This study examined the potential effects of empowering leadership on followers’ in-role performance and deviant behaviors via self-efficacy and psychological ownership over a 3-week period in a sample of 299 full-time employees working in the United States. Results from structural equation modeling demonstrated that empowering leadership was positively related to both self-efficacy and psychological ownership, which in turn were both negatively related to deviant behaviors. Alternative model comparisons and bootstrapping both confirmed the mediation effects of self-efficacy and psychological ownership. However, only one of the two mediators, self-efficacy, was positively related to followers’ in-role performance. Together, these findings highlighted the important roles of self-efficacy and psychological ownership explaining why empowering leadership may result in followers’ behaviors.
AhearneM.MathieuJ.RappA. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 945-955.
2.
AmundsenS.MartinsenØ. L. (2014a). Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. Leadership Quarterly, 25, 487-511.
3.
AmundsenS.MartinsenØ. L. (2014b). Self–other agreement in empowering leadership: Relationships with leader effectiveness and subordinates’ job satisfaction and turnover intention. Leadership Quarterly, 25, 784-800.
4.
AmundsenS.MartinsenØ. L. (2015). Linking empowering leadership to job satisfaction, work effort, and creativity: The role of self-leadership and psychological empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22, 304-323.
5.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
6.
AveyJ. B.AvolioB. J.CrossleyC. D.LuthansF. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 173-191.
7.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
9.
BennettR. J.RobinsonS. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349-360.
10.
BerryC. M.OnesD. S.SackettP. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 410-424.
11.
BrownG.CrossleyC.RobinsonS. L. (2014). Psychological ownership, territorial behavior, and being perceived as a team contributor: The critical role of trust in the work environment. Personnel Psychology, 67, 463-485.
12.
BrownG.PierceJ. L.CrossleyC. (2014). Toward an understanding of the development of ownership feelings. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 318-338.
13.
BrownM. E.TreviñoL. K. (2006). Socialized charismatic leadership, values congruence, and deviance in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 954-962.
14.
ChenG.CasperW. J.CortinaJ. M. (2001). The roles of self-efficacy and task complexity in the relationships among cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and work-related performance: A meta-analytic examination. Human Performance, 14, 209-230.
15.
ChenG.GullyS. M.EdenD. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62-83.
16.
CheongM.SpainS. M.YammarinoF. J.YunS. (2016). Two faces of empowering leadership: Enabling and burdening. Leadership Quarterly, 27, 602-616.
17.
CorderyJ. L.MorrisonD.WrightB. M.WallT. D. (2010). The impact of autonomy and task uncertainty on team performance: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 240-258.
18.
DemirtasO. (2015). Ethical leadership influence at organizations: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 273-284.
19.
DewettinckK.van AmeijdeM. (2011). Linking leadership empowerment behaviour to employee attitudes and behavioural intentions: Testing the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Personnel Review, 40, 284-305.
20.
DysvikA.KuvaasB. (2011). Intrinsic motivation as a moderator on the relationship between perceived job autonomy and work performance. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 20, 367-387.
21.
ErkutluH.ChafraJ. (2013). Effects of trust and psychological contract violation on authentic leadership and organizational deviance. Management Research Review, 36, 828-848.
22.
FongK. H.SnapeE. (2015). Empowering leadership, psychological empowerment and employee outcomes: Testing a multi-level mediating model. British Journal of Management, 26, 126-138.
23.
FoxS.SpectorP. E. (1999). A model of work frustration–aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 915-931.
24.
GalperinB. L. (2012). Exploring the nomological network of workplace deviance: Developing and validating a measure of constructive deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2988-3025.
25.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
HaysR. D.HayashiT.StewartA. L. (1989). A five-item measure of Socially Desirable Response Set. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 629-636.
27.
JexS. M.BlieseP. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 349-361.
28.
JudgeT. A.LockeE. A.DurhamC. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151-188.
29.
KatzD.KahnR. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
30.
LathamG. P.FrayneC. A. (1989). Self-management training for increasing job attendance: A follow-up and a replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 411-416.
31.
LathamG. P.WintersD. C.LockeE. A. (1994). Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 49-63.
32.
LitzkyB. E.EddlestonK. A.KidderD. L. (2006). The good, the bad, and the misguided: How managers inadvertently encourage deviant behaviors. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 91-103.
33.
MaelF.AshforthB. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
34.
MayhewM. G.AshkanasyN. M.BrambleT.GardnerJ. (2007). A study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 477-500.
35.
MorgesonF. P.Delaney-KlingerK.HemingwayM. A. (2005). The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 399-406.
36.
MustafaM.MartinL.HughesM. (2016). Psychological ownership, job satisfaction, and middle manager entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23, 273-287.
37.
NeubertM. J.KacmarK. M.CarlsonD. S.ChonkoL. B.RobertsJ. A. (2008). Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1220-1233.
38.
PearceC. L.SimsH. P.Jr.CoxJ. F.BallG.SchnellE.SmithK. A.TrevinoL. (2003). Transactors, transformers and beyond: A multi-method development of a theoretical typology of leadership. Journal of Management Development, 22, 273-307.
39.
PierceJ. L.KostovaT.DirksK. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26, 298-310.
40.
PierceJ. L.RubenfeldS. A.MorganS. (1991). Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. Academy of Management Review, 16, 121-144.
41.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. P.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569.
42.
PreacherK. J.KelleyK. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93-115.
43.
RaubS.RobertC. (2010). Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values. Human Relations, 63, 1743-1770.
44.
RobinsonS. L.BennettR. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multi-dimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555-572.
45.
SrivastavaA.BartolK. M.LockeE. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1239-1251.
46.
StajkovicA. D.LuthansF. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-261.
47.
TekleabA. G.SimsH. P.Jr.YunS.TeslukP. E.CoxJ. (2008). Are we on the same page? Effects of self-awareness of empowering and transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14, 185-202.
48.
VaderaA. K.PrattM. G.MishraP. (2013). Constructive deviance in organizations integrating and moving forward. Journal of Management, 39, 1221-1276.
49.
Van DyneL.PierceJ. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 439-459.
50.
van GilsS.van QuaquebekeN.van KnippenbergD.van DijkeM.De CremerD. (2015). Ethical leadership and follower organizational deviance: The moderating role of follower moral attentiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 26, 190-203.
51.
VecchioR. P.JustinJ. E.PearceC. L. (2010). Empowering leadership: An examination of mediating mechanisms within a hierarchical structure. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 530-542.
52.
VroomV. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.
53.
WilliamsL. J.AndersonS. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.
54.
ZhangX.BartolK. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107-128.
55.
ZoharD.PolachekT. (2015). Using event-level data to test the effect of verbal leader behavior on follower leadership perceptions and job performance: A randomized field experiment. Group & Organization Management, 22, 1-31.
