Research on rebel behavior focuses on the violent conduct of these groups. Work on rebel governance, however, has documented the myriad ways in which rebel groups seek to gain legitimacy, project strength, and govern civilian populations beyond direct violence. These efforts stress the importance of governance institutions for securing cooperation and compliance from the civilian population, a central concern for rebel groups. Judicial processes are one avenue through which this cooperation and compliance can be secured. These efforts encompass a range of processes including ad hoc trials, truth commissions and commissions of inquiry, offers of amnesty, and reparations programs. Using new data on the rebel use of judicial processes from 1946 to 2011, I examine the argument that rebel judicial processes can best be understood as a mobilization strategy by the group, offering concessions to a supportive civilian population or coercion when support is weak.
Agence France Presse. 1998, November25. Colombia Guerrillas to Compensate Families of Explosion Victims. New York: LexisNexis Academic.
2.
AppelBenjaminLoyleCyanne E.. 2012. “The Economic Benefits of Justice: Post-conflict Justice and Foreign Direct Investment.” Journal of Peace Research49 (5): 685–99.
3.
ArjonaAna. 2016. Rebelocracy: Social Order in the Colombian Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ArjonaAnaKasfirNelsonMampillyZachariah. 2015. Rebel Governance in Civil War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
The Associated Press. 1982, January29. Guerrillas Offer Two-week Amnesty to Informers. New York: LexisNexis Academic.
6.
The Associated Press. 1997, June23. Residents of First Town Captured by Rebels Say Harassment Common. New York: LexisNexis Academic.
Bueno de MesquitaEthan. 2013. “Rebel Tactics.” Journal of Political Economy121 (2): 323–57.
9.
ClaytonGovinda. 2013. “Relative Rebel Strength and the Onset and Outcome of Civil War Mediation.” Journal of Peace Research50 (5): 609–22.
10.
CohenDara Kay. 2013. “Explaining Rape during Civil War: Cross-national Evidence (1980–2009).” American Political Science Review107 (03): 461–77.
11.
CunninghamDavid E.GleditschKristian SkredeSalehyanIdean. 2012. “Codebook for the Non-state Actor Data.” Version 3.3(January 24). Accessed January 1, 2020. http://ksgleditsch.com/data/NSAEX_codebook.pdf.
12.
CunninghamDavid E.GleditschKristian SkredeSalehyanIdean. 2013. “Non-state Actors in Civil Wars: A New Dataset.” Conflict Management and Peace Science30 (5): 516–31.
13.
Department of State Dispatch. 1993, February. Angola Human Rights Practices, 1992. New York: LexisNexis Academic.
14.
EckKristineHultmanLisa. 2007. “One-sided Violence against Civilians in War Insights from New Fatality Data.” Journal of Peace Research44 (2): 233–46.
15.
ElsterJon. 2004. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FörsterTill. 2015. “Dialogue Direct: Rebel Governance and Civil Order in Northern Côte d’Ivoire.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, edited by ArjonaAnaKasfirNelsonMampillyZachariah, 203–25. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
GahimaGerald. 2013. Transitional Justice in Rwanda. New York: Routledge.
18.
GatesScott. 2002. “Recruitment and Allegiance the Microfoundations of Rebellion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (1): 111–30.
19.
GellnerD. N.HachhethuK.. 2008. Local democracy in South Asia: Microprocesses of Democratization in Nepal and Its Neighbours. New Delhi: Sage.
20.
GleditschNils PetterWallensteenPeterErikssonMikaelSollenbergMargaretaStrandHåvard. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research39 (5): 615–37.
HaynerPriscilla. 2011. Unspeakable Truths: Facing the Challenge of Truth Commissions. New York: Routledge.
23.
HegghammerThomas. 2013. “The Recruiter’s Dilemma: Signaling and Rebel Recruitment Tactics.” Journal of Peace Research50 (1): 3–16.
24.
HuangReyko. 2016. The Wartime Origins of Democratization: Civil War, Rebel Governance, and Political Regimes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Indo-Asian News Service. 2008, January8. Maoists in Jharkhand Introduce Compensation for Killed Cadre. New York: LexisNexis Academic.
27.
