Detectability in Scalp EEGs of Epileptic Spikes Emitted from Brain Electrical Sources of Different Sizes and Locations: A Simulation Study Using Realistic Head Models of Elderly Adults
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2025
Detectability in Scalp EEGs of Epileptic Spikes Emitted from Brain Electrical Sources of Different Sizes and Locations: A Simulation Study Using Realistic Head Models of Elderly Adults
Background. Epilepsy is prevalent in the elderly, whose brain morphologies and skull electrical characteristics differ from those of younger adults. Here, using a multivariate definition of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), we explored the detectability of epileptic spikes in scalp EEG measurements in elderly by forward simulations of hypersynchronous spikes generated at 78 cortical regions of interest (ROIs) in the presence of background noise. Methods. Simulated electric potentials were measured at 18, 35, and 70 standard 10–20 electrode positions using three reference methods: infinity reference (INF), common average reference (CAR), and average mastoid reference (M1M2). MRIs of six elderly subjects were used to construct finite element method (FEM) models with age-adjusted skull conductivities. Results. SNRs of epileptic spikes increased with increasing sizes of the brain electrical source areas, although medial and deep brain regions such as the hippocampus showed lower SNRs, consistent with clinical findings. The SNRs were greater in the 70-channel dataset than in the 18-channel and 35-channel datasets, especially for ROIs located closer to the head surface. In addition, the SNRs were lower for the CAR and M1M2 references than for the ideal INF reference. Moreover, we found comparable results in the standard FEM heads with age-adjusted skull conductivities. Conclusions. The results provide insights for evaluating scalp EEG data in elderly patients with suspected epilepsy, and suggest that age-adjusted skull conductivity is an important factor for forward models in elderly adults, and that the standard FEM head with age-adjusted skull conductivity can be used when MRIs are not available.
ToyotaTAkamatsuNTanakaA, et al.Interictal epileptiform discharges in new-onset epilepsy among older adults. Neurol Clin Neurosci. 2016;4(1):3–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ncn3.12025
3.
SmithSJM. EEG In the diagnosis, classification, and management of patients with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(2):ii2-iii7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.069245
BrittonJWFreyLCHoppJL, et al.Electroencephalography (EEG): An Introductory Text and Atlas of Normal and Abnormal Findings in Adults, Children, and Infants. American Epilepsy Society, Chicago.2016; ISBN 9780997975604.
CarboniMBrunetDSeeberMMichelCMVulliemozSVorderwülbeckeBJ. Linear distributed inverse solutions for interictal EEG source localisation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022;133:58–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.10.008
8.
MégevandPSpinelliLGenettiM, et al.Electric source imaging of interictal activity accurately localises the seizure onset zone. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(1):38–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-305515
9.
BrodbeckVSpinelliLLascanoAM, et al.Electroencephalographic source imaging: A prospective study of 152 operated epileptic patients. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 10):2887–2897. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr243
10.
LascanoAMPernegerTVulliemozS, et al.Yield of MRI, high-density electric source imaging (HD-ESI), SPECT and PET in epilepsy surgery candidates. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(1):150–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.025
SperliFSpinelliLSeeckMKurianMMichelCMLantzG. EEG Source imaging in pediatric epilepsy surgery: A new perspective in presurgical workup. Epilepsia. 2006;47(6):981–990. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00550.x
13.
RussoAJayakarPLallasM, et al.The diagnostic utility of 3D electroencephalography source imaging in pediatric epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 2016;57(1):24–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13228
14.
van MierloPStrobbeGKeeremanV, et al.Automated long-term EEG analysis to localize the epileptogenic zone. Epilepsia Open. 2017;2(3):322–333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12066
15.
CoitoABiethahnSTepperbergJ, et al.Interictal epileptogenic zone localization in patients with focal epilepsy using electric source imaging and directed functional connectivity from low-density EEG. Epilepsia Open. 2019;4(2):281–292. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12318
16.
SharmaPSchergMPinborgLH, et al.Ictal and interictal electric source imaging in pre-surgical evaluation: A prospective study. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25(9):1154–1160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13676
17.
BailletSRieraJJMarinGManginJFAubertJGarneroL. Evaluation of inverse methods and head models for EEG source localization using a human skull phantom. Phys Med Biol. 2001;46(1):77–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/46/1/306
18.
RullmannMAnwanderADannhauerMWarfieldSKDuffyFHWoltersCH. EEG Source analysis of epileptiform activity using a 1mm anisotropic hexahedra finite element head model. Neuroimage. 2009;44(2):399–410. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.009
BlinkouskayaYWeickenmeierJ. Brain shape changes associated with cerebral atrophy in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease. Front Mech Eng. 2021;7:705653. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2021.705653
21.
UnnwongseKRamppSWehnerT, et al.Validating EEG source imaging using intracranial electrical stimulation. Brain Commun. 2023;5(1):fcad023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcad023
22.
TaoJXBaldwinMRayAHawes-EbersoleSEbersoleJS. The impact of cerebral source area and synchrony on recording scalp electroencephalography ictal patterns. Epilepsia. 2007;48(11):2167–2176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01224.x
23.
Cosandier-RiméléDMerletIBadierJMChauvelPWendlingF. The neuronal sources of EEG: Modeling of simultaneous scalp and intracerebral recordings in epilepsy. Neuroimage. 2008;42(1):135–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.185
24.
