Can Leaders Step Outside of the Gender Box? An Examination of Leadership and Gender Role Stereotypes

Abstract

This study examined gender stereotypes for leaders using a more indirect method than is typical in stereotype research. Rather than reveal the leader's gender, this study used vignettes in which the leader's gender was unknown. Consistent with their hypothesis, the authors found that participants were more likely to infer a male (female) gender identity than a female (male) gender identity when presented with a leader using a masculine (feminine) style. They also hypothesized that a leader using a gender-consistent leadership style would be viewed more positively than a leader using a gender-inconsistent style. Contrary to this hypothesis, results revealed that men using a gender-inconsistent (feminine) style were actually evaluated more positively than men using a gender-consistent style. It is interesting that a perceived female leader who used a gender-inconsistent (masculine) style was evaluated more positively than a perceived male leader who used a masculine style, but only by female participants. Possible explanations for these results are discussed.

Keywords

sex role stereotypes masculine and feminine leadership sex differences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Avolio, B. , Bass, B. , & Jung, D. (1999). Reexamining the components of transactional and transformational leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441-462.

Brower, H.H. , Schoorman, F.D. , & Tan, H.H. (2000). A model of relational leadership: The integration of trust and leader-exchange. Leadership Quarterly, 11(2), 227-250.

Burke, C.S. , Sims, D. , Lazzara, E. , & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 606-632.

Caldwell, C. , & Hayes, L. (2007). Leadership, trustworthiness, and the mediating lens. Journal of Management Development, 26, 261-281.

Deaux, K. , & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. Gilbert , S. T. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 788-827). New York: Random House.

Dirks, K.T. , & Ferrin, D.L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628.

Eagly, A. , Johannesen-Schmidt, M. , & van Engen, M. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 29(4), 569-591.

Eagly, A. , & Johnson, B. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233-256.

Eagly, A. , & Karau, S. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.

10.

Echiejile, I. (1995). We need good managers, not gender stereotypes . People Management, 1(24), 19.

11.

Gibson, C. (1995). An investigation of gender differences in leadership across four countries. Journal of International Business Studies , 26(2), 255-279.

12.

Heilman, M. , Block, C. , Martell, R. , & Simon, M. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology , 74, 935-942.

13.

House, R.J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321-338.

14.

House, R.J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323-352.

15.

House, R.J. , & Dessler, G. (1974). The path-goal theory of leadership: Some post hoc and a priori tests. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Contingency approaches to leadership (pp. 29-62). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

16.

Lapidot, Y. , Kark, R. , & Shamir, B. (2007). The impact of situational vulnerability on the development and erosion of followers' trust in their leader. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 16-34.

17.

Lowe, K. , & Galen, K. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 385-426.

18.

Padgett, R.J. (2000). Gender neutral names. Unpublished manuscript.

19.

Petty, M. , & Miles, R. (1976). Leader sex-role stereotyping in a female-dominated work culture. Personnel Psychology, 29, 393-404.

20.

Powell, G.N. , Butterfield, D.A. , Alves, J.C. , & Bartol, K.M. (2004). Sex effects in evaluations of transformational and transactional leaders. Academy of Management Proceedings, pp. E1-E6.

21.

Schein, V. (1975). Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(3), 340-344.

22.

Schein, V. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 675-688.

23.

Schein, V. , & Mueller, R. (1992). Sex role stereotyping and requisite management characteristics: A cross cultural look. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 439-447.

24.

Spence, J. , & Buckner, C. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44-63.

25.

van Engen, M. , van der Leeden, R. , & Willemsen, T. (2001). Gender, context, and leadership styles: A field study. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology , 74(5), 581-599.