE. (2020). Culturally significant presence in single-player computer games. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 13(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3414831
6.
ChapmanA. (2016). Digital games as history: How videogames represent the past and offer access to historical practice. Routledge.
7.
Charles Games (2021). Svoboda 1945: Liberation.
8.
Charles Games (2022). Train to Sachsenhausen.
9.
CopplestoneT. J. (2016). But that’s not accurate: The differing perceptions of accuracy in cultural-heritage videogames between creators, consumers and critics. Rethinking History, 21(3), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2017.1256615
10.
ErllA. (2010). Literature, film, and the mediality of cultural memory. In ErllA.NünningA. (Eds.), Cultural memory studies: An interdisciplinary handbook (pp. 389–398). Walter de Gruyter.
11.
ErllA. (2011). Memory in culture. Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
ErllA.RigneyA. (2009). Mediation, remediation, and the dynamics of cultural memory. Walter de Gruyter.
13.
FlanaganM. (2009). Critical play: Radical game design. The MIT Press.
14.
FriedrichJ. (2021). Through the darkest of times: Making a digital game about the historical resistance against the Nazis. In MeyerS. R.AldanaG. (Eds.), Interactive storytelling for the screen (pp. 231–246). Routledge.
15.
FrommerB. (2005). National cleansing: Retribution against Nazi collaborators in Postwar Czechoslovakia. Cambridge University Press.
16.
HammarE. L. (2019). Producing and playing hegemonic pasts: Historical digital games as memory-making media. [Doctoral dissertation, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway].
17.
JechK. (2001). Soumrak selského stavu 1945–1960. Ústav pro soudobé dějiny AV ČR.
18.
LeikertJ. (2001). Černý pátek sedmnáctého listopadu. Univerzita Karlova v Praze.
19.
LorberM.ZimmermannF. (Eds.). (2020). History in games contingencies of an authentic past. Transcript Verlag.
MochockiM. (2022). Heritage, authenticity, and the fiction/nonfiction dualism in attentat 1942. In BostanB. (Ed.), Games and narrative: theory and practice. Springer.
24.
MolA. A. A.Ariese-VandemeulebrouckeC. E.BoomK. H. J.PolitopoulosA. (2017). The interactive past: Archaeology, heritage & video games. Sidestone Press.
PinkasJ.HannemannT. (2020). A computer simulation in the context of history teaching in Czech schools: Using the “Czechoslovakia 38–89” educational simulation. Historical Encounters, 7(2), 79–92.
27.
PötzschH.ŠislerV. (2019). Playing cultural memory: Framing history in “call of duty: Black ops” and “Czechoslovakia 38–89: Assassination. Games & Culture, 14(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016638603
28.
RosenstoneR. (2006). History on film/film on history. Pearson Education Limited.
SeixasP.MortonT. (2012). The big six historical thinking concepts. Cengage Learning EMEA.
31.
SicartM. (2011). Against procedurality. Game Studies, 11(3).
32.
ŠislerV. (2019). Critical war game development: Lessons learned from attentat 1942. In HammondP.PötzschH. (Eds.), War games: Memory, militarism and the subject of play (pp. 201–222). Bloomsbury Academic.
33.
StaněkT. (2005). Poválečné „excesy” v českých zemích v roce 1945 a jejich vyšetřování. Ústav pro soudobé dějiny AV ČR.
34.
SturkenM. (1997). Tangled memories. University of California Press.
35.
UricchioW. (2011). Simulation, history, computer games. In RaessensJ.GoldsteinJ. (Eds.), Handbook of computer game studies (pp. 327–338). MIT Press.
36.
von LünenA.LewisK. J.LitherlandB.CullumP. H. (Eds.). (2020). Historia Ludens: The playing historian. Routledge.
