The relationship between conflict and performance has been studied for decades, but little is known about how and under what conditions task conflict among top managers affects firm-level outcomes. In this study, we examine a curvilinear effect of task conflict in top management teams (TMTs) on both firm performance and TMT resilience efficacy, as moderated by behavioral integration. We argue and find that TMT task conflict can improve firm performance when behavioral integration is high, but the effect is not linear; rather it levels off. In contrast, we maintain and find that TMT task conflict can improve TMT resilience efficacy at an increasing rate when behavioral integration is low. We also find that behavioral integration itself is predicted by Chief Executive Officer relational leadership such that leaders with a more relationship-oriented style encourage more behavioral integration in their teams. Field data from 555 top managers from 111 organizations in South Korea provided support for our hypotheses. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AhearneM.LamS. K.KrausF. (2014). Performance impact of middle managers’ adaptive strategy implementation: The role of social capital. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 68-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2086
2.
AmasonA. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148. https://doi.org/10.5465/256633
3.
AmasonA. C.SchweigerD. M. (1994). Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making, and organizational performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5(3), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022745
4.
AnandN.GardnerH. K.MorrisT. (2007). Knowledge-based innovation: Emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 406-428. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634457
5.
Araujo-CabreraY.Suarez-AcostaM. A.Aguiar-QuintanaT. (2017). Exploring the influence of CEO extraversion and openness to experience on firm performance: The mediating role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051816655991
6.
BarsadeS. G.WardA. J.TurnerJ. D.SonnenfeldJ. A. (2000). To your heart’s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 802-836. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667020
7.
BatesonG. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. University of Chicago Press.
8.
BradleyB. H.AndersonH. J.BaurJ. E.KlotzA. C. (2015). When conflict helps: Integrating evidence for beneficial conflict in groups and teams under three perspectives. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19(4), 243-272. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000033
9.
BradleyB. H.PostlethwaiteB. E.KlotzA. C.HamdaniM. R.BrownK. G. (2012). Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024200
10.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis, & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 349–444). Allyn and Bacon.
11.
CarmeliA. (2008). Top management team behavioral integration and the performance of service organizations. Group & Organization Management, 33(6), 712-735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108325696
12.
CarmeliA.Ben-HadorB.WaldmanD. A.RuppD. E. (2009). How leaders cultivate social capital and nurture employee vigor: Implications for job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1553-1561. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016429
13.
CarmeliA.FriedmanY.TishlerA. (2013). Cultivating a resilient top management team: The importance of relational connections and strategic decision comprehensiveness. Safety Science, 51(1), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.06.002
14.
CarmeliA.SchaubroeckJ. (2006). Top management team behavioral integration, decision quality, and organizational decline. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(5), 441-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.06.001
15.
CarmeliA.TishlerA.EdmondsonA. C. (2012). CEO Relational leadership and strategic decision quality in top management teams: The role of team trust and learning from failure. Strategic Organization, 10(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127011434797
16.
CarpenterM. A.SandersW. G. (2002). Top management team compensation: The missing link between CEO pay and firm performance?Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.228
17.
ChenC. C.ChenX. P.MeindlJ. R. (1998). How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 285-304. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533227
18.
ChenG.GullyS. M.EdenD. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004
19.
ColbertA. E.Kristof-BrownA. L.BradleyB. H.BarrickM. R. (2008). CEO Transformational leadership: The role of goal importance congruence in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.30717744
20.
DansereauF.YammarinoF. J. (2006). Is more discussion about levels of analysis really necessary? When is such discussion sufficient?The Leadership Quarterly, 17(5), 537-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.07.002
21.
DattaD. K.GuthrieJ. P.WrightP. M. (2005). Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter?Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.15993158
22.
DawsonJ. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
23.
de ClercqD.MengucB.AuhS. (2009). Unpacking the relationship between an innovation strategy and firm performance: The role of task conflict and political activity. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1046-1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.10.021
24.
de DreuC. K. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277795
25.
de DreuC. K. (2008). The virtue and vice of workplace conflict: Food for (pessimistic) thought. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.474
26.
de DreuC. K.van KnippenbergD. (2005). The possessive self as a barrier to conflict resolution: Effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 345-357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.345
27.
de DreuC. K.WeingartL. R. (2003a). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741-749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
28.
de DreuC. K.WeingartL. R. (2003b). A contingency theory of task conflict and performance in groups and organizational teams. In WestM. A.TjosvoldD.SmithK. G. (Eds.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working (pp. 151-166). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696712.ch8
29.
De DreuC. K.WestM. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191
30.
de WitF. R.GreerL. L.JehnK. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360-390. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024844
31.
de WitF. R.JehnK. A.ScheepersD. (2013). Task conflict, information processing, and decision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.07.002
32.
DijkstraM.BeersmaB.CornelissenR. A. (2012). The emergence of the Activity Reduces Conflict Associated Strain (ARCAS) model: A test of a conditional mediation model of workplace conflict and employee strain. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(3), 365-375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028550
33.