Cosandier-RiméléDMerletIBadierJMChauvelPWendlingF. Recording of fast activity at the onset of partial seizures: Depth EEG vs. Scalp EEG. Neuroimage. 2012;59(4):3474–3487. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.045
25.
RamantaniGDümpelmannMKoesslerL, et al.Simultaneous subdural and scalp EEG correlates of frontal lobe epileptic sources. Epilepsia. 2014;55(2):278–288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12512
26.
von EllenriederNBeltrachiniLPeruccaPGotmanJ. Size of cortical generators of epileptic interictal events and visibility on scalp EEG. Neuroimage. 2014;94:47–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.032
27.
YaoDQinYHuSDongLBringas VegaMLValdés SosaPA. Which reference should we use for EEG and ERP practice?Brain Topogr. 2019;2019(4):530–549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-019-00707-x
28.
RamsayRERowanAJPryorFM. Special considerations in treating the elderly patient with epilepsy. Neurology. 2004;62(5 Suppl 2):S24–S29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.62.5_suppl_2.s24
29.
AcharyaJNAcharyaVJ. Epilepsy in the elderly: Special considerations and challenges. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2014;17(Suppl 1):S18–S26. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.128645
30.
VorwerkJAydinÜWoltersCHButsonCR. Influence of head tissue conductivity uncertainties on EEG dipole reconstruction. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:531. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00531
31.
EbersoleJSPedleyTA, editors. Current practice of clinical electroencephalography. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
32.
NunezPL. Localization of brain activity with electroencephalography. In: SatoS, ed. Advances in neurology, Vol. 54. Magnetoencephalography. Raven Press; 1990:39–65.
LanferBRöerCSchergMRamppSKellinghausCWoltersC. Influence of a silastic ECoG grid on EEG/ECoG based source analysis. Brain Topogr. 2013;26(2):212–228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-012-0251-0
35.
von EllenriederNBeltrachiniLMuravchikCHGotmanJ. Extent of cortical generators visible on the scalp: Effect of a subdural grid. Neuroimage. 2014;101:787–795. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.009
36.
DominguezLGWennbergRAGaetzWCheyneD. Snead OC 3rd, Velazquez JLP. Enhanced synchrony in epileptiform activity? Local versus distant phase synchronization in generalized seizures. J Neurosci. 2005;25(35):8077–8084. doi: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1046-05.2005
37.
VosslerDGKraemerDLBellAJ. The hippocampus and Cortex together generate the scalp EEG ictal discharge in temporal lobe epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;34(5):448–455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000394
38.
LamADColeAJCashSS. New approaches to studying silent mesial temporal lobe seizures in Alzheimer's disease. Front Neurol. 2019;10:959. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00959
KoesslerLCecchinTColnat-CoulboisS, et al.Catching the invisible: Mesial temporal source contribution to simultaneous EEG and SEEG recordings. Brain Topogr. 2015;28(1):5–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-014-0417-z
41.
HuSYaoDBringas-VegaMLQinYValdes-SosaPA. The statistics of EEG unipolar references: Derivations and properties. Brain Topogr. 2019;32(4):696–703. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-019-00706-y
42.
HuSLaiYValdes-SosaPABringas-VegaMLYaoD. How do reference montage and electrodes setup affect the measured scalp EEG potentials?J Neural Eng. 2018;15(2):026013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aaa13f
43.
AydinÜVorwerkJKüpperP, et al.Combining EEG and MEG for the reconstruction of epileptic activity using a calibrated realistic volume conductor model. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e93154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093154
44.
AzizollahiHAarabiAWalloisF. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;37(10):3604–3622. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23263
45.
AntonakakisMSchraderSAydinÜ, et al.Inter-Subject variability of skull conductivity and thickness in calibrated realistic head models. Neuroimage. 2020;223:117353. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117353
46.
Ein ShokaAADessoukyMMEl-SayedA, et al.EEG Seizure detection: Concepts, techniques, challenges, and future trends. Multimed Tools Appl. 2023;82:1–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15052-2
47.
AydinSSaraoğluHMKaraS. Log energy entropy-based EEG classification with multilayer neural networks in seizure. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009a;37(12):2626–2630. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9795-x
48.
AydinS. Comparison of power spectrum predictors in computing coherence functions for intracortical EEG signals. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009b;37(1):192–200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9579-8
HuangYParraLCHaufeS. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting. Neuroimage. 2016;15(140):150–162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.019
FonovVEvansACBotteronK, et al.Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies. Neuroimage. 2011;54(1):313–327. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.033
53.
KobayashiKYoshinagaHOhtsukayGotmanJ. Dipole modeling of epileptic spikes can be accurate or misleading. Epilepsia. 2005;46(3):397–408. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.31404.x
54.
HoekemaRWienekeGHLeijtenFS, et al.Measurement of the conductivity of skull, temporarily removed during epilepsy surgery. Brain Topogr. 2003;16(1):29–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025606415858
55.
AwadaKAJacksonDRWilliamsJT, et al.Computational aspects of finite element modeling in EEG source localization. IEEE trans Biomed eng. 1997;44(8):736–752. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/10.605431
56.
AwadaKAJacksonDRBaumannSB, et al.Closed-form evaluation of flux integrals appearing in a finite element solution of the 3D poisson equation with dipole sources. Electromagnetics. 2000;20(3):167–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/027263400308230
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