JoHyeran. 2015. Compliant Rebels: Rebel Groups and International Law in World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KalyvasStathis. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KasfirNelson. 2015. “Rebel Governance-constructing a Field of Inquiry: Definitions, Scope, Patterns, Order, Causes.” In Rebel Governance in Civil War, edited by ArjonaAnaKasfirNelsonMampillyZachariah, 21–46. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Keesing’s Record of World Events. 1997. Volume 43, April, Sierra Leone, Page 41577. “Apr 1997—Sierra Leone.”
31.
KreutzJoakim. 2010. “How and When Armed Conflicts End: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research47 (2): 243–50.
32.
Lecomte-TilouineMarie. 2013. “Maoist Despite Themselves: Amid the People’s War in a Maoist Model Village, Northern Gulmi.” In Revolution in Nepal: An Anthropological and Historical Approach to the People’s War, edited by Lecomte-TilouineMarie, 213–53. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
33.
LedwidgeFrank. 2017. Rebel Law: Insurgents, Courts and Justice in Modern Conflict. London, UK: C. Hurst & Co. Publishers Ltd.
34.
LokenMeredithLakeMilliCronin-FurmanKate. 2018. “Deploying Justice: Strategic Accountability for Wartime Sexual Violence.” International Studies Quarterly62 (4): 751–64.
35.
LoyleCyanne E.2018. “Transitional Justice and Political Order in Rwanda.” Ethnic and Racial Studies41 (4): 663–80.
36.
LoyleCyanne E.BinningsbøHelga Malmin. 2018. “Justice during Armed Conflict: A New Dataset on Government and Rebel Strategies.” Journal of Conflict Resolution62 (2): 442–66.
37.
LoyleCyanne E.DavenportChristian. 2016. “Transitional Injustice: Subverting Justice in Transition and Post-conflict Societies.” Journal of Human Rights15 (1): 126–49.
38.
LyallJason. 2009. “Does Indiscriminate Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks? Evidence from Chechnya.” Journal of Conflict Resolution53 (3): 331–62.
39.
MampillyZachariah. 2011. Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life during War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
40.
MampillyZachariah CherianStewartMegan. 2021. “A Typology of Rebel Political Institutional Arrangements.” Journal of Conflict Resolution65 (1): 15–45. doi: 10.1177/0022002720935642.
41.
MarshallMonty G.GurrTed RobertJaggersKeith. 2017. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2009.” Version p4v2009. Accessed January 1, 2020. www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.
42.
MendeloffDavid A.2004. “Truth-seeking, Truth-telling and Post-conflict Peacebuilding: Curb the Enthusiasm?” International Studies Review6 (3): 355–80.
43.
MooreWill H.1995. “Rational Rebels: Overcoming the Free-rider Problem.” Political Research Quarterly48 (2): 417–54.
44.
NicholsAngela D.2019. Impact, Legitimacy, and Limitations of Truth Commissions. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
45.
OsielMark J.2000. “Why Prosecute? Critics of Punishment for Mass Atrocity.” Human Rights Quarterly22 (1): 118–47.
46.
RevkinMara. 2021. “Competitive Governance and Displacement Decisions Under Rebel Rule: Evidence from the Islamic State in Iraq.” Journal of Conflict Resolution65 (1): 46–80.
47.
SikkinkKathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
48.
SivakumaranS.2009. “Courts of Armed Opposition Groups: Fair Trials or Summary Justice?” Journal of International Criminal Justice7 (3): 489–513.
49.
StanilandPaul. 2012. “Organizing Insurgency: Networks, Resources, and Rebellion in South Asia.” International Security37 (1): 142–77.
WeinsteinJeremy M.2006. Inside Rebellion. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Wickham-CrowleyT. P.1990. Exploring Revolution: Essays on Latin American Insurgency and Revolutionary Theory. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
56.
WoodReed M.2010. “Rebel Capability and Strategic Violence against Civilians.” Journal of Peace Research47 (5): 601–14.
57.
WoodReed M.2013. “Opportunities to Kill or Incentives for Restraint? Rebel Capabilities, the Origins of Support, and Civilian Victimization in Civil War.” Conflict Management and Peace Science31 (5): 461–80.
58.
WoodReed M.2014. “From Loss to Looting? Battlefield Costs and Rebel Incentives for Violence.” International Organization68 (04): 1–21.
59.
WoodReed M.ThomasJakana L.. 2017. “Women on the Frontline: Rebel Group Ideology and Women’s Participation in Violent Rebellion.” Journal of Peace Research54 (1): 31–46.
60.
ZedongMao. 1961. On Guerilla Warfare. New York: Praeger.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
