Adapting English Language Arts Text for Students With Complex Support Needs: What’s Next in Adapted Text

Abstract

Adapted books can serve as a support for students with complex support needs in general education classes. However, creating adapted books can be difficult for a special education teacher with a demanding schedule. Therefore, this article presents a feasible and efficient process for creating adapted books extended from the guidelines originally developed by Apitz et al. This process begins with special educators becoming familiar with the story through summarizing and outlining the original text. Next, collaboration with the general education teacher is recommended to identify the essential themes and key vocabulary. Special educators are encouraged to follow the book’s plot structure and use visual supports, such as images or videos, based on key events in the text. Also included in this article are suggestions on how teachers can more effectively and efficiently adapt books using modern technology tools, such as ChatGPT and DALL-E.

Keywords

adapted book complex support needs literacy inclusion generative artificial intelligence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

L. W.

Krathwohl

D. R.

(2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Apitz

Ruppar

Roessler

Pickett

J. K.

(2017). Planning lessons for students with significant disabilities in high school English classes. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(3), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916654900

Barrows

Topper

(2023, March 24). Basic principles for creating accessible information. Green Mountain Self-Advocates. https://gmsavt.org/resources/basic-principles-for-creating-accessible-information

Baum

F. L.

(1900). The wonderful wizard of Oz. G.M. Hill Company.

Braat

(2021). Evolving inclusive learning: From retrofitting disability to designing for variability [The Dissertation in Practice]. Western University. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/oip/185

Browder

D. M.

Trela

Jimenez

(2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22(4), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220040301

Copeland

S. R.

Keefe

E. B.

(2019). Literacy instruction for all students within general education settings. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(3), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079691986601

Courtade

G. R.

Lingo

A. S.

Whitney

. (2013). Using story-based lessons to increase academic engaged time in general education classes for students with moderate intellectual disability and autism. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 32(4), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051303200402

Kalla

Smith

(2023). Study and analysis of ChatGPT and its impact on different fields of study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(3).

10.

Kurth

J. A.

Ruppar

A. L.

McQueston

J. A.

McCabe

K. M.

Johnston

Toews

S. G.

(2019). Types of supplementary aids and services for students with significant support needs. The Journal of Special Education, 52(4), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918791156

11.

Lane

Ruppar

A. L.

(2018). Adapting books and other literacy genres. In Copeland

S. R.

Keefe

E. B.

(Eds.), Effective literacy instruction for learners with complex support needs (pp. 273–296). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.

12.

Melville

(1851). Moby-dick; or, the whale. Harper & Brothers.

13.

Murawski

W. W.

(2012). 10 tips for using co-planning time more efficiently. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(4), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991204400401

14.

OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (Apr 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat

15.

OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (March 29 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat

16.

Ruppar

A. L.

Afacan

Yang

Y. L.

Pickett

K. J.

(2017). Embedded shared reading to increase literacy in an inclusive English/language arts class: Preliminary efficacy and ecological validity. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(1), 51–63.

17.

Taub

D. A.

McCord

J. A.

Ryndak

D. L.

(2017). Opportunities to learn for students with extensive support needs: A context of research-supported practices for all in general education classes. The Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917696263

18.

Thompson

J. R.

Bradley

V. J.

Buntinx

W. H. E.

Schalock

R. L.

Shogren

K. A.

Snell

M. E.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Borthwick-Duffy

Coulter

D. L.

Craig

Gomez

S. C.

Lachapelle

Luckasson

R. A.

Reeve

Spreat

Tassé

M. J.

Verdugo

M. A.

Yeager

M. H.

(2009). Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-47.2.135

19.

TIES Center. (2021). Inclusive big ideas. https://tiescenter.org/topics/inclusive-instruction/ibi

20.

Toews

S. G.

Zimmerman

K. N.

Kurth

J. A.

Crump

(2025). Comparison of using modified and nonmodified books on comprehension of students with extensive support needs. Remedial and Special Education, 46(1), 53–65.