The technology of applied behavior analysis has documented impressive advances in procedures for changing behavior. Behavior change is often functional, however, only if it endures over time and is performed in nontrained situations. One approach to building a technology that meets these standards has been systematic analysis of generalization “successes.” The present paper extends this approach through an analysis of generalization failures (i.e., the patterns of generalization errors). A format is provided for categorizing the errors made in generalization situations, and linking these errors back to stimulus characteristics present during training. Stimulus control serves as the pivotal concept that directs this error analysis, and provides the bridge between infrahuman research on generalization and the broader applied issue of obtaining performance across nontrained situations. Implications of the error analysis are defined for building a technology of generalization, and for developing an effective research methodology for studying generalized responding in applied settings.
AndersonS. R.SpradlinJ. E. (1980). The generalized effects of productive labeling training involving common object classes. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 5(2), 143–157.
2.
BaerD. M. (1981). How to plan for generalization. Lawrence, KS: H & H Enterprises.
3.
BeckerW.EngelmannS.ThomasD. (1975). Teaching 2: Cognitive learning and instruction. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
4.
BerlerE. S.GrossA. M.DrabmanR. S. (1982). Social skills training with children: Proceed with caution. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 41–54.
5.
CarnineD. W.BeckerW. C. (1982). Theory of instruction: Generalization issues. Educational Psychology, 2, 249–262.
6.
CarrE. G.KologinskyE. (1983). Acquisition of sign language by autistic children II: Spontaneity and generalization effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 297–314.
7.
ColvinG. T.HornerR. H. (1983). Experimental analysis of generalization: An evaluation of a general case program for teaching motor skills to severely handicapped learners. In HoggD.MittlerP. (Eds.), Advances in mental handicap research: volume 2. Aspects of competence in severely mentally handicapped people (pp. 309–345). Chichester, England: John Wiley.
8.
CoonM. E.VogelsbergR. T.WilliamsW. (1981). Effects of classroom public transportation instruction on generalization to the natural environment. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6(2), 46–53.
9.
DrabmanR. S.HammerD.RosenbaumM. S. (1979). Assessing generalization in behavior modification with children: The generalization map. Behavioral Assessment, 1, 203–219.
10.
EngelmannS.CarnineD. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York: Irvington Publishers.
11.
GarciaE.BaerD. M.FirestoneI. (1971). The development of generalized imitation within topographically determined boundaries. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 101–112.
12.
GuessD.KeoghW.SailorW. (1978). Generalization of speech and language behavior: Measurement and training tactics. In SchiefelbuschR. (Ed.), Bases of language intervention (Vol. I, pp. 373–397). Baltimore: University Park Press.
13.
GuttmanN.KalishH. I. (1956). Discriminability and stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 79–88.
14.
HayesS. C.RincoverA.Solnick (1980). The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 275–285.
15.
HonigW. K.UrcuioliP. J. (1981). The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): 25 years of research on stimulus generalization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36(3), 405–445.
16.
HornerR. H.BuddC. M. (in press). Teaching manual sign language to a nonverbal student: Generalization of sign use and collateral reduction of maladaptive behavior. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded.
17.
HornerR. H.McDonaldR. S. (1982). Comparison of single instance and general case instruction in teaching a generalized vocational skill. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7(3), 7–20.
18.
HornerR. H.McDonnellJ. J.BellamyG. T. (1984). Teaching generalized behaviors: General case instruction in simulation and community settings. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon.
19.
HornerR. H.SpragueJ.WilcoxB. (1982). Constructing general case programs for community activities. In WilcoxB.BellamyG. T., Design of high school programs for severely handicapped students (pp. 61–98). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
20.
HornerR. H.WilliamsJ. A.SteveleyJ. D. (1984). Acquisition of generalized telephone use by students with severe mental retardation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
21.
HuppS. C.MervisC. B. (1981). Development of generalized concepts by severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6(1), 14–21.
22.
JenkinsH. M. (1965). Generalization gradients and the concept of inhibition. In MostofskyD. I. (Ed.), Stimulus generalization (pp. 55–61). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
23.
JohnstonJ. M.PennypackerH. S. (1980). Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
KazdinA. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1, 427–452.
25.
KendallP. C. (1981). Assessing generalization and the single-subject strategies. Behavior Modification, 5, 307–319.
26.
KoegelR. L. (1983). Pivotal response related to generalization. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Conference, Anaheim, CA.
27.
KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
LibertyK. A.HaringN. G.MartinM. M. (1981). Teaching new skills to the severely handicapped. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6(1), 5–13.
29.
McDonnellJ. J.HornerR. H.WilliamsJ. A. (1984). Comparison of three strategies for teaching generalized grocery purchasing to high school students with severe handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9(2), 123–133.
30.
O'ConnellJ. M. (1981). Acquisition of functional and nonfunctional response topographies by moderately and severely handicapped students performing a vocational task. Unpublished masters thesis, Division of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Oregon.
31.
PattersonG. R. (1974). A basis for identifying stimuli which control behaviors in natural settings. Child Development, 45, 900–911.
32.
PavlovI. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Translation by G. V. Anrep, London: Oxford University Press.
33.
PerkinsC. C. (1965). A conceptual scheme for studies of stimulus generalization. In MostofskyD. I. (Ed.), Stimulus generalization (pp. 38–54). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
34.
PetersonL.HomerA. L.WonderlichS. (1982). The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 477–492.
35.
RincoverA.KoegelR. (1975). Setting generality and stimulus control in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 235–246.
36.
RobinsonV.SwantonC. (1980). The generalization of behavioral teacher training. Review of Educational Research, 50, 486–498.
37.
RuschF. R.KazdinA. E. (1981). Toward a methodology of withdrawal design for the assessment of response maintenance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 131–140.
SandersM. R.JamesJ. E. (1983). The modification of parent behavior: A review of generalization and maintenance. In HersenM.BellackA. S. (Eds.), Behavior Modification (Vol. 7, No. 1). Beverly Hills: Sage.
40.
SchoenfeldW. N.FarmerJ. (1970). Reinforcement schedules and the “Behavior Stream.”. In SchoenfeldW. N. (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules (pp. 215–247). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
41.
SidmanM.StoddardL. T. (1967). The effectiveness of fading in programming a simultaneous form discrimination for retarded children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 3–15.
42.
SidmanM.Willson-MorrisM. (1974). Testing for reading comprehension: A brief report on stimulus control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 327–332.
43.
SkinnerB. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
44.
SnellM. E. (Ed.). (1983). Systematic instruction of the moderately and severely handicapped (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
45.
SpragueJ. R.HornerR. H. (1984). The effects of single instance, multiple instance and general case training on generalized vending machine use by moderately and severely handicapped students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 273–278.
46.
StellaM. E.EtzelB. (1983). Effects of criterion-level probing on demonstrating newly acquired discriminative behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 479–498.
47.
StokesT. F.BaerD. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.
48.
TerraceH. (1966). Stimulus control. In HonigW. (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 271–344). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
49.
VoeltzL. M.EvansI. M. (1983). Educational validity: Procedures to evaluate outcomes in programs for severely handicapped learners. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8(1), 3–15.
50.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement, or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
