Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-2
Why and When Empowering Leadership Has Different Effects on Employee Work Performance: The Pivotal Roles of Passion for Work and Role Breadth Self-Efficacy
Drawing on the dualistic model of passion, the present study examines why and when empowering leadership has different effects on employee work performance including both task performance and creative performance. Field survey data from 69 teams and 266 employees revealed that empowering leadership had a positive indirect relationship with employee work performance via harmonious passion for work and a negative indirect relationship with employee work performance via obsessive passion for work. Moreover, individual role breadth self-efficacy was found to moderate the relationships of empowering leadership with employees’ two types of passion for work, thereby affecting the relationship between empowering leadership and employee work performance. Moderation analyses revealed that empowering leadership was more likely to increase employee work performance when employees have high rather than low levels of role breadth self-efficacy. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings were discussed.
AguinisH.GottfredsonR. K.CulpepperS. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39, 1490-1528.
2.
AhearneM.MathieuJ.RappA. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 945-955.
3.
AmabileH.Grossman, (1986). Social influences on creative: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 14-23.
4.
AmabileT. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 123-167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5.
AmundsenS.MartinsenØ. L. (2014). Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. Leadership Quarterly, 25, 487-511.
6.
AmundsenS.MartinsenØ. L. (2015). Linking empowering leadership to job satisfaction, work effort, and creativity: The role of self-leadership and psychological empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22, 304-323.
7.
ArnoldJ. A.AradS.RhoadesJ. A.DrasgowF. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 249-269.
8.
AstakhovaM. N. (2014). The curvilinear relationship between work passion and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 361-374.
9.
BaerM.OldhamG. M. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 963-970.
10.
BauerD. J.PreacherK. J.GilK. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142-163.
11.
BenwareC. A.DeciE. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Education Research Journal, 21, 755-765.
12.
BiemannT.KearneyE.MarggrafK. (2015). Empowering leadership and managers’ career perceptions: Examining effects at both the individual and the team level. Leadership Quarterly, 26, 775-789.
13.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
BrislinR. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In LonnerW. J.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137-164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
ChenX. P.LiuD.HeW. (2015). Does passion fuel entrepreneurship and job creativity? A review and preview of passion research. In ShalleyC. E.HittM.ZhouJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship: Multilevel linkages (pp. 159-176). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
16.
CheongM.SpainS. M.YammarinoF. J.YunS. (2016). Two faces of empowering leadership: Enabling and burdening. Leadership Quarterly, 27, 602-616.
17.
ColquittJ. A.Zapata-PhelanC. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1281-1303.
18.
CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471-482.
19.
deCharmsR. (1968). Personal causation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
20.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
21.
Den HartogD. N.BelschakF. D. (2012). When does transformational leadership enhance employee proactive behavior? The role of autonomy and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 194-202.
22.
EisenbergerR.RhoadesL. (2001). Incremental effects of reward on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 728-741.
23.
ElangovanA. R.XieJ. L. (1999). Effects of perceived power of supervisor on subordinate stress and motivation: The moderating role of subordinate characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 359-373.
24.
FarhJ. L.HackettR. D.LiangJ. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 715-729.
25.
ForestJ.MageauG. A.SarrazinC.MorinE. M. (2011). “Work is my passion”: The different affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences of harmonious and obsessive passion toward work. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28, 27-40.
26.
ForresterR. (2000). Empowerment: Rejuvenating a potent idea. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 67-80.
27.
FredricksonB. L. (2001).The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.
28.
GagnéM.DeciE. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Management, 26, 331-362.
29.
GeorgeJ. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 299-307.
30.
GootyJ.ConnellyS.GriffithJ.GuptaA. (2010). Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 979-1004.
31.
GriffinM. A.ParkerS. K.MasonC. M. (2010). Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 147-182.
32.
HarrisT. B.LiN.BoswellW. R.ZhangX. A.XieZ. (2014). Getting what’s new from newcomers: Empowering leadership, creativity, and adjustment in the socialization context. Personnel Psychology, 67, 567-604.
33.
HeW.FehrR.YamK. C.LongL. R.HaoP. (2017). Interactional justice, leader -member exchange, and employee performance: Examining the moderating role of justice differentiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 537-557.
34.
HoV. T.WongS.-S.LeeC. H. (2011). A tale of passion: Linking job passion and cognitive engagement to employee work performance. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 26-47.
35.
HofmannD. A.GavinM. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 23, 723-744.
36.
HumborstadS. I. W.GiessnerS. R. (2016). The thin line between empowering and laissez-faire leadership: An expectancy match perspective. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206315574597
37.
HumborstadS. I. W.KuvaasB. (2013). Mutuality in leader-subordinate empowerment expectation: Its impact on role ambiguity and intrinsic motivation. Leadership Quarterly, 24, 363-377.
38.
HumborstadS. I. W.NerstadC. G. L.DysvikA. (2014). Empowering leadership, employee goal orientations and work performance: A competing hypothesis approach. Personnel Review, 43, 246-271.
39.
IsenA. M.DaubmanK. A.NowickiG. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131.
40.
KaplanS.CortinaJ.RuarkG.LaPortK.NicolaidesV. (2014). The role of organizational leaders in employee emotion management: A theoretical model. Leadership Quarterly, 25, 563-580.
41.
