Teacher agency has attracted growing attention in the field of educational management and leadership due to its positive outcomes for schools. This study investigated how and under what conditions school principals empowering leadership beneficial to teacher agency using data collected from 756 public secondary school teachers in Turkey. This study tested a moderated mediation model of how authentic leadership influences the effects of empowering leadership on teacher self-efficacy and teacher agency. The results supported the partial mediation model in which principal empowering leadership was associated with direct and indirect effects through teacher self-efficacy on teacher agency. Moreover, higher levels of principal authentic leadership were associated with stronger effects of empowering leadership on both teacher self-efficacy and teacher agency. Our results indicate a more profound comprehension of how empowering leadership influences teacher agency within the context of Turkish public schools. Furthermore, we provide practical recommendations for promoting teacher agency within school settings.
AğaldayBDağlıA (2021) The investigation of the relations between paternalistic leadership, organizational creativity and organizational dissent. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership6(4): 748–794.
3.
AhmedEI (2023) A systematic review of authentic leadership literature in educational research from 1997 to 2021. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 51(1): 1–39.
4.
AlazmiAAAl-MahdyYFH (2022) Principal authentic leadership and teacher engagement in Kuwait’s educational reform context. Educational Management Administration & Leadership50(3): 392–412.
5.
AlazmiAAHammadW (2021) Modeling the relationship between principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Kuwait: the mediating effects of trust and teacher Agency. Educational Management Administration & Leadership51(5): 1141–1160.
6.
ArnoldJJAradSRhoadesJA and Drasgow F (2000) The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior21(3): 249–269.
7.
AvolioBJGardnerWL (2005) Authentic leadership development: getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly16: 315–338.
8.
AvolioBJLuthansF (2006) The high impact leader: moments matter in accelerating authentic leadership development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
AvolioBJLuthansFWalumbwaFO (2004) Authentic leadership: Theory building for veritable sustained performance. Working paper: Gallup Leadership Institute, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
10.
AydınY (2016) Örgütsel sessizliğin okul yönetiminde kayırmacılık ve öğretmenlerin öz yeterlik algısı ile ilişkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi22(2): 165–192.
11.
BegleyPT (2006) Self-knowledge, capacity and sensitivity: prerequisites to authentic leadership by school principals. Journal of Educational Administration44(6): 570–589.
12.
BellibaşMŞÇalışkanÖGümüşS (2019) Öğretmen Failliği Ölçeği’nin (ÖFÖ) geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi9(1): 1–11.
13.
BellibaşMŞKılınçAÇPolatcanM (2021) The moderation role of transformational leadership in the effect of instructional leadership on teacher professional learning and instructional practice: An integrated leadership perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly57(5): 776–814.
14.
BellibaşMŞPolatcanMAkyürekMİ (2022a) Principal leadership typologies and their relationship with teacher self-efficacy and commitment: a latent profile mediation analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership50(6): 1–22.
15.
BellibaşMŞPolatcanMKılınçAÇ (2022b) Linking instructional leadership to teacher practices: The mediating effect of shared practice and agency in learning effectiveness. Educational Management Administration & Leadership50(5): 812–831.
16.
BerkovichIGuetaB (2022) Teachers’ authentic leadership and psychological need satisfaction climate in second chance programmes: the moderating role of teachers’ gender. Educational Management Administration & Leadership50(6): 995–1012.
17.
BhindiNDuignanP (1997) Leadership for a new century: authenticity, intentionality, spirituality and sensibility. Educational Management & Administration25(2): 117–132.
18.
BiestaGPriestleyMRobinsonS (2015) The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching21(6): 624–640.
19.
BilgetürkMBaykalE (2021) How does perceived organizational support affect psychological capital? The mediating role of authentic leadership. Organizacija54(1): 82–95.
20.
BlaseJBlaseJ (1997) The micropolitical orientation of facilitative school principals and its effects on teachers’ sense of empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration35(2): 138–164.
21.
BowersDGSeashoreSE (1966) Predicting organizational effectiveness with a four-factor theory of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly11(2): 238–263.
22.
BozkuşKGÜndüzY (2016) Ruhsal liderlik ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkinin modellenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi24(1): 405–420.
23.
BransonC (2007) Effects of structured self-reflection on the development of authentic leadership practices among Queensland primary school principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership35(2): 225–246.
24.
