The Newcastle Independence Assessment Form—Research: Development of an Alternative Functional Measure

Abstract

The Newcastle Independence Assessment Form—Research (NIAF-R) is a 55-item global measure of the functional independence of people with neurologic disability. It has been designed to establish outcome over time—throughout recovery and at long- term follow-up. This paper recounts the development of this scale and demonstrates its expediency, acknowledging the presence of other less suitable or less user-friendly extended ADL and global functional assessment measures. Interrater agreement was demonstrated throughout the developmental stages of the NIAF-R. The majority of kappa ratings were greater than 0.6 in a comparison .between the NIAF-R and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Values at this level are agreed to be a sub stantial result. Recommendations for future analyses include validation studies at longer term follow-up and with a wider range of neurologic disabilities, an increased sample size to increase statistical power, and further testing to establish NIAF-R as a clinical tool.

Keywords

Key Words: Newcastle Independence Assessment Form-Research-Neurologic rehabilitation—Functional outcome measurement.

References

Keith RA , Granger CV , Hamilton BB , Sherwin FS The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation . In: Eisenberg MG , Grzesiak RC (eds.). Advances in clinical assessment 1987;1:6-18.

Feinstein AR , Joseph BR , Wells CK Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann Intern Med 1986 ; 105:413-20.

Bergner M. Bobbitt RA , Kressel S. , Pollard WE , Gilson BS , Morris JR The Sickness Impact Profile: conceptual formulation for the development of a health status measure . Int J Health Serv 1976;6(3):393-415.

Moskowitz E. , McCann CB Classification of the chronically ill and aging. J Chron Dis 1957;5:342-46.

Hamilton BB , Granger CV , Sherwin FS , Zielezny M. , Tashman JS A Uniform National Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer M (ed.). Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Baltimore: Brooks , 1987:137-47.

Chau N. , Daler S. , Andre JM , Patris A. Inter-rater agreement of two functional independence scales: the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and a subjective uniform continuous scale. Disabil and Rehabil 1994;16(2):63-71.

Hamilton BB , Laughlin JA , Granger CV , Kayton RM Interrater agreement of the Seven Level Functional Independence Measure (FIM) . Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:790 (abstract).

Dodds TA , Martin DP , Stolov WC , Deyo RA A validation of the Functional Independence Measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:531-36.

Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, Department of Rehabilitation. 751 So. Bascom Avenue, San Jose, CA. Attention: Karyll Hall Ed.D.

10.

Hall KM Overview of functional assessment scales in brain injury rehabilitation . Neurorehab 1992;2(4):98-113.

11.

McPherson KM , Pentland B. , Cudmore SF , Prescott RJ An interrater reliability study of the Functional Assessment Measure (FIM + FAM). Disabil and Rehabil 1996;18:314-47.

12.

Wade DT FIM + FAM—a critical analysis. European Rehabilitation Newsletter, February 1995;7:2.

13.

Barnes MP FIM + FAM—a positive workshop. European Rehabilitation Newsletter, February 1995;7:3-7.

14.

Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educat Psychol Meas 1960;20(1):37-46:

15.

Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psych Bull 1968; 70(4):213-20.

16.

Keith RA Functional assessment measures in medical rehabilitation: current status. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984;65:74 -77.