Despite billions of dollars spent on technological devices to counter the Improvised Explosive Device (IED) threat, IEDs are still responsible for roughly 50% of the casualties on today’s asymmetric battlefield. Counter IED (CIED) investments in technology and improvements to military operations are hoped to reduce these casualties. This research focuses on CIED military operations and uses computer modeling and simulation to explore two alternative patrol tactics to defeat or otherwise reduce the impact of IED strikes, damage, and casualties on friendly forces operating in contemporary and future battlefields, such as rural Afghanistan. Among other findings and inferences, research analysis indicates the “Stop and Search” tactic results in statistically significantly fewer strikes and casualties than the “Drive Through” tactic.
PettittRA. Recognition of Combatants-Improvised Explosive Devices (ROC-IED) training effectiveness evaluation. DTIC Document, 2009.
14.
Department of Defense. Department of Defense Design criteria standard: human engineering: MIL-STD-1472G. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense, 2012.
Army Ammunition Data Sheets: Artillery Ammunition Guns, Howitzers, Mortars, Recoilless Rifles, Grenade Launchers, and Artillery Fuzes (FSC 1310, 1315, 1320, 1390). Washington D.C.: Headquarters, Department of Army, 1994.
JonesI, Malice aforethought: the history of booby traps from World War One to Vietnam. London: Greenhill Books/Lionel Leventhal, 2004.
19.
FM 5-31 Boobytraps. Washington D.C.: Department of the Army, 1965.
20.
SchatzSDolletski-LazarRColomboGTaylorAVogel-WalcuttJ. Advanced perceptual skills: improving their training, evaluation and operational effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM 2011), Orlando, USA, 31 May–3 June 2011, pp.128–135.
21.
ClarkBADickJ.The vernacular of future conflicts or lessons forgotten?Marine Corps Gaz2014; 98: 6.
22.
GoodMT.The IED: tactical solutions for a tactical problem. DTIC Document, 2010.
