Predicting the Frequency and Significance of Social Contacts Across Placements: A Bayesian Multilevel Model Analysis

Abstract

Parents and teachers have identified the social inclusion of students with complex support needs as one of the most important components of school participation. Previous research has found that the opportunities for, and importance of, social contacts for students with complex support needs vary by educational placement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a national sample of 92 elementary-aged students with complex support needs to determine whether placement predicts the number and importance of social contacts. We used multilevel regression analysis to measure the extent to which placement predicts the number of social contacts and teachers’ ratings of importance. Students in inclusive placements had almost 50% more social contacts than students in a segregated school. Furthermore, teachers’ perceptions of the social significance of the contacts experienced by students with complex support needs were notably higher in inclusive settings. Given these findings, we suggest implications for practice and future research.

Keywords

complex support needs social contacts social importance inclusion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asmus

J. M.

Carter

E. W.

Moss

C. K.

Biggs

E. E.

Bolt

D. M.

Born

T. L.

Bottema-Beutel

Brock

Cattey

Cooney

Fesperman

E. S.

Hochman

J. M.

Huber

H. B.

Lequia

J. L.

Lyons

G. L.

Vincent

L. B.

Weir

(2017). Efficacy and social validity of peer network interventions for high school students with severe disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 122(2), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-122.2.118

Barber

Hupp

S. C.

(1993). A comparison of friendship patterns of individuals with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28(1), 13–22.

Bigby

(2008). Known well by no-one: Trends in the informal social networks of middle-aged and older people with intellectual disability five years after moving to the community. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 33(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250802094141

Biggs

E. E.

Carter

E. W.

Gustafson

(2017). Efficacy of peer support arrangements to increase peer interaction and AAC use. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 122(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-122.1.25

Biggs

E. E.

Snodgrass

M. R.

(2020). Children’s perspectives on their relationships with friends with and without complex communication needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919901271

Brinker

R. P.

Thorpe

M. E.

(1984). Integration of severely handicapped students and the proportion of IEP objectives achieved. Exceptional Children, 51(2), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298405100210

Brown

McDonnell

Snell

M. E.

(Eds.). (2020). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (9th ed.). Pearson.

Carter

E. W.

Asmus

Moss

C. K.

Biggs

E. E.

Bolt

D. M.

Born

T. L.

Brock

Cattey

G. N.

Chen

Cooney

Fesperman

Hochman

J. M.

Huber

H. B.

Lequia

J. L.

Lyons

Moyseenko

K. A.

Riesch

L. M.

Shalev

R. A.

Vincent

L. B.

Weir

(2016). Randomized evaluation of peer support arrangements to support the inclusion of high school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598780

Carter

E. W.

Hughes

(2005). Increasing social interaction among adolescents with intellectual disabilities and their general education peers: Effective interventions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(4), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.4.179

10.

Carter

E. W.

Hughes

(2006). Including high school students with severe disabilities in general education classes: Perspectives of general and special educators, paraprofessionals, and administrators. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079690603100209

11.

Carter

E. W.

Sisco

L. G.

Brown

Brickham

Al-Khabbaz

Z. A.

(2008). Peer interactions and academic engagement of youth with developmental disabilities in inclusive middle and high school classrooms. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113(6), 479–494. https://doi.org/10.1352/2008.113:479-494

12.

Feldman

Carter

E. W.

Asmus

Brock

M. E.

(2016). Presence, proximity, and peer interactions of adolescents with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585481

13.

Forrester-Jones

Carpenter

Coolen-Schrijner

Cambridge

Tate

Beecham

Hallam

Knapp

Wooff

(2006). The social networks of people with intellectual disability living in the community 12 years after resettlement from long-stay hospitals. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 19(4), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2006.00263.x

14.

Fryxell

Kennedy

C. H.

(1995). Placement along the continuum of services and its impact on students’ social relationships. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20(4), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699602000403

15.

Gotto

Calkins

Jackson

Walker

Beckmann

(2010). Accessing social capital: Implications for persons with disabilities. National Gateway to Self-Determination, University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities. https://www.aucd.org/docs/Accessing%20Social%20Capital%20Implications%20for%20Persons%20With%20Disabilities%2C%20Final.pdf

16.