DijkstraM. T.BeersmaB.EversA. (2011). Reducing conflict-related employee strain: The benefits of an internal locus of control and a problem-solving conflict management strategy. Work & Stress, 25(2), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2011.593344
34.
EdmondsonA. C.LeiZ. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
35.
EdmondsonA. C.RobertoM. A.WatkinsM. D. (2003). A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: Managing unstructured task streams. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 297-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00021-3
36.
EllisH. C.AshbrookP. W. (1989). The “state” of mood and memory research: A selective review. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4(2), 1-21.
37.
ErezM.EarleyP. C.HulinC. L. (1985). The impact of participation on goal acceptance and performance: A two-step model. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.5465/256061
38.
FarhJ. L.LeeC.FarhC. I. (2010). Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1173-1180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020015
39.
FeurerR.ChaharbaghiK.WarginJ. (1995). Analysis of strategy formulation and implementation at Hewlett-Packard. Management Decision, 33(10), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749510100203
40.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484-503. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393314
41.
FletcherJ. K. (2007). Leadership, power, and positive relationships. In DuttonJ. E.RaginsB. R. (Eds.), Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 347-371). Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
43.
GelfandM. J.LeslieL. M.KellerK.de DreuC. (2012). Conflict cultures in organizations: How leaders shape conflict cultures and their organizational-level consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1131-1147. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029993
44.
GilbertJ. A.TangT. L. P. (1998). An examination of organizational trust antecedents. Public Personnel Management, 27(3), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609802700303
45.
GoncaloJ. A.PolmanE.MaslachC. (2010). Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.05.001
46.
GreerL. L.CarusoH. M.JehnK. A. (2011). The bigger they are, the harder they fall: Linking team power, team conflict, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(1), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.005
47.
HaleblianJ.FinkelsteinS. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 844-863. https://doi.org/10.5465/256761
48.
HambrickD. C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 171-214). JAI.
HarveyJ.WheelerA.HalbeslebenJ. R.BuckleyM. R. (2010). How did you figure that out? Employee learning during socialization. In H. Liao, J. J. Martocchio, & A. Joshi (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 167-200). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-7301(2010)0000029007
51.
HeggestadE. D.ScheafD. J.BanksG. C.HausfeldM. M.TonidandelS.WilliamsE. B. (2019). Scale adaptions in organizational science research: A review and best practice recommendations. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2596-2627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319850280
52.
HortonK. E.GriffinM. A. (2017). Identification complexity and conflict: How multiple identifications affect conflict across functional boundaries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(2), 286-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1259215
53.
HurtK. J.AbebeM. A. (2015). The effect of conflict type and organizational crisis on perceived strategic decision effectiveness: An empirical investigation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(3), 340-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815570038
54.
HuselidM. A.JacksonS. E.SchulerR. S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resources management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.5465/257025
55.
JanicikG. A.BartelC. A. (2003). Talking about time: Effects of temporal planning and time awareness norms on group coordination and performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.7.2.122
56.
JehnK. A. (1992). The impact of intragroup conflict on effectiveness: A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of conflict. Northwestern University.
57.
JehnK. A. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5(3), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022744
58.
JehnK. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256-282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638
59.
JehnK. A.BenderskyC. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25005-X
60.
JehnK. A.MannixE. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238-251. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069453
61.
JehnK. A.NorthcraftG. B.NealeM. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667054
62.
JiangK.LepakD. P.HuJ.BaerJ. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264-1294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088
63.
KimK. Y.AtwaterL.PatelP. C.SmitherJ. W. (2016). Multisource feedback, human capital, and the financial performance of organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(11), 1569-1584. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000125
64.
KimK. Y.MessersmithJ. G.AllenD. G. (2021). Are they worth it? Warmth and competence perceptions influence the investment of slack resources in and the efficacy of HPWS. Personnel Psychology, 74(3), 611-640. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12421
65.
KimK. Y.MessersmithJ. G.EisenbergerR. (2024). Social distancing initiatives and perceived organizational support: It’s the intended beneficiary that counts. Group & Organization Management, 49(4), 977-1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221129007
66.
KimK. Y.PatelP. C. (2024). Nonlinear effect of employee ownership on organizational financial misdeeds: The moderating role of organizational size. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(4), 573-586. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001148
67.
KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810033001
68.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
69.
KoopmanJ.LanajK.ScottB. A. (2016). Integrating the bright and dark sides of OCB: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 414-435. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0262
70.
LeBretonJ. M.SenterJ. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815-852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
71.
LeeJ.WangG.PiccoloR. F. (2018). Jekyll and Hyde leadership: A multilevel, multisample examination of charisma and abuse on follower and team outcomes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(4), 399-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818757692
72.
Lengnick-HallC. A.BeckT. E. (2005). Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: How organizations respond to environmental change. Journal of Management, 31(5), 738-757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279367
73.
LevinD. Z.CrossR. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136
74.
LevinthalD.RerupC. (2006). Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17(4), 502-513. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0197
LovelaceK.ShapiroD. L.WeingartL. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779-793. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069415
77.
MadhavanR.PrescottJ. E. (1995). Market value impact of joint ventures: The effect of industry information-processing load. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 900-915. https://doi.org/10.5465/256751
78.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123
79.