BushT (2014) Instructional and transformational leadership: Alternative and complementary models?Educational Management Administration & Leadership42(4): 443–444.
ÇelikOTKonanN (2021) The relationship between school principals’ empowering leadership with teachers’ self-efficiancy and organizational citizenship behaviors. Education & Science46(206): 1–21.
27.
CemaloğluNKılınçAÇ (2012) The relationship between school principals’ ethical leadership behaviors and teachers’ perceived organizational trust and mobbing. Education and Science37(165): 137–151.
28.
Cong-LemN (2021) Teacher agency: A systematic review of international literature. Issues in Educational Research31(3): 718–738.
29.
CongerJAKanungoRN (1988) The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review13(3): 471–482.
30.
DağlıEKalkanF (2021) The relationship between empowering leadership behaviors of school principals and teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions and job satisfaction levels. Education & Science46(208): 105–123.
31.
DansereauFYammarinoFJMarkhamSEAluttoJANewmanJDumasMDNachmanSANaughtonTJKimKAl-KelabiSALeeSKellerT (1995) Individualized leadership: A new multiple-level approach. The Leadership Quarterly6(3): 413–450.
32.
De NeveDDevosGTuytensM (2015) The importance of job resources and self-efficacy for beginning teachers’ professional learning in differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education47: 30–41.
33.
DuignanPA (2014) Authenticity in educational leadership: History, ideal, reality. Journal of Educational Administration52(2): 152–172.
34.
EastmanCA (2019) The developmental needs of coaches and coachees: A meta-synthesis of IJMCE volumes 1–7. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education8(3): 217–227.
35.
EmirbayerMMischeA (1998) What is agency?American Journal of Sociology103(4): 962–1023.
36.
FlahertyMG (2013) Age and agency: Time work across the life course. Time & Society22(2): 237–253.
37.
FrostD (2006) The concept of ‘agency’ in leadership for learning. Leading & Managing12(2): 19–28.
38.
FullanM (2010) The role of leadership in the promotion of knowledge management in schools. Teachers and Teaching8(3): 409–419.
39.
GaoAJiangJ (2019) Perceived empowering leadership, harmonious passion, and employee voice: The moderating role of job autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology10: 1484.
40.
GencerM (2023) Teaching in terms of occupational professionalization: A qualitative analysis. International Journal of Social Sciences Academic Researches7(13): 21–41.
41.
GkorezisP (2016) Principal empowering leadership and teacher innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Educational Management30(6): 1030–1044.
42.
GöktaşV (2011) Opportunities that could be granted by sufi education to today’s religion education. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi52(2): 137–155.
43.
GumusSBellibasMSGumusE (2018) A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership46(1): 25–48.
HallingerPLeeM (2014) Mapping instructional leadership in Thailand: Has education reform impacted principal practice?Educational Management Administration & Leadership42(1): 6–29.
46.
HallingerPLeithwoodK (1996) Culture and educational administration: A case of finding out what you don’t know you don’t know. Journal of Educational Administration34(5): 98–116.
47.
HayesA (2022) Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional processes analysis: A regression-based approach, 3rd ed.New York: The Guilford Press.
48.
Hendawy Al-MahdyYFHallingerPEmamMHammadWAlabriKMAl-HarthiK (2021) Supporting teacher professional learning in Oman: The effects of principal leadership, teacher trust, and teacher agency. Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 1–22.
49.
Hendawy Al-MahdyYFHallingerPOmaraEEmamM (2022) Exploring how power distance influences principal instructional leadership effects on teacher agency and classroom instruction in Oman: A moderated-mediation analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 1–23.
50.
HerseyPBlanchardK (1982) Management of organizational behaviour: Utilizing human resources, 4th ed.New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International Editions.
51.
HerseyPBlanchardKHNatemeyerWE (1979) Situational leadership, perception, and the impact of power. Group & Organization Studies4(4): 418–428.
52.
HilalYYHammadWPolatcanM (2022) Does distributed leadership improve teacher agency? Exploring the mediating effect of teacher reflection. Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 1–19.
53.
HoaglinDCIglewiczB (1987) Fine-tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association82(400): 1147–1149.
54.
HofstedeGHofstedeGJMinkovM (2010) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw Hill.
55.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
56.
HuangJ (2017) The relationship between employee psychological empowerment and proactive behavior: Self-efficacy as mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal45(7): 1157–1166.
