Clinical practice guidelines for walking recovery post-stroke recommend high aerobic intensity training, which usually involves walking at fast speeds. However, the acute effect of fast speeds on the neuromuscular control of walking is unclear.
Objectives:
(1) Assess the criterion validity of the Dynamic Motor Control Index (WalkDMC) as a measure of coactivation post-stroke. (2) Assess acute speed-dependent coactivation post-stroke. (3) Assess how clinical characteristics shape the speed-dependent coactivation response. (4) Assess the relationship between heart rate and coactivation post-stroke. We hypothesized that WalkDMC is correlated with function and impairment measures. We also hypothesize that coactivation measured via the WalkDMC increases for speeds above or below self-selected speeds (SSS).
Methods:
32 chronic stroke survivors and 17 age and sex-matched controls walked at SSS, fast, and slow speeds. EMGs were measured bilaterally on 7 lower extremity muscles. We used non-negative matrix factorization to calculate WalkDMC. We used regression to assess the relationship between WalkDMC, speed, heart rate, and clinical outcomes.
Results:
WalkDMC was correlated with clinical outcomes, supporting its criterion validity. We observed a quadratic relationship between speed and coactivation: for the paretic extremity, the predicted speed that would lead to the lowest coactivation was ~120% higher than SSS. Slow speeds consistently increased coactivation in controls and participants post-stroke. Coactivation in the paretic extremity was significantly predicted by speed, balance, and impairment.
Conclusions:
Our results suggest that increased speeds lead to differential improvements in coactivation in the paretic and non-paretic extremities. These results may inform speed prescriptions for HIT interventions.
PerryJGarrettMGronleyJKMulroySJ.Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke. 1995;26:982-989.
2.
OlneySJRichardsC.Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: characteristics. Gait Posture. 1996;4:136-148.
3.
HondaKSekiguchiYMurakiTIzumiS-I.The differences in sagittal plane whole-body angular momentum during gait between patients with hemiparesis and healthy people. J Biomech. 2019;86:204-209.
4.
NottCRNeptuneRRKautzSA.Relationships between frontal-plane angular momentum and clinical balance measures during post-stroke hemiparetic walking. Gait Posture. 2014;39:129-134.
5.
SánchezNFinleyJM.Individual differences in locomotor function predict the capacity to reduce asymmetry and modify the energetic cost of walking poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32(8):701-713.
6.
WatersRLMulroyS.The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait. Gait Posture. 1999;9:207-231.
7.
HornbyTGReismanDSWardIG, et alClinical practice guideline to improve locomotor function following chronic stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, and brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;44:49-100.
8.
BoynePMillerASchwab-FarrellSM, et alTraining parameters and adaptations that mediate walking capacity gains from high-intensity gait training poststroke. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2025;57:1285-1296.
9.
ThompsonEDPohligRTMcCartneyKM, et alIncreasing activity after stroke: a randomized controlled trial of high-intensity walking and step activity intervention. Stroke. 2024;55:5-13.
10.
BoynePBillingerSAReismanDS, et alOptimal intensity and duration of walking rehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2023;80:342.
11.
ChenGPattenCKothariDHZajacFE.Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait Posture. 2005;22:51-56.
12.
LamontagneAFungJ.Faster is better: implications for speed-intensive gait training after stroke. Stroke. 2004;35:2543-2548.
13.
ArdestaniMMKinnairdCRHendersonCEHornbyTG.Compensation or recovery? Altered kinetics and neuromuscular synergies following high-intensity stepping training poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33:47-58.
14.
WonsetlerECBowdenMG.A systematic review of mechanisms of gait speed change post-stroke. Part 1: spatiotemporal parameters and asymmetry ratios. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24:435-446.
15.
HornbyTGHendersonCEPlaweckiA, et alContributions of stepping intensity and variability to mobility in individuals poststroke: a randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2019;50:2492–2499.
16.
LeeDDSeungHS.Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature. 1999;401:788-791.
17.
RabbiMFPizzolatoCLloydDGCartyCPDevaprakashDDiamondLE.Non-negative matrix factorisation is the most appropriate method for extraction of muscle synergies in walking and running. Sci Rep. 2020;10:8266.
18.
TingLHChvatalSASafavyniaSALucas McKayJ.Review and perspective: neuromechanical considerations for predicting muscle activation patterns for movement: neuromechanics of muscle activity. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Engng. 2012;28:1003-1014.
19.
IvanenkoYPPoppeleRELacquanitiF.Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion. J Physiol. 2004;556:267-282.
20.
TingLHChielHJTrumbowerRD, et alNeuromechanical principles underlying movement modularity and their implications for rehabilitation. Neuron. 2015;86:38-54.
21.
BowdenMGClarkDJKautzSA.Evaluation of abnormal synergy patterns poststroke: relationship of the Fugl-Meyer assessment to hemiparetic locomotion. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:328-337.
22.
ClarkDJTingLHZajacFENeptuneRRKautzSA.Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103:844-857.
23.
HashiguchiYOhataKKitataniR, et alMerging and fractionation of muscle synergy indicate the recovery process in patients with Hemiplegia: the first study of patients after subacute stroke. Neural Plasticity. 2016;2016:1-7.
24.
ChvatalSATorres-OviedoGSafavyniaSATingLH.Common muscle synergies for control of center of mass and force in nonstepping and stepping postural behaviors. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:999-1015.
25.
MacLellanMJIvanenkoYPMassaadFBruijnSMDuysensJLacquanitiF.Muscle activation patterns are bilaterally linked during split-belt treadmill walking in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2014;111:1541-1552.
