Humeral head intraosseous access: Filling the military training gap

Abstract

Humeral head intraosseous (HHIO) infusion is the process of injecting fluids directly into the marrow of the humerus, or upper arm bone, to provide a non-collapsible entry point into the circulatory system. This technique provides fluids and medication quickly when intravenous (IV) access is not feasible in emergency situations. As of 2010, Tactical Combat Casualty Care guidelines recommend using intraosseous (IO) infusion in any resuscitation scenario where IV access is not feasible. The US Army Center for Pre-Hospital Medicine (CPHM) provides pre-deployment training to Roles I, II, and III medical providers. In addition, the CPHM provides training for deploying Forward Surgical Teams and en route care via the Critical Care Flight Paramedic Program. The Army’s Program of Instruction currently lacks an adequate simulation-based training model for the HHIO procedure and relies on live tissue training. The US Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Advanced Training and Simulation Division, developed a capability (i.e., Partial Task Trainer, or PTT) to train this procedure. This study assessed the usability of the PTT device for training on the IO procedure. Specifically, this paper seeks to identify statistically significant differences among the usability ratings of the PTT for paramedics and emergency medicine physicians.

Keywords

Military applications medical simulation applications in science and engineering

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TC3). Guidelines, https://www.naemt.org/education/TCCC/guidelines_curriculum (accessed 1 September 2015).

Drinker

Lund

CC.

The circulation in the mammalian bone-marrow. Am J Physiol Legacy Content 1922; 62: 1–92.

Harcke

Crawley

Mabry

et al . Placement of tibial intraosseous infusion devices. Mil Med 2011; 176: 824–827.

Sarkar

Philbeck

The use of multiple intraosseous catheters in combat casualty resuscitation. Mil Med 2009; 174: 106–108.

Foëx

BA.

Discovery of the intraosseous route for fluid administration. J Accid Emerg Med 2000; 17: 136–137.

Paxton

Knuth

Klausner

HA.

Proximal humerus intraosseous infusion: a preferred emergency venous access. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2009; 67: 606–611.

Hartholt

van Lieshout

Thies

et al . Intraosseous devices: a randomized controlled trial comparing three intraosseous devices. Prehosp Emerg Care 2010; 14: 6–13.

Glaeser

Hellmich

Szewczuga

et al . Five-year experience in prehospital intraosseous infusions in children and adults. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22: 1119–1124.

Miller

Guimond

Hostler

et al . Feasibility of sternal intraosseous access by emergency medical technician students. Prehosp Emerg Care 2005; 9: 73–78.

10.

Ong

Chan

et al . An observational, prospective study comparing tibial and humeral intraosseous access using the EZ-IO. Am J Emerg Med 2009; 27: 8–15.

11.

American Heart Association. Advanced cardiac life support guidelines: management of cardiac arrest. Circulation 2005; 112-IV: 57–66.

12.

National Association of EMS Physicians. Position statement. Prehosp Emerg Care 2007; 11: 11–15.

13.

Gorski

LA.

Standard 63: intraosseous access devices. J Infus Nurs 2008; 31: 146–147.

14.

Weiser

Hoffmann

Galbraith

et al . Current advances in intraosseous infusion–a systematic review. Resuscitation 2012; 83: 20–26.

15.

Mott

Hill

Parsons

Tactical combat casualty care handbook. Observations, insights and lessons. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Center for Army Lessons Learned 66027, 2013, pp.10–13.

16.

Salva

Coiro

Sotomayor

. Development evaluation of a humeral head intraosseous training system. In: interservice/industry training, simulation, and education conference (I/ITSEC), Orlando, FL, 2014.

17.

Carness

Russell

Lima

et al . Fluid resuscitation using the intraosseous route: Infusion with lactated Ringer’s and hetastarch. Mil Med 2012; 177: 222–228.