57.
JonesRE (1997) Teacher participation in decision making: Its relationship to staff morale and student achievement. Education118(1): 76–82.
58.
KaradaşHÖzerN (2021) Okul müdürlerinin yönetim tarzları ile müdür öğretmen ilişkilerinde güven. International Journal of Society Researches17(34): 125–153.
59.
Karakitapoğlu-AygünZGumusluogluL (2013) The bright and dark sides of leadership: transformational vs. non-transformational leadership in a non-western context. Leadership9(1): 107–133.
60.
KaraoğluİB (2019) Öğretmen öz yeterlik algısı ölçeği kısa formu’nun Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. The Journal of Academic Social Science99: 23–139.
61.
KaratayMMelikeGTaşM (2020) The relationship between teacher professionalism and autonomy. Munzur Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi9(2): 173–195.
62.
KavgacıH (2023) Exploring the relationship among paternalistic leadership, teacher trust in principal, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Pedagogical Research7(1): 273–289.
63.
KhanF (2023) Transformational leadership and teacher work performance: Mediating effect of job autonomy and trust in school principal–insights from senior secondary school data in India. Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 1–21.
64.
KimMBeehrTA (2017) Self-efficacy and psychological ownership mediate the effects of empowering leadership on both good and bad employee behaviors. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies24(4): 466–478.
65.
KılınçAÇBozkurtEİlhanH (2018) Examining teachers’ opinions on teacher autonomy. Journal of Education and Humanities9(18): 78–98.
66.
KılınçAÇÖzdemirNPolatcanMSavaşGDolapcıE (2023) Linking transformational leadership to teacher commitment and alienation: Do motivational climate profiles moderate?Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 1–25.
67.
KõivKLiikKHeidmetsM (2019) School leadership, teacher’s psychological empowerment and work-related outcomes. International Journal of Educational Management33(7): 1501–1514.
68.
KonanNÇelikOT (2018) Turkish adaptation of the empowering leadership scale for educational organizations: a validity and reliability study. Kastamonu Education Journal26(4): 1043–1054.
69.
KonczakLJStellyDJTrustyML (2000) Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement60(2): 301–313.
70.
KulophasDHallingerPRuengtrakulAWongwanichS (2018) Exploring the effects of authentic leadership on academic optimism and teacher engagement in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Management32(1): 27–45.
71.
KwanP (2020) Is transformational leadership theory passé? Revisiting the integrative effect of instructional leadership and transformational leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly56(2): 321–349.
72.
LathamGPWintersDCLockeEA (1994) Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: a mediator study. Journal of Organizational Behavior15(1): 49–63.
73.
LeeAWillisSTianAW (2018) Empowering leadership: a meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of Organizational Behavior39(3): 306–325.
74.
LeeANNieY (2016) Teachers’ perceptions of school leader empowering behaviors on psychological empowerment: a moderated path analysis. New Waves-Educational Research and Development Journal19(2): 36–58.
75.
LeeANNieY (2017) Teachers’ perceptions of school leaders’ empowering behaviours and psychological empowerment: evidence from a Singapore sample. Educational Management Administration & Leadership45(2): 260–283.
76.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2005) Transformational leadership. In: DaviesB (ed) The Essentials of School Leadership. Los Angeles: Sage, 31–43.
77.
LeithwoodKSunJ (2012) The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly48(3): 387–423.
78.
LiLLiuY (2022) An integrated model of principal transformational leadership and teacher leadership that is related to teacher self-efficacy and student academic performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Education42(4): 661–678.
79.
LiuSHallingerP (2018) Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly54(4): 501–528.
80.
LiuSHallingerP (2022) The effects of instructional leadership, teacher responsibility and procedural justice climate on professional learning communities: A cross-level moderated mediation examination. Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 1–20.
81.
LiuSHallingerPFengD (2016) Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference. Teaching and Teacher Education59: 79–91.
82.
LiuSYinH (2023) How ethical leadership influences professional learning communities via teacher obligation and participation in decision making: A moderated-mediation analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership51(2): 345–364.
83.
LiuYBellibaşMŞGümüşS (2021) The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(3): 430–453.
84.
LockeEASchweigerDM (1979) Participation in decision-making: One more look. In: StawBM (ed) Research in Organizationl Behavior, Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 265–339.
MarksHMPrintySM (2003) Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly39(3): 370–397.
