The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of general-case instruction on spontaneous and generalized requests for assistance by three adolescents with severe disabilities. The findings support the efficacy of the general-case approach in relation to using a single example to teach requests for help. The distinguishing aspect of the general-case phase was the variation in stimulus conditions that occurred across teaching opportunities. Results indicated that general-case instruction produced generalized requests for assistance with two of the three learners. The implications for using general-case procedures for teaching communicative interactions are discussed and future research areas are proposed.
BryanD. N.JoyceD. G. (1985). Language intervention with the severely handicapped: A decade of research. The Journal of Special Education, 19, 7–39.
2.
Chadsey-RuschJ.HalleJ. (1992). The application of general-case instruction to the requesting repertoires of learners with severe disabilities. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 121–132.
3.
CostelloJ. (1983). Generalization across settings: Language intervention with children. In MillerJ.YoderD.SchiefelbuschR. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in language intervention (pp. 275–297). Rockville, MD: The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
4.
DayH. M.HornerR. H. (1986). Response variation and the generalization of a dressing skill: Comparison of single instance and general-case instruction. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 7, 189–202.
5.
DucharmeJ. M.FeldmanM. A. (1992). Comparison of staff training strategies to promote generalized teaching skills. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 165–179.
6.
GoetzL.GeeK.SailorW. (1985). Using a behavior chain interruption strategy to teach communication skills to students with severe disabilities. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 21–31.
7.
GoetzL.SailorW. (1988). New directions: Communication development in persons with severe disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 4, 41–54.
8.
HallG.SundbergM. L. (1987). Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 41–53.
9.
HalleJ. W. (1982). Teaching functional language to the handicapped: Using the natural environment as the context for teaching. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 7, 29–37.
10.
HalleJ. W. (1987). Teaching language in the natural environment: An analysis of spontaneity. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 28–37.
11.
HalleJ. W.MarshallA. M.SpradlinJ. E. (1979). Time delay: A technique to increase language use and facilitate generalization in retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 431–440.
12.
HornerR. H.AlbinR. W. (1988). Research on generalcase procedures for learners with severe disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 375–388.
13.
HornerR. D.BaerD. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation on the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196.
14.
HornerR. H.JonesD.WilliamsJ. A. (1985). A functional approach to teaching generalized streetcrossing. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 71–78.
15.
HornerR. H.SpragueJ.WilcoxB. (1982). General case programming for community activities. In WilcoxB.BellamyG. T. (Eds.), Design of high school programs for severely handicapped students (pp. 61–98). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
16.
HornerR. H.WilliamsJ. A.StevelyJ. D. (1987). Acquisition of generalized telephone use by students with moderate and severe disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 229–247.
17.
KaczmarekL. A. (1990). Teaching spontaneous language to individuals with severe handicaps: A matrix model. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 160–169.
18.
KaiserA. P.WarrenS. F. (1988). Pragmatics and generalization. In SchiefelbuschR. L.LloydL. L. (Eds.), Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention (2nd ed.) (pp. 393–442). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
19.
MichaelJ. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.
20.
O'NeillR. E. (1990). Establishing verbal repertoires: Toward the application of general case analysis and programming. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 113–126.
21.
RomskiM. A.SevickR. A.PateJ. L. (1988). Establishment of symbolic communication in persons with severe retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53, 94–107.
22.
SigafoosJ.ReichleJ. (1993). The facilitation of spontaneous verbal behavior. In GableR.WarrenS. F. (Eds.), Strategies for teaching students with mild to severe mental retardation (pp. 191–230). London: Kingsley Publishers, Ltd.
23.
SpragueJ. R.HornerR. H. (1984). The effects of single instance, multiple instance and general case training on generalized vending machine use by moderately and severely handicapped students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 273–278.
24.
SteereD. E.StrauchJ. D.PowellT. H.ButterworthJ. (1990). Promoting generalization from a teaching setting to a community-based setting among persons with severe disabilities: A general-case programming approach. Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 5–20.
25.
Stremel-CampbellK.CampbellC. R. (1985). Training techniques that may facilitate generalization. In WarrenS. F.Rogers-WarrenA. K. (Eds.), Teaching functional language (pp. 251–285). Baltimore: University Park Press.
26.
WarrenS.Rogers-WarrenA. K. (1985). Teaching functional language. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
