Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Results in Increased Motor Map Area in Subjects 3 to 9 Months After Stroke

Abstract

Background. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) has received considerable attention as an intervention to enhance motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke. Objective. The present study represents the first multi-center effort to measure cortical reorganization induced by CIMT in subjects who are in the subacute stage of recovery. Methods. A total of 30 stroke subjects in the subacute phase (>3 and <9 months poststroke) were recruited and randomized into experimental (receiving CIMT immediately after baseline evaluation) and control (receiving CIMT after 4 months) groups. Each subject was evaluated using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, and at 4-month follow-up (ie, after CIMT in the experimental groups and before CIMT in the control groups). The primary clinical outcome measure was the Wolf Motor Function Test. Results. Both experimental and control groups demonstrated improved hand motor function 2 weeks after baseline. The experimental group showed significantly greater improvement in grip force after the intervention and at follow-up (P = .049). After adjusting for the baseline measures, the experimental group had an increase in the TMS motor map area compared with the control group over a 4-month period; this increase was of borderline significance (P = .053). Conclusions. Among subjects who had a stroke within the previous 3 to 9 months, CIMT produced statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in arm motor function that persisted for at least 4 months. The corresponding enlargement of TMS motor maps, similar to that found in earlier studies of chronic stroke subjects, appears to play an important role in CIMT-dependent plasticity.

Keywords

Plasticity Recovery Transcranial magnetic stimulation Upper extremity.

References

Ottenbacher K. Cerebral vascular accident: some characteristics of occupational therapy evaluation forms. Am J Occup Ther . 1980;34:268-271.

Broderick J. , Brott T. , Kothari R. , et al. The Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study: preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks. Stroke. 1998;29:415-421.

Wittenberg GF , Chen R. , Ishii K. , et al. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:48-57.

Schaechter JD , Kraft E. , Hilliard TS , et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair . 2002;16:326-338.

Hamada I. , DeLong MR Excitotoxic acid lesions of the primate subthalamic nucleus result in reduced pallidal neuronal activity during active holding. J Neurophysiol . 1992;68:1859-1866.

Hamzei F. , Liepert J. , Dettmers C. , Weiller C. , Rijntjes M. Two different reorganization patterns after rehabilitative therapy: an exploratory study with fMRI and TMS. Neuroimage. 2006;31:710-720.

Liepert J. , Miltner WH , Bauder H. , et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett. 1998;250:5-8.

Rossini PM , Caltagirone C. , Castriota-Scanderbeg A. , et al. Hand motor cortical area reorganization in stroke: a study with fMRI, MEG and TCS maps. Neuroreport. 1998;9:2141-2146.

Nudo RJ Functional and structural plasticity in motor cortex: implications for stroke recovery. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003 ;14 (1 Suppl):S57-S76.

10.

Taub E. , Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: bridging from the primate laboratory to the stroke rehabilitation laboratory. J Rehabil Med. 2003 (41 Suppl):34-40.

11.

Wolf SL , Lecraw DE , Barton LA , Jann BB Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104:125-132.

12.

Ostendorf CG , Wolf SL Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. A single-case design. Phys Ther. 1981;61:1022-1028.

13.

van der Lee JH , Wagenaar RC , Lankhorst GJ , Vogelaar TW , Devillé WL , Bouter LM Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2369-2375.

14.

Taub E. , Uswatte G. , King DK , Morris D. , Crago JE , Chatterjee A. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1045-1049.

15.

Wolf SL , Winstein CJ , Miller JP , et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial . JAMA. 2006;296:2095-2104.

16.

Liepert J. , Uhde I. , Gräf S. , Leidner O. , Weiller C. Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. J Neurol. 2001;248:315-321.

17.

Taub E. , Miller NE , Novack TA , et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347-354.

18.

Johansen-Berg H. , Dawes H. , Guy C. , Smith SM , Wade DT , Matthews PM Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. Brain . 2002;125: 2731-2742.

19.

Wolf SL , Binder-MacLeod SA Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Phys Ther. 1983;63: 1393-1403.

20.

Taub E. , Crago JE , Burgio LD , et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994;61:281-293.

21.

Panyan M. How to Use Shaping. Lawrence, KS: H & H Enterprises; 1980.

22.

Winstein C. Designing practice for motor learning: clinical impressions. In: Lister M , ed. Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems: Proceedings of the II Step Conference. Alexandria, VA: Foundation for Physical Therapy; 1991.

23.

Schmidt RA , Lee TD Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1999 .

24.

Wolf SL , Butler AJ , Campana GI , et al. Intra-subject reliability of parameters contributing to maps generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation in able-bodied adults. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:1740-1747.

25.

Brasil-Neto JP , McShane LM , Fuhr P. , Hallett M. , Cohen LG Topographic mapping of the human motor cortex with magnetic stimulation: factors affecting accuracy and reproducibility . Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol . 1992 ;85:9-16.

26.

Kobayashi M. , Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology . Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:145-156.

27.

Rossini PM , Barker AT , Berardelli A. , et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;91:79-92.

28.

Wassermann EM , McShane LM , Hallett M. , Cohen LG Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol . 1992;85:1-8.

29.

Devanne H. , Lavoie BA , Capaday C. Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway . Exp Brain Res. 1997;114:329-338.

30.

Rothwell JC Physiological studies of electric and magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991;43:29-35.

31.

Wolf SL , Thompson PA , Morris DM , et al. The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair . 2005;19:194-205.

32.

Chollet F. , Weiller C. Imaging recovery of function following brain injury. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994;4:226-230.

33.

Chollet F. , Loubinoux I. , Carel C. , Marque P. , Albucher JF , Guiraud-Chaumeil. Mechanisms of motor recovery after cerebrovascular accident [in French]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1999;155:718-724.

34.

Carey JR , Kimberley TJ , Lewis SM , et al. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain. 2002;125:773-788.

35.

Pascual-Leone A. , Grafmann J. , Hallet M. Modulation of cortical motor output maps during development of implicit and explicit knowledge. Science. 1994;263:1287-1289.

36.

Bastings EP , Greenberg JP , Good DC Hand motor recovery after stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping study of motor output areas and their relation to functional status. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16:275-282.

37.

Dong Y. , Winstein CJ , Albistegui-Dubois R. , Dobkin BH Evolution of FMRI activation in the perilesional primary motor cortex and cerebellum with rehabilitation training-related motor gains after stroke: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:412-428.

38.

Butler AJ , Wolf SL Transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess cortical plasticity: a critical perspective for stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2003 (41 Suppl):20-26.