LeachD. J.WallT. D.JacksonP. R. (2003). The effect of empowerment on job knowledge: An empirical test involving operators of complex technology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 27-52.
42.
LeeS.CheongM.KimM.YunS. (2017). Never too much? The curvilinear relationship between empowering leadership and task performance. Group & Organization Management, 42, 11-38.
43.
LiN.ChiaburuD. S.KirkmanB. L. (2017). Cross-level influences of empowering leadership on citizenship behavior: Organizational support climate as a double-edged sword. Journal of Management, 43, 1076-1102.
44.
LiS. L.HeW.YamK. C.LongL. R. (2015). When and why empowering leadership increases followers’ taking charge: A multilevel examination in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32, 645-670.
45.
LiuD.ChenX. P.YaoX. (2011). From autonomy to creativity: A multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 294-309.
46.
KozlowskiS. W. J.BellB. S. (2013). Work groups and teams in organizations. In WeinerI. B.SchmittN. W.HighhouseS. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology. Volume 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 412-469). London, England: Wiley.
47.
MageauG. A.VallerandR. J.CharestJ.SalvyS. J.LacailleN.BouffardT.KoestnerR. (2009). On the development of harmonious and obsessive passion: The role of autonomy support, activity specialization, and identification with the activity. Journal of Personality, 77, 601-646.
48.
MageauG. A.VallerandR. J.RousseauF. L.RatelleC.ProvencherP. J. (2005). Passion and gambling: Investigating the divergent affective and cognitive consequences of gambling. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 100-118.
49.
ManzC. C.SimsH. P. (1989). Superleadership: Leading others to lead themselves. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
50.
ManzC. C.SimsH. P. (1991). Superleadership: Beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19(4), 18-35.
51.
ManzC. C.SimsH. P. (2001). The new superleadership: Leading others to lead themselves. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
52.
MathieuJ. E.MaynardM. T.RappT.GilsonL. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476.
53.
MaynardM. T.GilsonL. L.MathieuJ. E. (2012). Empowerment—fad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research. Journal of Management, 38, 1231-1281.
54.
MaynardM. T.MathieuJ.MarshW. M.RuddyT. M. (2007). A multilevel investigation of the influences of employees’ resistance to empowerment. Human Performance, 20, 147-171.
55.
ParkerS. K. (1998). Role breadth self-efficacy: Relationship with work enrichment and other organizational practices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 835-852.
56.
ParkerS. K.WilliamsH. M.TurnerN. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636-652.
57.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.
58.
RandolphW. A.SashkinM. (2002). Can organizational empowerment work in multinational settings?Academy of Management Executive, 16, 102-115.
59.
RatelleC. F.VallerandR. J.MageauG. A.RousseauF. L.ProvencherP. (2004). When passion leads to problematic outcomes: A look at gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 105-119.
60.
RaubS.RobertC. (2010). Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment. Human Relations, 63, 1743-1770.
61.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2001). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
RobertC.ProbstT. M.MartocchioJ. J.DrasgowF.LawlerJ. J. (2000). Empowerment and continuous improvement in the United States, Mexico, Poland, and India: Predicting fit on the basis of the dimensions of power distance and individualism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 643-658.
63.
RyanR. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450-461.
64.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
65.
SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.González-RomáV.BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
66.
SharmaP. N.KirkmanB. L. (2015). Leveraging leaders: A literature review and future lines of inquiry for empowering leadership research. Group & Organization Management, 40, 193-237.
67.
SpreitzerG. M. (1995). Individual empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465.
68.
SrivastavaA.BartolK. M.LockeE. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1239-1251.
69.
VallerandR. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271-360). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
70.
VallerandR. J. (2008). On the psychology of passion: In search of what makes people’s lives most worth living. Canadian Psychology, 49, 1-13.
71.
VallerandR. J.BlanchardC.MageauG. A.KoestnerR.RatelleC.LéonardM.. . . MarsolaisJ. (2003). Les passions de l’âme: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 756-767.
72.
VallerandR. J.HoulfortN. (2003). Passion at work: Toward a new conceptualization. In SkarlickiD.GillilandS.SteinerD. (Eds.), Social issues in management (Vol. 3, pp. 175-204). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
73.
VallerandR. J.MiquelonP. (2007). Passion for sport in athletes. In JowettS.LavalleeD. (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 249-263). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
74.
VecchioR. P.JustinJ. E.PearceC. L. (2010). Empowering leadership: An examination of mediating mechanisms within a hierarchical structure. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 530-542.
75.
WallaceJ. C.JohnsonP. D.MatheK.PaulJ. (2011). Structural and psychological empowerment climates, performance, and the moderating role of shared felt accountability: A managerial perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 840-850.
76.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77.
WrightT. A.CropanzanoR. (1998). Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 486-493.
78.
ZhangX. M.BartolK. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107-128.
79.
ZhangX. M.ZhouJ. (2014). Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity: Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124, 160-164.
80.
ZhouJ.GeorgeJ. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682-696.
81.
ZhuW.AvolioB. J.WalumbwaF. O. (2009). Moderating role of follower characteristics with transformational leadership and follower work engagement. Group & Organization Management, 34, 590-619.
82.
ZigarmiD.NimonK.HousonD.WittD.DiehlJ. (2009). Beyond engagement: Toward a framework and operational definition for employee work passion. Human Resource Development Review, 8, 300-326.
