While anecdotal industry evidence indicates that passionate workers are engaged workers, research has yet to understand how and when job passion and engagement are related. To answer the how question, we draw from person-environment fit theory to test, and find support for, the mediating roles of perceived demands–abilities (D–A) fit and person–organization (P–O) fit in the relationships between passion and job engagement, and between passion and organizational engagement, respectively. Also, because the obsessive form of passion is contingency-driven, we answer the when question by adopting a target-similarity approach to test the contingent role of multi-foci trust in the obsessive passion-to-engagement relationships. We found that when obsessively passionate workers trust their organization, they report greater levels of organizational engagement (because of increased P–O fit). In contrast, when these workers trust both their co-workers and supervisor simultaneously, they report greater levels of job engagement (because of increased D–A fit).
AikenLSWestSG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
2.
AstakhovaMN (2015) The curvilinear relationship between work passion and organizational citizenship behavior: The moderating effect of collectivistic values. Journal of Business Ethics130(2): 361−374.
3.
AstakhovaMNPorterG (2015) Understanding the work passion–performance relationship: The mediating role of organizational identification and moderating role of fit at work. Human Relations68(8): 1315−1346.
4.
BeckerTE (2005) Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods8(3): 274−289.
5.
BirkelandKIBuchR (2015) The dualistic model of passion for work: Discriminate and predictive validity with work engagement and workaholism. Motivation and Emotion39(3): 392–408.
6.
BlauPM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
7.
BurkeRJAstakhovaMNHangH (2015) Work passion through the lens of culture: Harmonious work passion, obsessive work passion and work outcomes in Russia and China. Journal of Business and Psychology30(3): 457–471.
8.
CableDMDeRueDS (2002) The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology87(5): 875–884.
9.
CableDMParsonsCK (2001) Socialization tactics and person-organization fit. Personnel Psychology54(1): 1–23.
10.
CarbonneauNVallerandRJFrenetteCGuayF (2008) The role of passion for teaching in intra and interpersonal outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology100(4): 977–987.
11.
ChatmanJA (1989) Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review14(3): 333−349.
12.
ChenC-YYenC-HTsaiFC (2014) Job crafting and job engagement: The mediating role of person-job fit. International Journal of Hospitality Management37(1): 21−28.
13.
ChristianMSGarzaASSlaughterJE (2011) Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology64(1): 89–136.
14.
ConwayJLanceC (2010) What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology25(3): 325–334.
15.
CrawfordERLePineJARichBL (2010) Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology95(5): 834–848.
16.
CrawfordERRichBLBuckmanBBergeronJ (2014) The antecedents and drivers of employee engagement. In: TrussCDelbridgeRAlfesKet al. (eds) Employee Engagement: Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge, 37–81.
17.
CurranTHillPAAppletonRPVallerandJRStandageM (2015) The psychology of passion: A meta-analytical review of a decade of research on intrapersonal outcomes. Motivation and Emotion39(5): 631–655.
18.
DirksKTFerrinDL (2001) The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science12(4): 450–467.
19.
DonahueEGForestJVallerandRJet al. (2012) Passion for work and emotional exhaustion: The mediating role of rumination and recovery. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being4(3): 341–368.
20.
EdmondsonA (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly44(2): 350–383.
21.
EdwardsJR (1996) An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Academy of Management Journal39(2): 292–339.
22.
EdwardsJRLambertLS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods12(1): 1–22.
23.
EdwardsJRCaplanRDHarrisonRV (1998) Person-environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In: CooperCL (ed.) Theories of Organizational Stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 28–67.
24.
FerresNVan WykRTravaglioneTBoshoffA (2004) Validation of the workplace trust scale across Australian and South African samples. 2004 ICCB Conference Proceedings, September, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
25.
FestingerL (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
FisherCD (1993) Boredom at work: A neglected concept. Human Relations46(3): 395–417.
27.
ForestJMageauGACrevier-BraudLet al. (2012) Harmonious passion as an explanation of the relation between signature strengths’ use and well-being at work: Test of an intervention program. Human Relations65(9): 1233–1252.
28.
ForestJMageauGASarrazinCMorinEM (2011) ‘Work is my passion’: The different affective, behavioural, and cognitive consequences of harmonious and obsessive passion toward work. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences28(1): 27–40.
29.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
30.
FredricksonBL (1998) What good are positive emotions?Review of General Psychology2(3): 300–319.
31.
FrenchJRavenB (1959) The basis of social power. In CartwrightD (ed.) Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 150–167.
32.
GabrielASDiefendorffJMChandlerMMMoranCMGregurasGJ (2014) The dynamic relationships of work affect and job satisfaction with perceptions of fit. Personnel Psychology67(2): 389–420.
33.
GoodmanJSBlumTC (1996) Assessing the non-random sampling effects of subject attrition in longitudinal research. Journal of Management22(4): 627–652.
HoVTPollackJM (2014) Passion isn’t always a good thing: Examining entrepreneurs’ network centrality and financial performance with a dualistic model of passion. Journal of Management Studies51(3): 433–439.
36.
HoVTWongSSLeeCH (2011) A tale of passion: Linking job passion and cognitive engagement to employee work performance. Journal of Management Studies48(1): 26–47.