McAllisterD. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59. https://doi.org/10.5465/256727
Mesmer-MagnusJ. R.DeChurchL. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535-546. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013773
82.
MessersmithJ. G.KimK. Y.PatelP. C. (2018). Pulling in different directions? Exploring the relationship between vertical pay dispersion and high-performance work systems. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21846
83.
MooneyA. C.SonnenfeldJ. (2001, August). Exploring antecedents to top management team conflict: the importance of behavioral integration. In Academy of management proceedings (Vol. 2001, pp. 1-6). Academy of Management.
NijdamN. E. (1998). The functioning of work teams. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Amsterdam.
87.
OlsonB. J.ParayitamS.BaoY. (2007). Strategic decision making: The effects of cognitive diversity, conflict, and trust on decision outcomes. Journal of Management, 33(2), 196-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306298657
88.
OstroffC.KinickiA. J.ClarkM. A. (2002). Substantive and operational issues of response bias across levels of analysis: An example of climate-satisfaction relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 355-368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.355
89.
PelledL. H. (1996). Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance: A field investigation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(3), 230-246. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022783
90.
PetersonR. S.BehfarK. J. (2003). The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92(1-2), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00090-6
91.
PetersonR. S.SmithD. B.MartoranaP. V.OwensP. D. (2003). The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 795-808. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.795
92.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
93.
PolzerJ. T.CrispC. B.JarvenpaaS. L.KimJ. W. (2006). Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How co-located subgroups can impair group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 679-692. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083024
94.
PowleyE. H. (2009). Reclaiming resilience and safety: Resilience activation in the critical period of crisis. Human Relations, 62(9), 1289-1326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709334881
95.
ReinaC.ZhangZ.PetersonS. (2014). CEO Grandiose narcissism and firm performance: The role of organizational identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 958-971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.004
96.
RichardP. J.DevinneyT. M.YipG. S.JohnsonG. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718-804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330560
97.
RobeyD.FarrowD. L.FranzC. R. (1989). Group process and conflict in system development. Management Science, 35(10), 1172-1191. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.10.1172
ScheinE. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). CA: John Wiley & Sons.
100.
ShahP. P.PetersonR. S.JonesS. L.FergusonA. J. (2021). Things are not always what they seem: The origins and evolution of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(2), 426-474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220965186
101.
ShawJ. D.TangiralaS.VissaB.RodellJ. B. (2018). New ways of seeing: Theory integration across disciplines. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.4001
102.
ShawJ. D.ZhuJ.DuffyM. K.ScottK. L.ShihH. A.SusantoE. (2011). A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 391-400. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021340
SimonsT.PelledL. H.SmithK. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 662-673. https://doi.org/10.2307/256987
105.
SimonsT. L.PetersonR. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
106.
SimsekZ.VeigaJ. F.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2005). Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.15993139
107.
SinhaR.JanardhananN. S.GreerL. L.ConlonD. E.EdwardsJ. R. (2016). Skewed task conflicts in teams: What happens when a few members see more conflict than the rest?Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(7), 1045-1055. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000059
108.
SturmR. E.VeraD.CrossanM. (2017). The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 349-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.11.007
109.
TekleabA. G.QuigleyN. R.TeslukP. E. (2009). A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 34(2), 170-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108331218
110.
ThielC. E.GriffithJ. A.Hardy IIIJ. H.PetersonD. R.ConnellyS. (2018). Let’s look at this another way: How supervisors can help subordinates manage the threat of relationship conflict. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(3), 368-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817750545
111.
ThompsonA. A.StricklandA. J. (1983). Strategy formulation and implementation: Tasks of the general manager. Business Publications, Inc.
112.
TjosvoldD. (2002). Managing anger for teamwork in Hong Kong: Goal interdependence and open-mindedness. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00098
113.
TodorovaG.BearJ. B.WeingartL. R. (2014). Can conflict be energizing? A study of task conflict, positive emotions, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 451-467. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035134
114.
TugadeM. M.FredricksonB. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320-333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320
115.
Uhl-BienM. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007
116.
van CauwenberghA.CoolK. (1982). Strategic management in a new framework. Strategic Management Journal, 3(3), 245-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250030306
117.
VisserM. (2007). Deutero-learning in organizations: A review and a reformulation. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 659-667. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351883
118.
WaldmanD. A.CarmeliA.HaleviM. Y. (2011). Beyond the red tape: How victims of terrorism perceive and react to organizational responses to their suffering. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(7), 938-954. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.710
119.
WeingartL. R.BehfarK. J.BenderskyC.TodorovaG.JehnK. A. (2015). The directness and oppositional intensity of conflict expression. Academy of Management Review, 40(2), 235-262. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0124
120.
YangJ.MossholderK. W. (2004). Decoupling task and relationship conflict: The role of intragroup emotional processing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(5), 589-605. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.258
121.
ZhangY.WiersemaM. F. (2009). Stock market reaction to CEO certification: The signaling role of CEO background. Strategic Management Journal, 30(7), 693-710. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.772
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