Haring

T. G.

Breen

C. G.

(1992). A peer-mediated social network intervention to enhance the social integration of persons with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1992.25-319

17.

Hicks

Rodriguez-Campos

Choi

J. H.

(2018). Bayesian posterior odds ratios: Statistical tools for collaborative evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 39(2), 327–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214017704302

18.

Jackson

L. B.

Ryndak

D. L.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(2008–2009). The dynamic relationship between context, curriculum, and student learning: A case for inclusive education as a research-based practice. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 34(1), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.33.4.175

19.

Jeffreys

(1931). Scientific inference. Cambridge University Press.

20.

Kennedy

C. H.

Cushing

L. S.

Itkonen

(1997). General education participation improves the social contacts and friendship networks of students with severe disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7(2), 167–189. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41824171

21.

Kennedy

C. H.

Horner

R. H.

Newton

J. S.

(1990). The social networks and activity patterns of adults with severe disabilities: A correlational analysis. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15(2), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699001500204

22.

Kennedy

C. H.

Itkonen

(1994). Some effects of regular class participation on the social contacts and social networks of high school students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699401900101

23.

Kennedy

C. H.

Itkonen

(1996). Social relationships, influential variables, and change across the lifespan. In Koegel

L. K.

Koegel

R. L.

Dunlap

(Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 287–304). Brookes Publishing.

24.

Kleinert

Towles-Reeves

Quenemoen

Thurlow

Fluegge

Weseman

Kerbel

(2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught. Exceptional Children, 81, 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563697

25.

Kromrey

J. D.

Hines

C. V.

(1994). Nonrandomly missing data in multiple regression: An empirical comparison of common missing-data treatments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164494054003001

26.

Kurth

Jackson

(2022). Introduction to the special topic issue on the impact of placement on outcomes for students with complex support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities.

27.

Ladd

G. W.

(1990). Having friends, keeping friends, making friends, and being liked by peers in the classroom: Predictors of children’s early school adjustment. Child Development, 61(4), 1081–1100. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130877

28.

Landesman-Dwyer

Berkson

Romer

(1979). Affiliation and friendship of mentally retarded residents in group homes. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 83(6), 571–580.

29.

Lockman Turner

Bubash

Fialka-Feldman

Hayes

. (2022). Circles of support and self-direction: An interview highlighting a journey of friendship and managing services. Inclusive Practices, 1(2), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/27324745221074408

30.

McDonald

K. E.

Kidney

C. A.

Patka

(2013). “You need to let your voice be heard”: Research participants’ views on research. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(3), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01527.x

31.

McLeskey

Waldron

N. L.

Redd

(2014). A case study of a highly effective, inclusive elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 48(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466912440455

32.

Milner

Kelly

(2009). Community participation and inclusion: People with disabilities defining their place. Disability & Society, 24(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590802535410

33.

Osterman

K. F.

(2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003323

34.

Overton

Rausch

J. L.

(2002). Peer relationships as support for children with disabilities: An analysis of mothers’ goals and indicators for friendship. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835760201700102

35.

Petrina

Carter

Stephenson

(2014). The nature of friendship in children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.10.016

36.

Pooley

C. M.

Marion

(2018). Bayesian model evidence as a practical alternative to deviance information criterion. Royal Society Open Science, 5(3), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171519

37.

Raghavendra

Olsson

Sampson

McInerney

Connell

(2012). School participation and social networks of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities, and typically developing peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2011.653604

38.

Santillan

Frederick

Gimore

Locke

(2019). Brief report: Examining the association between classroom social network inclusion and playground peer engagement among children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357619838275

39.

SAS Institute. (2017). SAS/STAT® user’s guide. https://documentation.sas.com/doc/en/pgmsascdc/9.4_3.4/statug/titlepage.htm

40.

Stroup

(2012). Generalized linear mixed models: Modern concepts, methods and applications. CRC Press.

41.

Van der Klift

Kunc

. (2019). Segregation versus solidarity: Rethinking the uncritical commitment to inclusion. In Scourgie

Forlin

(Eds.), Promoting social inclusion (pp. 17–24). Emerald Publishing Limited.