26.
Torres-OviedoGMacphersonJMTingLH.Muscle synergy organization is robust across a variety of postural perturbations. J Neurophysiol. 2006;96:1530-1546.
27.
Torres-OviedoGTingLH.Subject-specific muscle synergies in human balance control are consistent across different biomechanical contexts. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103:3084-3098.
28.
BarradasVRKutchJJKawaseTKoikeYSchweighoferN.When 90% of the variance is not enough: residual EMG from muscle synergy extraction influences task performance. J Neurophysiol. 2020;123:2180-2190.
29.
CollimoreANAielloAJPohligRTAwadLN.The dynamic motor control index as a marker of age-related neuromuscular impairment. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:678525.
30.
SpomerAMYanRZSchwartzMHSteeleKM.Motor control complexity can be dynamically simplified during gait pattern exploration using motor control-based biofeedback. J Neurophysiol. 2023;129:984-998.
31.
SteeleKMRozumalskiASchwartzMH.Muscle synergies and complexity of neuromuscular control during gait in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57:1176-1182.
32.
Hayes CruzTDhaherYY. Evidence of abnormal lower-limb torque coupling after stroke: an isometric study. Stroke. 2008;39:139-147.
33.
SánchezNAcostaAMLopez-RosadoRStienenAHADewaldJPA. Lower extremity motor impairments in ambulatory chronic hemiparetic stroke: evidence for lower extremity weakness and abnormal muscle and joint torque coupling patterns. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31:814-826.
34.
SanchezNAcostaAMLopez-RosadoRDewaldJPA. Neural constraints affect the ability to generate hip abduction torques when combined with hip extension or ankle plantarflexion in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Front Neurol. 2018;9:564.
35.
FinleyJMPerreaultEJDhaherYY.Stretch reflex coupling between the hip and knee: implications for impaired gait following stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2008;188:529-540.
36.
LamontagneARichardsCLMalouinF.Coactivation during gait as an adaptive behavior after stroke. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10:407-415.
37.
AwadLNReismanDSBinder-MacleodSA.Do improvements in balance relate to improvements in long-distance walking function after stroke?Stroke Res Treat. 2014;2014:1-6.
38.
AreneNHidlerJ.Understanding motor impairment in the paretic lower limb after a stroke: a review of the literature. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16:346-356.
39.
LatashML.Muscle coactivation: definitions, mechanisms, and functions. J Neurophysiol. 2018;120:88-104.
40.
KautzSABowdenMGClarkDJNeptuneRR.Comparison of motor control deficits during treadmill and overground walking poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:756-765.
41.
CornsweetTN.The staircase-method in psychophysics. Am J Psychol. 1962;75:485.
42.
ChujoYMoriKKitawakiTWakidaMNodaTHaseK.How to decide the number of gait cycles in different low-pass filters to extract motor modules by non-negative matrix factorization during walking in chronic post-stroke patients. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022;16:803542.
43.
Van CriekingeTVermeulenJWagemansK, et alLower limb muscle synergies during walking after stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42:2836-2845.
44.
KatchVMcArdleWKatchF.Essentials of Exercise Physiology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
45.
GellishRLGoslinBROlsonREMcDONALDARussiGDMoudgilVK.Longitudinal modeling of the relationship between age and maximal heart rate. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:822-829.
46.
Maxwell DonelanJKramRArthurDK. Mechanical and metabolic determinants of the preferred step width in human walking. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2001;268:1985-1992.
47.
EllisRGHowardKCKramR.The metabolic and mechanical costs of step time asymmetry in walking. Proc R Soc B. 2013;280:20122784.
48.
AkaikeH.Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J Econom. 1981;16:3-14.
49.
NakagawaSSchielzethH.A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. O’HaraRB, ed. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013;4:133-142.
50.
MansfieldERHelmsBP.Detecting multicollinearity. Am Statis. 1982;36:158.
51.
StraubeDDHolleranCLKinnairdCRLeddyALHennessyPWHornbyTG.Effects of dynamic stepping training on nonlocomotor tasks in individuals poststroke. Phys Ther. 2014;94:921-933.
52.
MehrabiNSchwartzMHSteeleKM.Can altered muscle synergies control unimpaired gait?J Biomech. 2019;90:84-91.
53.
van Ingen SchenauG. Some fundamental aspects of the biomechanics of overground versus treadmill locomotion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980;12:257-261.
54.
TyrellCMRoosMARudolphKSReismanDS.Influence of systematic increases in treadmill walking speed on gait kinematics after stroke. Phys Ther. 2011;91:392-403.
55.
RosenbergMCChristiansonHLiuJ, et alFastest may not maximize gait quality: differential and individual-specific immediate effects of gait speed on biomechanical variables post-stroke. medRxiv. 2022. Accessed June 10, 2025. http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2022.12.14.22283438
BarrosoFOTorricelliDMolina-RuedaF, et alCombining muscle synergies and biomechanical analysis to assess gait in stroke patients. J Biomech. 2017;63:98-103.
58.
GizziLNielsenJFFeliciFIvanenkoYPFarinaD.Impulses of activation but not motor modules are preserved in the locomotion of subacute stroke patients. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:202-210.
59.
FrenchMAMooreMFPohligRReismanD.Self-efficacy mediates the relationship between balance/walking performance, activity, and participation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23:77-83.
60.
MiddletonABraunCHLewekMDFritzSL.Balance impairment limits ability to increase walking speed in individuals with chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:497-502.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
