Australian occupational therapy practice for adult clients with an intellectual disability was explored through a series of focus group discussions with practitioners. The recorded transcripts from these groups were analyzed using constant comparative analysis. From this analysis four beginning propositions about practice were developed. First, that occupational therapists act as advocates for their adult clients with an intellectual disability; second, that therapists consider occupational therapy a specific contribution to enhancing client “quality of life;” third, that occupational therapy is practiced as part of an interdisciplinary team; and, finally, that there are some limitations to practice in the team setting. The relevance and implications of these propositions for practice and further study are discussed.
CalderB. J. (1977). Focus groups and the nature of qualitative marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, XIV (August), 353–364.
2.
Council of Social Welfare Ministers (1990). Framework for the funding and operation of disability services. Tasmania: Author.
3.
CrappsJ. M.LangoneJ., & SwaimS. (1985). Quantity and quality of participation in community environments by mentally retarded adults. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 20(2), 123–129.
4.
Disability Council of NSW. (1990). A focus on outcomes. Sydney: Author.
5.
Disability Services Act. (1986). Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Printing Service.
6.
FondillerE. D.RosageL. J., & NeuhausB. E. (1990). Value influencing clinical reasoning in occupational therapy: An exploratory study. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10, 41–55.
7.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
8.
GubaE., & LincolnY. (1987). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. In MadausG.ScrivenM., & StufflebeamD. (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoint on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 311–331). Boston: Klewer-Nijhoff.
9.
HinojosaJ. (1990). How mothers of preschool children with cerebral palsy perceive occupational and physical therapists and their influence on family life. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10, 144–160.
10.
HopkinsH. (1988). An historical perspective on occupational therapy. In HopkinsH. & SmithH. (Eds.), Willard & Spackman's occupational therapy (7th ed., pp. 16–37). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
11.
JahodaA.CattermoleM., & MarkovaI. (1990). Moving out: An opportunity for friendship and broadening social horizons. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 34, 127–139.
12.
KibeleA., & LlorensL. A. (1989). Going to the source: The use of qualitative methodology in a study of the needs of adults with cerebral palsy. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(2/3), 27–40.
13.
KielhofnerG. (1981). An ethnographic study of deinstitutionalized adults: Their community settings and daily life experiences. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 1, 125–146.
14.
KielhofnerG. (1982). Qualitative research: Part Two. Methodological approaches and relevance to occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 2, 150–164.
15.
KnaflK., & BreitmayerB. J. (1989). Triangulation qualitative research: Issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. In MoreseJ. (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 193–203). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
16.
Le CompteM., & GoetzJ. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 31–60.
17.
LevineH. G., & LangnessL. L. (1986). Conclusions: Themes In an anthropology of mental retardation. In LangnessL. L. & LevineH. G. (Eds.), Culture and retardation (pp. 191–206). Dordecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
18.
LlewellynG. (1989). Exploring continuing education needs and preferences: A pilot study. Studies in Continuing Education, 11(2), 135–141.
19.
LlewellynG. (1990). The image of the profession: A decade of writing. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 37(3), 131–135.
20.
LlewellynG. (1991). Occupational therapy treatment goals for adults with developmental disabilities. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 38(1), 233–236.
21.
LoflandJ., & LoflandL. (1984). A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. California: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
22.
MapleG. (1987). Early intervention: Some issues in cooperative team work. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 34(4), 145–150.
23.
MeyersS. K. (1989) Program evaluation of occupational therapy level 11 fieldwork environments: A naturalistic inquiry. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 9, 347–361.
24.
New Directions—Report of the Handicapped Persons Program Review. (1985). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
25.
New South Wales Council for Intellectual Disability. (1988). A decent life: Policy statement. Sydney: Author.
26.
New South Wales Department of Health. (1985). Policies for Intellectual disability services. Sydney: Author.
27.
Occupational therapy contribution in people with a developmental disability. (1989, November). OT Newspaper, p. 4.
28.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
PoulsenA., & ZivianiJ. (1981). The occupational therapist in the school system. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 28(4), 161–166.
30.
SchwartzH., & JacobsJ. (1979). Qualitative sociology. A method to the madness. New York: The Free Press.
31.
SigelmanC. K.BuddE. C.SpanhelC. L., & SchoenrockC. J. (1981). When in doubt, say yes: Acquiescence in interviews with mentally retarded persons. Mental Retardation, 19, 53–58.
WilliamsP., & ShoultzB. (1982). We can speak for ourselves. London: Souvenir Press.
34.
YerxaE. J.ClarkF.FrankG.JacksonJ.ParhamD.PierceD.SteinC., & ZemkeR. (1990). An introduction to occupational science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(4), 1–17.