37.
HoffmanBJBynumBHPiccoloRFSuttonAW (2011) Person-organization value congruence: How transformational leaders influence work group effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal54(4): 779–796.
38.
KahnWA (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal33(4): 692–724.
39.
KahnWA (1992) To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations45(4): 321–349.
40.
KristofAL (1996) Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology49(1): 1–49.
41.
Kristof-BrownALZimmermanRDJohnsonEC (2005) Consequences of individual’s fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology58(2): 281–342.
42.
LafrenièreMAKSt-LouisACVallerandRJDonahueEG (2012) On the relation between performance and life satisfaction: The moderating role of passion. Self and Identity11(4): 516–530.
43.
LafrenièreMAKVallerandRJSedikidesC (2013) On the relation between self-enhancement and life satisfaction: The moderating role of passion. Self and Identity12(6): 597–609.
44.
LavelleJJRuppDEBrocknerJ (2007) Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model. Journal of Management33(6): 841–866.
45.
LittleTDCunninghamMAShaharGWidamanKF (2002) To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling9(2): 151–173.
46.
LiuDChenXYaoX (2011) From autonomy to creativity: A multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. Journal of Applied Psychology96(2): 294–309.
47.
McAllisterDJ (1995) Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal38(1): 24–59.
48.
MaslachCLeiterMP (1997) The Truth About Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What To Do About It. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
49.
MaslachCLeiterMP (2008) Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology93(3): 498–512.
50.
MayDRGilsonRLHarterLM (2004) The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology77(1): 11–37.
51.
MayerRCGavinMB (2005) Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss?Academy of Management Journal48(5): 874–888.
52.
MonnotMJBeehrTA (2014) Subjective well-being at work: Disentangling source effects of stress and support on enthusiasm, contentment, and meaningfulness. Journal of Vocational Behavior85(2): 204–219.
53.
PhilippeFLVallerandRJHoulfortNet al. (2010) Passion for an activity and quality of interpersonal relationships: The mediating role of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology98(6): 917–932.
54.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBPodsakoffNP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology63(1): 539–569.
55.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In: HayesAFSlaterMDSnyderLB (eds) The SAGE Sourcebook of Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 13–54.
56.
RichBLLepineJACrawfordER (2010) Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal53(3): 617–635.
57.
RothbardNP (2001) Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly46(4): 655–684.
58.
SaksAM (2006) Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology21(7): 600–619.
59.
SchaufeliWBSalanovaMGonzález-RomáVBakkerAB (2002) The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies3(1): 71–92.
60.
SchoormanFDMayerRCDavisJH (2007) An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review32(2): 344–354.
61.
ShinY (2004) A person-environment fit model for virtual organizations. Journal of Management30(5): 725–743.
62.
SonnentagS (2003) Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology88(3): 518–528.
63.
SonnentagSMojzaEJDemeroutiEBakkerAB (2012) Reciprocal relations between recovery and work engagement: The moderating role of job stressors. Journal of Applied Psychology97(4): 842–853.
64.
ThorgrenSWincentJSirénC (2013) The influence of passion and work–life thoughts on work satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly24(4): 469–492.
65.
TrépanierS-GFernetCAustinSForestJVallerandRJ (2014) Linking job demands and resources to burnout and work engagement: Does passion underlie these differential relationships?Motivation and Emotion38(3): 353–366.
66.
VallerandRJ (2008) On the psychology of passion: In search of what makes people’s lives most worth living. Canadian Psychology49(1): 1–13.
67.
VallerandRJ (2010) On passion for life activities: The dualistic model of passion. In: ZannaMP (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 42. New York: Academic Press, 97−193.
68.
VallerandRJ (2015) The Psychology of Passion: A Dualistic Model. New York: Oxford University Press.
69.
VallerandRJHoulfortN (2003) Passion at work: Toward a new conceptualization. In: SkarlickiDGillilandSSteinerD (eds) Emerging Perspectives on Values in Organizations, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, 175−204.
70.
VallerandRJBlanchardCMageauGAet al. (2003) Les passions de l’âme: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85(4): 756–767.
71.
VallerandRJHoulfortNForestJ (2014) Passion for work: Determinants and outcomes. In: GagnéM (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-determination Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 85−105.
72.
VallerandRJSalvySJMageauGAElliotAJDenisPGrouzetFMEet al. (2007) On the role of passion in performance. Journal of Personality75(3): 505–533.
73.
Van DyneLGrahamJWDieneschRM (1994) Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal37(4): 765–802.
74.
WilliamsLJHartmanNCavazotteF (2010) Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods13(3): 477–514.
75.
WilliamsKDSommerKL (1997) Social ostracism by coworkers: Does rejection lead to loafing or compensation?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin23(7): 693–706.
76.
YuKYT (2009) Affective influences in person–environment fit theory: Exploring the role of affect as both cause and outcome of P–E fit. Journal of Applied Psychology94(5): 1210−1226.
77.
YuKYT (2013) A motivational model of person-environment fit: Psychological motives as drivers of change. In: Kristof-BrownALBillsberryJ (eds) Organizational Fit: Key Issues and New Directions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 21−49.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