87.
MertPÖzgenelM (2020) A relational research on paternalist leadership behaviors perceived by teachers and teachers’ performance. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research15(2): 41–60.
88.
MillerALWiltCLAllcockHCKurthJAMorningstarMERupparAL (2022) Teacher agency for inclusive education: An international scoping review. International Journal of Inclusive Education26(12): 1159–1177.
NinkovićSRKnežević-FlorićOČ (2018) Transformational school leadership and teacher self-efficacy as predictors of perceived collective teacher efficacy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership46(1): 49–64.
91.
Owusu-BempahJAddisonRFairweatherJ (2014) Commonalities and specificities of authentic leadership in Ghana and New Zealand. Educational Management Administration & Leadership42(4): 536–556.
92.
PanWSunLYChowIHS (2011) The impact of supervisory mentoring on personal learning and career outcomes: The dual moderating effect of self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior78(2): 264–273.
93.
PantićNFlorianL (2015) Developing teachers as agents of inclusion and social justice. Education Inquiry6(3): 333–351.
94.
PiyamanPHallingerPViseshsiriP (2017) Addressing the achievement gap: Exploring principal leadership and teacher professional learning in urban and rural primary schools in Thailand. Journal of Educational Administration55(6): 717–734.
95.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBPodsakoffNP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology63: 539–569.
96.
PolatcanMArslanPBalciA (2023) The mediating effect of teacher self-efficacy regarding the relationship between transformational school leadership and teacher agency. Educational Studies49(5): 823–841.
97.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40(3): 879–891.
98.
PriestleyMBiestaGJJPhilippouSRobinsonS (2015) The teacher and the curriculum: Exploring teacher agency. In: WyseDHaywardLPandyaJ (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment. Los Angeles: Sage, 187–201.
99.
PyhältöKPietarinenJSoiniT (2015) Teachers’ professional agency and learning–from adaption to active modification in the teacher community. Teachers and Teaching21(7): 811–830.
100.
ShenXY (2015) Institutional legitimacy, teacher agency, and the development of teacher teaching expertise. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Beijing Normal University, China.
101.
SpillaneJP (2005) Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum69(2): 143–150.
102.
SrivastavaABartolKMLockeEA (2006) Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal49(6): 1239–1251.
103.
TabachnickBG and FidellLS (2001) Using Multivariate Statistics, Vol. 6. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
104.
TabakAPolatMCoşarSTürközT (2012) Otantik liderlik ölçeği: Güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources14(4): 89–106.
105.
TianMRiskuMCollinK (2016) A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership44(1): 146–164.
106.
Tschannen-MoranMHoyAW (2001) Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education17(7): 783–805.
107.
VecchioRPJustinJEPearceCL (2010) Empowering leadership: An examination of mediating mechanism within a hierarchical structure. The Leadership Quarterly21(3): 530–542.
108.
VermeulenMKreijnsKEversAT (2022) Transformational leadership, leader–member exchange and school learning climate: Impact on teachers’ innovative behaviour in The Netherlands. Educational Management Administration & Leadership50(3): 491–510.
109.
VitanovaG (2018) Just treat me as a teacher!’ mapping language teacher agency through gender, race, and professional discourses. System79: 28–37.
110.
WalumbwaFOAvolioBJGardnerWLWernsingTPetersonS (2008) Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management34(1): 89–126.
111.
WangGLiJLiuHZaggiaC (2023) Transformational leadership and teachers’ voice behaviour: A moderated mediation model of group voice climate and team psychological safety. Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 1–21.
112.
WangYZhangW (2021) The effects of principal support on teachers’ professional skills: The mediating role of school-wide inclusive practices and teacher agency. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education68(6): 773–787.
113.
Yalçınİ (2023) Inner transformation in Sufism in the context of Leo Schaya. Türkiye Sosyal Bilimler Sempozyumu.
114.
YılmazÖ (2007) The relation between human and world in Tasawwuf culture. Tasavvuf: İlmi ve Akademik Araştırma Dergisi8(18): 191–203.
115.
ZhangSBowersAJMaoY (2021) Authentic leadership and teachers’ voice behaviour: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of interpersonal trust. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(5): 768–785.
116.
ZhengXYinHLiZ (2019) Exploring the relationships among instructional leadership, professional learning communities and teacher self-efficacy in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership47(6): 843–859.
