When countries emerge from a civil war, accountability and compensation for harms done are crucial for peacebuilding. However, post-civil war governments face uncertain political contexts, delegation problems, difficulties building trust among former combatants, deficits of central administrative capacity, and incentives to reward supporters. Given these challenges, they are unlikely to be able to fairly distribute financial compensation. In Nepal, the awarding of internationally funded compensation for conflict-related losses provides a very tangible test regarding whether factional opportunism or broader public interest considerations guide post-conflict allocations. We hypothesize that without effective institutions, compensation will be skewed in favour of those in power and not proportional to harms suffered. Using individual-level data, we analyse who benefited from the post-conflict settlement, showing those killed by Maoist perpetrators, those sympathetic to the state and members of the state armed forces were more likely to be compensated, a biased, hence unfavourable, outcome for peacebuilding.
AdhikariP.HansenW. L. (2013). Reparations and reconciliation in the aftermath of civil war. Journal of Human Rights, 12(4), 423–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2013.812465
3.
AdhikariP.HansenW. L.PowersK. L. (2012). The demand for reparations: Grievance, risk, and the pursuit of justice in civil war settlement. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002711421594
4.
AdhikariP.SamfordS. (2013). The Nepali state and the dynamics of the Maoist insurgency. Studies in Comparative International Development, 48(4), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-012-9125-4
5.
ÅkeboM.BastianS. (2021). Beyond liberal peace in Sri Lanka: Victory, politics, and state formation. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 16(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1542316620976121
6.
ArrowK. J. (1974). The limits of organization. W.W. Norton.
BrettR.MalagónL. (2022). ‘Transitional justice and peacemaking/peacebuilding’. In Contemporary Peacemaking (pp. 475–505). Springer International Publishing.
9.
CallC. (2012). Why Peace Fails: The Causes and Prevention of Civil War Recurrence. Georgetown University Press.
10.
CaplanR. (2019). Measuring Peace: Principles, Practices, and Politics. Oxford University Press.
11.
CohenD. K. (2016). Rape During Civil War. Cornell University Press.
12.
CollierP. (2003). Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy. The World Bank.
13.
CooleyA.NexonD. (2020). Exit from Hegemony: The Unravelling of the American Global Order. Oxford University Press.
14.
CramerC.GoodhandJ. (2002). Try again, fail again, fail better? war, the state, and the ‘post-conflict’ challenge in Afghanistan. Development and Change, 33(5), 885–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.t01-1-00253
15.
DeatonA. (2013). The Great Escape: Health Wealth and the Origins of Inequality. Princeton University Press.
16.
De GreiffP. (2006). The Handbook of Reparations. Oxford University Press.
17.
EasterlyW. (2006). The White Man‘s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. The Penguin Press.
18.
EckK. (2010). ‘Recruiting Rebels: Indoctrination and Political Education in Nepal’, 53-71. In The Maoist Insurgency in Nepal: Revolution in the Twenty-first Century by Lawoti, M & Pahari AK. Routledge.
19.
EinsiedelS.SalihC. (2017). ‘Conflict Prevention in Nepal: Background Paper for the United Nations-World Bank Flagship Study on the Prevention of Violent Conflict.’ United Nations University Center for Policy Research: Conflict Prevention Series: No. 1, April 2017.
20.
FearonJ. D. (2010). Governance and Civil War Onset. World Bank.
21.
FearonJ. D.HumphreysM.WeinsteinJ. M. (2009). Can development aid contribute to social cohesion after civil war? Evidence from a field experiment in post-conflict Liberia. American Economic Review, 99(2), 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.2.287
FortnaV. P. (2004). Peace Time: Cease-fire Agreements and the Durability of Peace. Princeton University Press.
24.
GibsonJ. L. (2004). Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation?Russell Sage Foundation.
25.
GilliganM. J.PasqualeB. J.SamiiC. (2014). Civil war and social cohesion: Lab-in-field evidence from Nepal. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 604–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12067
LaplanteL. J.TheidonK. T. (2007). Truth with consequences: Justice and reparations in post-truth commission Peru. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(1), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2007.0009
30.
LewisD. G.SagnayevaS. (2020). Corruption, patronage and illiberal peace: Forging political settlement in post-conflict Kyrgyzstan. Third World Quarterly, 41(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1642102
31.
MendeloffD. (2004). ‘Truth-seeking, truth-telling, and postconflict peacebuilding: Curb the enthusiasm?’International Studies Review, 6(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-9488.2004.00421.x
32.
MitchellN. J. (2004). Agents of Atrocity Leaders, Followers, and the Violation of Human Rights in Civil War. Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
NarangN. (2014). Humanitarian assistance and the duration of peace after civil war. The Journal of Politics, 76(2), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001382
ParisR. (2004). At War‘s End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge University Press.
37.
PillarP. R. (1983). Negotiating Peace: War Termination as a Bargaining Process. Princeton University Press.
38.
PinkerS. (2011). The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. Penguin Books Publishing Groups.
39.
PowellR. (1999). In the Shadow of Power: States and Strategies in International Politics. Princeton University Press.
40.
PrattJ. W.ZeckhauserR. J.ArrowK. J. (1985). Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Harvard Business School Press.
41.
ProPublic & SeeD (2016). ‘Predictors of Peace and Violence in Nepal—An empirical study of peace and need and peace services.’.
42.
ReiterA. G.OlsenT. D.PayneL. A. (2013). Transitional justice and civil war: Exploring new pathways, challenging old guideposts. Transitional Justice Review, 1(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.5206/tjr.2015.1.3.5
43.
RobinsS. (2011). Towards victim-centred transitional justice: Understanding the needs of families of the disappeared in postconflict Nepal. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijq027
44.
RobinsS. (2016). ‘Transition but not Transformation: How Nepal’s liberal peace fails its citizens.’ In Nepal Transition to Peace: A Decade of the Comprehensive Peace Accord (2006–2016) Nepal Transition to Peace Initiative.
45.
SajjadT. (2016). ‘Heavy hands, helping hands, holding hands: The politics of exclusion in victims’ networks in Nepal.’. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 10(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijv033
46.
SelimY. (2018). Transitional Justice in Nepal: Interests, Victims and Agency. Routledge.
47.
SmillieI.MinearL. (2004). The Charity of Nations: Humanitarian Action in a Calculating World. Kumarian Press, Inc.
48.
SnyderJ. L. (2000). From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. W. W. Norton & Company.
49.
SriramC. L. (2007). Justice as peace? Liberal peacebuilding and strategies of transitional justice. Global Society, 21(4), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820701562843
50.
United Nations (2005). Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law. UN Doc. A/RES/60/147. https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/BASICP∼1.PDF (Accessed on May 31, 2022).
WalterB. F.SnyderJ. L. (1999). Civil Wars, Insecurity, and Intervention. Columbia University Press.
55.
WhelptonJ. (2005). A History of Nepal. Cambridge University Press.
56.
WucherpfennigJ.MetternichN. W.CedermanL.GleditschK. S. (2012). Ethnicity, the state, and the duration of civil war. World Politics, 64(1), 79–115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004388711100030X
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
