Background. The neural correlates of training-induced improvements of cognitive functions after brain damage remain still scarcely understood. In the specific case of aphasia, although several investigations have addressed the issue of the neural substrates of functional recovery, only a few studies have attempted to assess the impact of language training on the damaged brain.
Aims. The main goal of this study was to examine the neurobiological correlates of improved picture-naming performance in 2 aphasic patients who received intensive and specific training for a chronic and severe phonological anomia.
Methods. In both participants, picture-naming performance was assessed before and after phonological cueing training. Training-induced changes in patients’ performance were correlated to brain activity patterns as revealed by pre- and post-training event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning.
Results. Training-induced improvement was observed concurrently with changes in the brain activation patterns. Better performance was observed in the patient with the smaller lesion, partially sparing Broca’s area, who showed a left perilesional reactivation. Conversely, the patient with complete destruction of Broca’s area showed a posttraining activation in the right mirror frontal region.
Conclusions. The results show that, even in the chronic stage, phonological strategies may improve impaired naming and induce cerebral reorganization.
Heiss WD, Kessler J, Thiel A, Ghaemi M, Karbe H.Differential capacity of left and right hemispheric areas for compensation of poststroke aphasia. Ann Neurol. 1999;45: 430-438.
2.
Karbe H, Thiel A, Weber-Luxenburger G, Herholz K, Kessler J, Heiss WD.Brain plasticity in poststroke aphasia: what is the contribution of the right hemisphere? Brain Lang. 1998;64: 215-230.
3.
Cao Y, Vikingstad EM, George KP, Johnson AF, Welch KM.Cortical language activation in stroke patients recovering from aphasia with functional MRI. Stroke. 1999;30: 2331-2340.
4.
Warburton E, Price CJ, Swinburn K, Wise RJ.Mechanisms of recovery from aphasia: evidence from positron emission tomography studies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66: 155-161.
5.
Calvert GA, Brammer MJ, Morris RG, Williams SC, King N, Matthews PM.Using fMRI to study recovery from acquired dysphasia. Brain Lang. 2000;71: 391-399.
6.
Weiller C, Isensee C, Rijntjes M, et al.Recovery from Wernicke’s aphasia: a positron emission tomographic study. Ann Neurol. 1995;37: 723-732.
7.
Cappa SF, Perani D, Grassi F, et al.A PET follow-up study of recovery after stroke in acute aphasics. Brain Lang. 1997;56: 55-67.
8.
Thulborn KR, Carpenter PA, Just MA.Plasticity of language-related brain function during recovery from stroke. Stroke. 1999;30: 749-754.
9.
Rosen HJ, Petersen SE, Linenweber MR, et al.Neural correlates of recovery from aphasia after damage to left inferior frontal cortex. Neurology. 2000;55: 1883-1894.
10.
Price CJ, Crinion J.The latest on functional imaging studies of aphasic stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 2005;18: 429-434.
11.
Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T.New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3: 228-236.
12.
Cappa SF.Recovery from aphasia: why and how? Brain Lang. 2000;71: 39-41.
13.
Thompson CK.The neurobiology of language recovery in aphasia. Brain Lang. 2000;71: 245-248.
14.
Heiss WD, Thiel A, Kessler J, Herholz K.Disturbance and recovery of language function: correlates in PET activation studies. Neuroimage. 2003;20(Suppl 1): S42-S49.
15.
Belin P, Van Eeckhout P, Zilbovicius M, et al.Recovery from non-fluent aphasia after melodic intonation therapy: a PET study. Neurology. 1996;47: 1504-1511.
16.
Musso M, Weiller C, Kiebel S, Muller SP, Bulau P, Rijntjes M.Training-induced brain plasticity in aphasia. Brain. 1999;122(Pt 9): 1781-1790.
17.
Blasi V, Young AC, Tansy AP, Petersen SE, Snyder AZ, Corbetta M.Word retrieval learning modulates right frontal cortex in patients with left frontal damage. Neuron. 2002;36: 159-170.
18.
Léger A, Demonet JF, Ruff S, et al.Neural substrates of spoken language rehabilitation in an aphasic patient: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2002;17: 174-183.
19.
Peck KK, Moore AB, Crosson BA, et al.Functional magnetic resonance imaging before and after aphasia therapy: shifts in hemo-dynamic time to peak during an overt language task. Stroke. 2004;35: 554-559.
20.
Crosson B, Moore AB, Gopinath K, et al.Role of the right and left hemispheres in recovery of function during treatment of intention in aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005;17: 392-406.
21.
Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, et al.Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca’s area: an open-protocol study. Brain Lang. 2005;93: 95-105.
22.
Le Dorze G, Pitts C.A case study of the effects of different techniques for the treatment of anomia. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1995;5: 51-65.
23.
Basso A.Prognostic factors in aphasia. Aphasiology. 1992;6: 337-348.
24.
Cappa SF, Perani D.Broca’s area and lexical-semantic processing. In: Grodzinsky Y, Amunts K, eds. Broca’s Region. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
25.
Miceli G, Laudanna A, Burani C, Capasso R. BADA: batteria per l’analisi dei deficit afasici. Roma: CEPSAG, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; 1994.
26.
Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M.A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol [Hum Learn]. 1980;6: 174-215.
27.
De Mauro T, Mancini F, Vedovelli M, Voghera M. Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Roma: Etaslibri; 1993.
28.
Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline JB, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp. 1995;2: 189-210.
Brett M, Leff AP, Rorden C, Ashburner J.Spatial normalization of brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking. Neuroimage. 2001;14: 486-500.
31.
Joanette Y, Keller E, Lecours AR.Sequences of phonemic approximations in aphasia. Brain Lang. 1980;11: 30-44.
32.
Nickels LA, Best W.Therapy for naming deficits (part II): specifics, surprises and suggestions. Aphasiology. 1996;10: 109-136.
33.
Demonet JF, Thierry G, Cardebat D.Renewal of the neuro-physiology of language: functional neuroimaging. Physiol Rev.2005;85: 49-95.
34.
Thompson-Schill SL, D’Esposito M, Aguirre GK, Farah MJ.Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94: 14792-14797.
35.
Paulesu E, Frith CD, Frackowiak RS.The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature. 1993;362: 342-345.
36.
Raboyeau G, Marie N, Balduyck S, Gros H, Demonet JF, Cardebat D.Lexical learning of the English language: a PET study in healthy French subjects. Neuroimage. 2004;22: 1808-1818.
37.
Cornelissen K, Laine M, Tarkiainen A, Jarvensivu T, Martin N, Salmelin R.Adult brain plasticity elicited by anomia treatment. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003;15: 444-461.
38.
Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, Cohen JD.Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science. 1998;280: 747-749.
39.
Cardebat D, Demonet JF, De Boissezon X, et al.Behavioral and neurofunctional changes over time in healthy and aphasic subjects: a PET Language Activation Study. Stroke. 2003;34: 2900-2906.
40.
Ansaldo AI, Arguin M, Lecours AR.Recovery from aphasia: a longitudinal study on language recovery, lateralization patterns, and attentional resources. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004;26: 621-627.
